logo
He developed 'dissociative amnesia' after a rape. What is that?

He developed 'dissociative amnesia' after a rape. What is that?

USA Today8 hours ago

He developed 'dissociative amnesia' after a rape. What is that?
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Organizers say political pressure is motivation to continue celebrating Pride
Organizers say political pressure is motivation to continue organizing and celebrating Pride, although some corporate support dwindles.
Editor's Note: This story contains graphic descriptions that some readers may find disturbing.
Ron Blake understands trauma. He also understands what it's like to work through it.
Blake was raped more than a decade ago. Held down, beaten and assaulted. The men responsible, including a prior domestic partner of his, were all aware he was a gay man. Police made no arrests. A documentary released earlier this year recaps his experience.
In order to cope with his trauma, his brain blocked it all out. He had some recollection of what happened, but the vast majority was gone. Several years later, in May 2014, a Time article jogged his memory. Like a lightning bolt.
"I remember at lunchtime, I was reading the cover story, and it was about sexual assault on campus. For whatever reason, that just started triggering memories. And I remember I shut off the TV, I stopped eating, and I called my friend, and I said, 'I think this happened to me,'" says Blake, now 56, of Phoenix. The friend knew, though. Blake had told him the day after, then never brought it up again.
What was going on? Dissociative amnesia, according to counselors of Blake's. "It took me a long time to really accept that dissociative amnesia is a real thing."
In case you missed: What 'The Red Zone' on college campuses teaches us about sexual assault
What is dissociative amnesia?
The condition may occur "when your mind blocks out important information about yourself, causing 'gaps' in your memory," according to Cleveland Clinic. "One of the most common reasons your mind blocks out things is to protect you from unpleasant, distressing or traumatic experiences." People may develop it after one-time traumatic events or from years and years of stress. Think neglect, abuse, seeing violence up close, etc.
"For many, the memories they regain are upsetting or overwhelming," Cleveland Clinic adds. "Mental health therapy can help you cope with those feelings and manage them in a healthy and safe way."
Treatments and diagnoses aren't one-size-fits-all; it's not something that can be cured, but can be managed. Blake still can't remember certain details about the night of the rape, but his therapists have told him "if you want to try and remember, that's great, but look at where you're at today. And, you know, does it really matter?" The important thing is he's safe now.
Still, it's an odd sensation. "Even as I'm describing it to you, it doesn't seem real that those memories could have been stored in my head, but just not accessible to me," he says.
In Blake's case, "the most destructive part was knowing that my ex partner was involved in this." His counselor told him the dissociation "was more than likely my brain's way of saying, 'somebody this close to you, somebody that you love this much, could have done something so destructive to you. Your brain just shut it out because it wasn't prepared to deal with it.'"
Her daughter's suicide shocked everyone. Now, she's raising awareness.
'What I needed to keep surviving'
Blake survived a suicide attempt in May 2015 and credits a Stephen Colbert joke for making him laugh and stopping him from dying by suicide months later. He doesn't recall the joke today. "It wasn't the joke that was important, it was me recognizing that I still had something good in me," he says, "the laughter."
He's since made it his mission over the last decade to share his story with strangers; he's met 34,320 to be exact, who have all written on large poster boards he carries around. What started off as trying to get people to support him getting on "The Late Show With Stephen Colbert" has snowballed into people writing down song lyrics, jokes, and Bible verses. They opened up to him about their lives, just as he opened up to them.
"That was what I needed to keep surviving, is I had to learn how to talk to people and re-engage with society, and I could even show myself at the end of the day," he says. "Look at what I accomplished. I got out. Look at all these people that listen to me."
His trauma and dissociative amnesia may lurk in the dark background. But Blake has stepped into a light of his own making.
If you are a survivor of sexual assault, RAINN offers support through the National Sexual Assault Hotline at 800.656.HOPE (4673) and Hotline.RAINN.org and en Español RAINN.org/es.
If you or someone you know is a victim of domestic violence, call the National Domestic Violence Hotline at 800-799-7233 or text "START" to 88788.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Justin Baldoni's Blake Lively Lawsuit Dismissed: Opinion
Justin Baldoni's Blake Lively Lawsuit Dismissed: Opinion

