McIntosh sets Canadian record in 800M freestyle
VICTORIA — Two Canadian Olympic medallists went head-to-head in a nail-biting 100-metre butterfly race, while Summer McIntosh of Toronto set a Canadian record in the 800-metre freestyle on Sunday at the Bell Canadian Swimming Trials in Victoria.
Ilya Kharun of Montreal and Josh Liendo of Toronto squared off in the same race that saw them share a podium at the Paris 2024 Olympic Games.
Advertisement
Kharun won in a personal best time of 50.37 seconds, touching the wall .09 ahead of Liendo. Both were well under the AQUA A qualifying time of 51.77 for this summer's world championships in Singapore.
The 20-year-old Kharun was happy with the win but sees room for improvement.
'There's definitely some tweaks I can improve on,' said Kharun. 'I know it's not perfect yet. There's some things we've got to work on.' Liendo took silver in Paris, and Kharun the bronze. It was the first time two Canadian men stood on the Olympic podium together and first double podium for Swimming Canada since 1976 (Cheryl Gibson, Becky Smith — silver and bronze 400IM).
McIntosh had a sellout crowd on its feet at Saanich Commonwealth Place cheering as she swam the 800 metres in 8:05.07. That shaved almost five seconds off her own Canadian record and was the third-fastest time ever, 0.95 of a second off the world record American legend Katie Ledecky set in May.
Advertisement
'I'm always hoping to break records and push the boundaries of sport,' said the 18-year-old, who set a world record in the 400-metre freestyle on Saturday's opening night.
'I'm always trying to be faster and faster. That just gives me more fuel to the fire.'
Para swimmer Nicholas Bennett won his second event of the trials. The S14 swimmer with the Red Deer Catalina Swim Club won the men's 200-m multi-class freestyle event in 1:54.44. He earned a silver medal in the same race at the Paris 2024 Paralympics.
'It was really good,' said the 21-year-old from nearby Parksville, B.C., who won the men's 100-m multi-class breaststroke Saturday. 'We're right where we want to be.'
Advertisement
Kylie Masse of Lasalle, Ont., also picked up her second victory of the meet by winning the 50-m backstroke in 27.24 seconds. Ingrid Wilm of the High Performance Centre-Vancouver celebrated her 27th birthday by finishing second in 27.58.
Both swimmers were under the AQUA A qualifying time of 28.22.
'I've been enjoying doing it and putting a little more focus on it this year,' Masse said about the sprint race, in which she was the 2022 world champion. 'Every little detail counts, trying to execute it perfectly. It's really fast and really hard.'
Earning a spot on the world championships team helped Wilm shake off the disappointment of finishing third in the 100-back Saturday night. That meant she didn't qualify for the event for the upcoming world championships after reaching the finals at the Paris Olympics.
Advertisement
'I was frustrated after (Saturday) night,' said the Calgary native. 'It's to my chagrin we have such a deep field here in Canada. I relied a lot on my teammates and my coaching staff and it just once again showed me just how many people have my back.'
It was a bittersweet victory for Blake Tierney in the men's 50-m backstroke. The Saskatoon native who trains at the High Performance Centre-Vancouver won the race in personal best time of 25.23 seconds. That was over the AQUA A qualifying time of 25.11 but under Swimming Canada's secondary standard of 25.36.
"A lot of work needs to be done,' said Tierney, who has been dealing with an ankle issue. 'I couldn't do a lot of kicking, so that kind of messed with the confidence. I'm just doing the best I can. I'm really thankful I made the team.'
Two-time Olympian Mary-Sophie Harvey of Trois-Rivières, Que., also won her second race of the meet but wasn't happy with her time.
Advertisement
Harvey, who trains with Montreal's CAMO club, won the 100-m butterfly in 58.37 seconds, over the AQUA A qualifying time of 58.33 but under Swimming Canada's secondary time of 59.91.
'I'm going to be honest,' said Harvey, who won the 200 breaststroke Saturday. 'It was good practice for my individual medley.'
Montreal's Eric Brown won the 1,500-m freestyle in 15:17.54. That was over both the AQUA A time of 15:01.89 and the Swimming Canada secondary standard of 15:10.91.
In other Para swimming events, Reid Maxwell, an S8 Para swimmer from the Edmonton Keyano Swim Club, won the multi-class 400-m freestyle in 4:26.66. It was the same event in which the 17-year-old won a silver medal at the Paris 2024 Paralympic Games in Canadian record time.
