logo
An alarming reality: 4% of truckers on U.S. highways lack valid licenses

An alarming reality: 4% of truckers on U.S. highways lack valid licenses

Yahoo20-05-2025

A recent study by trucking expert Adam Wingfield, analyzing the FMCSA database, revealed a troubling trend: approximately 4% of truckers on U.S. highways operate without a valid Commercial Driver's License.
This issue transcends regulatory oversight, posing a serious threat to all who share the road with these massive vehicles. Unlicensed operators handling trucks weighing over 26,000 pounds endanger motorists, passengers, and pedestrians.
Understanding License Requirements
A Commercial Driver's License is a vital certification, ensuring truckers have the training and skills to safely operate large, potentially hazardous vehicles.
Vehicles requiring this license typically include:
Those weighing 26,001 pounds or more
Those transporting hazardous materials
Those carrying 16 or more passengers
Federal and state authorities recognize three main license classes based on vehicle and trailer weight:
Class A: For combined weights of 26,001 pounds or more, with trailers exceeding 10,000 pounds
Class B: For single vehicles of 26,001 pounds or more, with trailers of 10,000 pounds or less
Class C: For vehicles under 26,001 pounds carrying specific cargo or passengers
Specialized endorsements, such as for school buses or hazardous materials, require additional training and testing.
Current State of Trucking Compliance
Data from 2025 Roadcheck Week inspections, also analyzed by Adam Wingfield, reveal concerning patterns. Over 56% of inspected trucks had violations, ranging from minor to severe. The out-of-service rate stood at 19.3%, consistent with the past five years, with a peak of 20.3% in 2022. Inspections averaged 1.74 violations per truck, slightly above the five-year low of 1.65 in 2021.
In the first quarter of 2025, trucking recorded 645 fatal crashes. According to Wingfield, each fatal accident costs an estimated $7.2 million, creating a significant economic burden alongside the human toll.
Consequences of Unlicensed Operation
Operating a truck without proper credentials carries severe legal repercussions, varying by circumstance:
For those never licensed:
Misdemeanor charges
Up to six months in jail
Fines up to $1,000
Ban from operating trucks for up to 120 days
For exceeding license limits:
Similar penalties apply for operating beyond license class or without endorsements, such as air brake certification.
For expired or revoked licenses:
Some states offer renewal grace periods, but driving with an expired license may result in misdemeanor charges. Operating with a revoked license, particularly due to impaired driving, can lead to:
Mandatory jail time
Higher fines
Extended or permanent loss of driving privileges
Public Concerns and Industry Standards
Stricter enforcement of existing regulations could improve highway conditions, making the highways far safer. It would also impact the economics of trucking, likely increasing trucking rates by reducing capacity.
The debunked 'driver shortage' narrative may have prompted lower industry standards to fill roles, contrasting with the historical image of truckers as skilled 'knights of the road.' A four-year trend indicates 4.07% of truckers lack valid licenses, with 4.06% in the current year.
That 4% of truckers lack proper credentials remains a pressing concern for all road users. Given the weight and risk of these vehicles, ensuring operators are fully trained and licensed is critical for regulators and the industry.
Stronger enforcement could enhance outcomes while upholding the professionalism expected of truckers. Addressing unlicensed operation can help restore their reputation as trusted professionals and make highways safer for everyone.
The post An alarming reality: 4% of truckers on U.S. highways lack valid licenses appeared first on FreightWaves.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

FMCSA eliminates DEI rules for $89M in CDL grants
FMCSA eliminates DEI rules for $89M in CDL grants

