Manitoba Indigenous groups agree to work together on major infrastructure projects
It comes as the federal government looks to fast-track projects across the country.
The Southern Chiefs' Organization, which represents 32 Anishinaabe and Dakota First Nations in the province, and the Manitoba Métis Federation have signed a five-year agreement.
It outlines their shared commitment to ensure First Nations and Red River Métis voices are included in the approval of any project proposed by the Manitoba government and supported by federal legislation.
A new federal law gives Ottawa sweeping powers to speed up permits for what it calls 'nation-building projects.'
The controversial legislation has faced pushback from Indigenous groups that argue elements of it could be used to undermine their rights.
Story continues below advertisement
The Southern Chiefs' Organization and the Manitoba Métis Federation say they'll work together to pursue Indigenous-led developments in areas including forestry, harvesting and traditional economies.
The Manitoba government is also exploring how it would create and operate a proposed Crown-Indigenous corporation.
Get breaking National news
For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
'This agreement sends a message to all governments, partners and industry that First Nations and the Red River Métis are working together to shape a future that is led by Indigenous nations,' Grand Chief Jerry Daniels of the Southern Chiefs' Organization said Wednesday.
'We are forging a path towards economic independence and sustainability, ensuring the voices of First Nations and Red River Métis are integral to the design, approval and implementation of nation-building projects across this province.'
Prime Minister Mark Carney has said the legislation is needed to shore up Canada's economy during the trade war with the United States.
Ottawa has also promised to build up northern infrastructure, in part, to meet a NATO military alliance spending target for critical infrastructure.
It's unknown which projects could be fast-tracked, but the government has pointed to ports, railways and pipelines.
Carney recently met with First Nations, Inuit and Métis groups to discuss how best to build projects in partnership with Indigenous Peoples.
Story continues below advertisement
The Manitoba Métis Federation turned down Carney's invitation to discuss the legislation, after Ottawa invited another Métis group the federation claims has no reason to exist.
Other Métis groups and First Nations say communities represented by the Métis Nation of Ontario have no claim to Métis heritage and that Ottawa and Ontario have no right to recognize them.
Manitoba Métis Federation president David Chartrand said the legislation must move forward, as Canada deals with ongoing threats from U.S. President Donald Trump.
'There's not a doubt it must arrive, because the danger that Trump imposes on all of us is very scary … this is an economic war, and people should not take it lightly,' he said Wednesday.
He added any nation-building projects approved in Manitoba must be done in collaboration with Indigenous Peoples in the province.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Cision Canada
4 minutes ago
- Cision Canada
/R E P E A T -- Media Advisory - The Government of Canada and Long Plain First Nation recognize the national historic significance of the Former Portage La Prairie Indian Residential School/ Français
PORTAGE LA PRAIRIE, MB, Aug. 12, 2025 /CNW/ - Ginette Lavack, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Indigenous Services and Member of Parliament for St. Boniface—St. Vital, Manitoba, on behalf of the Honourable Steven Guilbeault, Minister of Canadian Identity and Culture, and Minister responsible for Official Languages, along with Long Plain First Nation, will participate in a Parks Canada and Historic Sites and Monuments Board of Canada plaque unveiling ceremony to commemorate the historic significance of the Former Portage La Prairie Indian Residential School. Built in 1914-1915, the former Portage La Prairie Indian Residential School functioned within the residential school system whereby the federal government and certain churches and religious organizations worked together to assimilate Indigenous children as part of a broad set of efforts to destroy Indigenous cultures and identities and suppress Indigenous histories. The building has been given new meaning by the community as a site of commemoration and resilience that keeps the legacy of the residential school era alive and educates the public. The details are as follows: SOURCE Parks Canada (HQ)
National Post
2 hours ago
- National Post
Terry Glavin: A better response to B.C.'s Cowichan land ruling — calm down!
Article content It is customary for British Columbians to set their hair on fire whenever the courts remind them that they've been losing that bet as far back as the Calder case of 1973. This latest case involves a Cowichan fishing village on the Fraser River that Colonial Governor James Douglas had set aside from pre-emption that was swindled from the tribe only two years after Confederation by Richard Clement Moody, the former colonial commissioner of lands and works. Article content Not satisfied with deliberately overlooking the presence of a village that was home to as many as 1,000 Cowichan people during the fishing season, and then selling it off illegally in the province's first rounds of land pre-emptions, Moody sold a big chunk of the old village site to himself via the connivings of a land agent. Article content Moody had no legal right to buy the village lands, it should go without saying — he ended up selling roughly 2,000 acres to himself in 11 different pre-emptions on British Columbia's mainland — but the point is he had no right to sell the Cowichan land, either. The whole thing was illegal and unconstitutional. Article content While the federally-owned lands are no small matter — about 260 hectares are under the jurisdiction of the Vancouver Fraser Port Authority — it's the City of Richmond that's been shouting the loudest about Judge Young's declaration. Richmond owns several lots and the entirety of the foreshore along the Fraser River at the site, which the judge described as 'essentially undeveloped land that Richmond does not use.' Richmond acquired the land over the years mostly as 'windfall' from municipal tax sales. Judge Young said she agrees with Richmond's lawyers that a declaration of Aboriginal title creates a degree of uncertainty about the fee-simple private properties in the 2,000-hectare claim area. However, 'there is greater uncertainty if I do not declare that Richmond and Canada's fee simple titles and interests are defective and invalid.' Article content It's the Cowichan victory in its fishing-rights arguments that are likely of greater significance, and it was because of those assertions that the Cowichan claim was opposed by the Tsawwassen and Musqueam nations. As for the precedent the decision sets, it's in Judge Young's explicit finding that a provincial Crown grant of fee-simple title is not sufficient to extinguish Aboriginal title. That's a power available only to the federal government, and only according to a fairly severe test of justification in the interest of a valid public purpose. Article content Article content 'Neither Aboriginal title nor fee simple title is absolute,' the judge noted 'Aboriginal title and fee simple interests are not unqualified interests.' And they can coexist, or rather they already do coexist. The provincial Land Titles Act doesn't apply to Aboriginal title. It never did. Both Crown title and Aboriginal title can underlie private property without the world coming to an end. Article content But how all this will come out in the wash will depend largely on the sophistication and the stamina of the provincial and federal governments. And that's a matter that's very much worth worrying about. If the Cowichan decision is handled badly, we may all end up paying very dearly. Still, it doesn't have to be this way. Where the pattern of settlement and the advance of Crown sovereignty failed in Canada, it was in the breach of an Aboriginal rights doctrine that stretches back to 1763 and in the slovenliness of politicians who preferred the easy way. Article content
National Observer
3 hours ago
- National Observer
What kind of Canada do we want to build?
