Activist 7Square pushes Germany's Nuernberger to consider rival offers
The life-insurance, property and casualty insurance divisions of Nuernberger have underperformed for years, 7Square, which holds an unspecified stake in Nuernberger, wrote in the letter seen by Reuters. Yet the group could be worth as much as 1.6 billion euros ($1.87 billion), it said.
Bloomberg reported on the letter earlier on Tuesday.
Nuernberger did not immediately reply to requests for comment on 7Square's letter. Vienna Insurance Group declined to comment.
Shares of Nuernberger fell 0.7% in Frankfurt on Tuesday, giving it a market value of 700 million euros.
Vienna Insurance Group announced last week it was in exclusive due diligence for a potential takeover of a controlling stake in the German company, without specifying a possible price.
Nuernberger should end discussions with VIG and start a new sales process to explore strategic options, 7Square wrote in the letter.
A sale to the Viennese company would be "extremely disadvantageous and value-destroying for shareholders," it added.
Nuernberger's investors include Munich Re (MUVGn.DE), opens new tab, Hannover Re (HNRGn.DE), opens new tab, Swiss Re (SRENH.S), opens new tab and Japan's T&D Holdings (8795.T), opens new tab.
"We have concrete knowledge of the interest of several strategic investors, who would be interested in acquiring the life-insurance division or the entire Nuernberger Group," 7Square wrote in the letter.
7Square is also calling on Nuernberger to lift transfer restrictions on its shares, which requires the management board to approve significant stock transactions.
As Nuernberger shares are listed on Frankfurt's over-the-counter 'Scale' segment, an acquirer of a majority stake would not be required to make a mandatory offer for the remaining shares, which 7Square said would permanently reduce the value for all shareholders.
7Square advises hedge funds and activist shareholders on publicly listed German companies, occasionally investing itself.
($1 = 0.8570 euros)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Our wine expert's pick of the best Portuguese red wines, from £8
Daily Mail journalists select and curate the products that feature on our site. If you make a purchase via links on this page we will earn commission - learn more I've tasted some excellent supermarket Portuguese offerings this summer – none of that overly extracted, rustic, hot-alcohol feel. One of my choices is just 11%: fresh and vibrant, showing the diversity of reds from this country. My selections also highlight the good wines still found at under £10. With this price category shrinking due to yet more duty and tax rises, it's a pleasure to share quality bottles that are wallet-friendly, too. Ramos Family Reserva Tinto 2023 (13.5%), £11, Morrisons . £11.00 Shop Sedoso Douro 2022 (11%), £8.95, Co-op. This one is lower in alcohol, silky in texture (with cranberry notes) and surprisingly versatile: it even works with salmon and other fish. Pop in the fridge for 20 minutes to enhance its freshness. £8.95 Shop
Sky News
3 hours ago
- Sky News
Whitehall on alert for collapse of Gupta's steel empire
The metals tycoon Sanjeev Gupta is this weekend plotting a controversial deal that would keep him in control of his remaining UK steel operations and avert their collapse into compulsory liquidation – a move that would put close to 1,500 jobs at risk. Sky News has learnt that Mr Gupta is in talks about a so-called connected pre-pack administration of Liberty Steel's Speciality Steel UK (SSUK) arm, which would involve Mr Gupta emerging as the owner of the assets after shedding hundreds of millions of pounds of tax and other liabilities to creditors. Begbies Traynor, the accountancy firm, is understood to be working on efforts to progress the pre-pack deal. This weekend, Whitehall sources said that government officials had stepped up planning for the collapse of SSUK if an already-deferred winding-up petition scheduled to be heard next Wednesday is approved. If that were to happen, SSUK would be likely to enter compulsory liquidation within days, with a special manager appointed by the Official Receiver to run the operations. Mr Gupta's UK business operates steel plants at Sheffield and Rotherham in South Yorkshire, with a combined workforce of more than 1,400 people. Sources close to Mr Gupta could yet secure a further adjournment of the winding-up petition to buy him additional breathing space from creditors. A connected pre-pack risks stiff opposition from Liberty Steel's creditors, which include HM Revenue and Customs. UBS, the investment bank which rescued Credit Suisse, a major backer of the collapsed finance firm Greensill Capital - which itself had a multibillion dollar exposure to Liberty Steel's parent, GFG Alliance - is also a creditor of the company. Grant Thornton, the accountancy firm handling Greensill's administration, is also watching the legal proceedings with interest. On Saturday, a Liberty Steel spokesperson said: "Discussions are ongoing to finalise options for SSUK. "We remain committed to identifying a solution that preserves electric arc furnace steelmaking in the UK-a critical national capability supporting strategic supply chains. "We continue to work towards an outcome that best serves the interests of creditors, employees, and the broader community." Last month, The Guardian reported that Jonathan Reynolds, the business secretary, was monitoring events at Liberty Steel's SSUK arm, and had not ruled out stepping in to provide support to the company. Such a move is still thought to be an option, although it is not said to be imminent. The Department for Business and Trade has been contacted for comment. It has previously said: "We continue to closely monitor developments around Liberty Steel, including any public hearings, which are a matter for the company. "It is for Liberty to manage commercial decisions on the future of its companies, and we hope it succeeds with its plans to continue on a sustainable basis." Wednesday's winding-up petition was filed by Harsco Metals Group, a supplier of materials and labour to SSUK, and is said to be supported by other trade creditors. Mr Reynolds has already orchestrated the rescue of British Steel, the Scunthorpe-based steelmaker, after failing to reach a government aid deal with Jingye Group, the company's Chinese owner. Jingye had been preparing to permanently close Scunthorpe's remaining blast furnaces, prompting Mr Reynolds to step in and seize control of the company in April. The government has yet to make a decision to formally nationalise British Steel, although that is anticipated in the autumn. Tata Steel, the owner of Britain's biggest steelworks at Port Talbot, has agreed a £500m government grant to build an electric arc furnace capable of manufacturing greener steel. Other parts of Mr Gupta's empire have been showing signs of financial stress for years. The Financial Times reported in May that he was preparing to call in administrators to oversee the insolvency of Liberty Commodities. Separately, HMRC filed a winding-up petition against Liberty Pipes, another subsidiary, earlier this month, The Guardian reported. Mr Gupta is said to have explored whether he could persuade the government to step in and support SSUK using the legislation enacted to take control of British Steel's operations. Whitehall insiders told Sky News in May that Mr Gupta's overtures had been rebuffed. He had previously sought government aid during the pandemic but that plea was also rejected by ministers. SSUK, which also operates from a site in Bolton, Lancashire, makes highly engineered steel products for use in sectors such as aerospace, automotive and oil and gas. The company said earlier this year that it had invested nearly £200m in the last five years into the UK steel industry, but had faced "significant challenges due to soaring energy costs and an over-reliance on cheap imports, negatively impacting the performance of all UK steel companies".
