NFL coach Jim Harbaugh reflects on White House visit
Speaking at the opening of Chargers training camp, the 61-year-old former NFL quarterback said it was Trump's engagement and observations that made their recent Oval Office meeting so memorable.
'He's super observant,' Harbaugh told reporters of Trump. 'Really engaged.' Harbaugh and his brother, Baltimore Ravens head coach John Harbaugh, were recently spotted leaving the White House , leading to speculation the two had met with Trump.
Soon after, Outkick's Clay Travis posted a photo online showing the brothers with Trump, NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang, U.S. trade representative Jamieson Greer and U.S. commerce secretary Howard Lutnick in the Oval Office. 'There's a lot of gratitude there to be invited to the White House to meet the president with my family, my mom and dad,' Harbaugh told reporters.
'President Trump was just great to my mom and dad. That meant so much. My brother John, his daughter Allison, my two daughters [Addison and Katherine], my sister Joanie and niece Ainsley. So there was nine of us and it was great. 'I mean, who gets invited to the White House with eight other family members and doesn't go?' Harbaugh asked. 'Nobody.'
Harbaugh also said there is a 'cool factor' in meeting important people. 'Pope Francis, can't leave him out,' Harbaugh said. 'Not a president but doesn't get any higher, doesn't get any better than Pope Francis. I think seven presidents, four first ladies, I've caught 22 foul balls in games. Legit … I'm really proud of that.
As for the details of the Harbaugh family meeting with Trump and Lutnick, the Chargers' head coach said it was a first-time encounter for everyone involved. And although it was intended to be brief, Trump wasn't rushing him out the door.
'Met President Trump at 4:30, 4:45, and then it was after 5, and we were still talking,' he said. 'You could tell he wasn't going to be the first to leave. I'm sure he wanted to go get dinner or something.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
21 minutes ago
- The Independent
The Latest: Harvard heads to court in $2.6B lawsuit against Trump administration
Harvard University is in federal court Monday to make the case that President Donald Trump's administration illegally cut $2.6 billion from the storied college. It's a pivotal moment in the school's battle against the federal government. If U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs decides in the university's favor, the ruling would reverse a series of funding freezes that later became outright cuts as the administration escalated its fight with the nation's oldest and wealthiest university. Such a ruling, if it stands, would revive Harvard's sprawling scientific and medical research operation and hundreds of projects. Harvard's lawsuit accuses the administration of waging a retaliation campaign against the university after it rejected a series of demands in an April 11 letter from a federal antisemitism task force. Here's the latest: However, even with the nation's largest endowment at $53 billion, the university has warned it can't absorb the full cost of the federal cuts. Federal agencies say grants can be scrapped if they no longer align with government policies In court filings, Harvard has said the government 'fails to explain how the termination of funding for research to treat cancer, support veterans, and improve national security addresses antisemitism.' The Trump administration denies the cuts were made in retaliation, saying the grants were under review even before the April demand letter was sent. It argues the government has wide discretion to cancel contracts for policy reasons. Hearing begins in Harvard's lawsuit over funding cuts A lawyer for Harvard opened the hearing by saying the Trump administration violated the university's First Amendment rights by cutting more than $2.6 billion in federal funding. Steven Lehotsky said the government conditioned research grants on Harvard, 'ceding control' to the government over what is appropriate for students and faculty to say. US envoy doubles down on support for Syria's government and criticizes Israel's intervention A U.S. envoy doubled down on Washington's support for Syria's new government, saying Monday there is 'no Plan B' to working with it to unite the country still reeling from years of civil war and wracked by new sectarian violence. In an exclusive interview with The Associated Press, Tom Barrack also criticized Israel's recent intervention in Syria, calling it poorly timed and saying it complicated efforts to stabilize the region. Barrack is ambassador to Turkey and special envoy to Syria, with a short-term mandate in Lebanon. He spoke in Beirut following more than a week of clashes in Syria's southern province of Sweida between militias of the Druze religious minority and Sunni Muslim Bedouin tribes. Tom Barrack, who is ambassador to