Bill making changes to ballot design faces broad opposition during hearing
Lawmakers want to revamp primary ballots. One critic called the plan "a step back for democracy in New Jersey." (Photo by Jennifer Peacock | Assembly Republican Office)
Lawmakers on a Senate panel on Thursday unanimously approved a bill to codify changes to New Jersey's ballot design over the opposition of more than a dozen witnesses.
The bill approved by the Senate Judiciary Committee would require New Jersey ballots to organize candidates by office sought — eliminating the controversial and potentially unconstitutional ballot design known as the county line — and would end elections for state party officials.
Critics opposed provisions that would allow candidates running on a slate to have their ballot positions drawn together, warned alphanumerical markers proposed by the bill could be abused, and repeated calls for randomized electronic ballot draws to replace draws conducted now by hand.
'The bill is not a simple technical change. It is a step back for democracy in New Jersey,' Jocelyn Wallace told the committee.
The move follows a March 2024 order issued by U.S. District Court Judge Zahid Quraishi that found New Jersey's system of county-line ballots, which grouped party-endorsed candidates for separate offices into a single row or column, is likely unconstitutional. Critics of the county line said it gave party-backed candidates an insurmountable advantage over insurgent challengers.
The Assembly in December gave overwhelming approval to a similar bill. Like the Assembly bill, the Senate's measure would allow candidates running as a group to have their ballot positions determined by a single draw, rather than multiple individual draws. Multiple witnesses said Thursday that lawmakers should remove that provision, saying it would disadvantage candidates seeking office on their own.
'This unfair choice — either associate with others or stand alone — creates an optical disadvantage for those who run independent,' said Hoboken Mayor Ravi Bhalla, a Democrat who is seeking an Assembly seat this year.
Others railed against new provisions that would label candidates with markings based on their ballot position — 1A for a candidate drawn to be first on the ballot among their opponents, for example. Most critics said the markings would serve no purpose other than to clutter the ballot and allow campaigning divorced from the actual candidate.
'It's not a lottery ticket, right? We're not giving people their locker combination. We need people to campaign based on the individuals and the office they're seeking. We should not have numbers on the ballot. It's completely extraneous,' said Kate Delaney, president of South Jersey Progressive Democrats.
Others alleged these markings would enable clerks to maintain a form of the county line by manipulating ballot draws.
In New Jersey, ballot positions are hand-drawn by county clerks, and such draws are sometimes less than random. Neither chamber has taken up advocates' suggestion to require randomized electronic ballot draws and rotating ballot positions.
The committee began taking testimony on the ballot design bill more than four hours after its scheduled start time and after two separate recesses. A number of witnesses had already left when they were called to testify.
The Senate's bill — and the amendments the panel made to the Assembly bill — would remove primary elections for members of the Democratic and Republican state committees, handing their elections over to partisan county committee members.
'Even if there's no ill intent, this leaves the public asking why,' said Jesse Burns, executive director of the League of Women Voters of New Jersey, adding, 'This feels a little bit like a bait and switch.'
The Senate bill maintains language that would bar candidates from using a slogan that includes the name of a candidate for a separate office. This provision is broadly viewed as targeting Jersey City Mayor Steve Fulop, a Democrat running for governor this year who is recruiting a slate of Assembly candidates. Under the bill, those candidates would not be able to use Fulop's name in their slogans.
Another controversial provision in both bills would allow the secretary of state to bar multiple candidates from using similar slogans. Neither chamber's bill makes clear how the secretary of state would determine whose slogan to invalidate when two slogans are similar, though both versions would allow for candidates whose slogans are denied to challenge the decision in Superior Court.
The Senate Judiciary Committee approved separate legislation that would allow New Jersey municipalities and counties to print legal notices in digital editions of newspapers — rather than only in physical ones — through June 30.
The measure would also require media outlets that publish public notices to disclose data regarding subscribers, page views, and sales to the state.
The measure is the latest to attempt to conform public notices required by the state's Open Public Meetings Act with an increasingly bare print media landscape. Towns and counties have worried they may be unable to comply with the sunshine law as print circulation declines or ceases altogether.
Though concern over the future of legal notices has simmered for years, it boiled over in October after the owner of the Star-Ledger said it would stop printing it and other papers it owns. The Star-Ledger's last print edition was published on Feb. 2, meaning many towns in New Jersey no longer have a daily newspaper that would publish their legal notices.