Yahoo

time6 hours ago

  • Yahoo

FMCSA eliminates DEI rules for $89M in CDL grants

WASHINGTON — State and local government agencies, schools, small businesses, and others eligible for FMCSA's CDL grants will see fewer restrictions tied to the application process than was the case under the previous administration. FMCSA announced on Friday up to $89.4 million available in the latest round of competitive grant funding through its Commercial Driver's License Program Implementation (CDLPI) grant. The grants are aimed at developing, implementing and maintaining CDL programs. As is the case with all competitive grant programs now being run by the Trump administration, including infrastructure grants, the latest round of CDLPI grants eliminates the diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) and climate change requirements mandated under the Biden administration – what Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy refers to as 'woke' and 'Green New Scam' mandates. 'Previously, recipients of this critical safety grant were forced to prioritize climate change and DEI agendas alongside core safety objectives,' FMCSA by eliminating DEI, the agency asserts, 'taxpayer dollars are now fully dedicated to genuine safety improvements, appropriate accountability, and real, measurable outcomes. Potential applicants are instructed to thoroughly review the reformed application guidelines to align with these necessary and refocused priorities.' CDLPI grants help states strengthen compliance with federal safety regulations and enhance the integrity of the National Commercial Driver's License Program, according to the U.S. Department of Transportation. The program 'focuses on the concept that each driver has only one driving record and only one licensing document, commonly referred to as 'One Driver — One License — One Record.'' The National CDL Program also requires states to conduct knowledge and skills testing before issuing a commercial learner's permit and/or a CDL, to maintain a complete and accurate driver history record for anyone who obtains either document, and to impose driver disqualifications as required by be considered for a CDLPI grant, applicants should specify performance goals related to the project. Performance goals for successful CDLPI grant award projects may include, among others: Sustained compliance with rulemakings: Activities that support a state's implementation of federal CDL regulatory requirements, such as medical certification, Drug & Alcohol Clearinghouse, and entry-level driver training requirements. Timely driver history record (DHR) actions: Activities to issue disqualifications, suspensions and downgrades in a timely manner to CLP and CDL holders and post to their DHR, which will allow unsafe drivers to be removed from service. Data quality, accuracy and completeness: Activities that address a state's accuracy and completeness of DHRs, including all conviction and disqualification data, medical certifications, entry-level driver training verification, and knowledge and skills testing information. Innovative approaches to improving CDL issues: Activities that provide a novel technique or approach (program design, use of technology assets, etc.) to benefit national CDL safety and/or improve state driver license agencies' (SDLA) CDL safety data quality, which may include research projects and pilot testing new approaches to improving compliance. Human trafficking recognition, prevention and reporting: Activities that deter and reduce commercial truck-based human trafficking-related activities, and increase human trafficking awareness and training for SDLA, judiciary, and law enforcement staff and other industry stakeholders. Increased testing rates and integrity: Activities that increase a state's capacity for testing and issuing CDLs, including using new technology to ensure that CDL knowledge and skills testing integrity is maintained. Cost savings: Activities that reduce costs for SDLAs through the increased use of automated systems. Reduction in fraudulent CDL activities: Activities that increase the effectiveness of fraud prevention related to driving, medical credentials, skills testing operations and license issuance. Complete proposals must be submitted electronically by July 7. FreightWaves spotlight: CDL issues FMCSA makes up to $90M available in FY2025 grants Trump administration wants to cut FMCSA workforce by 7% Click for more FreightWaves articles by John Gallagher. The post FMCSA eliminates DEI rules for $89M in CDL grants appeared first on FreightWaves.

