‘Alligator Alcatraz' civil rights case sees split ruling from Miami judge
US district judge Rodolfo Ruiz issued the decision late Monday, writing in a 47-page ruling that claims the detainees at the facility don't have confidential access to their lawyers or to hearings in immigration court were rendered moot when the Trump administration recently designated the Krome North processing center near Miami as a site for their cases to be heard.
The judge heard arguments from both sides in a hearing earlier Monday in Miami. Civil rights attorneys were seeking a preliminary injunction to ensure detainees at the facility have access to their lawyers and can get a hearing.
The state and federal government had argued that even though the isolated airstrip where the facility is located is owned by Miami-Dade county, Florida's southern district was the wrong venue since the detention center is located in neighboring Collier county, which is in the state's middle district.
Judge Ruiz had hinted during a hearing last week that he had some concerns over which jurisdiction was appropriate.
'Much has changed since the complaint's filing,' Ruiz wrote.
Six of the plaintiffs have met with lawyers through videoconference, though they claimed the conferences are not confidential since they are not in an enclosed room and staff is close by and in listening proximity to the detainees.
A subset of detainees alleged they are eligible for bond hearings and their lawyers have been 'unable to access – yet alone identify – the proper court for those hearings'.
But Ruiz noted the facts in the case changed Saturday, when the Trump administration designated the Krome facility as the immigration court with jurisdiction over all detainees at the detention center.
Ruiz wrote that the case has 'a tortured procedural history' since it was filed 16 July, weeks after the first group of detainees arrived at the facility.
'Nearly every aspect of the Plaintiffs' civil action – their causes of action, their facts in support, their theories of venue, their arguments on the merits and their requests for relief – have changed with each filing,' the judge wrote.
The judge granted the state defendants change of venue motion to the middle district of Florida, where the remaining claims of first amendment violations will be addressed.
The state and federal government defendants made an identical argument last week about jurisdiction for a second lawsuit in which environmental groups and the Miccosukee Tribe sued to stop further construction and operations at the Everglades detention center until it's in compliance with federal environmental laws.
US district judge Kathleen Williams in Miami on 7 August ordered a 14-day halt on additional construction at the site while witnesses testified at a hearing that wrapped up last week. She has said she plans to issue a ruling before the order expires later this week. She had yet to rule on the venue question.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
43 minutes ago
- The Independent
US state claims TikTok uses addictive algorithms to target children
Minnesota has become the latest US state to launch legal action against TikTok, alleging the social media giant preys on young people with 'addictive algorithms' that trap them into compulsive consumption of its short videos. The lawsuit, filed in state court, accuses TikTok of violating Minnesota laws against deceptive trade practices and consumer fraud. Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison stated: "This isn't about free speech. I'm sure they're gonna holler that. It's actually about deception, manipulation, misrepresentation. 'This is about a company knowing the dangers, and the dangerous effects of its product, but making and taking no steps to mitigate those harms or inform users of the risks." This legal challenge follows a flurry of lawsuits filed by more than a dozen states last year, alleging the popular short-form video app is designed to be addictive for children and harms their mental health. With Minnesota 's case, the total number of states pursuing action against TikTok now stands at approximately 24, according to Mr Ellison's office. Many of these earlier lawsuits stemmed from a nationwide investigation into TikTok, launched in 2022 by a bipartisan coalition of attorneys general from 14 states, focusing on the app's effects on young users' mental health. Mr Ellison, a Democrat, explained that Minnesota waited to file its complaint while conducting its own investigation. Sean Padden, a middle-school health teacher in the Roseville Area school district, joined Ellison, saying he has witnessed a correlation between increased TikTok use and an 'irrefutable spike in student mental health issues,' including depression, anxiety, anger, lowered self-esteem and a decrease in attention spans as they seek out the quick gratification that its short videos offer. The lawsuit comes while President Donald Trump is still trying to broker a deal to bring the social media platform, which is owned by China 's ByteDance, under American ownership over concerns about the data security of its 170 million American users. While Trump campaigned on banning TikTok, he also gained more than 15 million followers on the platform since he started sharing videos on it. No matter who ultimately owns TikTok, Ellison said, it must comply with the law. TikTok disputed Minnesota's allegations. 