Want an upgrade on your flight? Here's what works (and what doesn't)
You might have a mate who knows someone whose cousin got an upgrade. A couple of them, actually. They arrived at the check-in desk for their economy class flight suited up like they were heading for the Birdcage at the Melbourne Cup and a miracle happened. Instead of economy, their boarding class bore the magical words 'business'. Legends!
Thus adding fuel to the myth that says if you dress nicely, you just might get an upgrade, but honestly, this is a furphy. Dressing in designer wear and asking for an upgrade will only provide temporary amusement for the check-in staff. They do not have discretion to offer upgrades, and by themselves, charm, a genuine Louis Vuitton case or a pearly smile won't get you a seat at the pointy end. Likewise, claiming it's a honeymoon trip, a special anniversary, a birthday or a first-time meet-up with your Facebook love interest. Don't even think about it.
What gets you that upgrade
In a word, loyalty. Loyalty is everything when it comes to air travel upgrades. Airlines have long memories and big databases, and they know exactly how often you fly with them and how many points and status credits you've accumulated, and those are the metrics that will help you get an upgrade. With a purse bulging with points and status credits, you're at the front of the queue when upgrade opportunities come your way.
Travellers on fully flexible fares are next in line. They've paid for the privilege, and airlines are more inclined to look after them when seats need shuffling. Beyond those, the pool dries up quickly. Between loyal frequent flyers and full-fare passengers, there's usually no shortage of contenders when an upgrade is on the cards, leaving little room for hopeful glances or whispered charm at the gate.
When points are not enough
Even when you're sitting on a zillion points, getting an upgrade is not a shoo-in. I recently requested an upgrade to business using points on a Singapore Airlines return flight from Sydney to Delhi. I paid full price for a flexi premium economy seat, the highest category, which is a points-upgradeable ticket. When I submitted the request via the airline's MySQupgrade website, the response was no-go. I called the airline's customer service and was told yes, I could upgrade with points, but not on the flights I'd booked. I'd have to switch to a flight leaving Delhi the following day, at an inconvenient time with a much longer stopover in Singapore, and that wasn't going to work.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

9 News
3 hours ago
- 9 News
Australia regulator says YouTube, others 'turning a blind eye' to child abuse material
Your web browser is no longer supported. To improve your experience update it here Australia 's internet watchdog has said the world's biggest social media firms are still "turning a blind eye" to online child sex abuse material on their platforms, and said YouTube in particular had been unresponsive to its enquiries. In a report released on Wednesday, the eSafety Commissioner said YouTube , along with Apple , failed to track the number of user reports it received of child sex abuse appearing on their platforms and also could not say how long it took them to respond to such reports. The Australian government decided last week to include YouTube in its world-first social media ban for teenagers, following eSafety's advice to overturn its planned exemption for the Alphabet-owned Google's GOOGL.O video-sharing site. Australia's internet watchdog has said the world's biggest social media firms are still "turning a blind eye" to online child sex abuse material on their platforms, with YouTube in particular, unresponsive to its enquiries (SOPA Images/LightRocket via Gett) "When left to their own devices, these companies aren't prioritising the protection of children and are seemingly turning a blind eye to crimes occurring on their services," eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant said in a statement. "No other consumer-facing industry would be given the licence to operate by enabling such heinous crimes against children on their premises, or services." Google has said previously that abuse material has no place on its platforms and that it uses a range of industry-standard techniques to identify and remove such material. Meta - owner of Facebook, Instagram and Threads, three of the biggest platforms with more than 3 billion users worldwide - says it prohibits graphic videos. Google has said before that its anti-abuse measures include hash-matching technology and artificial intelligence. (Smith Collection/Getty) The eSafety Commissioner, an office set up to protect internet users, has mandated Apple, Discord, Google, Meta, Microsoft, Skype, Snap and WhatsApp to report on the measures they take to address child exploitation and abuse material in Australia. The report on their responses so far found a "range of safety deficiencies on their services which increases the risk that child sexual exploitation and abuse material and activity appear on the services". Safety gaps included failures to detect and prevent livestreaming of the material or block links to known child abuse material, as well as inadequate reporting mechanisms. It said platforms were also not using "hash-matching" technology on all parts of their services to identify images of child sexual abuse by checking them against a database. The Australian regulator said some providers had not made improvements to address these safety gaps on their services despite it putting them on notice in previous years. (Getty) Google has said before that its anti-abuse measures include hash-matching technology and artificial intelligence. The Australian regulator said some providers had not made improvements to address these safety gaps on their services despite it putting them on notice in previous years. "In the case of Apple services and Google's YouTube, they didn't even answer our questions about how many user reports they received about child sexual abuse on their services or details of how many trust and safety personnel Apple and Google have on-staff," Inman Grant said. national Australia social media youtube CONTACT US Property News: Rubbish-strewn house overtaken by mould asks $1.2 million.