Advertisement
'It was a little slower than I wanted but I can't complain,' said Maxwell. 'I gave it everything I had.'
Mary Jibb, an S9 swimmer from the Pacific Sea Wolves won the multi-class 400-m freestyle in 4:52.69.
Emma Van Dyk, an S14 swimmer from the Brock Niagara Aquatics, was first in the women's 200-m multi-class freestyle in 2:23.78. Aly van Wyck-Smart, an S3 swimmer from Whitby Swimming, finished second in a Canadian record time of 4:48.05.
During the morning heats S4 swimmer Jordan Tucker of Royal City Aquatics set a Canadian record of 4:03.87 in the S4 category.
'I'm blown away,' said Tucker. 'I'm very surprised but very hopeful I can keep breaking records.'
This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 8, 2025.
The Canadian Press
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
27 minutes ago
- CNN
Mary Lou Retton pleads no contest, fined $100 for DUI, says she's committed to make positive changes
American gymnastics icon Mary Lou Retton on Tuesday entered a no contest plea to driving under the influence stemming from a May traffic stop in her hometown of Fairmont. A Marion County judge fined her $100, consistent with sentencing guidelines for first-time, non-aggravated offenses, her attorney Edmund J. Rollo said in a statement. In a statement released through her attorney, the 57-year-old Retton said she took full responsibility for her actions. 'What happened was completely unacceptable. I make no excuses,' she said. 'To my family, friends and my fans: I have let you down, and for that I am deeply sorry. I am determined to learn and grow from this experience, and I am committed to making positive changes in my life. I truly appreciate your concern, encouragement and continued support.' Fairmont police stopped Retton on May 17 following a report about a person in a Porsche driving erratically. According to the criminal complaint, Retton smelled of alcohol and was slurring her words, and she failed a field sobriety test. Officers also reported observing a container of wine in the passenger seat. Retton was 16 when she became the first American female gymnast to win the all-around at the 1984 Los Angeles Olympics. She also won two silver and two bronze medals to help bring gymnastics into the mainstream in the United States. In 2023, Retton's family disclosed she was recuperating from a rare form of pneumonia that landed her in intensive care. Doctors found her oxygen levels dangerously low. Her medical team considered putting her on a ventilator as her conditioned worsened. Retton went on oxygen treatment and, after weeks in the hospital, improved enough to be sent home.
New York Times
2 hours ago
- New York Times
No, the Maple Leafs should not (and cannot) run it back: Mirtle mailbag
A couple weeks ago, we put out the call for mailbag questions from Maple Leafs fans after another disappointing playoff exit for Toronto. Subscribers didn't disappoint in contributing nearly 350 for us to filter through, something I plan on doing between now and free agency. We'll start with these two, which hit on a theme I've heard a lot since the Leafs were eliminated on May 18. Advertisement From Curtis P.: 'The core of the Leafs hasn't gotten it done yet, but every season is a new opportunity — just like rolling dice, past outcomes don't dictate future results. This team is different; they've grown, adapted, and learned. The right move isn't to dismantle everything, but to plug that second-line centre hole and tweak the depth. If the price is right, why not run it back with a team that's already shown it can compete at the highest level? The Atlantic Division is the toughest in the league, and if we can get through that, the sky's the limit. A few adjustments could be the key to finally breaking through.' From Danny A.: 'Are we holding the Leafs to different standards than other teams? Why isn't 'perennially in the mix in a league where anyone in the playoffs had as good a chance as any other' at least considered a mild success? Mitch Marner seems as good as gone, but it feels to me like re-signing him and keeping the core as a bridge to the rising cap (which was the original plan that a frozen cap killed) would be as good a plan as any.' Even though I've been around this team and fan base for a long, long time, I've been surprised how many of you want the status quo. Even after all of the losing. Even after the way they were eliminated in the second round this time around. If what happened this year — an ugly Game 7 loss in the second round against a terrific opponent — was happening for the first, or second, or even third or fourth time, then you could rationally argue to run things back. Leafs management did just that for years, after some really tough outcomes in the playoffs in the six seasons between 2019 and 2024. (I'm counting 2017 and 2018 as a young team going through growing pains and losing to more experienced opponents.) But as we sit here, three weeks out from free agency in 2025, we know that's not what has happened. The loss to the Panthers wasn't the second or third time something like this has occurred. It's not a new phenomenon for a talented Leafs core to no-show in two of the biggest games of the year. It has happened again and again and again in remarkably similar fashion. Advertisement The Leafs' core isn't young anymore. They aren't learning lessons. William