'This lawsuit is based on misleading and inaccurate claims that fail to recognise the robust safety measures TikTok has voluntarily implemented to support the well-being of our community," company spokesperson Nathaniel Brown said in a statement. "Teen accounts on TikTok come with 50+ features and settings designed to help young people safely express themselves, discover and learn. "Through our Family Pairing tool, parents can view or customise 20+ content and privacy settings, including screen time, content filters, and our time away feature to pause a teen's access to our app,' Brown added. Minnesota is seeking a declaration that TikTok's practices are deceptive, unfair or unconscionable under state law, a permanent injunction against those practices, and up to $25,000 for each instance in which a Minnesota child has accessed TikTok. Ellison wouldn't put a total on that but said, 'it's a lot.' He estimated that 'hundreds of thousands of Minnesota kids' have TikTok on their devices. 'We're not trying to shut them down, but we are insisting that they clean up their act,' Ellison said. 'There are legitimate uses of products like TikTok. But like all things, they have to be used properly and safely.' Minnesota is also among dozens of US states that have sued Meta Platforms for allegedly building features into Instagram and Facebook that addict people. The messaging service Snapchat and the gaming platform Roblox are also facing lawsuits by some other states alleging harm to kids.
The Independent
43 minutes ago
- The Independent
Minister brands Farage ‘the very worst' kind of politician over asylum hotel claims
The 'very worst' kind of politicians 'try to drive people apart', the security minister has said in response to comments made by Nigel Farage over the use of asylum hotels. Dan Jarvis accused the Reform UK leader of fanning the flames of division that has seen protests flare up outside hotels housing asylum seekers after Mr Farage celebrated a council's successful legal challenge against one in Epping. Epping Forest District Council won an interim High Court injunction to stop asylum seekers being housed at The Bell Hotel, arguing it had become a 'feeding ground for unrest' in recent weeks after a series of violent protests resulted in multiple arrests and saw police officers injured. In response, Mr Farage wrote in the Daily Telegraph: 'Now, the good people of Epping must inspire similar protests around Britain. 'Wherever people are concerned about the threat posed by young undocumented males living in local hotels and who are free to walk their streets, they should follow the example of the town in Essex. 'Let's hold peaceful protests outside the migrant hotels, and put pressure on local councils to go to court to try and get the illegal immigrants out; we now know that together we can win.' The Reform leader also vowed to challenge the use of asylum hotels in any of the 10 local authorities controlled by his party. Asked about Mr Farage's comments, minister Mr Jarvis told Sky News: 'I've always thought that the best politicians try and bring people together, and the very worst politicians try and drive them apart.' He said the government is looking closely at the verdict in Epping as the Home Office considers launching an appeal. He also confirmed officials are looking at alternative accommodation for up to 138 asylum seekers currently being housed at The Bell Hotel. Home secretary Yvette Cooper made a last-minute attempt on Tuesday to halt their removal, arguing that other councils would make similar applications for migrant accommodation in their areas. Labour is now bracing for dozens of local authorities to challenge the use of asylum hotels in their areas on similar grounds, with Home Office lawyers having warned that the decision could 'substantially impact' the government's use of the accommodation. On Tuesday night, Conservative-run Broxbourne borough council announced it was considering pursuing its own injunction. The council revealed it would 'take legal advice as a matter of urgency' about attempting to shut down a four-star asylum hotel in the Hertfordshire town. Meanwhile, the leader of South Norfolk District Council, which covers the town of Diss where a hotel housing asylum seekers has also been the subject of protests, said the council would not go down the same route. Conservative leader Daniel Elmer said the council was using planning rules to try to ensure it was families being housed in the area rather than single adult males. He said to do so, which would effectively convert the hotels into hostels, should require a change of use. The Home Office had warned the judge that an injunction in Epping could 'interfere' with the department's legal obligations, and lawyers representing the hotel's owner argued it would set a 'precedent'. The Bell Hotel has been at the centre of a series of protests in recent weeks after an asylum seeker who was staying there was charged with sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl. Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch suggested that the migrants housed at the hotel 'need to be moved out of the area immediately', while her shadow home secretary Chris Philp said that 'residents should never have had to fight their own government just to feel safe in their own town'. He said: 'Local residents have every right to feel safe in their own streets and every right to object when their community is treated as a dumping ground.'
