2025 iPhone Photography Award Winners Prove Any Phone Can Create Stunning Images
The full collection of this year's winners and their photos -- along with which Apple device they used to take their masterful shot -- is now available at the IPPAWARDS site. You might be surprised to learn you don't need the latest iPhone models to capture great images.
In the Photographers of the Year category, Jarod Peraza took the grand prize for his photo "Viajero Nocturno." The US-based photographer captured the nighttime scene in Villa de Leyva, Colombia, using an iPhone 16 Pro Max.
Enlarge Image
Viajero Nocturno
Villa de Leyva, Colombia
Shot on iPhone 16 Pro Max
Jarod Peraza/IPPAWARDS
In first place, US photographer Carol Addassi won for "Passage," a black-and-white night shot of Central Park in New York City taken using a 7-year-old iPhone XS.
Enlarge Image
Passage
Central Park in Manhattan, New York City
Shot on iPhone XS
Carol Addassi/IPPAWARDS
In second place, "Moto Cães" is a playful shot of two dogs in a motorcycle sidecar at sunset, captured by Brazil's Thiago Bernardes de Souza on an iPhone 15 Pro Max.
Enlarge Image
Moto Cães
Brasília, Distrito Federal
Shot on iPhone 15 Pro Max
Thiago Bernardes de Souza/IPPAWARDS
Third place is a moody early morning photo of Virginia's Corrotoman River, entitled "Foggy Morning on the Corrotoman," taken by US photographer Martha Nance on an iPhone 15 Pro.
Enlarge Image
Foggy Morning on the Corrotoman
Merry Point, Virginia
Shot on iPhone 15 Pro
Martha Nance/IPPAWARDS
Since the first iPhone appeared in 2007, the awards have showcased both the technology and the aesthetics of mobile photography.
"When we began, the idea was simply to explore how this new device was transforming the way people create and share images," said Kenan Aktulun, founder and editor-in-chief of IPPAWARDS, via email. "Early on, there was a heavy use of filters; users were experimenting with the novelty of mobile photography. Over the years, as users grew more fluent with the medium, the work became more personal, emotional, and relatable."
Enlarge Image
Lan Zhanxiang's photo took second place in the Architectural category.
Light Chaser
Zhiyi Building, Shenzhen City
Shot on iPhone 15 Pro Max
Lan Zhanxiang/IPPAWARDS
In addition to the four top slots, the awards also name three winners in 12 different categories, including Abstract, Architecture, Landscape, Nature and Portrait. Dozens of photos are also named as honorable mentions in each category.
This year's winning photos were made using a wide variety of iPhones, the oldest being an iPhone 8 Plus from 2017. Nearly every model since then is represented, with just a handful of the latest iPhone 16 lineup appearing among the awarded photos.
The competition stipulates that photos must be captured using an iPhone or iPad, and not edited in Photoshop on a desktop computer, although editing using apps on the device (presumably including the mobile versions of Photoshop) is allowed.
This year's grand prize winner received a 13-inch Apple iPad Air, and the other Photographers of the Year received an Apple Watch Series 10. In the 12 specific categories, the first-place winners each received a gold bar, and the second and third-place winners each received a platinum bar.
Enlarge Image
This photo by Dominic Dähncke received second place in the Other category.
Untitled
Tenerife, Canary Islands
Shot on iPhone 15 Pro Max
Dominic Dähncke/IPPAWARDS
Judges evaluated images and determined winners based on artistic merit, originality, subject and style. According to Aktulun, the panel is made up of 10 to 12 judges from different backgrounds, "such as photographers, art buyers, creative directors, architects, academics, people in the creative field and occasionally selected winners from previous years."
Submitting work to the competition involves an entry fee of $7.50 for one image and discounted per-image rates for batches of up to 25 images. There are no limits on the number of entries you can submit.