Turkey and special envoy to Syria and also has a short-term mandate in Lebanon, told The Associated Press that Israel's intervention in the latest round of conflict in Syria had further complicated matters. (AP Video shot by Fadi Tawil; Production by Abby Sewell) Syrian government forces intervened, ostensibly to restore order, but ended up siding with the Bedouins before withdrawing under a ceasefire agreement with Druze factions. Hundreds have been killed in the fighting, and some government fighters allegedly shot dead Druze civilians and burned and looted homes. Neighboring Israel intervened last week on behalf of the Druze, who are seen as a loyal minority within Israel and often serve in its military. Israel launched dozens of strikes on convoys of government forces in Sweida and struck the Ministry of Defense headquarters in central Damascus. Over the weekend, Barrack announced a ceasefire between Syria and Israel. Syrian government forces have redeployed in Sweida to halt renewed clashes between the Druze and Bedouins, and civilians from both sides were set to be evacuated Monday. ▶ Read more about the U.S. support for Syria's new government Trump threatens to hold up stadium deal if Washington Commanders don't switch back to Redskins Trump is threatening to hold up a new stadium deal for Washington's NFL team if it does not restore its old name of the Redskins, which was considered offensive to Native Americans. Trump also said Sunday that he wants Cleveland's baseball team to revert to its former name, the Indians, saying there was a 'big clamoring for this' as well. The Washington Commanders and Cleveland Guardians have had their current names since the 2022 seasons, and both have said they have no plans to change them back. Trump said the Washington football team would be 'much more valuable' if it restored its old name. His latest interest in changing the name reflects his broader effort to roll back changes that followed a national debate on cultural sensitivity and racial justice. The Commanders and the District of Columbia government announced a deal earlier this year to build a new home for the football team at the site of the old RFK Stadium, the place the franchise called home for more than three decades. ▶ Read more about Trump's attempt to strongarm the NFL team
The Independent
21 minutes ago
- The Independent
What order? Trump team ignoring 1 in 3 major judicial rulings against them, analysis finds
Multiple federal court judges have accused the Trump administration of deliberately defying court orders by being slow to respond, misrepresenting facts in filings, and not taking prompt action as President Donald Trump continues an unprecedented campaign to expand his executive authority. In an analysis of 165 court orders filed against the Trump administration, the Washington Post found that it was accused of resisting court orders in at least 57 of those cases – approximately 34 percent. Since taking office, Trump has sought to implement his agenda as swiftly as possible, particularly in cases involving his immigration policies and attempts to drastically reduce the federal workforce. Despite multiple district court judges issuing temporary injunctions to stop the administration from deporting immigrants without due process or sending them to third countries they've never been to, filings indicate the administration has continued its efforts. This has, most notably, occurred in the case involving Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran immigrant who was previously granted permission to remain in the U.S. by a court. The administration inadvertently sent Abrego Garcia to a maximum security prison in El Salvador, under accusations that he was a gang member. Multiple courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court, ordered the administration to 'facilitate' Abrego Garcia's return, yet officials made no swift efforts – leading to a judge's admonishment. 'Defendants have failed to respond in good faith, and their refusal to do so can only be viewed as willful and intentional noncompliance,' Judge Paula Xinis, appointed by former president Barack Obama, said after the administration failed to provide updates on how it was returning Abrego Garcia. It was just one of several immigration cases in which judges have raised concerns about the administration not following orders. In April, D.C. Judge James Boasberg, appointed by Obama, admonished the administration for 'willful disobedience of judicial orders' after they did not comply with his order to turn around planes carrying dozens of people to a prison in El Salvador. 'The Constitution does not tolerate willful disobedience of judicial orders — especially by officials of a coordinate branch who have sworn an oath to uphold it,' Boasberg wrote. Accusations against the administration have also occurred in cases involving the federal workforce. Also in April, Judge Amy Berman Jackson, appointed by Obama, raised 'significant grounds for concern' that the administration was deliberately disobeying her order to keep more than 1,000 employees with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. 