logo
Senior aide of Abu Dhabi Crown Prince was mystery £30m broker in investigated Manchester City sponsorship deal

Senior aide of Abu Dhabi Crown Prince was mystery £30m broker in investigated Manchester City sponsorship deal

New York Times27-03-2025

The mysterious 'Person X' who facilitated sponsorship payments to Manchester City in one of the deals being investigated by the Premier League was, at the time, a key aide of Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan (MBZ), now the ruler of Abu Dhabi.
According to an unpublished 2020 judgement made by UEFA's Club Financial Control Board (CFCB), Manchester City's lawyers name the individual involved in supplying the supposed sponsorship money from state-owned Emirati telecommunications company Etisalat as 'Jaber Mohamed'.
Advertisement
The judgement, which has been seen and authenticated by The Athletic, as well as previously by the makers of a YouTube documentary about Manchester City's legal battle with the Premier League and The Times, states he was 'a person in the business of providing financial and brokering services to commercial entities in the UAE'.
It can now be revealed that, at the time, Jaber Mohamed worked as the General Director of the Crown Prince's Court (CPC), an Abu Dhabi government body that runs the public affairs of the then Crown Prince, MBZ.
Another even more senior figure at the CPC was also on Manchester City's board then too, a position he held for over a decade, raising uncomfortable questions not just about the source of the funding for the sponsorship payments, but also as to whether the payments were known about within the highest seats of power in the UAE.
A post shared by Jaber Mohamed Alsuwaidi (@j_alsuwaidi)
In their 2020 judgement the CFCB concluded that Manchester City were guilty of breaking UEFA's financial rules, finding that payments from Etisalat, facilitated by Jaber Mohamed, were actually 'disguised equity funding'. Equity funding refers to funding that is directly injected into a club by its owners, whose cap is dictated by UEFA financial fair-play rules (FFP). Clubs are required to accurately declare their income annually to comply with FFP regulations.
The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) later overturned that judgement, ruling that the claims related to Etisalat were time-barred. Manchester City have always denied any wrongdoing and insist the transactions were genuine sponsorship payments.
Much of CAS' judgement was redacted due to requests from the parties — including the name of a mysterious 'Person X' who facilitated payments from Etisalat.
For example, in CAS' public summary of the CFCB report, they state that UEFA found that '[X] paid GBP [xxx] towards Etisalat's sponsorship obligations… no sensible explanation has ever been provided by MCFC as to why [City owners] ADUG needed to engage the assistance of [X] to make the payment.'
Advertisement
However, UEFA's unredacted report reveals Person X as 'Jaber Mohamed', finding that he was a central figure in the controversial transaction.
Investigators at UEFA were provided with bank statements containing Jaber Mohamed's name, with the panel stating in their conclusions that one email 'clearly evidences an arrangement under which cash of £15million is to be paid by 'the shareholder' but paid through the bank account of the sponsors… In the event, a payment of £15million was made from the account of Jaber Mohamed to the account of the Club on 10 January 2013, not via Etisalat.'
The panel details: 'two payments of £15million made by Jaber Mohamed on 13 June 2012 and 10 January 2013.'
In concluding their write-up of the Etisalat segment of the judgement, the five-person panel states: 'The Adjudicatory Chamber is comfortably satisfied… [that] the management of the club was well aware that the payments totalling £30million made by Jaber Mohamed were made as equity funding, not as payments for the sponsor on account of genuine sponsorship liabilities.'
UEFA declined to comment on any element of this story when approached by The Athletic.
Jaber Mohamed has uploaded several pictures of himself at Manchester City on his public Instagram page, including posing with former players David Silva, Jesus Navas, and Sergio Aguero during their time at the club. Other pictures show him with chairman Khaldoon Al-Mubarak and the Premier League trophy.
His role within the power structures of the UAE has never previously been publicly identified.
According to a now removed page on the CPC website, Jaber Mohamed was one of the two most senior aides to MBZ as the General Director of the CPC.
He variously spells his surname as Mohammed on the CPC website but as Mohamed on his personal Instagram account — these disparities are not uncommon when translating Arabic into English due to the greater tendency to use double letters in English. The Athletic has authenticated that this is the same man.