Submissions for the 2026 iPhone Photography Awards are now open through March 31, 2026.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
2 hours ago
- Forbes
‘Betty La Fea' S2: Ana María Orozco, Jorge Enrique Abello Talk What To Expect
Betty la Fea: La Historia Continúa — Prime Video's global smash series, the sequel based on the hit late 1990s Colombian telenovela — returns for its highly anticipated second season, upping the stakes for its leading protagonists. The story picks up with Betty (Ana María Orozco) facing difficult choices about herself, her family and the future of Ecomoda — where she has returned as president. She makes another life-changing decision regarding Armando (Jorge Enrique Abello), who she admits is the love of her life, and continues her efforts to reconnect and build a stronger relationship with her daughter Mila (Juanita Molina), who is herself recovering from a romantic disappointment and betrayal. For Orozco and Abello, the revival is both joyful and challenging, as they ensure the show remains true to the essence of the story that audiences remember and love. "We're very pleased to return with this story that needed new chapters for fans around the world," says Abello. A Record-Breaking Return The return resulted in a record-shattering first season, with the largest global viewership for a Latin American title in Prime Video history and the most‑watched series or movie of all time on Prime Video in Colombia. The success was driven by nostalgia, curiosity around what happened to the beloved characters, and most of the original actors reprising their roles, with on-set chemistry and camaraderie enriched by time. "Reuniting with Jorge and the entire cast is a joy," says Orozco. "They're all wonderful actors. We have a lot of fun working, and we bring out the best in each other. Everyone contributes so much and the magic truly happens on set." Both stars now serve as associate producers and describe their role as guiding the spirit of the show — making sure the show's direction stays aligned with Betty's true essence, while big decisions remain a broader team effort. Streaming Format, Timeless Appeal The sequel's streaming-first format gives the 21st century series momentum without straying far from its origins. Abello contrasts the original telenovela pacing with the new version's episode length. "We always did 30-minute episodes where nothing and a lot of things happened, because the arcs would take 20 or 30 episodes to unfold so there could be real transformations within the narrative…. Now we have the same time but with greater punch." Orozco agrees. "Everything is tighter, more to the point…there are things you won't see but are told another way." Strategic flashbacks help old audiences remember and new ones catch up with history that provides context to the current story. Female empowerment anchors the narrative, reframing beauty, success and staying true to oneself. Orozco frames Betty's most visible transformation from Season 1 — abandoning a polished image to return to her original appearance — as a deeply personal reckoning. "The glasses and the look symbolize going back to her essence, back to herself," Orozco explains. "She's wondering whether the polished path she took was faithful to who she is, or a response to external pressures and a search for social approval from Armando's world. She's at a point in life where certain events trigger a crisis where those questions surface." But she isn't the only one doing some introspection as Armando's world crumbles under the weight of poor life decisions. "I don't know if Armando has fully evolved," admits Abello. "Armando is a product of a society where the discourse completely changed for men — where everything you've done from the past until now is wrong, so you have to reinvent yourself... He's trying to learn a language of norms he never grew up with, one his upbringing didn't prepare him for, which leads to mistakes and a real sense that he doesn't know where he belongs." Those internal questions intersect with the show's larger themes. The series continues to address female empowerment and the tension between change and continuity. Even as beauty standards and workplace culture have evolved over time, some negative attitudes persist. There are still characters who call Betty ugly, reflecting real-world resistance to change. At the end of the first season, Mila discovered she was used to bring down Ecomoda — her own family's company — by a vengeful member of Marcela's (Natalia Ramírez) family. She also found Betty's younger‑self diary detailing the painful past with Armando before his change of heart and her mother's forgiveness. Furious yet newly empathetic, Mila — strong, sometimes snobby, once dismissive of her mother — now understands Betty more and is determined to help her be happy again, away from her father, who is now on her blacklist. Betty, torn between her daughter's expectations and her enduring love for Armando, wants to reconcile her family and find a way to save Ecomoda from bankruptcy, a takeover, and legal consequences tied to Armando's failed investments during the pandemic. Armando, meanwhile, struggles with his