Nylander is 29. Mitch Marner turned 28 during the playoffs, and Auston Matthews will join him there in September. Key veterans like Morgan Rielly and John Tavares are on the back nine of their careers at 31 and 34. Can we chalk up the implosions in Games 5 and 7 to bad luck that can be overcome with another roll of the dice? Are we sure these aren't loaded dice, set to land on snake eyes more often than not? Is next season a new opportunity if you attempt the same thing again, for an eighth consecutive season, with those five players making up the majority of your star power and cap space? And how can you be sure that's the right course of action when it hasn't been so many times before? We aren't holding the Leafs to a different standard than other teams. What they've done in running it back for so many years is unlike anything an unsuccessful franchise in pro sports has done. It's hard to find a good comparison for an organization keeping that much of its core together for that long with this little to show for it. (The closest comp would likely be the 2018 Washington Capitals who won the Stanley Cup after years of failed attempts, but even then, it was really only Alex Ovechkin, Nick Backstrom and defenceman John Carlson who were together for seven-plus seasons before winning, which would be akin to keeping Auston Matthews, William Nylander and Morgan Rielly — not all five members of the Leafs' core. The Mike Greens, Alexander Semins and Brooks Laichs weren't kept in Washington through that many years of postseason disappointment.) Most management groups in this situation would have pulled the plug on this configuration and tried to adapt three or four years ago. Certainly by 2023, when they still had an out to make major moves. Advertisement As for if being 'perennially in the mix' is considered a mild success, sure, we can call it that. These Leafs are a mild success! Nine consecutive years in the playoffs in the Matthews era, something no other NHL team has done. Tenth in playoff games played — and 11th in wins — since drafting him first overall. Two trips out of the first round and none past the second. But no one is arguing that the Leafs have been an unmitigated disaster the way they were previously. They're arguing that mild success isn't good enough, not when the goal is to win the Stanley Cup. They're arguing about what the best path forward is to be more than a mild success. How do they win it all? What do they need to get over the top, before the inevitable rebuild comes 'round again? Maybe you believe that's possible with this group. But what we're seeing in these big games is repeated evidence that something is wrong, and that gets reinforced when I talk to people behind the scenes. At this point, they very much agree they need a rethink. The GM isn't coming out after the postseason and saying his team needs to change 'some DNA' for show. This core has been kept together so long that it's become stale and dysfunctional, on and off the ice. They've been kept together so long that they don't even believe in themselves anymore. Think about it: If Marner truly believed they were right there, just about to break through, and there was a good chance of winning the Stanley Cup in his hometown with the Leafs, why wouldn't he have been willing to negotiate throughout the year for an eight-year deal worth massive money? Why did he seem so withdrawn and noncommittal? To me this goes beyond negotiating strategies and a players' camp trying to push for the maximum dollar figure on July 1. It's about something being fundamentally off, for Marner and for this organization. The strange thing is the player seemed to recognize it before management did, which puts the Leafs in a real bind. It appears almost certain at this point that they'll lose one of the best players in the NHL for very little in return, which is why some fans are getting cold feet about breaking up the core. Even if you believe this group needs change, these are hardly ideal circumstances under which to do it. Advertisement However, the next steps in Toronto shouldn't be the mass destruction of the roster. For one, that's not even going to be possible, not with free agency coming fast and so much of this group under contract, with no-movement and no-trade clauses. What GM Brad Treliving and his staff need to do instead is to try to identify how they can change the cast around the core members who stay in such a way that it resets the environment and allows them to be better in critical situations. Watch those playoff failures and analyze the team's shortcomings — not just with the core, but at every position, up and down the lineup. There are a lot of different ways the Leafs need to be better, but realistically, only some of them can be addressed this offseason. Assuming Marner is leaving, the change has to be focused on building a more well-rounded and less top-heavy roster, one that gets contributions down the lineup the way Florida has this postseason. One that can control play better and produce more offence when games get tight in the playoffs. That is going to be challenging with the Leafs' lack of trade assets, a weak free agent class, and the number of quality players Toronto needs to add, but challenging does not equal impossible. The best front offices in the league have made transformations like this in recent