EPA's Lee Zeldin publishes facts page debunking claims that ‘chemtrails' alter weather
In a video message accompanying the launch, Zeldin said the new webpages were written to inform 'anyone who's ever looked up to the streaks in the sky and asked, 'What the heck is going on?''
'We did the legwork, looked at the science, consulted agency experts, and pulled in relevant outside information to put these online resources together,' he added.
Advertisement
'Everything we know about contrails to solar geoengineering will be in there.'
The EPA website explains how condensation trails, or 'contrails,' are common exhaust clouds left behind by high-altitude aircraft and visible to Americans gazing up at the sky 'for the same reason that you can see the exhaust from your vehicle or your own breath on a cold day.'
4 In a video message accompanying the launch, EPA administrator Lee Zeldin said the new webpages were written to inform 'anyone who's ever looked up to the streaks in the sky and asked, 'What the heck is going on?''
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Advertisement
'Contrails are a normal effect of jet aircraft operations and have been since its earliest days of air travel,' the agency stated. 'If you are seeing a lot of contrails in your area it is because there are a lot of jet aircraft flying overhead.'
By contrast, according to the EPA, 'chemtrails' is 'a term some people use to inaccurately claim that contrails resulting from routine air traffic are actually an intentional release of dangerous chemicals or biological agents at high altitudes for a variety of nefarious purposes, including population control, mind control, or attempts to geoengineer Earth or modify the weather.'
Low-altitude, propeller aircraft disperse chemicals at times, but only 'for legitimate purposes like firefighting or farming,' the agency said on its website.
'The federal government is not aware of there ever being a contrail intentionally formed over the United States for the purpose of geoengineering or weather modification,' it added.
Advertisement
4 Zeldin clarified: 'The enthusiasm for experiments that would pump pollutants into the high atmosphere has set off alarm bells here at the Trump EPA.'
Getty Images
'The enthusiasm for experiments that would pump pollutants into the high atmosphere has set off alarm bells here at the Trump EPA,' Zeldin noted in his video, adding that his staff have been 'seeing headlines about private actors and even governments looking to blot out the sun in the name of stopping global warming' — despite the federal government not attempting any small- or large-scale solar geoengineering.
Only one private company, South Dakota-based Make Sunsets, has experimented in the US with solar geoengineering through what is known as stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI) and marine cloud brightening (MCB) to potentially lower the Earth's temperature.
Those kinds of research are distinct from weather modification — the most common of which is cloud seeding — that the US government has been involved with in the past.
Advertisement
4 Most cloud seeding is carried out to learn how to combat heavy droughts and 'primarily funded at the state or local level,' according to a December 2024 Government Accountability Office report.
AP
In 1947, a public-private partnership between branches of the US military and General Electric Laboratories dumped dry ice into a hurricane near Florida's coastline, but there's been no indication then or since that such tinkering could modify a storm's intensity.
A classified Pentagon project, dubbed 'Operation Popeye,' also tried 'to extend monsoon season' during the Vietnam War 'to disrupt supply routes in North Vietnam and Laos.'
Most cloud seeding is carried out to learn how to combat heavy droughts and is 'primarily funded at the state or local level,' according to a December 2024 Government Accountability Office report.
Some states — including Florida and Tennessee — have passed laws prohibiting activities to change temperatures or modify the intensity of the sunlight or the weather more generally.
4 Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) promised earlier this month to introduce 'a bill that prohibits the injection, release, or dispersion of chemicals or substances into the atmosphere for the express purpose of altering weather.'
ALAA BADARNEH/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock
There have also been efforts at the federal level, with Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) promising earlier this month to introduce 'a bill that prohibits the injection, release, or dispersion of chemicals or substances into the atmosphere for the express purpose of altering weather, temperature, climate, or sunlight intensity.'
'It will be a felony offense,' declared the Georgia Republican, claiming the bill's text matches legislation already passed in Florida. 'I have been researching weather modification and working with the legislative counsel for months writing this bill.'
Advertisement
Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. responded to a viral video last August claiming to show the dispersal of chemicals into the atmosphere as a 'crime' that he would 'stop' for good.
At an April 29 town hall event with TV host Dr. Phil McGraw, Kennedy blamed the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) for possibly spraying bromium, aluminum, and strontium into the sky.
'A lot of it now is coming out of the jet fuel. You know, those materials are put in jet fuel. I'm going to do everything in my power to stop it,' he told a concerned audience member.
Advertisement
'EPA shares many of the same concerns when it comes to potential threats to human health and the environment, especially from solar geoengineering activities,' Zeldin declared in his video message.