How to keep DQ files audit-ready
How to keep DQ files audit-ready

Yahoo

time9 hours ago

  • Yahoo

How to keep DQ files audit-ready

Qualifying drivers requires navigating complex Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSRs). Doing this correctly is critical, as non-compliant driver qualification files can result in substantial audit fines and serve as a basis for negligence claims in post-crash litigation. Maintaining audit-ready DQ files isn't just about regulatory compliance—it's essential for protecting your business from financial and reputational damage. Since COVID restrictions have been lifted, FMCSA has prioritized face-to-face audits. After almost two years of increased remote evaluations, on-site screenings have skyrocketed. These comprehensive audits have more than doubled, jumping from nearly 2,000 in 2020 to over 4,400 in 2024. Additionally, FMCSA has increased record-keeping penalties to $1,544 per day, with a maximum penalty of $15,445. This shift is important for carriers to be aware of, as onsite audits are typically more thorough and detailed. Some violations detected during audits are so severe that even a single instance requires immediate corrective action. According to FMCSA's Analysis and Information Online, the most common acute violations regarding driver qualification include: Using a driver with a suspended CDL, disqualified status or multiple CDLs Allowing a driver with more than one CDL to operate a CMV Driving a CMV while disqualified Using an unqualified driver showing as Prohibited on the MVR Using a physically unqualified driver While these acute violations require immediate and specific action, critical violations represent broader issues with the company's recordkeeping and compliance efforts. These violations can add up to create liability issues and downgraded safety ratings. Common critical violations include: Driver applications that are missing, incomplete or non-compliant Lacking documentation of safety performance history from all DOT-regulated employers from the previous three years Motor vehicle records (MVRs) showing drivers not properly licensed for assigned vehicles (wrong class, missing endorsements, restricted/suspended/revoked licenses) When accidents happen, plaintiff attorneys will immediately look into the involved company's safety record. Hiring drivers with questionable safety histories or failing to follow FMCSRs will become the focus of litigation, stacking the deck against the carrier. In order to avoid this outcome, carriers must fulfill their duty to employ qualified and safe drivers. The American Transportation Research Institute's 2022 study, 'Understanding the Impact of Nuclear Verdicts on the Trucking Industry,' found that both defense and plaintiffs' attorneys agree on three key factors for protecting carriers from nuclear verdicts: Crash avoidance is paramount, meeting and exceeding regulations is essential and strict adherence to company policies is critical. 'Don't make it easy for plaintiff's attorneys. They are experts in every aspect of DQ files or they hire experts to find inconsistent execution of policies or blatant non-compliance. Carriers need their own experts to stay defendable,' says Mark Schedler, J. J. Keller's Senior Editor of Transport Management. Headline-making crashes can severely damage a company's reputation and ability to secure future business. Details about what contributed to a crash often become public knowledge. Media coverage of poor hiring practices can result in customers losing trust and wanting to avoid vicarious liability, including being sued because of a carrier's crash while hauling their goods. A comprehensive DQ Checklist should focus on keeping only FMCSA-required driver qualification documents in the file whenever possible. Files are easier to audit when they contain only necessary documentation. Non-required or 'nice to have' documents only add clutter and should be stored elsewhere with appropriate security protocols. 'Nice to have' documents include qualification checklists, documents certifying the driver agrees to follow certain rules, statements of on-duty time and training records for non-required training. While these documents may provide additional information, they should be stored separately from the official DQ file to maintain clarity and compliance focus. 'I am a backpacker with 25 plus years of experience who goes into the wilderness with everything I need to stay safe. I use a checklist for every trip, and I recommend that carriers do the same for every DQ file,' noted Schedler. This checklist created by J. J. Keller includes permanent FMCSA-required items for all drivers, recurring items and those applicable only to drivers operating vehicles requiring a CDL, as well as optional best practices. 'If you are looking at using a third-party expert, J. J. Keller's Managed Services team has an over 160-item checklist that they use to keep DQ files audit ready. That goes a long way to staying defendable,' according to Schedler. While FMCSA allows an acquiring company to accept DQ files from the acquired company, a company won't know what violations they are inheriting without conducting a full audit of these files. Missing or incomplete records could also lead to penalties or legal consequences. The acquiring company assumes responsibility for any deficiencies—even if the violations occurred under previous ownership. Being unaware of compliance gaps creates significant risk if an unqualified driver operates a CMV and becomes involved in a crash, regardless of fault. When moving employees from warehouse or other non-DOT regulated positions to CMV driving roles, companies often miss critical requirements like obtaining a DOT-compliant application per 391.21. These oversights can lead to serious violations and potential liability. Drivers with breaks in employment require new DQ files with updated documentation, though some existing documents may be reused. Carriers must accurately determine whether a driver is a rehire or simply returning from extended time off to ensure proper documentation is maintained. By understanding these common risk scenarios and implementing thorough checklist procedures, carriers can maintain audit-ready DQ files that not only satisfy regulatory requirements but also provide protection against costly fines, litigation and reputational damage. Investing in proper driver qualification management today prevents significant problems tomorrow. The post How to keep DQ files audit-ready appeared first on FreightWaves.