Advertisement
Whilst UEFA found that Jaber Mohamed was 'a person in the business of providing financial and brokering services to commercial entities in the UAE', The Athletic has not been able to find evidence of him holding any business or governmental roles beyond the CPC which might explain why he would be asked to provide financial or brokering services to companies linked to Manchester City.
Mohamed and the CPC did not respond to multiple requests for comment.
A post shared by Jaber Mohamed Alsuwaidi (@j_alsuwaidi)
The CPC's website describes Jaber Mohamed's job as acting as the chief operational officer, whose role was to 'oversee the day to day operations […and] also interact with all other divisions, sections, and units that all fall under the auspices of the CPC'.
According to the UAE Cabinet's website, Jaber Mohamed held the role from August 16 2005 to August 16 2022.
More broadly, the CPC states its own role as 'managing the public affairs of the Crown Prince, including his involvement in corporate and philanthropic projects'. It also describes itself as 'an independent entity that enjoys full legal status as a government body'.
According to sources with knowledge of the Premier League's current case against Manchester City, speaking anonymously as they are not authorised to discuss proceedings publicly, Jaber Mohamed's involvement in the transaction led to the role of the CPC, a government body, in facilitating the alleged sponsorship rule breaches becoming a significant line of inquiry for the Premier League as they investigated whether the payments were from the sponsors, Etisalat, or from elsewhere.
But the CPC's involvement also raises wider questions over the extent to which MBZ, given the alleged involvement of members of his court in providing payment, was aware of City's sponsorship arrangements.
Given Manchester City's strong denial of any state involvement in the ownership and control of the club, and the Europe-wide debate surrounding state ownership and control of football clubs, this link to a UAE government body raises uncomfortable questions about the nation's role at the club, which should be of significant interest to the Premier League, whose role it is to oversee such matters.
The Premier League offered no comment when contacted by The Athletic with these concerns.
State ownership and control is currently permitted in the UK game provided that would not raise issues under the Owners' and Directors' Test. However the planned new football regulator is considering implementing rules outlawing state ownership or control of football clubs in the UK.
Manchester City have always insisted that it would be legally inaccurate to describe the club as state-owned. City are majority owned by the Abu Dhabi United Group, the private equity company which is owned by Sheikh Mansour, the vice president and deputy prime minister of the UAE. His brother is MBZ.
A post shared by Jaber Mohamed Alsuwaidi (@j_alsuwaidi)
Adding to the questions to be answered, it can also be revealed that another key figure at City, former board member Mohamed Al Mazrouei, is listed as working at the CPC as the organisation's undersecretary.
This role, according to the CPC, saw him 'determine the strategic direction and the internal policies of the CPC and supervise its implementation', where he 'reported directly to the chairman (MBZ).' He and Jaber Mohamed, at the time of the payments, were the two most senior employees of the CPC.
Advertisement
According to the UAE Cabinet's website, Al Mazrouei served as undersecretary of the CPC from 2009 to 2022, and is now the Minister of State for Defense. He sat on the City board from January 30 2010 until January 1 2022, just over a year before the Premier League announced they had charged City with at least 115 breaches of financial rules.
In the Premier League's case against Manchester City, which concluded in December, the club are accused of falsely increasing their revenue by inflating sponsorship deals with associated parties, including the deal with Etisalat, and also with hiding some costs by failing to declare some salaries and image-rights payments. They strongly deny any wrongdoing.
A verdict is due in the coming weeks. Either side can appeal the decision, but if found guilty, the range of punishment which City could face is severe, including a points deduction which could relegate the club from the Premier League.
Manchester City did not respond to multiple requests for comment.
(Paul Ellis/AFP via Getty Images)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Spain vs France – Predicted lineup and team news
Spain vs France – Predicted lineup and team news

