
'Academic freedom is under assault': Indiana educators fear degree cuts will redefine higher ed
Six public universities will cut or consolidate about 400 degree programs, or nearly 20% of the state's offerings, the Commission for Higher Education announced June 30.
That's in response to a new state law approved earlier this year to eliminate degrees with low numbers of graduating students. Over three years, undergraduate programs must average 15 graduates, seven for a master's degree program and three for a doctorate program, in order to automatically continue being offered without needing approval from the state.
More cuts could still be coming.
University faculty and staff across the state told IndyStar they believe these cuts will deter students and drive away faculty—further contributing to the brain drain state leaders are trying to curtail.
And they said the lack of appreciation for specialty fields and humanities will hurt student outcomes by shrinking their worldview and reducing soft skill and critical thinking development.
"We're not just talking about what professors can or can't teach," Ball State professor Timothy Berg said. "This is about the freedom of students to study the important subjects that contribute to a good economy and a good society."
State leaders have said the legislation will "streamline" degree program offerings to be in line with the state's economic goals and responsive to student demand. Gov. Mike Braun said in a press release that the move prepares students for "career opportunities in the most in-demand fields."
The Governor's Office did not respond to an IndyStar request for comment regarding academic freedom concerns.
Some professors and staff told IndyStar that they believe this legislation is an example of the government overstepping its role to dictate curricula, but not everyone said it is an explicit violation of their academic freedom.
However, they all said the larger movement to constrict higher education is.
"Academic freedom is under assault broadly," said Carl Pearson, a staff member at Indiana University-Bloomington. "That isn't just in Indiana. That's a national problem."
Academic freedom is defined as the ability for an academic institution's faculty and staff members to build curriculum, research and pursue knowledge without interference from government officials and administrators, according to several First Amendment organizations. Several U.S. Supreme Court cases have labeled academic freedom as protected under the First Amendment.
Indiana's Republican supermajority has passed a number of bills reshaping how Indiana's universities function. Many new laws, including the required degree cuts, are part of a wave of trendy, conservative polices sweeping red states.
In the past two years, the Indiana Legislature has codified a contentious bill mandating "intellectual diversity" on campus, a ban on diversity, equity and inclusion programs, new tenure productivity standards and a change that makes faculty governance groups solely advisory.
Indiana University, too, has seen specific legislation that removed the ability for three trustees to be alumni-elected and barred state funding from touching the Kinsey Institute for Research in Sex, Gender, and Reproduction.
Academic freedom advocates said this recent law, which was a last minute addition to the budget taken without public testimony, is another step to devalue higher education.
"When lawmakers tie a university's ability to offer programs to minimum enrollment numbers, they're not just making budget decisions. They're narrowing the scope of inquiry," said Amy Reid, a senior manager of PEN America's Freedom to Learn program. "It may not look like censorship, but it chills academic freedom just the same."
Though the legislation is strictly focused on graduation numbers, the liberal arts will see the most cuts and consolidations, especially in language and cultural studies programs. Regional campuses were also significantly affected since the quotas apply to all public universities, regardless of the size of the student body.
"Our institutions want to ensure the programs they're offering are responsive to student demand and fit the needs of Indiana's evolving economy," Commissioner for Higher Education Chris Lowery said in a news release. "The primary beneficiaries of this work will be students, who face an overwhelming number of degree programs as they make their educational and career decisions.'
This is part of shift away from shared governance between universities and their faculty, which has traditionally decided what students learn in the classroom.
Professors called the idea of prioritizing industrially in-demand degrees over others "shortsighted." Shifting students toward certain degrees for economic development purposes is a misunderstanding of the role of higher education and the economy at large, faculty and staff said.
Faculty and staff also emphasized that students, particularly those in graduate programs, potentially won't attend Hoosier universities at all because they'd rather attend their specific program elsewhere.
"We're basically removing those things as things that your students can study," Berg said. "We're really hamstringing ourselves with future opportunities for this shortsighted goal of saving money or reducing programs for efficiency."
While faculty and staff said economic development is an important piece, they disagreed that higher education's sole purpose is to funnel students into careers. Pearson said higher education is meant to create all-around educated citizens who think critically about issues facing their communities.
"That's a fundamentally different idea of what a university is," Pearson said. "(State leaders) want to create laborers. They want to create a workforce."
A PEN America column published earlier this year argued that laws in Iowa and Florida prioritizing college degree programs' return on investment is a form of censorship to target specific programs and limit the free exchange of ideas.
"We are already seeing a lot of pressure to eliminate programs that don't have this immediate visible cost benefit sort of return," Berg said. "It's going to push this idea that education is simply about job skills rather than helping students grow up and grow out so that they can be real contributors to a good society that we all want."