years — swapping out core players, making bold trades and underrated signings — and been better for it on the other side. The Panthers, for example, had terrific regular season success — winning the Presidents' Trophy in 2022 — but were swept in the second round and decided they needed to make major changes. Four of the eight biggest-minute players on that roster were gone the next offseason. They've continued to adapt and evolve over the last few years, adding key core pieces through trades and free agency, including Seth Jones, Brad Marchand, Matthew Tkachuk and Niko Mikkola. That's not to say the Leafs haven't changed. The blue line, especially, has undergone a dramatic makeover in a similar time frame, with defensive defenders Chris Tanev and Jake McCabe replacing T.J. Brodie and Jake Muzzin. But you'd be hard-pressed to call Toronto's moves a successful re-envisioning, given how similar (and how small) they look when up against a championship-level opponent in a playoff series. It's time to try something new, to cut deeper and ask the tough questions about why things haven't worked. Advertisement In an ideal world, the Leafs would have properly identified the need for this level of change before Marner was set to walk for nothing. We're going to be litigating the fallout of that for years to come, but that doesn't change the fact that trying the same thing again next season should have been out of the question either way. The only positive out of Marner's decision is it finally removes the 'run it back' option from the equation. It gives the Leafs a chance to reimagine what that $11 million in cap space can do for them in the playoffs if deployed differently, in support of the players who remain. And to acknowledge that mild success isn't good enough after nearly a decade of trying. (Top photo of Brad Treliving: Steve Russell / Toronto Star via Getty Images)
New York Times
3 hours ago
- New York Times
World Cup 2026 – What you need to know with a year to go
The Athletic FC ⚽ is The Athletic's daily football (or soccer, if you prefer) newsletter. Sign up to receive it directly to your inbox. Hello! Today marks exactly a year until the start of the 2026 World Cup. We're here to explain the numbers, the politics, the finance, the geography and the key players behind the globe's biggest sporting event — and the biggest tournament FIFA has ever staged. On the way: In the spirit of a certain fast-food outlet, FIFA's approach to the 2026 World Cup was to supersize it. The 48-nation event is the largest in the tournament's history. It's the first to be spread across an entire continent, with 4,800 kilometres between Mexico City, the southern-most host, and Vancouver, furthest north. FIFA's projected earnings are leaping from $7.6bn in the four-year cycle to the last World Cup in 2022 to $13bn this time around. Extra large was the cry. Advertisement A year today, the competition gets going in Mexico City, with the first of 104 matches. FIFA already owns the biggest sporting event on the planet — a television audience of 1.5bn for the final in Qatar three years ago was 11 times the U.S. audience for the 2025 Super Bowl, and five billion people are expected to watch worldwide in 2026 — but by expanding from 32 teams and naming Mexico, Canada and the United States as joint hosts, soccer's world governing body is consolidating that status. The U.S. in isolation is an example of the sport's capacity to grow at an exponential rate. When the country staged the World Cup in 1994, Major League Soccer did not even exist. Today, the division contains billion-dollar clubs, some of whom rank among the game's most valuable. It boasts Lionel Messi, the finest player of his era (and arguably any other). Mauricio Pochettino is the USMNT's head coach, as high-profile a name as they have ever been able to recruit. Soccer has taken time to crack the States, but it's getting there, and FIFA sending both this year's Club World Cup and next year's World Cup to North America is a concerted commercial push on that front. There's no getting away from the political manoeuvring involved in allocating these tournaments, but the fact remains: when the World Cup kicks off, it's the only show in town. FIFA's selection of countries to host its showpiece is increasingly becoming a bone of contention. That was true of Russia in 2018 and true of Qatar four years later. It's most certainly true of Saudi Arabia, which won the bidding unopposed for the 2034 World Cup. Many argue football's administrators are brushing over serious matters such as human rights concerns. Handing the 2026 edition to the U.S. alongside Mexico and Canada involved much interaction between FIFA and the White House. Jared Kushner, the son-in-law of American President Donald Trump, was a key point of contact in the run up to the 'United' bid winning the race. Latterly, FIFA president Gianni Infantino has grown very close with Trump — to a degree that is concerning some of Infantino's colleagues. Advertisement North America, however, is well equipped for a World Cup. Much of the necessary infrastructure is in place and while stadium alterations will be required, none are having to be built from scratch. The 11 U.S. cities where matches will be played are wrestling with the federal government for $625m in security funding, and they're not exactly hyped yet. Trump's