Yahoo

time37 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Spain vs France – Predicted lineup and team news

Spain take on France in the semi-finals of the UEFA Nations League this evening. The European champions and current Nations League holders face France in Stuttgart, with the winners to meet Portugal in Sunday's final. Advertisement It's the first meeting between the teams since Euro 2024, when La Roja eliminated France in the last four on route to tournament success. Luis de la Fuente's side will be aiming for a repeat, as the Spanish look to maintain their status as Europe's finest. Spain vs France – Predicted lineup and team news Spain team news La Roja remain without Rodri, who missed the majority of the 2024/25 campaign with an ACL injury. The Ballon d'Or winner returned during the Premier League run-in but will remain with Manchester City as he steps up his fitness ahead of the Club World Cup. There are returns to the squad for Isco and Gavi after long absences, with the former in contention to make his first international appearance since 2019. The veteran impressed as part of the Real Betis side that reached the Europa Conference League final. Advertisement Elsewhere, Barcelona forward Ferran Torres is ruled out after undergoing surgery last month. Dean Huijsen is back involved, with the newly-signed Real Madrid defender hoping to add to his two senior caps. Spain predicted lineup Spain predicted XI: Simon; Porro, Cubarsi, Le Normand, Cucurella; Zubimendi, Pedri, Ruiz; Yamal,N. Williams; Morata. When is Spain vs France? Spain face France in the semi-finals of the UEFA Nations League on Thursday 5th June 2025. Kick-off in Stuttgart is 20:00 BST. What TV channel is Spain vs France? Viewers can watch the Nations League match live on Amazon Prime, with coverage of the game available to watch on pay-per-view for £2.49. Advertisement Read – Five international debuts to look out for this month See more – The Premier League transfer stories to watch this week Follow The Football Faithful on Social Media: Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | YouTube | TikTok

Italy Player Ratings vs Norway: Disjointed Azzurri Humiliated in Oslo
Italy Player Ratings vs Norway: Disjointed Azzurri Humiliated in Oslo

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Italy Player Ratings vs Norway: Disjointed Azzurri Humiliated in Oslo

Italy could not have imagined a worse way to commence their 2026 FIFA World Cup qualifying campaign as Norway thrashed them 3-0 in Oslo. A one-sided first half at the Ullevaal Stadium saw the rising Scandinavian superpower set the tone for their first win over the Italians since 2000. Due to their UEFA Nations League duties, Italy didn't feature in World Cup qualifiers in March. After failing to secure a berth at the most prestigious international tournament in the last two editions, the pressure was on Gli Azzurri to start on the front foot. Advertisement However, it was quite the opposite. Buoyed by a brace of multi-goal margin wins over Moldova and Israel, Norway came flying out of the traps. Indeed, Alexander Sorloth put Stale Solbakken's side in front after only 14 minutes. Norway doubled their lead 20 minutes later through Antonio Nusa, while Manchester City superstar Erling Haaland sealed Italy's fate on the brink of halftime. A 3-0 deficit proved unattainable for Italy, whose underwhelming winless streak in all competitions now stands at four matches. Without further ado, let's look at our Italy player ratings. Italy (3-5-1-1) Gianluigi Donnarumma – 3/10 Merely a shadow of the best Champions League goalkeeper for 2024/25, the Italy captain conceded from three out of Norway's four shots on target. It's fair to say that his defenders also let him down. Advertisement Alessandro Bastoni – 3/10 The Inter Milan star's significant dip in form came to the fore in Oslo as he struggled to cope with Haaland's runs behind the lines and Sorloth's aerial strength. Diego Coppola – 6/10 Spalletti's gamble didn't pay off, yet Coppola was arguably Italy's best-performing defender tonight. However, a lack of understanding with his defensive colleagues was evident. Giovanni Di Lorenzo – 3/10 Still hungover after Napoli's Scudetto win, the Partenopei right-back had an awful evening. Deployed as a right center-half, Di Lorenzo was among the worst on the pitch. Destiny Udogie – 4/10 Though Haaland gave him a slip for the third goal, the Tottenham Hotspur left-back had some bright moments, especially in the opposition's half. Not nearly enough, though! Advertisement Sandro Tonali – 5/10 He was supposed to be Italy's driving force in the midfielder, but the Newcastle United talisman saw very few things go his way. His set-piece delivers often led to nothing. Nicolo Rovella – 4/10 Despite leaving his heart and soul on the pitch, his defensive contribution wasn't significant enough to disguise his disheartening performance in the build-up play. Nicolo Barella – 5/10 Seemingly out of steam after Inter's long season, the diminutive midfielder showed flashes of class but lacked his usual sharpness and drive. Davide Zappacosta – 4/10 Atalanta's wingback was largely ineffective on both ends of the pitch. He offered little going forward, rarely troubling the opposition with his crosses and was too often caught out of position defensively Advertisement Giacomo Raspadori – 2/10 A near-anonymous showing from the Scudetto winner! His passing was occasionally sloppy, and he struggled to impose himself in key moments. Mateo Retegui – 3/10 Cut off from the rest of the pack, Serie A's top goalscorer was an idle threat. He was never in a position to put Orjan Nyland to the test and would want to forget this fixture in a hurry.