When the prime minister and premiers recently met in Saskatoon, it was Trump's attacks that brought them together. As wildfires forced tens of thousands to evacuate in Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba and Ontario, the first ministers gathered to discuss the nation-building projects Canada needs. Driving into town through the smoke, they passed our billboards: a wildfire fighter facing a smoke-filled sky with the message 'Don't Let Canada Burn. Connect Canada's Clean Power. Build the East-West Electricity Grid. ' Crisis has a way of sharpening choices between falling back on what you know and evolving into what you can be. Canada must retool our economy to withstand US economic pressure and the escalating fossil-fuel-driven climate disasters. There are loud voices calling for us to react by building new pipelines, trampling Indigenous rights and deluding ourselves about climate pollution. Instead, we must build to last. We can strengthen our communities with clean, affordable energy. We can steward some of the world's vast remaining forests. We can cut pollution, grow good jobs that can't be offshored and build our economy on security, not volatility. The economic future will belong to countries that can supply affordable, clean power for their economies, writes Jamie Biggar In doing so, we'll position ourselves to be leaders in the clean electricity transition that's building momentum. Despite political backsliding in the US, demand for clean electricity technology is booming because it's cheaper, faster to deploy and safer for communities. In China, EV car sales grew 40 per cent in 2024 alone, and now 1 in 4 cars sold worldwide in 2025 will be electric. Global oil demand will peak this decade. According to the International Energy Association, annual global investment in clean energy and electricity infrastructure is now fully double the global investment in fossil fuels. In 2026, the $26T European Union market will introduce a carbon tariff, putting real costs on any carbon-intensive imports from countries that fall behind. The economic future will belong to countries that can supply affordable, clean power for their economies. We have a choice: invest in infrastructure that sets Canada up to thrive for the next fifty years, or double down on costly projects designed for a world that is slipping away. Clean, reliable electric power is the future because it cuts risks, costs and pollution alike. Since clean electricity is where the world is going, we are fortunate to have incredible resources and leaders across the country. Canada's largest operating battery storage facility opened in Ontario just before the first ministers' meeting — a project conceived by the Six Nations of the Grand River Development Corp, with a 70 per cent Indigenous workforce. One of the most powerful nation-building, Trump-proofing projects is an East-West electricity grid that moves clean power when it's needed. Since the 1960s, we have built our electricity grids North-South to export power to the US. We've neglected East-West connections that would unite our country and boost our economy. It's time to change that. Consider Alberta and BC. Alberta has world-class wind and solar potential. BC has massive hydroelectric capacity. Connecting their grids means clean Alberta power will flow to BC when the wind blows and the sun shines. When the wind dies down and day turns to night, then BC's power will flow back to Alberta. That's a system built to last. Nova Scotia is another case in point. The province has vast offshore wind potential — enough to send power across Eastern Canada, including the markets and manufacturing centres of Quebec. But without links between the provinces, that energy won't reach the places it's needed. This isn't just about megawatts. It's about the country we want to build. Do we want short-term projects that lock us into pollution and geopolitical risk, or long-term infrastructure that strengthens Canada's independence and economic staying power? It also means meaningful partnership with Indigenous communities whose lands and rights are too often trampled when governments rush major projects. True partnership, based on consent, is moral, constitutional and smart. It leads to better designed projects, fewer delays and shared prosperity. At its best, Canada is a country built on evolving agreements between nations — Indigenous and non-Indigenous. We can live up to that vision by ensuring Indigenous peoples are full partners in building a clean energy future — indeed, they have been leading in the field in Canada for years. Prime Minister Carney is right that we are making decisions in a 'hinge' moment for the country. We're deciding what kind of projects we will fund and fast-track. We can keep pouring public money into unneeded pipelines. Or, we can build the infrastructure to connect our clean power and secure our long-term prosperity. Don't let Canada burn. Canada needs energy that's built to last: clean, reliable and built in partnership with the communities that host it.
