
GCT Semiconductor Celebrates Major Milestone with Delivery of 5G Chipsets and Modules to Customers
'We are thrilled to achieve this major milestone and now have our 5G chips in the hands of our customers,' said John Schlaefer, CEO of GCT.
'We are thrilled to achieve this major milestone and now have our 5G chips in the hands of our customers,' said John Schlaefer, CEO of GCT. 'Our chips are currently being evaluated and we're eager to receive positive feedback from our customers. Our first priority is to focus on mid-tier applications and immediate demand for the growing 5G market. This will include the development of a Verizon-certified module. We're also excited to expand sampling to all our customers in the near future.'
After the evaluation process is complete, GCT will work with customers to optimize their device performance, and to determine production demands. GCT is fully prepared to meet these demands, supported by a robust supply chain built on years of proven experience delivering high-performance solutions efficiently and reliably.
About GCT Semiconductor Holding, Inc.
GCT is a leading fabless designer and supplier of advanced 5G and 4G LTE semiconductor solutions. GCT's market-proven solutions have enabled fast and reliable 4G LTE connectivity to numerous commercial devices such as CPEs, mobile hotspots, routers, M2M applications and smartphones, etc., for the world's top wireless carriers. GCT's system-on-chip solutions integrate radio frequency, baseband modem and digital signal processing functions, therefore offering complete 4G and 5G platform solutions with small form factors, low power consumption, high performance, high reliability, and cost-effectiveness. For more information, visit www.gctsemi.com.
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements –
This press release contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the "safe harbor" provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1955. These forward-looking statements include, without limitation, statements regarding delivery of 5G chipset and completion of customer evaluation processes. Words such as 'believe,' 'project,' 'expect,' 'anticipate,' 'estimate,' 'intend,' 'strategy,' 'future,' 'opportunity,' 'plan,' 'may,' 'should,' 'will,' 'would,' 'will be,' 'will continue,' 'will likely result,' and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are predictions, projections and other statements about future events that are based on current expectations and assumptions and, as a result, are subject to significant risks and uncertainties that could cause the actual results to differ materially from the expected results. Most of these factors are outside the Company's control and are difficult to predict. Factors that may cause actual future events to differ materially from the expected results, include, but are not limited to: the ability of the Company to develop its 5G products and generate revenue; the ability of the Company to enter into and meet the obligations under partnership and collaboration agreements; the ability of the Company to grow and manage growth profitability and retain its key employees; the Company's financial and business performance, including the Company's financial projections and business metrics; changes in the Company's strategy, future operations, financial position, estimated revenues and losses, forecasts, projected costs, prospects and plans; the Company's inability to anticipate the future market demands and future needs of its customers; the impact of component shortages, suppliers' lack of production capacity, natural disasters or pandemics on the Company's sourcing operations and supply chain; the Company's future capital requirements and sources and uses of cash; the ability of the Company to raise sufficient capital to fund its operations; the ability to implement business plans, forecasts, and other expectations, including the growth of the 5G market; the risk that the Company may not be able to repay its debt; the risk of economic downturns that affects the Company's business operation and financial performance; the risk that the Company may not be able to develop and design its products acceptable to its customers; actual or potential conflicts of interest of the Company's management with its public stockholders; and other risks and uncertainties indicated from time to time in the Company's filings with SEC, including the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 and those disclosures under the "Risk Factors" section therein. The foregoing list of factors is not exhaustive. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made. Readers are cautioned not to put undue reliance on forward-looking statements, and the Company assumes no obligation and does not intend to update or revise these forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
If You'd Invested $1,000 in Pfizer (PFE) Stock 3 Years Ago, Here's How Much You'd Have Today