Purdue Fort Wayne professor Noor O'Neill teaches anthropology and women's studies, which are two programs slated for consolidation. She said limiting educational opportunities to what's best for economic development won't achieve the outcomes leaders desire and students will be left without needed critical thinking skills.
"It's definitely an attack on academic freedom in the sense that they're not allowing us to teach what the faculty believe needs to be taught," O'Neill said. "They're really putting pressure on narrowing the curriculum."
It's largely unclear what the future of many of these programs will look like. Many departments are expected to be folded under a more general umbrella degree, while others may become concentrations rather than a standalone program. Some could be outright eliminated.
Following the bill's passage, faculty and staff said they have not been given much direction from their university's administration, and any communication about department cuts and realignment has come from department chairs and other school-specific leaders.
The uncertainty and larger wave of legislation focused on higher education, academics said, will likely cause their colleagues to leave voluntarily.
Berg said he's seen faculty leave already due to the lack of transparency and the feeling of being abandoned. He and others said they felt their administrations could have done more to demonstrate the need for their fields and fought to keep them alive.
"I've never felt more abandoned and alone in that what I do doesn't matter," Berg said.
Others, like Pearson, are waiting to learn what will happen to their departments and whether there will be layoffs. O'Neill worries this law will be used as an excuse to layoff faculty and staff who have certain political leanings or say things the university doesn't like. She said all faculty are already censoring themselves in the classroom in response to the new laws.
Another staff member at Indiana University told IndyStar that the stress and uncertainty within higher education will likely cause an exodus of students and academics, including himself, out of the state over the next five years.
"I don't see higher ed as being the kind of place for academic freedom, academic inquiry that it used to be," he said. "In states like Indiana, it's going to be about technical training—making sure that your teaching, your research aligns with what politicians in Indianapolis think it should be about."
The USA TODAY Network - Indiana's coverage of First Amendment issues is funded through a collaboration between the Freedom Forum and Journalism Funding Partners.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


UPI
21 minutes ago
- UPI
Tesla shares drop 7% after Musk unveils new U.S. political party
1 of 2 | Tesla shares sold at $293 per share in morning trading but was on track to see its worst day of trading since June 5 when it tumbled 14% as the feud between Tesla CEO Elon Musk (pictured May 30 in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, D.C.) and U.S. President Donald Trump erupted into public view. File Photo by Francis Chung/UPI | License Photo July 7 (UPI) -- Stock shares in Elon Musk's car company Tesla fell about 7% Monday after the billionaire ex-Trump administration official announced plans to form his new "America Party." Tesla shares sold at $293 per share in morning trading but was on track to see its worst day of trading since June 5 when it tumbled 14% as the feud between Musk and U.S. President Donald Trump erupted into public view. On Saturday, the world's richest man said the so-called America Party may focus on "just 2 or 3 Senate seats and 8 to 10 House districts," going so far to suggest it could be "enough to serve as the deciding vote on contentious laws, ensuring that they serve the true will of the people." Tesla saw a Wall Street rebound in May after Musk left his Department of Government Efficiency role amid a decline in company sales. However, Musk could lose federal subsidies that support SpaceX and his Starlink global satellite Internet services provider, Trump recently warned, as Tesla stock saw a drop on July 1. In April, Tesla shares saw a 5% jump at one point during daily trading as Musk teased about exiting the White House, which later called the reports "garbage." But Musk's heavy involvement in U.S. political affairs has made investors nervous. "Very simply, Musk diving deeper into politics and now trying to take on the Beltway establishment is exactly the opposite direction that Tesla investors/shareholders want him to take during this crucial period for the Tesla story," Dan Ives, global head of technology research at Wedbush Securities, said Sunday in a note. Musk and Trump have clashed over the Republican's recently-passed tax spending bill for which no Democrat voted for approval. "While the core Musk supporters will back Musk at every turn no matter what, there is broader sense of exhaustion from many Tesla investors that Musk keeps heading down the political track," Ives added. On Sunday, the president called the creation of Musk's new America Party "ridiculous" and stated the Tesla chief had gone "completely off the rails" as Musk sided with Democrats saying Trump's new tax bill will add trillions to the U.S. national debt. Sales of Tesla's EVs fell over 13% from April to June versus the same time last year. In addition, European sales dropped by nearly 50% in April. Meanwhile, Tesla reported a staggering 14% year-on-year-decline in its second-quarter car deliveries, missing its own expectations as nationwide "Tesla Takedown" protests gripped the EV maker and Tesla dealerships dealt with acts of arson fueled in anger over Musk's meddling in U.S. government policies and operations. Also, Tesla faces rising competition in the Chinese market as other global companies, such as Apple, seek to end reliance on China's hefty manufacturing capabilities.