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Trump's tariffs replace diplomacy as other US tools of statecraft are discarded
On the campaign trail, Donald Trump pledged to use tariffs to revitalise American industry, bringing jobs home and helping to make America great again. But more than six months into his administration, experts say the president's trade war is increasingly being wielded as a political cudgel, in lieu of more traditional forms of diplomacy. The president's current target, India, has been unable to reach a trade agreement, and Trump appears ready to follow through with his threat to impose a further 25% tariff on Delhi – bringing the total to 50% – the joint highest levy on any country, along with Brazil. It is a whiplash-inducing turnaround from a few months ago, when the newly minted Trump administration seemed intent on continuing a years-long bipartisan effort to deepen ties with India as a geopolitical counterweight to China. It's part of a trend that highlights how tariffs are used as threats against countries perceived to be recalcitrant. Rather than a tool of economic coercion, Trump instead wields tariffs as a political weapon. Five rounds of trade talks between the two sides have brought India no closer to conceding to US demands that it open up its vast agriculture and dairy sectors. Negotiations planned for early next week have been abruptly called off, as India's prime minister, Narendra Modi, grapples with Trump's demand that India cease to buy oil from Russia; sales that the US says are helping to fuel Vladimir Putin's war against Ukraine. The demand – that India wean itself off the Russian oil, which accounts for about 35% of its total supply – sits at odds with the original stated purpose of Trump's tariff regime: to bring manufacturing back to the US and rebalance trade deficits. 'Tariffs have a very specific purpose of protecting domestic industry from competition,' says Dr Stuart Rollo from the Centre for International Security Studies at the University of Sydney. 'That's not really what this is about … It's kind of pivoted to a tool of geopolitical compulsion.' Trump himself has come to admit this. Along with the threatened additional 25% tariff on India in retaliation for continuing to purchase Russian oil, the president has tied Canada's 35% tariff to its recognition of Palestinian statehood. In the case of Brazil, which has a rare trade surplus with the US, meaning it buys more than it sells, Trump has said that the huge 50% tariff is due to the trial of his political ally, Jair Bolsonaro, who is charged with plotting a military coup after he lost the 2022 presidential election. The president's top trade adviser, Peter Navarro, even has a new term for these explicitly political trade threats: 'national security tariffs'. The Democratic senator Chris Murphy put it more bluntly, writing in the Financial Times in April that the tariffs are not designed as economic policy but as a 'means to compel loyalty to the president'. Rollo says: 'It's a way of the United States to compel as much of the world as possible into realignment with its global leadership at a time when its actual weight and gravity is diminishing.' In some ways, this is not new; the Biden administration used trade restrictions to limit China's access to state-of-the-art semiconductors at a time of heated geopolitical tensions. But Devashish Mitra, a professor of economics at Syracuse University, says that for many in India, the threat faced over Russian oil purchases seems incoherent, ill thought out, and could push India closer to China. 'India did consider the US an ally,' says Mitra. 'It was a country that the US was relying on as a counter to China in that region. So it had a huge geopolitical importance, but it doesn't seem like Trump values any of that.' This week, China's foreign minister has been in Delhi for talks, and Modi is expected in Shanghai at the end of the month, his first visit in seven years. It's a part of a recent pattern of tightening relations between the Brics countries – Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa, which make up 40% of global GDP – that experts say is a response to Trump's aggressive trade policies. For future US administrations, winning back the trust of some of these countries could be difficult, as Trump's escalating trade war comes at the same time as his administration dismantles its instruments of global statecraft. From mass firings at the state department to the slashing of foreign assistance programmes at USAID, America's diplomatic toolbox is vastly diminished. Tariffs have 'come to replace diplomacy', says Rollo. And so with his attention divided between crises at home and abroad, the president has left himself armed with only a hammer, with every global flashpoint looking to him like a nail.