Fake Sassa grants ‘news' is exploding online. Here's how to spot the lies
Fake Sassa grants ‘news' is exploding online. Here's how to spot the lies

News24

timean hour ago

  • News24

Fake Sassa grants ‘news' is exploding online. Here's how to spot the lies

YouTube channels and fake news websites are pumping out dozens of false stories about Sassa grants and jobs every month. These hoaxes prey on vulnerable recipients, spreading confusion, false hope or panic. Many are clearly fake, Andrew Thompson writes, but they have still managed to infiltrate public discourse and be widely shared. South Africa's social grant system is under digital siege. A flood of fake news targeting the South African Social Security Agency (Sassa) has spread across Facebook, YouTube and a network of low-quality, foreign-run websites. These stories are designed to mislead, confuse or panic grant recipients, often with the aim of generating clicks and ad revenue by preying on vulnerable beneficiaries. YouTube channels with tens of thousands of subscribers and some videos with hundreds of thousands of views have together uploaded hundreds of fake videos this year alone. They claim imminent changes to payouts, onerous new rules, or exciting bonuses. Dozens of websites posing as job boards or news sites have also published false notices about new jobs, grant amounts, pension cuts, and backlogged payments. Screengrab None of these channels have any connection to South African state institutions, yet they continue to reach large audiences and prompt real-world concern, forcing Sassa to issue repeated denials. In May, Sassa issued a media statement highlighting the extent of the problem and warning that it is 'concerned about the mushrooming and the rapid spread of fake news and disinformation targeting the Agency and its services almost daily'. It stressed that it has made no announcements about 'double grants', changes to pension rules, or automatic top-ups, which are among the most popular fake news stories that tend to gain traction. 'Furthermore, reports have been spreading like wildfire that Sassa has announced 'New Rules Could Affect Your Pension' from 10 June. The report has even gone further and announced various dates for different provinces. This is not an official announcement from Sassa,' the cautionary statement reads. How fake Sassa grant news spreads: volume, panic, and false hope The wave of Sassa disinformation in 2025 has followed two broad patterns, regardless of the medium or the outlet disseminating it, and the content is broadly split into two themes: fake job adverts and fake grant updates. The job advertisements regularly go viral. They claim that well-paid government positions requiring no experience are available and often direct users to deceptive forms or clickbait sites that mine data. These regularly appear as images on fake government letterheads that circulate widely on platforms like Facebook, WhatsApp and X. SASSA The fake grant updates employ a more familiar disinformation approach with a different motive. These mostly AI-generated false news articles report on increased or double payments, pension rule changes, or Sassa 'deadlines' that risk non-payment of grants. All are presented without basis, and often spill over from clearly fake websites into public discourse. Fake news websites and YouTube accounts repeatedly publish variations of similar videos and articles, many of which use text-to-speech tools and AI-generated thumbnails to appear convincing. The tone ranges from panic ('rules changing next week!') to false reassurance ('you can still claim your R7 000 today'). Most rely on sheer volume, hoping that one story or job advert will catch on and spread - as many already have. News24's Disinformation Desk has counted hundreds of fake news articles about Sassa currently online, and although many fade into obscurity, an increasing number are breaking through requiring official responses. Screengrab For now, the motive of