Buzz Feed

timean hour ago

  • Buzz Feed

Justin Baldoni's Blake Lively Lawsuit Dismissed: Opinion

I fucking told you so: Justin Baldoni's $400 Million countersuit against Blake Lively was tossed out by a judge. Last December, Blake filed a California Civil Rights Department complaint against her It Ends With Us co-star and director, in which she alleged sexual harassment and a subsequent retaliatory media campaign (she would then go on to sue Justin). Justin denied the claims and filed a countersuit of his own, alleging defamation and extortion, among other things. Earlier today, a judge ruled that the countersuit against Blake, as well as Ryan Reynolds, Leslie Sloane, Vision PR, and the New York Times Company had been dismissed. The Wayfarer parties can still amend their complaint for "breach of implied covenant and tortious interference with contract." But the important part that I'd like to highlight is the emphasis that the allegations Blake made in her CRD complaint were privileged speech. To highlight one section from the judge: "The Wayfarer Parties have not adequately alleged a defamation claim as to any part of the purported conspiracy. The Wayfarer Parties have not adequately alleged that any false statements were made to the Times other than the statements in Lively's CRD complaint, which were privileged under California law. There also is no allegation that the distribution of the CRD complaint was made by anyone other than Lively or, more particularly, with the involvement or agreement of Sloane or Reynolds. The Wayfarer Parties have not adequately alleged that Sloane or Reynolds individually did any more than repeat Lively's version of events, which they had no reason to doubt. And the Wayfarer Parties have not adequately alleged that Lively should be held responsible for Sloane or Reynolds' statements. Their allegations of a conspiracy between the parties are conclusory." In non-legal-speak terms, California has a rule that essentially means you can't be sued for defamation if you make a serious allegation of sexual harassment. It's designed to prohibit a tactic that can be used to silence survivors who do speak out by bleeding them dry via the courts. 19 women's organizations already expressed concern over Baldoni's lawsuit because of what it could mean for survivors. Child USA worried that allowing Baldoni's lawsuit to continue would effectively have grave complications for California's civil code and "would force survivors into the untenable position of having to choose between remaining silent or facing emotional, reputational, and financial devastation through protracted, abusive litigation." The Child USA amicus brief continues, "It would also send a dangerous message to other survivors contemplating disclosure — that speaking out may carry intolerable risks — and it would embolden perpetrators and complicit institutions that depend on secrecy to perpetuate cycles of abuse." This is what I have been harping on about since news of the lawsuits first emerged. This isn't just an annoying celebrity trial. If Blake Lively, a rich white lady with celebrity cache, can face a multimillion retaliatory defamation lawsuit, where the fuck does that put the rest of us who might want to speak out about sexual harassment? We need allegations of sexual harassment without malice to be considered privileged speech, which isn't the case across the country. The suit against the New York Times being dropped is also good news for the media's ability to report on alleged sexual harassment cases. Smaller publications sounded the alarm from the get-go. To a certain extent, I do worry that the damage has already been done. Most people I speak to voice confusion about what to me is a fairly simple sexual harassment and retaliation case, citing the sheer abundance of media flooding our feeds. Will all the tabloids and TikTokers that called Blake a bitch in a million different ways because she made an allegation of sexual harassment finally look at themselves in the mirror? Will my comments finally not be full of people who claim they know more about this case and its implications for women than a domestic violence shelter? (For the love of god, "Believe All Women" is not the slogan). Or perhaps the slop machine will keep churning until the trial, reminding us that we are in an age of conspiracy that will continue to assert that survivors' stories are really important — well, unless I don't like you. Nothing says, "I champion survivors' stories" more than spending most of your time bashing a woman online!

