Watchdog appoints interim managers for troubled charity linked to Carrie Johnson
The Aspinall Foundation is facing an investigation by the Charity Commission after it raised 'serious concerns' about the charity's 'governance and financial management'.
Founded in 1984, it runs breeding sanctuaries for endangered animals as well as operating the Howletts and Port Lympne animal parks in Kent, which were set up by gambling club host and animal enthusiast John Aspinall.
Carrie Johnson was appointed head of communications for the foundation in 2021.
The same year, it emerged that the charity paid more than £150,000 to the wife of the chairman of the trustees for 'interior design services'.
The Charity Commission's interim managers – appointed in May this year – will also review whether any trustees or their family members have received any benefit from the charity.
A spokesperson for the regulator said: 'Our inquiry into The Aspinall Foundation is ongoing.
'Towards the end of last year, fresh issues of concern were identified requiring us to embark on a further phase of investigation and our investigators are working hard to pursue these at pace.
'The Commission has now appointed interim managers to The Aspinall Foundation who will work alongside the existing trustees on specific areas in line with the charity's governing document.'
The foundation has been approached for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Those who invested in Castings (LON:CGS) five years ago are up 9.0%
Ideally, your overall portfolio should beat the market average. But every investor is virtually certain to have both over-performing and under-performing stocks. So we wouldn't blame long term Castings P.L.C. (LON:CGS) shareholders for doubting their decision to hold, with the stock down 23% over a half decade. On top of that, the share price is down 5.9% in the last week. However, this move may have been influenced by the broader market, which fell 2.6% in that time. Since shareholders are down over the longer term, lets look at the underlying fundamentals over the that time and see if they've been consistent with returns. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. While markets are a powerful pricing mechanism, share prices reflect investor sentiment, not just underlying business performance. One imperfect but simple way to consider how the market perception of a company has shifted is to compare the change in the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price movement. During the five years over which the share price declined, Castings' earnings per share (EPS) dropped by 16% each year. The share price decline of 5% per year isn't as bad as the EPS decline. So investors might expect EPS to bounce back -- or they may have previously foreseen the EPS decline. The image below shows how EPS has tracked over time (if you click on the image you can see greater detail). Before buying or selling a stock, we always recommend a close examination of historic growth trends, available here. What About Dividends? As well as measuring the share price return, investors should also consider the total shareholder return (TSR). Whereas the share price return only reflects the change in the share price, the TSR includes the value of dividends (assuming they were reinvested) and the benefit of any discounted capital raising or spin-off. Arguably, the TSR gives a more comprehensive picture of the return generated by a stock. In the case of Castings, it has a TSR of 9.0% for the last 5 years. That exceeds its share price return that we previously mentioned. This is largely a result of its dividend payments! A Different Perspective Investors in Castings had a tough year, with a total loss of 16% (including dividends), against a market gain of about 22%. However, keep in mind that even the best stocks will sometimes underperform the market over a twelve month period. Longer term investors wouldn't be so upset, since they would have made 1.7%, each year, over five years. It could be that the recent sell-off is an opportunity, so it may be worth checking the fundamental data for signs of a long term growth trend. While it is well worth considering the different impacts that market conditions can have on the share price, there are other factors that are even more important. Even so, be aware that Castings is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 1 of those is potentially serious... We will like Castings better if we see some big insider buys. While we wait, check out this free list of undervalued stocks (mostly small caps) with considerable, recent, insider buying. Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on British exchanges. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What Alexander Isak's agent said about transfer as Anfield rumors swirl
Alexander Isak's agent recently suggested that the Newcastle United forward is close to taking "the next step" in his career, and it was rumored that one of his representatives was at Anfield on Monday. Liverpool played a double-header against Athletic Bilbao on Monday, and the Reds won 4-1 and 3-2 with two different squads. The Anfield Wrap claimed that one of Isak's agents was at Anfield, sending social media into overdrive. Isak has expressed a desire to leave Newcastle this summer, but the club rejected Liverpool's $145 million offer. Newcastle has since sent an official bid worth $105 million to RB Leipzig for striker Benjamin Sesko, which has sparked mass speculation that Isak may join Liverpool. READ MORE: Harvey Elliott sees Liverpool exit option open up after nightmare injury blow READ MORE: Liverpool transfer news LIVE: Alexander Isak boost, Will Wright joins, Bilbao double action The 25-year-old is represented by Universal Twenty Two, and one of his agents, Gonzalo Gaitan, recently discussed his client and a potential transfer. "We are already studying and analyzing all options, and we may be close to finalizing the next step for the