'There is reason to believe that the defendants simply spent the days immediately following the Circuit's relaxation of the Order dressing their RIF in new clothes, and that they are thumbing their nose at both this Court and the Court of Appeals,' Jackson wrote. The Independent has asked the White House for comment. Courts can hold the administration accountable with contempt hearings for noncompliance but they're traditionally slow to bring such action because many of the rulings are being appealed. Hearings in which a party is found noncompliant can result in fines or imprisonment. But the U.S. Marshal Service, a federal law enforcement agency tasked with serving as security for the federal judiciary, can serve subpoenas or warrants as well as make arrests when indicated by a court. But some experts raised concerns that, under Trump's authority, the Marshal Service would not carry-out those orders. Trump and his officials consistently lash out against judges who rule against them, misrepresenting them as Democratic and far-left extremists. A vast majority of the accusations have been brought by Democratic-appointed judges in immigration cases, but a handful of Republican appointees, including two judges tapped by Trump, have also either accused or raised questions about the administration's compliance. Jessica Roth, a former federal prosecutor and professor at Cardozo School of Law, told The Hill in April that it was 'deeply distressing' to see lawyers for the government act this way. 'This is extremely unusual behavior, both from the administration and from the lawyers representing the administration in court, and it's deeply distressing to see the behavior from these Department of Justice lawyers, which is not the norm for how Department of Justice lawyers conduct themselves in court,' Roth told The Hill.
Daily Mirror
22 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Why Morgan Gibbs-White didn't travel with Nottingham Forest squad for pre-season in Portugal
Tottenham are still in the dark over Morgan Gibbs-White's future after Nottingham Forest quickly shut down his move to north London over claims of an "illegal approach", despite activating his £60m release clause Nottingham Forest star Morgan Gibbs-White has not travelled with the team for their pre-season camp in Portugal due to a "personal matter", amid his club's ongoing transfer row with Tottenham. Spurs and Forest began a dispute over Gibbs-White after the north London club triggered his £60m release clause and even set up a medical for the England international. But Forest quickly slammed the brakes on the deal and claimed that Tottenham had not been granted permission to the speak to the player - saying they would be consulting their lawyers after their "illegal approach". Forest have since reported Spurs to the Premier League, with the dispute ongoing and the move considered off as things stand - though the move could yet be resurrected later down the line. Gibbs-White has since returned to training but is understood to be keen on joining Thomas Frank's men - and reportedly wanted his future solved by this week, before Forest jetted out to Portugal. Gibbs-White did not board the plane heading to their pre-season training camp on Monday. His fiancee, Britney De Villiers, posted a photo from a hospital bed on her Instagram on Sunday night. De Villiers, who is heavily pregnant, uploaded the picture with the caption: "To all the mamas who are dealing with or have dealt with a high risk pregnancy, my heart really goes out to you and I want you to know you're not alone. "This has been one of the hardest things I've dealt with and I just don't really remember a time I wasn't overwhelmed with stress." It's understood Forest have allowed Gibbs-White to stay with his family. He is expected to join up with the rest of his Forest team-mates later this week once he is ready. He played the first half of Forest's 0-0 draw at Chesterfield last week and was given a warm reception by fans. It's understood the 25-year-old has displayed an exemplary attitude amid the transfer saga but that he still wants clarity on his future either way. Gibbs-White has less than two years remaining on his deal at the City Ground and has shown no indication he wants to renew his contract amid the huge interest in his signature - including from Manchester City. It's believed Tottenham are considering submitting a second bid of £65m in the hopes it would change Forest's position, but it's not yet clear whether the club would be open to negotiations amid the fierce row. Forest have sold Anthony Elanga to Newcastle for £55m and are reluctant to lose two key players in the same transfer window.