FMCSA Modernizing Complaint System to Fight Freight Fraud, Coercion, Safety Gaps
FMCSA Modernizing Complaint System to Fight Freight Fraud, Coercion, Safety Gaps

Yahoo

time12 hours ago

  • Yahoo

FMCSA Modernizing Complaint System to Fight Freight Fraud, Coercion, Safety Gaps

For years, drivers, brokers and carriers have voiced the same complaint: Filing reports with the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration often feels like yelling into the void. The National Consumer Complaint Database (NCCDB), designed initially to collect reports on bad actors in the supply chain, has been criticized for being clunky, outdated and ineffective. Now, in a low-profile move buried in the Federal Register, the FMCSA is proposing a sweeping overhaul of the NCCDB. The goal? To turn it into a fully modernized system for flagging broker fraud, motor carrier violations, shipper coercion and questionable conduct from substance abuse professionals, medical review officers and others operating under DOT compliance rules. It's not a new regulation, but it might be one of the agency's most important modernization efforts in years. The proposed changes stem from a 2023 Government Accountability Office (GAO) report that slammed the FMCSA's existing complaint system for lacking transparency, accountability and enforcement power. The new framework aims to change that by streamlining how complaints are filed, tracked and resolved and it aims to bring clarity to a marketplace defined by ghost carriers and untraceable the proposal, the NCCDB would get a complete overhaul, making it easier to file complaints, allowing users to track the status of their submissions, and improving data collection methods so that trends, patterns and serial offenders don't fall through the cracks. There's even language allowing carriers and brokers to challenge inaccurate or duplicate data, a nod toward due process in a system that's long lacked it. (This sounds ridiculously familiar to fleets' issues with the lack of due process in the antiquated Data Q system.) At the root, this change is about enforcement, not usability. The FMCSA has stated that the goal is to make complaint data more actionable, linking it directly to safety violations, broker noncompliance and the kinds of coercive behavior that regulators often miss in the field. While many complaints have historically vanished into limbo, the revamped system would increase the chance that they trigger investigations or enforcement when the trucking industry, this could be a quiet turning point. Carriers dealing with coercive shippers or unlicensed brokers may finally have a meaningful place to submit evidence. Drivers who've faced harassment, withheld pay or unsafe working conditions could gain a traceable channel to elevate their concerns. Brokers who play by the rules may benefit from a system that starts calling out the ones who don't. Freight fraud and cargo theft have gotten so bad that private businesses like Freight Validate and the Freight Fraud Task Force have been developed to fight fraud on the front end. In many ways, this feels like a 'clearinghouse' moment for complaints, especially fraud. While it doesn't have the regulatory teeth of the Drug & Alcohol Clearinghouse, the concept is similar: aggregating data, flagging repeat offenders and giving industry players a tool to verify legitimacy before they engage. Still, execution is everything. A digital form means little if it leads to no meaningful action. The FMCSA has opened the door to a smarter system, but it will need real infrastructure and enforcement commitment behind it to succeed. The agency is gathering public comment and refining the proposal based on feedback, with implementation likely to begin in 2026. Given the freight market's growing vulnerability to fraud, ghost operations and regulatory loopholes, many hope this won't just be a paper fix. The post FMCSA Modernizing Complaint System to Fight Freight Fraud, Coercion, Safety Gaps appeared first on FreightWaves.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store