In December, lawmakers passed and Gov. Phil Murphy signed legislation that allows local governments to print legal notices in digital newspapers, but that allowance is due to expire on March 1, and lawmakers have yet to reach a more permanent solution on digital notices.
The committee on Thursday approved a separate bill that would expand early voting in New Jersey's primaries to six days.
The bill comes as the state prepares to elect a new governor, with six Democrats and at least five Republicans vying for their party's nomination in the June primaries.
Presently, New Jersey's primary early-voting period runs for three days in years without a presidential election, from the Friday before Election Day to the Sunday before Election Day. In years with a presidential election, early voting begins the Wednesday before Election Day.
The bill, which is sponsored by Sen. Brian Stack (D-Hudson), would make early voting run from the Wednesday before Election Day to the Sunday before Election Day regardless of who's on the ballot.
As introduced, the bill would have allowed 10 days of early voting but was amended Thursday to only allow for six.
Nearly 1.2 million New Jerseyans cast early in-person ballots in 2024's general election.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Looking ahead to Missouri special session, Show Me Sports Investment Act
KANSAS CITY, Mo. — The Missouri General Assembly's special session reconvenes Monday, and it's the House side of the rotunda's turn in Jefferson City. The state Senate passed a trio of bills last week, one providing a plan to fund up to half of stadium projects for the Chiefs or Royals or Cardinals in St. Louis. The Missouri State House will consider the Show Me Sports Investment Act. The stadium funding bill sets the framework for the Royals and the Chiefs to pay back some of the costs for new and renovated venues. Construction bonds would be paid back using tax money generated at the stadiums and would cover up to 50% of the cost to build it. The teams would have to qualify to have access to that money. The stadiums would need to be built for football or baseball, have more than 30,000 seats, and cost at least half a billion dollars. On Sunday, Rudi Keller, the deputy editor of the Missouri Independent, discussed what could happen as the special session continues this week. Kansas City superheroes assemble behind local child battling cancer 'A member of the House budget Committee who will consider the spending bill on Tuesday said there is an assumption the House will pass this, and that's correct. I also talked to the Chair of the House Budget Committee earlier today, and it turns out he's not going to be demanding anything new. So as long as there aren't serious demands that endanger the bill from the House, much as the way demands from Senators resulted in a change to the call, I'm anticipating this will go relatively smoothly this week,' Keller said on 4 The People. The stadium funding bill does not have the words 'Royals' or 'Chiefs' in it, but a big reason for the calling of this special session was to find a way to keep both teams in the state and counter the plans of Kansas lawmakers. Nearly a year ago, the Kansas legislature approved a bill to utilize STAR bonds to cover stadium construction costs. The deadline for that bill is coming up at the end of June. 'If Kansas believes that we could really be in the conversation, you could see some limited extension,' said Kansas Senate President Ty Masterson. 'The way the law is written, it could be extended for up to a year. I don't see that happening.' You can watch the full conversation with Masterson and Keller here. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


The Hill
3 hours ago
- The Hill
Rand Paul slams Graham's push for Russian sanctions as ‘self-defeating economic warfare'
Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) slammed Sen. Lindsey Graham's (R-S.C.) push for Russian sanctions, calling his bill 'self-defeating economic warfare.' Graham's sanctions bill on Russia would impose a 500 percent tariff on imports from any country that buys Russian oil, gas, uranium and other products. The legislation has more than 80 co-sponsors in the Senate, potentially making it veto-proof. But GOP senators are waiting on President Trump to move ahead with the legislation, and Trump said this week he hasn't even looked at it. Trump has also said he doesn't want to undermine the chances of a peace deal between Russia and Ukraine. Paul, in a series of posts on X on Saturday, said the bill would be ineffective and backfire against efforts to achieve peace, as the war between Russia and Ukraine continues in its fourth year. 'The Graham bill would derail President Trump's efforts to negotiate an end to the war in Ukraine. Self-defeating economic warfare is no way to achieve peace,' Paul said on X. 'This bill won't force China or India to change behavior, but it will impose an effective embargo on ourselves that will hurt American families,' he said. Paul also argued that the bill could hurt U.S. allies and raise gas prices. 'The Graham bill could raise tariffs on allies like Israel and Taiwan to 500 percent and potentially even higher. Why are we punishing our friends while pretending it'll hold Russia accountable? This isn't strategy—it's economic self-sabotage,' he wrote. 'Cutting off Russian oil takes a major source of supply off the market, resulting in higher gas prices. Analysts warned that a U.S. ban on Russian oil could cause prices to hit $160–$200 a barrel. That's $5+ gas at the pump,' he said. Graham, this past week, sought to address some of those concerns by proposing a carveout for his bill to exempt countries that aid in Ukraine's defense. The carveout could help insulate countries in Europe that still import Russian gas and have provided military support for Ukraine, as well as other U.S. partners that have straddled the line between maintaining ties with Moscow and providing assistance to Kyiv. 'A lot of countries still buy Russian oil and gas but less. Some European countries still have relationships with Russia, but they've been very helpful to Ukraine. So I want to carve them out,' Graham told reporters Wednesday. 'I tell China, if you don't want to have a 500 percent tariff, help Ukraine.'