player," Gaitin said, via Saudi Arabian outlet Arriyadiyah. Isak helped Newcastle end a 70-year wait for silverware last season and scored in a 2-1 win over Liverpool in the League Cup Final. Despite achieving hero status, Isak expressed his desire to leave Newcastle in July. Newcastle was in talks with Eintracht Frankfurt striker Hugo Ekitike earlier this summer, with ambitious plans to partner him with Isak. However, Liverpool hijacked the move and signed Ekitike for an initial fee worth $92 million. Despite signing Ekitike, Liverpool then switched its attention to Isak. The striker missed Newcastle's preseason tour due to a reported thigh injury, but it's believed he's pushing to join Liverpool. After making a formal offer, Liverpool has yet to submit an improved bid for Isak. However, should Leipzig accept Newcastle's offer for Sesko, then a record bid could force the club to part ways with Isak. Due to uncertainty surrounding his future, Isak has been training alone since Liverpool's opening bid. Newcastle head coach Eddie Howe hasn't spoken to Isak since the offer was made, but sent him a clear message. After Newcastle's preseason tour in Asia ended, Howe condemned Isak's behavior and warned him that isolated training may continue once the squad returns to England. "You have to earn the right to train with us," Howe told the Daily Mail. "We are Newcastle United. The player has a responsibility here to be part of a team and part of a squad - you have to act in the right way. So that is also at play here. "We will make sure that any player does that to earn the right to train with the group. No player can expect to act poorly and train with the group as normal." Howe also distanced himself from the transfer saga because he focused on Newcastle's preseason tour. "Other people have been dealing with that situation back at home," he said.
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Renewable energy is a big opportunity for our region–we must seize it
East Anglia is at the centre of the UK's renewable energy sector. Take offshore wind alone – we are home to 44% of the UK's existing offshore wind farms. With 3.6 GW already operational and a further 10 GW of projects in the pipeline, we have a crucial role to play. Data from CBI Economics (2025) show that almost one million full-time equivalent (FTE) jobs are currently supported by the clean energy and net zero economy — that includes 83,400 in the East of England. The Labour Government is serious about seizing the opportunity of renewable energy for our country and our region, delivering clean energy jobs for the UK, boosting energy security and economic growth. Recently, I visited Scroby Sands, a wind farm, which lies off the coast of Great Yarmouth with the company RWE. Commissioned in 2004, Scroby Sands powers the electricity needs for approximately 48,000 homes – the equivalent of all the homes in King's Lynn and already provides many jobs. We have even greater potential in East Anglia. The proposed Norfolk Offshore Wind Zone is made up of Vanguard West, Vanguard East, and Boreas. Once up and running, it would be one of the biggest wind clusters in the world with a combined generating capacity of 4.2 GW (1 GW more than Sizewell), producing enough electricity to power the equivalent of more than 4 million UK households. This project would bring billions of pounds of investment and employment to Norfolk. Many jobs would be created during the construction phases as well as long-term jobs during the operations phases. There are also many more opportunities in the broader supply chain. Those jobs are much needed in Norfolk and would create opportunities for our young people now and in the future. To progress these projects, it is vital that the upcoming Contract for Difference (CfD) Allocation Round 7 (AR7) auction is a success. The CfD scheme guarantees a fixed price to energy companies for their electricity, helping to encourage investment in clean energy projects. Yet, recently Reform's Deputy Leader Richard Tice wrote to the heads of eight energy companies, including RWE, putting them 'on notice' and warning that any companies entering this auction round would do so at their 'own risk'. In May, he also said that Reform would use "every lever" to block renewable energy developments in the councils they now control. This would be bad for jobs, bad for consumers, bad for energy security and bad for our country. In 2024, the clean energy economy nationally grew by more than 10% and generates £83.1 billion in Gross Added Value for Britain. It would also have a retrograde impact on Norfolk and the East of England more broadly, putting the thousands of jobs that could be created through clean energy at risk. Failing to back renewable energy is not only failing to back British jobs but also failing to back the action needed to get energy bills down and to tackle climate change. We have seen what happens when we are too dependent on foreign gas – bills soar and we have little control. That's one of the reasons why investing in British renewables is vital. So, is Reform happy for us to remain reliant on expensive foreign fossil fuels rather than cheap, homegrown, clean energy? I know that my constituents in Norwich North want lower energy bills and investing in renewables is part of the answer. So, why would a political party oppose such vital projects and the opportunities they would bring to regions like ours? It seems to me that they are willing to put ideology before our national interest. This is in stark contrast to the Labour Government's clean energy mission. Since July 2024, over £40 billion of private investment has been announced into the UK's clean energy industries - helping to kick-start the economy to put more money in people's pockets. The economic scale of the opportunity and prize on offer to Norfolk and the wider region is huge. Backing investment in clean energy is backing Britain. *Alice MacDonald is the MP for Norwich North.