these platforms appears to be financial gain. Most of the videos are hosted on monetised channels, and the websites link to Google Adwords accounts. If these get enough traction from panicked recipients, they will generate some revenue for the owners. Yet ironically, much of the vitality of this material reveals itself on platforms like WhatsApp without direct links to the source, which do not generate the website owners income but have the same impact on grant recipients. The majority of the Sassa disinformation that gains mainstream traction appears not to have an overt political motive or agenda, yet. Instead, it is riding on the wave of attention afforded by this vulnerable target market, many of whom are understandably deceived by the deluge. Rapid-fire Sassa debunks from the last few months alone News24's Disinformation Desk has identified hundreds of fake news stories and videos targeting Sassa recipients published in the last few months alone. Here are the most prominent examples, with their themes often emulated across other fake news sites: A viral post linking to a website called All Provinces Jobs claimed that 'South African government jobs 2025' were open for applications. The link leads to a fraudulent website not affiliated with any government department. Similar posts appeared on Facebook pages falsely advertising hiring opportunities through Sassa, often featuring job titles and closing dates to lend false credibility and create a sense of urgency. YouTube channels 'SASSA Benefits Updates' and 'Stimulus Sam' have released several dozen videos each about grant payments in South Africa, including that increased Sassa payments would be made in June 2025. The videos utilise text-to-speech narration featuring a vaguely South African accent and footage that is clearly created with generative AI. Both channels are entirely fake. A report hosted on the fake news website Debtcol Council claimed that 'new rules could affect your pension' from 10 June. Sassa has confirmed that this is also false. Another story on that website claimed application backlogs had been cleared, while yet another suggested a new top-up payment was in progress. All are fabricated. A website called Prabh Honda published a story about Sassa grant suspensions, which is entirely baseless and without truth. A piece on Rise Up WV, a website responsible for several prominent fake news items, stated that grant beneficiaries needed to reapply for doubled payments due to 'SASSA system updates'. There is no basis for this in any of Sassa's official communications. Why it matters - and how to protect yourself or family members Many of the intended recipients of these grants are older, economically vulnerable, and may not be experienced with digital literacy or fact-checking online. The combination of desperation and trust in anything that looks official makes this a fertile ground for exploitation via disinformation. These false reports don't just casually mislead - comments beneath even palpably false news items and videos indicate the confusion and desperation many experience about this topic. This fake news also distracts Sassa, which is already stretched in the payment grants, by forcing them to correct disinformation. To stay safe, advise family members of the following: Check only official Sassa channels: Information is reliably published on and Sassa's verified X and Facebook pages. Do not trust any information sent via WhatsApp or Facebook Messenger. Sassa does not communicate important information via forwarded messages. Never enter personal information into a form on a website claiming to offer Sassa job opportunities. Ignore YouTube channels with videos claiming to be the Department of Social Development or Sassa. Sassa's official YouTube page is not used to share news about grants. When in doubt, don't share: spreading false information, even with good intentions, can cause unnecessary panic.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store