Washington Post
33 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Republican Chris Carr raises $1.25M more for 2026 Georgia governor bid
ATLANTA — Georgia Attorney General Chris Carr said Monday he raised another $1.25 million for his 2026 gubernatorial bid from Feb. 1 to June 30. The Republican announced the fundraising totals to The Associated Press on Monday, although he hasn't yet filed an official report with the state Ethics Commission. Those reports are due Tuesday.

Miami Herald
35 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Veteran fund manager who predicted Musk America Party expects ‘nervous breakdown'
It's his party and he'll cry if he wants to. Tesla (TSLA) CEO Elon Musk may be hearing the strains of Lesly Gore's 1963 hit "It's My Party" as he contends all manner of misery. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter The electric vehicle maker's stock was down 7.2% at last check on July 7, days after Musk announced the creation of the "American Party" to compete against the Republican and Democratic parties, declaring on X, the social media site he owns, that "today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom." Musk's political power move comes after the world's richest man's relationship with President Donald Trump blew up like a SpaceX rocket - which also belongs to Musk - over the administration's tax and spending plans. The billionaire had pumped at least $270 million to help Trump win the White House and went on to work as a special government employee for the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). The controversial agency ripped through the federal workforce like a chainsaw, which Musk proudly wielded at one point, as well as government agencies that were responsible for overseeing his companies.. But now Musk has no reason to smile as Trump blasted him on Truth Social, his own social media site."I'm saddened to watch Elon Musk go completely 'off the rails,' essentially becoming a TRAIN WRECK over the past five weeks," Trump said in his post. "The one thing Third Parties are good for is the creation of complete and total disruption and chaos." Meanwhile, Tesla is facing trouble in China, according to The Wall Street Journal, which reported that the company's market share has shriveled while other Chinese automakers have become more popular. More Tesla: Tesla robotaxi launch hits major speed bumpTesla claims rival startup is built on stolen trade secrets10,000 people join Tesla class action lawsuit over key issue Chinese consumers said the vehicles feel increasingly tired and out of touch with local tastes, the Journal noted, noting that the top China-designed EVs come with features not normally found in Teslas. In addition, Musk's reputation as a partner for Beijing in Washington took a hit after his relationship with Trump soured. Tesla shares are down 28% this year, while the stock is up 16% from this time in 2024. William Blair downgraded Tesla to market perform from outperform without a price target, according to The Fly. While the removal of the $7,500 electric vehicle tax credit from the "Big, Beautiful Bill's" budget reconciliation was expected, the elimination of the Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) fines "requires a reset in expectations," the firm said in a research note. The standards, enacted after the 1973 to 1974 oil embargo, were intended to reduce fuel consumption by increasing the average fuel economy of cars and light trucks William Blair said that it believes the combination of a demand headwind from the tax credit removal and Tesla's over $2 billion in profit from regulatory credits being at risk "may be too much for investors to bear." The firm said that it expects the company's reduction in regulatory credit revenue to result in a "direct hit to profitability, prompting yet another across-the-board reset to Street models." HSBC recently said that Tesla's reported second quarter volumes "imply an exceptional June" and finds it "difficult to explain this sales bump." Tesla reported around 384,000 vehicle deliveries in the second quarter, down 14% from a year ago and marking the second straight quarterly decline. The third quarter may see some pulled forward demand ahead of the new tax bill, but the firm said that it thinks the June result "looks like an aberration" and doesn't expect the 170,000 to 180,000 vehicle June run-rate to "be the new normal." HSBC maintained a reduce rating and $120 price target on Tesla shares. Related: Veteran Tesla analyst drops 4-word call None of Musk's troubles come as a surprise to Doug Kass. The longtime hedge fund manager and TheStreet Pro contributor, reminded readers that "The Musk/Trump romance was short lived - as I predicted in my '15 Surprises for 2025'." Kass, who described the Musk-Trump relationship as "a limited production novella," had forecast that the "romance between Trump/Musk, doesn't make it past Spring 2025." He also invoked another '60s hit, Neil Sedaka's "Breaking up is Hard to Do" to describe the Musk-Trump tribulations "Reading the room (and increasingly uncomfortable with Musk's notoriety), President Trump begins to be openly critical of Musk and finally abandons him entirely," Kass had observed in the December 23, 2024 post. "Musk lashes out and retaliates by forming his own party and has a nervous breakdown." Kass also predicted that "Tesla makes little progress in 'full self driving.'" "The U.S. government takes away the $7,500 tax credit, competition from China intensifies, unit sales drop by double digits and Tesla's profits collapse," the post continued. "In addition, an 'accounting issue' (related to warranties) is uncovered by a short-oriented research boutique. All these factors cause the shares of (TSLA) to drop to $100/share." Kass also predicted that "Elon Musk's non-Tesla investments suffer from reduced U.S. government support." "Musk grows ever more unhinged throughout 2025 - his mother attempts a family intervention," the months-old post concluded. Stay tuned... Related: Fund-management veteran skips emotion in investment strategy The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.