San Francisco Chronicle
3 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Oakland Mayor Barbara Lee promises ‘relentless effort' at community inauguration
Oakland Mayor Barbara Lee promised during a community inauguration Sunday to lead with 'openness, honesty and relentless effort' and invited the community to join her to make the city better. 'If we match hope with hard work, there's nothing that this city can't do, so let's do it,' Lee said on a stage at Jack London Square. 'Let's grab whatever you can grab — a paintbrush, a policy idea, a neighbor's hand, because the next chapter of Oakland starts now.' She added: 'All of you are co-authors of this next chapter.' Lee was elected in April and sworn in last month. The former congresswoman replaced former Mayor Sheng Thao, whom voters ousted in November in a recall fueled by a federal investigation that resulted in bribery charges against her. Thao pleaded not guilty to the charges. Lee takes over as the city confronts a historic budget deficit, public safety concerns, homelessness and illegal dumping, among other issues. By the end of this month, the city must balance its budget, which includes an annual deficit of about $140 million. Lee previously said the city will address the deficit through both short- and long-term solutions, though she did not provide specifics. During her remarks Sunday, after she again took the oath of office, Lee spoke of her work in the first few weeks of her administration. The goal from the start was to 'turn hope into action,' the Democrat told the crowd, which included faith leaders, business owners and other dignitaries, including California Attorney General Rob Bonta, California Lt. Gov. Eleni Kounalakis and San Francisco Mayor Daniel Lurie. Already she's met with faith and business leaders to discuss public safety strategies. She acknowledged that despite violence prevention efforts and a decrease in homicides last year, some residents still don't feel safe. 'We've got to work to change this narrative in Oakland,' she said. Lee also said she traveled to the state Capitol to advocate for the city, 'because Oakland deserves its fair share of state resources,' she said. 'I made it clear: Investing in Oakland lifts the entire Bay Area.' State Sen. Jesse Arreguín, a Democrat whose district includes Oakland, said the city needs a 'proven leader with integrity and experience' to unite the city and region. 'That leader is Mayor Barbara Lee,' he said. Arreguín, who serves as chair of the public safety standing committee, said he's committed to working with Lee to curb crime in Oakland and make the city safer. He pledged to support the city's Ceasefire strategy and other violence-prevention programs. Oakland City Council President Kevin Jenkins called Sunday 'a beautiful day in Oakland.' He noted that Lee is the city's fourth mayor in two years. 'But I think we got it right this time,' he quipped. Jenkins described Lee as a mayor for all, especially Oakland residents 'who don't know where City Hall is.' 'The way she campaigned is the way she's going to govern: with integrity,' he added. Selena Wilson, CEO of the East Oakland Youth Development Center, urged the public to support Lee. 'We must continue to stand with her.' Barbara Leslie, president and CEO of the Oakland Metropolitan Chamber of Commerce, picked by Lee as a co-chair of her transition team, said she can attest that Lee 'hit the ground running.' 'Frankly, my goal is just to keep up,' Leslie said, joined by members of the Rotary Club of Oakland #3 and Oakland Restaurant Collective. 'We are here to support you, as your success is Oakland's success,' Leslie said.