Key Points Those who invested in Pfizer three years ago and hung on are not thrilled. They would have done much better with a simple S&P 500 index fund. Still, Pfizer today offers a fat dividend and plenty of growth potential. 10 stocks we like better than Pfizer › Wondering how well you'd have done if you'd invested in pharmaceutical giant Pfizer (NYSE: PFE) three years ago and hung on? Well, I'm afraid the answer isn't pretty: If you'd investing $1,000 in Pfizer on Aug. 8, 2022, hung on and reinvested dividends, that sum would have been worth $585 on Aug. 8, 2025. Ouch! For some context, during those same three years, the S&P 500 index of 500 of America's biggest companies averaged gains of roughly 17% per year, turning $1,000 into $1,615. Here's some good news, though: Stock investors need to look forward much more than backward. Trailing returns are in the past. What matters most for current Pfizer investors and would-be Pfizer investors is how the company will perform from here on. And Pfizer's future is looking promising. Some investors have been disappointed in Pfizer when they've compared recent results to those from the past. But those past years were exceptional boom years thanks to Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine and Paxlovid COVID-19 treatment. Those were in great demand, but demand has fallen. Others worry because some of Pfizer's big sellers, such as Eliquis, Ibrance, Inlyta, Xeljanz, Xtandi, and Vyndaqel, are coming off patent protection in the next few years. Pfizer has been planning for that, and investing in its pipeline, which features more than 100 active programs -- many of which are in oncology. Pfizer has also been getting additional approvals for its drugs, and it has been cutting its costs in an effort to boost profitability. Finally, Pfizer is a dividend-paying stock, with a whopping recent dividend yield of 7%. So as you invest in Pfizer and wait for its investments to pay off, you'll be rewarded. Should you invest $1,000 in Pfizer right now? Before you buy stock in Pfizer, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Pfizer wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $653,427!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,119,863!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,060% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 182% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 11, 2025 Selena Maranjian has positions in Pfizer. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Pfizer. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. If You'd Invested $1,000 in Pfizer (PFE) Stock 3 Years Ago, Here's How Much You'd Have Today was originally published by The Motley Fool
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Orla Mining Reports Second Quarter 2025 Financial Results
VANCOUVER, BC, Aug. 11, 2025 /CNW/ - Orla Mining Ltd. (TSX: OLA) (NYSE: ORLA) ("Orla" or the "Company") today announces the results for the second quarter ended June 30, 2025. (All amounts expressed in U.S. dollars unless otherwise stated) Second Quarter 2025 Summary Record quarterly gold production of 77,811 ounces and total quarterly gold sold of 78,911 ounces (pre-released). Second quarter all-in sustaining cost1 ("AISC") was $1,421 per ounce of gold sold. Year to date AISC was $1,260 per ounce of gold sold. Net income for the second quarter was $48.2 million or $0.15 per share Adjusted earnings1 for the second quarter were $64.2 million or $0.20 per share. Cash flow from operating activities before changes in non-cash working capital during the second quarter was $102.7 million. Exploration and project expenditure1 was $32.3 million during the quarter, of which $22.9 million was capitalized and $9.4 million was expensed. The Company experienced a pit wall event at Camino Rojo on July 23rd. The mine has started the work on the action plan, including a 50–80 metre pushback of the north wall with a redesigned slope and continuous monitoring. As a result of the operational pause and mining resequencing at Camino Rojo, Orla updated annual consolidated guidance to 265,000 to 285,000 ounces of gold production and AISC of $1,350 to $1,550 per ounces of gold produced. The Company ended the period with $215.4 million in cash and $420.0 million in debt after paying $30.0 million towards its revolving credit facility during the quarter. "The second quarter marked another record production period for Orla, supported by strong contributions from Musselwhite. However, the pit wall event at Camino Rojo on July 23rd was an operational setback. Thanks to proactive geotechnical monitoring systems, no injuries occurred, and no equipment was damaged. While the temporary suspension of in-pit operations poses a short-term challenge for what has otherwise been a consistently strong-performing mine, the benefits of Orla's diversified production base are clear." - Jason Simpson, President and Chief Executive Officer of Orla _____________________________________ 1 Non-GAAP measure. Refer to the "Non-GAAP Measures" section of this press release. Financial and Operations Update Table 1: Financial and Operating HighlightsOperatingQ2 2025 YTD 2025 ConsolidatedTotal Gold Produced oz 77,811 125,570 Total Gold Sold oz 78,911 125,267 Average Realized Gold Price2 $/oz $ 3,251 $ 3,127 Cash Cost per Ounce2,3 $/oz $ 1,065 $ 934 All-in Sustaining Cost per Ounce2,3 $/oz $ 1,421 $ 1,260 Camino Rojo, MexicoOre Stacked tonnes 2,608,589 4,281,415 Stacked Ore Gold Grade g/t 0.57 0.66 Gold Produced oz 25,145 55,118 Gold Sold oz 26,591 57,103 Musselwhite, Canada1Ore Milled tonnes 294,568 398,855 Milled Ore Gold Head Grade g/t 5.52 5.52 Gold Produced oz 52,666 70,452 Gold Sold oz 52,318 68,163 FinancialRevenue $m $ 263.7 $ 404.4 Cost of Sales – Operating Cost $m $ 85.6 $ 106.6 Net Income (Loss) $m $ 48.2 $ (21.6) Adjusted Earnings2 $m $ 64.2 $ 102.8 Earnings per Share – basic $/sh $ 0.15 $ (0.07) Adjusted Earnings per Share – basic2 $/sh $ 0.20 $ 0.32 Cash Flow from Operating Activities before Changes in Non-Cash Working Capital $m $ 102.7 $ 503.9 Free Cash Flow2 $m $ 64.2 $ (339.9) Financial PositionJun 30, 2025 Dec 31, 2024 Cash and Cash Equivalents $m $ 215.4 $ 160.8 