'Prior to now, EPA has never been this proactive to raise awareness about concerns with geoengineering and to stop this activity from being scaled up.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
26 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Anna Paulina Luna Tells Joe Rogan About Her UFO Experience in Air Force
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. During an interview with Joe Rogan on his eponymous Joe Rogan Experience podcast on Wednesday, U.S. Representative Anna Paulina Luna recounted her experience with an unidentified flying object (UFO) while serving in the Air Force. Newsweek reached out to Luna's office for comment via email. Why It Matters Luna, a Florida Republican, has been among lawmakers calling for greater transparency from the federal government, including on UFO investigations. Questions about UFOs have captivated the American public for decades. While many people may associate UFOs with aliens, the government has generally focused on whether the objects are from U.S. adversaries and pose national security risks in its investigations. The government has never confirmed the existence of extraterrestrial life, but theories about the possibility of life outside the planet endure. A YouGov poll from September 2024 found that a majority of Americans—53 percent—believe aliens definitely or probably exist. That poll surveyed 1,135 adults from September 17 to September 20, 2024, and had a margin of error of plus or minus 3.9 percentage points. What To Know On the podcast, Luna, 36, told Rogan that during her time at Portland Air National Guard—where she worked as an airfield manager—she encountered an unidentified anomalous phenomenon (UAP). In efforts to describe a broader range of unexplained sightings, the U.S. government shifted to the term UAP in lieu of UFO, as the latter refers specifically to flying objects. Luna said an airspace incursion occurred one day while she was working. But when she asked a pilot for more information, she said they told her they were not allowed to talk about it, she told Rogan. "No one really wanted to address it, and so from what I gathered, that had likely been a UAP," she said. "So that kind of was my perspective." She said she did not look at it with a "crazy lens of perspective" because she believes "you never know if we're the only ones out there, essentially." U.S. Representative Anna Paulina Luna attends a House Oversight Subcommittee hearing on April 1 in Washington, D.C. U.S. Representative Anna Paulina Luna attends a House Oversight Subcommittee hearing on April 1 in Washington, asked why she did not assume it could have been another country's military craft, but Luna said the way the pilot discussed it made her believe otherwise. "He didn't want to, from what I gather, get taken off flight status, and he was like, 'I really can't discuss it. We couldn't identify it, essentially.' And it had outperformed them," Luna said. The Florida Republican leads a House Oversight Committee on "disclosure," which focuses on government transparency on matters from UFOs to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. She said the task force was formed after pilots at Eglin Air Force Base came forward to accuse the Air Force of covering up instances of UAP incidents. The panel's investigations have indicated there is technology out there that "would rival what we know currently with physics" and that the U.S. does not have "the ability to reproduce" it. What People Are Saying Luna also said on the podcast: "Based on the photos that I've seen, I'm very confident that there's things out there that have not been created by mankind." The Department of Defense All-Domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) wrote in a June 2024 report: "It is important to underscore that, to date, AARO has discovered no evidence of extraterrestrial beings, activity, or technology." What Happens Next Luna's task force will continue exploring questions about UAPs and other mysteries that have fueled concerns over government transparency.
UPI
2 hours ago
- UPI
New study highlights inconsistencies in defining long COVID
The medical field still lacks a clear answer as to what constitutes long COVID, despite hundreds of published studies and millions of sufferers worldwide, a new study says. File Photo by Shou Sheng/EPA Do you suspect you have long COVID, but aren't sure? The answer you get will largely hinge on whom you ask, a new study says. The medical field still lacks a clear answer as to what constitutes long COVID, despite hundreds of published studies and millions of sufferers worldwide, researchers reported Tuesday in JAMA Network Open. The definition of long COVID varies so widely that the percentage of people identified as having the ailment can differ dramatically, making it harder to properly diagnose and treat patients, researchers said. "The findings highlight the need for a standard definition for long COVID," lead researcher Lauren Wisk, an assistant professor of medicine at UCLA's David Geffen School of Medicine, said in a news release. A number of major organizations like the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine have advanced their own definitions for long COVID, but none has stuck and all feature some flaws, researchers said in background notes. For example, the National Academies' definition, released in 2024, is extremely broad and does not require lab confirmation that a person actually had an initial COVID-19 infection, researchers said. For the study, researchers applied five published long COVID definitions from previous studies to a group of more than 4,500 COVID patients being tracked as part of an ongoing research project. The prior studies took place in the U.S., U.K., Netherlands, Sweden and Puerto Rico. The five definitions differed by symptom duration, ranging from four weeks to six months, researchers said. The definition also varied by the number of potential symptoms, from nine to as many as 44. The percentage of patients with long COVID varied from 15% to 42%, depending on which definition had been used, results showed. These differences can lead doctors to miss legitimate long COVID cases while misdiagnosing others who actually don't have the syndrome, said senior researcher Dr. Joann Elmore, a professor at David Geffen School of Medicine. "Without a shared definition, we risk mislabeling patients and misguiding care," she said in a news release. "This is more than an academic debate -- it affects real people." These differences are also hampering medicine's ability to figure out long COVID, Wisk said. "If every study on long COVID uses a different definition for identifying who has it, the scientific conclusions become harder to compare across studies and may lead to delays in our understanding of it," she said. "In the absence of an objective measure, like a blood test, or a uniform standard for measuring long COVID, researchers and clinicians will need to decide which definition is best suited for their scientific question and be more transparent about the potential limitations of using a more versus less restrictive definition," Wisk added. More information The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has more on long COVID. Copyright © 2025 HealthDay. All rights reserved.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Scientists tout potential weight loss advance using gene technology
There could be new hope for people aiming to fight obesity following a research breakthrough identifying certain microproteins that store fat. In findings published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) in the US, the team from the California-based Salk Institute for Biological Studies said that the microproteins "could potentially serve as drug targets to treat obesity and other metabolic disorders." The findings could prove particularly useful for people who struggle with other treatments such as lifestyle changes, bariatric surgery or courses of drugs such as Ozempic and Wegovy. "The obesity rate has more than doubled in the last 30 years, affecting more than one billion people worldwide," the Salk Institute warned, reminding that being overweight is linked to "other metabolic disorders" such as diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, chronic kidney disease, and cancers. Microproteins, according to the team, are "an understudied class of molecules found throughout the body that play roles in both health and disease." The team believes the findings are noteworthy because they entailed the use of CRISPR gene editing to screen thousands of fat cell genes to try to find genes "that likely code for microproteins that regulate either fat cell proliferation or lipid accumulation." "We wanted to know if there was anything we had been missing in all these years of research into the body's metabolic processes," says Salk's Victor Pai. Solve the daily Crossword