own reinvention, burdened by his father's shadow and a need to prove he can be better for his family and everyone who depends on the company. "I feel we've done a great, conscientious job, with a lot of love, and we've had fun—and that will surely come through," Orozco says of the new season, which she hopes gets picked up for a third installment. The series is produced by RCN Estudios and written by Marta Betoldi (Ciega a Citas), César Betancur (Rigo), Valeria Gómez (Manes), and Luis Carlos Ávila (La Reina del Flow), and directed by Mauricio Cruz Fortunato (Manes). Season 2 is executive produced by Yalile Giordanelli (Ana de Nadie), Alexander Marín, VP of Distribution at RCN Estudios, and Juan Pablo Posada (Manes), RCN Estudios production VP. Betty la Fea: La Historia Continúa premieres today, August 15, exclusively on Prime Video in over 240 countries and territories. The new season has 10 episodes, with two released each week.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Steve Jobs' first Silicon Valley boss turned down an offer to buy a third of Apple for $50,000—today, his share would be worth nearly $1 trillion
Atari cofounder Nolan Bushnell turned down his former employee, the late Steve Jobs, when he was offered to buy a third of Apple for $50,000 in the 1970s. With the iPhone titan now standing at $3.1 trillion, the video gaming pioneer missed out on making $1 trillion from his relatively small investment. But he isn't troubling himself with regret, reasoning he might not be as happy—and Apple may not have been as successful—if he accepted the deal. Many people may be kicking themselves for not buying Bitcoin or investing in Nvidia stock sooner—but few will have missed out on a bigger deal than Atari cofounder Nolan Bushnell, the first Silicon Valley boss of the late Steve Jobs. A young Jobs offered the gaming mogul an eye-popping deal: buy a third of Apple for just $50,000. What might come as a shock to many is that Bushnell turned it down. Apple has since grown into a $3.1 billion sensation with over a billion iPhones sitting in people's back pockets, and over 100 million Mac users worldwide—and if Bushnell had taken the deal, his cut would have made him $1 trillion today. But Bushnell isn't crying over the missed opportunity Bushnell first witnessed Jobs' potential as a businessman in the 1970s, when the college dropout joined Atari as a technician and games designer before moving into entrepreneurship. Jobs was an essential engineer 'solving problems in the field' at Atari, Bushnell recalled, but his leadership mentality also meant some tension at the office. The Atari cofounder strategically employed Jobs during nightshifts, knowing that Wozniak would also join and help out on projects like the brick-breaking game 'Breakout.' But Jobs would also barge into his office to tell Bushnell that the other employees weren't good at soldering, offering to instruct them. Bushnell recognized that Jobs was a genius—albiet, a complicated one. 'He was a difficult person,' Bushnell told ABC News in 2015. 'He was very smart. Often he was the smartest person in the room, and he would tell everybody that. It's generally not a good social dynamic.' But years later, the tech pioneer isn't quietly simmering over his choice to reject the offer. 'I could have owned a third of Apple computer for $50,000, and I turned it down,' Bushnell said in the interview. 'I've got a wonderful family, I've got a great wife, my life is wonderful. I'm not sure that if I had been uber, uber, uber rich that I'd have had all of that.' In fact, Bushnell even thinks Apple may not have been so successful if he had taken the deal. And his potential payout may not have soared to that trillion-dollar height. 'I'm still an Apple fan and you know I think that hindsight is 20/20,' he told Tech Radar in 2013, when asked about his decision to say no. 'I can go through a thread very easily which, by me turning Steve down led to me introducing him to Don Valentine, and he introduced him to Mike Markkula who is as responsible for Apple's success as Steve Woz[niak] and Jobs.' He's not the first tech boss to have missed out on billions Bushnell isn't the only one who missed out on critical business opportunities that would launch them into billionaire status—there are even others who blew it on big deals with Apple. Ronald Wayne, the lesser-known third Apple cofounder, was also working at the electronics company Atari when he stepped up as Jobs' friend to help convince Wozniak of formalizing Apple's launch. Wayne even typed up the contract, penning that he would receive a 10% share in the tech company, while Jobs and Wozniak would each be awarded a 45% stake. However, less than two weeks after drafting up the document, Wayne sold his stake for just $800, also reaping $1,500 to forgo any claim to the company. Looking back, it's a massive misstep as his 10% share could now be worth between $75 billion and $300 billion today. His wasted opportunity isn't as stark as Bushnell's—and the decision mainly came from a desire to have financial stability in his life. 'Jobs and Woz didn't have two nickels to rub together,' Wayne told Business Insider in 2017. 