The Age
a day ago
- The Age
Five hours was enough on Singapore Airlines' oldest, worst plane
The seats are arranged in a 3-3 configuration, and my aisle seat is second from the back. I selected this seat hoping to score a spare seat beside me. I'm thrilled to see this has worked. The 737-800 NG is an older style of plane, a relic from former regional carrier Silk Air. For several reasons, this plane is an outlier in the Singapore Airlines fleet. The economy seat width is fairly standard, at 17.7 inches (45cm). But its pitch is a paltry 30 inches (76cm) with a 5-inch (12.7cm) recline, giving it the dubious distinction of having the least legroom of any Singapore Airlines plane. It's worth noting that this plane has the only business class seats in the fleet that do not lie flat. Entertainment + tech Under the seat is a universal power outlet compatible with Australian plugs and a USB-A port. These are shared between passengers on a two-between-three basis. Another deviation: There's no seat-back entertainment screens. A subset of the KrisWorld Entertainment system can be viewed from your own device; I've forgotten my headphones, so that counts me out. The crew provides headphones, to plug into the armrest to listen to one of the 12 channels, as in the olden days. Wi-Fi? I'm afraid not. Service Something that's not an anomaly is the service. The Singapore Airlines crew is as attentive and efficient as always. When I realise the overhead locker above my seat is reserved for crew use, a friendly crew member kindly whisks my bag to a space further forward. Food The spiced chicken in creamy tomato gravy is finished by the time the cart gets to me, but my fish arrabbiata pasta, and salad of barley, cucumber and smoked salmon are tasty. Wines, beers and spirits are complimentary and later there are individual tubs of ice-cream. Surprisingly, there is no menu card in the seat back, nor on the limited selection of KrisWorld entertainment on my device. Sustainability Among many airlines, Singapore Airlines has committed to net zero carbon emissions by 2050.* Newer-generation aircraft help this cause by using less fuel, but not this one, which could be one reason the airline plans to replace it. Loading One more thing Singapore Airlines flies these dinosaurs on three routes, from Singapore to Penang, Kuala Lumpur and Kathmandu. By October, the airline plans to replace all 737-800 NGs with the more modern 737-Max 8 (which it already flies, with Boeing 787 Dreamliners, on the Kathmandu route). Seat pitch in economy will remain the same, but all seats on the new planes will have entertainment screens and Wi-Fi. Business class seats will lie flat, standardising this in the entire fleet. The price From about $1600 return for economy class from Sydney or Melbourne**. The verdict Five hours was long enough on the worst Singapore Airlines plane. The service was excellent, the food was good, but this does not feel like a Singapore Airlines experience. Our rating out of five ★★★

Sydney Morning Herald
a day ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Five hours was enough on Singapore Airlines' oldest, worst plane
The seats are arranged in a 3-3 configuration, and my aisle seat is second from the back. I selected this seat hoping to score a spare seat beside me. I'm thrilled to see this has worked. The 737-800 NG is an older style of plane, a relic from former regional carrier Silk Air. For several reasons, this plane is an outlier in the Singapore Airlines fleet. The economy seat width is fairly standard, at 17.7 inches (45cm). But its pitch is a paltry 30 inches (76cm) with a 5-inch (12.7cm) recline, giving it the dubious distinction of having the least legroom of any Singapore Airlines plane. It's worth noting that this plane has the only business class seats in the fleet that do not lie flat. Entertainment + tech Under the seat is a universal power outlet compatible with Australian plugs and a USB-A port. These are shared between passengers on a two-between-three basis. Another deviation: There's no seat-back entertainment screens. A subset of the KrisWorld Entertainment system can be viewed from your own device; I've forgotten my headphones, so that counts me out. The crew provides headphones, to plug into the armrest to listen to one of the 12 channels, as in the olden days. Wi-Fi? I'm afraid not. Service Something that's not an anomaly is the service. The Singapore Airlines crew is as attentive and efficient as always. When I realise the overhead locker above my seat is reserved for crew use, a friendly crew member kindly whisks my bag to a space further forward. Food The spiced chicken in creamy tomato gravy is finished by the time the cart gets to me, but my fish arrabbiata pasta, and salad of barley, cucumber and smoked salmon are tasty. Wines, beers and spirits are complimentary and later there are individual tubs of ice-cream. Surprisingly, there is no menu card in the seat back, nor on the limited selection of KrisWorld entertainment on my device. Sustainability Among many airlines, Singapore Airlines has committed to net zero carbon emissions by 2050.* Newer-generation aircraft help this cause by using less fuel, but not this one, which could be one reason the airline plans to replace it. Loading One more thing Singapore Airlines flies these dinosaurs on three routes, from Singapore to Penang, Kuala Lumpur and Kathmandu. By October, the airline plans to replace all 737-800 NGs with the more modern 737-Max 8 (which it already flies, with Boeing 787 Dreamliners, on the Kathmandu route). Seat pitch in economy will remain the same, but all seats on the new planes will have entertainment screens and Wi-Fi. Business class seats will lie flat, standardising this in the entire fleet. The price From about $1600 return for economy class from Sydney or Melbourne**. The verdict Five hours was long enough on the worst Singapore Airlines plane. The service was excellent, the food was good, but this does not feel like a Singapore Airlines experience. Our rating out of five ★★★