recent travel ban could have implications for the travelling parties from specific countries such as Iran. But unlike previous tournaments, it's taken as read that the U.S., Mexico and Canada will be logistically ready. Argentina and Messi (assuming his pencil has enough lead left in it) go into 2026 as defending champions. The bookmakers narrowly favour France, and public confidence must be swinging towards Lamine Yamal and Spain. A 41-year-old Cristiano Ronaldo should be in town, too, keeping the old flame alive. But him and Messi aside, 2026 is a new frontier. Our American subscribers would hope to hear us say that 2026 will be the USMNT's moment. We'd love to… but Pochettino has hit the ground crawling, his team were smashed 4-0 by Switzerland in a friendly yesterday (their fourth defeat back-to-back), and errors like Johnny Cardoso's against Turkey last weekend, above, are doing them in. I thought I'd defer to The Athletic's USMNT expert, Paul Tenorio, to give his take on where Poch is at with 12 months until showtime: 'The honeymoon is over and a marriage counsellor is on retainer. The losses in the Nations League riled both an already-concerned fanbase and a coach who expected more effort out of his players. Now, Pochettino is trying to shake things up with an MLS-heavy squad. He's under deadline to create a connection with his core players and foster some positivity — and results — around this group.' That reads like trouble in paradise to me. We'll be back with more of the fall-out in tomorrow's TAFC. Back in 2001, FIFA altered its qualification rules to deny the World Cup holders an automatic place at the next tournament. Fortunately, Argentina stormed the South American (CONMEBOL) group, so they'll be in the U.S. to have a go at becoming the first back-to-back winners since Brazil in '62. With 12 months to go, Lionel Scaloni's squad are one of 13 countries booked in for the 2026 finals. Mexico and the USMNT, both of whom are habitual participants, received a place as hosts, as did Canada. Familiar faces Brazil, Australia, South Korea, Japan, Iran and Ecuador have made the cut again. Advertisement Uzbekistan and Jordan are first-time qualifiers and bona fide unknown quantities. As for New Zealand, the Oceania Football Confederation campaign was so mismatched that they averaged just under six goals a game; a case of beating whatever's put in front of you. As the slots fill up and we count down to December's draw (most likely in Vegas, baby), keep an eye on the following nations: 2024 Copa America finalists Colombia have work to do. New Caledonia — population 290,000 — are hanging in there. And is Norway's first World Cup trip in almost 30 years in the bag? A perfect record in a group where Italy are imploding means a berth is theirs for the taking; and doesn't Erling Haaland just love the smell of blood. Every World Cup produces a breakout star, but in 2026, Lamine Yamal can't really be it. He might be 17 years old and he might not have played in a World Cup before, but by the time he does, the Barcelona winger will have won just about everything else there is to win — including, potentially, the Ballon d'Or. Be psyched for his involvement, though, because Yamal is the real deal. It's why Barcelona are committing to paying him up to $880,000 a week, and why trading cards with his face on are soaring in value. He's patenting those step-off-the-right, finish-with-the-left-foot goals — and the variety in the way he carries the ball (see our graphic, above) is purgatory for a full-back. The Athletic's data writers have picked a list of 10 players, Yamal included, who they think could steal the show in the States. Two names they didn't mention but who I'm keen to see out there (aside from Real Madrid's Dean Huijsen, who is sky high in the breakout stakes) are Premier League-bound Cherki and his France colleague Michael Olise. The Bayern Munich factor is real, but 12 goals and 15 assists from Olise equates to a hell of a first season in the Bundesliga. For those of us who remember the '94 World Cup clearly, two memories are abiding: Diana Ross' shambolic penalty during the opening ceremony, and Roberto Baggio outdoing her on the comedy scale with that decisive spot-kick in the final between Italy and Brazil. It's still on its way to Mars. The competition dared to be different, though, and it was. The States got its first taste of the World Cup. Detroit's Pontiac Silverdome staged indoor matches for the first time (minus air-conditioning, so the humidity was hideous). The USMNT broke from the traditions of international shirts with their famous denim Adidas number — which, if we're honest, has aged pretty well. Advertisement But the event which resonates most all these years later concerns the Group A game between the U.S. and Colombia, played in California on June 22. The USMNT secured passage to the knockouts by winning 2-1, aided by an own goal from Andres Escobar. Ten days after Colombia's defeat, Escobar was shot dead in his homeland. Were the own goal and his murder linked? No motive has ever been established, and some of his old team-mates doubt it. But as ex-USMNT defender Alexi Lalas said in this gripping oral history of the match: 'I don't think there's anybody who was on that field that day who wouldn't gladly lose that game if it meant that Andres Escobar was still with us.'