'I, on the other hand, had a house, and a car, and a bank account—which meant that I was on the hook if that thing blew up.' YouTube's cofounders, Chad Hurley, Steven Chen and Jawed Karim could also be sitting in a sizable nest egg today if they didn't sell their company so early. The YouTube creators sold their popular video platform to Google for $1.65 billion in fall 2006—each receiving millions of dollars worth of stock. Hurley got company shares worth around $345 million, according to The New York Times, while Chen accepted about $326 million worth. Karim, who left the business early to go back to school, got $64 million of shares. They were ecstatic about the deal in the beginning, but the buyer's remorse would potentially creep up less than 20 years later. Today, YouTube is valued at $550 billion—333 times higher than its market cap from nearly two decades prior, adjusted to inflation. If Hurley and Chen accepted the same stock deal today that they did in 2006, each could have more than $100 billion in their bank accounts. This story was originally featured on Sign in to access your portfolio
New York Post
12 hours ago
- New York Post
Controversial app for men to trash talk women hacked — just days after users doxxed on rival site for gals
First came Tea, then came the spill. Weeks after hackers swiped user data from the Tea app — a 'rate your ex' app where women could swap dirt on dud dates — its testosterone-fueled twin, TeaOnHer, has suffered the same fate. Billed as a 'safety' tool, the viral gossip hub let women swap stories about dud dates and potential predators — featuring undercover convos, ID verifications, number lookups and photo sleuthing to expose fake profiles. Advertisement But after simmering quietly for a year, the app boiled over in July 2025, landing in Apple's top three downloads. Not to be outdone, TeaOnHer launched last month — promising men their own place to dish about dates — and shot up the charts right beside its sister app. 3 Just weeks after hackers raided the women-only Tea app, its men-only twin, TeaOnHer, got hit the same way. TeaOnHer Advertisement Hackers struck Tea in July, swiping private chats and ID snaps and posting them on 4chan, as per 404 Media. Slueths followed suit for TeaOnHer last week. TechCrunch said reporters cracked into the sensitive stash in minutes, thanks to an admin panel so wide open it didn't even ask for a login. On August 14, one X user weighed in on how hackers broke in, writing, 'TeaOnHer, the app meant to combat the infamous 'TeaApp', is also a giant dumpster fire. It has been compromised.' 'THE DEVELOPER MADE HIS PASSWORD TO THE ADMIN PANEL 'Password1!'. IT WAS STORED IN PLAIN TEXT ON THE LANDING PAGE. WHAT THE F—K.' Advertisement 3 TeaOnHer hit the App Store last month, giving men their own spot to dish on dates — and quickly shot up the charts alongside its sister app. Buzzer Beaters – Both Tea and TeaOnHer could be staring down class-action lawsuits from users whose private info hit the web, NBC News wrote. Since the original Tea app got busted, Redditors on r/technology have been roasting TeaOnHer for the same sloppy security. Advertisement As reported by The Daily Dot, one user wrote, 'Wait, so they saw what happened with the first app getting 'hacked' and decided, let's store user info in the same negligent way?' Some even wondered if the hack was a sting aimed at outing the men using the app. One tweeted, 'Was this just a revenge project made by the original with the only intention of doxxing some men?' As previously reported by The Post, the initial Tea app had men breaking into a cold sweat — and not over forgetting their wallets on first dates. Users anonymously roasted exes and warned about sketchy dates as the app climbed the App Store charts, sparking a fiery clash between digital safety and online trash talk. 3 After Tea got hacked, Redditors tore into TeaOnHer for repeating the same security fiasco. Tetiana – 'I see men freaking out today about this Tea app,' TikTokker @azalialexi noted in a recent video. 'If you don't want things like this to exist, then maybe look into advocating for women's safety and actually holding your fellow men accountable.' Advertisement This week, TikTok user @ninadoesthemost observed that many women used the Tea app 'to expose people who be doing [domestic violence] and maybe got a restraining order,' or men who have secret children they 'don't show up for.' Men, however, would join TeaOnHer 'for a different reason.' She alleged, 'They're green flagging which girls are easy or good in bed.' Others, however, feared that the concept of both apps had crossed the line into full-blown digital vigilantism. User @ warned viewers on TikTok to 'be careful' with them. Advertisement He added that he could see the 'vision' behind the OG Tea app but stressed that he knew 'how vile' people who might use it could be. 'Hot take: The tea app is toxic,' wrote another, who sent a female friend undercover to snoop on what women were saying about him. 'These women were clearly just upset … I was honest with them and respectful.' Whether it's Tea or TeaOnHer, one thing's clear: in the battle of digital dirt vs. privacy, nobody's coming out unscathed.