Gypsy-Rose Blanchard calls daughter a new beginning on anniversary of mom's death
Gypsy-Rose Blanchard calls daughter a new beginning on anniversary of mom's death

Miami Herald

time2 hours ago

  • Miami Herald

Gypsy-Rose Blanchard calls daughter a new beginning on anniversary of mom's death

On Monday, June 9, Gypsy-Rose Blanchard took to Instagram to commemorate the day that has two meanings. Alongside a photo of herself and her partner Ken Urker holding up sonogram images from when she was pregnant with their daughter Aurora, Blanchard wrote that June 9 is 'ONE day, TWO meanings.' 'One year ago, we saw Aurora for the first time in this sonogram and my heart has never been the same,' the new mom wrote. 'She is my light, my joy, my greatest blessing.' Blanchard and Urker announced the birth of their daughter, Aurora Raina, on New Year's Day. However, June 9 'also marks 10 years since the death of' Blanchard's mom, Clauddine 'Dee Dee' Blanchard. Dee Dee Blanchard was killed in 2015. During her 2018 testimony, Gypsy-Rose Blanchard admitted she 'wanted to be free of her' mother's hold on her, and persuaded her then-boyfriend, Nicholas Godejohn, to kill Dee Dee Blanchard. 'I talked him into it,' she said during the trial, NPR reported. According to Blanchard's attorney, Michael Stanfield, Dee Dee Blanchard had Munchausen syndrome by proxy, now known as factitious disorder imposed on another. The Cleveland Clinic categorizes factitious disorder imposed on another as a 'mental health condition where you pretend that someone within your care is sick when they aren't. It's a type of abuse.' As a result of her alleged involvement in her mother's death, Gypsy-Rose Blanchard pleaded guilty to second-degree murder, according to ABC News. She was sentenced to 10 years of prison, but released in December 2023 after serving more than 8 years. As Gypsy-Rose Blanchard continued her statement, she said her mom was 'a woman known not for love, but for the abuse she inflicted on me. That pain shaped my life in ways that led to tragic choices, consequences, and years we BOTH can never get back.' 'I won't pretend she was a good person,' the 33-year-old continued. 'And I won't pretend I've been perfect either. But Aurora… she represents a new beginning.' Gypsy-Rose Blanchard says her daughter is now 'a chance to break every cycle. A chance to raise someone with love, truth, and freedom. A chance to give her a life better than what I had and better than my past choices.' 'I may carry the past, but she carries my future,' the mom continued. 'And I pray that who she becomes will be greater than who I was, and greater than the woman who came before me.'

Police: State College man arrested for setting PRIDE flag on fire at local church
Police: State College man arrested for setting PRIDE flag on fire at local church

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Police: State College man arrested for setting PRIDE flag on fire at local church

STATE COLLEGE, Pa. (WTAJ) — A 27-year-old man has been arrested following a series of incidents in downtown State College where police said he lit a PRIDE flag on fire, shouted homophobic slurs, and damaged other decorations. Markos Bejiga, a resident of State College, was charged with one felony count of Causing or Risking a Catastrophe, a misdemeanor count of Disorderly Conduct, and three summary counts of Criminal Mischief. The incidents happened Friday morning, June 6, according to State College police. Investigators say Bejiga lit a PRIDE flag on fire outside the Faith United Church of Christ, attempted to set another flag ablaze while climbing a streetlight pole, and damaged decorations at Chumley's and Café 210 West. He is also accused of shouting slurs at bystanders during the acts. Bejiga was arrested on June 9 and taken to the Centre County Correctional Facility for arraignment. Bail was set at $10,000 by District Judge Lachman. A preliminary hearing is scheduled for June 11 at the Centre County Courthouse. Police continue to seek any additional witnesses or information related to the incident. Tips can be submitted by phone, email, or anonymously via the department's website. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store