Telegraph
4 hours ago
- Telegraph
If Labour gives £2.3bn of our cash to retired British Coal staff, it has truly lost the plot
How big is the black hole in Britain's public finances? The respected think tank National Institute of Economic and Social Research (Niesr) has just forecast a £50bn gap, which the Chancellor will be forced to plug by lower spending or higher taxes. Meanwhile, as Rachel Reeves tries to balance the books by saving every penny, her deputy, Darren Jones, Chief Secretary to the Treasury, casually told Parliament in July that he is 'considering proposals' to hand out £2.3bn of taxpayers' money to the 40,000 members of the British Coal Staff Superannuation Scheme (BCSSS). He added: 'I will be looking at those issues in more detail over the summer, and I hope to say more in the autumn.' What is this possible £2.3bn giveaway? The BCSSS, for above-ground managers, and its sister scheme, the Mineworkers' Pension Scheme (MPS), for those below ground digging out coal, were set up after the coal industry was nationalised in 1947, at a time when it employed 700,000 people. By privatisation in 1994, British Coal had shrunk drastically to just 13,000 staff. The BCSSS and MPS became stand-alone trusts, with the Government guaranteeing all pension entitlements, including annual inflation increases. In return, the Government receives half of any 'surplus' calculated at the three-yearly actuarial valuations, with the other half used to increase pensions. The average BCSSS pension of £15,000 a year is over twice the average MPS pension of £7,000, reflecting much higher pay for British Coal managers compared to the miners. The taxpayers' share of surpluses was also calculated at privatisation, which remained in both schemes as a reserve against poor investment performance. The £2.3bn the Government is now 'considering' giving to BCSSS members is the taxpayers' share of surpluses at privatisation, which under the BCSSS rules will be paid back to the Government in 2033 – in only eight years' time. The BCSSS trustees' argument for a £2.3bn giveaway is that last October, as revealed by Telegraph Money, the Government gave £1.5bn of taxpayers' money to the 112,000 MPS members, boosting their annual pensions by 32pc. This was all part of the rhetoric to end what Labour called an 'historic injustice' and fulfilled Labour's election manifesto pledge, repeated by Ed Miliband at the 2024 Labour Party conference. The BCSSS Trustees' argument simply rests on ' the similarities between MPS and BCSSS'. But the £1.5bn given away to MPS members didn't 'belong' to them in the first place. Just like the BCSSS' £2.3bn, it was the Government's share of surpluses at privatisation. Under the MPS rules it would have been paid back to the Government in 2029. Since privatisation in 1994, all BCSSS and MPS members have received every last penny of the pensions promised to them, including inflation increases. More than that, under the rules set up at privatisation, half of valuation surpluses have been given to members as 'bonus' pensions. To add insult to injury, after receiving the £1.5bn, the MPS trustees are now lobbying for all of any future surpluses to go to members, rather than half going to the Government. And handing over the £2.3bn of taxpayer money to the BCSSS members would not be in exchange for giving up the Government guarantee. If that money is to be handed over, it should at least be on the understanding that BCSSS pensions become a defined contribution plan, entirely dependent on the performance of scheme assets like other private sector schemes. But the trustees say they would 'not consider giving up the guarantee in exchange for the investment reserve… The guarantee does not form part of our discussions with the Government. It will remain in place, whatever decision the Government makes'. This would be an extraordinary case of: 'heads BCSSS members win, tails taxpayers lose'. As guarantor, the Government must step in to make payments if there is a future deficit. Once money is used to increase pensions the only way any future deficit to be plugged is for taxpayers to write a cheque. And because 85pc of BCSSS and MPS assets are in 'risky', that is, not index-linked bonds to match liabilities, any current surplus could easily become a deficit. The Government, and specifically Mr Miliband, still have some serious explaining to do about the £1.5bn already handed over to MPS. If Labour hands over another £2.3bn of taxpayers' money – £3.8bn in all – then surely this government will lose any shred of fiscal credibility left. Rachel Reeves should tell Darren Jones, in plain language, to stop 'considering' this proposal and say a polite 'no' to the BCSSS trustees, and the Labour MPs pushing it.