Net Cash (Debt)2 $m $ (204.6) $ 160.8 1 Orla completed the acquisition of Musselwhite on February 28, 2025. Operational figures (excluding cash cost and AISC) are provided from March 1, 2025 onwards.2 Non-GAAP measure. Refer to the "Non-GAAP Measures" section of this news release.3 Cash cost and AISC on a year-to-date basis for 2025 include the impact of the Musselwhite Mine as of April 1, 2025 onwards. Refer to "Non-GAAP Measures" for further discussion. Second Quarter 2025 Consolidated Summary Gold produced during the quarter totaled 77,811 ounces, with contributions from the Camino Rojo Oxide Mine and the Musselwhite Mine. This period represented the first full quarter of contribution from Musselwhite, resulting in a quarterly record for production for the Company. Gold sold during the quarter totalled 78,911 ounces, also a quarterly record. Consolidated cash costs and AISC totaled $1,065 and $1,421 per ounce of gold sold, respectively. Camino Rojo Operations Summary The Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Mine produced 25,145 ounces of gold in the second quarter of 2025, in-line with plan. During the quarter, Camino Rojo mined nearly 2.0 million tonnes of ore and 2.6 million tonnes of waste, for an implied strip ratio of 1.33. A total of 1.7 million tonnes of ore were stacked at an average grade of 0.71 g/t gold equating to an average daily stacking rate of approximately 18.5 thousand tonnes. In addition, 0.9 million tonnes of low-grade ore were rehandled and placed on the leach pad, at an average grade of 0.32 g/t gold. In total, 2.6 million tonnes of ore at an average grade of 0.57 g/t gold were placed on the heap leach pad during the quarter. Gold sold during the second quarter 2025 totaled 26,591 ounces and sustaining capital during the second quarter of 2025 totaled $0.5 million. On July 23rd, Camino Rojo experienced an uncontrolled material movement on the north wall, resulting in no injuries or equipment damage. Work has started on the action plan, including a 50–80 metre pushback of the north wall with a redesigned slope and continuous monitoring. Approximately 9.0 million tonnes of predominantly oxidized material (strip ratio 1:0.9, average grade 0.74 g/t Au) is planned to be removed and stacked on the heap leach. No material was lost or sterilized; the update to 2025 guidance reflects a deferral of production based on grade and recovery mix. See "2025 Guidance Update" below for details. Musselwhite During the quarter, Musselwhite mined 303,000 tonnes of ore and milled 295,000 tonnes at a mill head grade of 5.52 g/t gold. Gold recovery rates of 96.5% resulted in gold production of 52,666 ounces. Gold sold during the quarter was 52,318 ounces. Lateral development metres in the quarter totalled 2,746 metres. Lateral development is to access mining horizons for existing reserves and to provide additional drill platforms to support the underground exploration drill program to grow reserves, resources, and mineral inventories. Sustaining capex was $18.4 millions, mostly driven by underground development and PQ Deep Extension. Project and Exploration Summary The key project highlight of the quarter was the release of the initial underground Mineral Resource estimate at Camino Rojo on June 5, 2025. The Mineral Resource estimate will support future technical studies, engineering evaluations, and permitting preparations as the project advances. During the quarter, exploration focused on drilling activities at Camino Rojo in Mexico, the South Carlin Complex (including the South Railroad Project) in Nevada, and Musselwhite in Canada. For the second quarter, a total of 23,248 metres were drilled, with 7,575 metres in Mexico, 4,686 metres in Nevada and 10,987 metres at Musslewhite. Project development activities during the period focused on advancing permitting efforts for the South Railroad Project in Nevada and progressing the potential underground development at Camino Rojo. Camino Rojo, Mexico: During the quarter, the Company released an initial underground Mineral Resource estimate for the Camino Rojo deposit, incorporating mineralization hosted in the Camino Rojo Sulphides and extending into the underlying Zone 22. As a reminder Zone 22 represents the vertical and down plunge continuation of the Camino Rojo sulphide mineralization. A supporting technical report was released in July. Summary highlights of the initial resource:Measured Indicated Measured & Indicated Inferredkt g/t / % koz / Mlbs kt g/t / % koz / Mlbs kt g/t / % koz / Mlbs kt g/t / % koz / Mlbs Gold 7 1.95 0 50,079 2.45 3,949 50,086 2.45 3,950 5,576 2.21 396 Silver 31.5 7 10.6 17,048 10.6 17,055 10.9 1,949 Zinc - - 0.25 278 0.25 278 0.21 26 Gold Equiv. 2.11 1 2.58 4,156 2.58 4,156 2.33 418 See Appendix 1 to this news release and the Company's news release dated June 5, 2025 for additional information (Orla Mining Delivers Initial Underground Mineral Resource for Camino Rojo in Mexico, Paving the Way for Future Development Planning). Zone 22 accounts for only 7% (0.29 Moz AuEq) of the current underground Indicated Mineral Resource and 19% (0.08 Moz AuEq) of the current underground Inferred Mineral Resource. Drilling is ongoing and 2025 results will inform future updates. Recovery model supported by ongoing metallurgical work and the mineral resource is divided into three spatially distinct zones, each with specific processing options for the Caracol-hosted mineralization: Heap leaching (3%), Flotation by cyanidation (CIL) (25%), Flotation followed by pressure oxidation ("POX") as a pre-treatment prior to cyanidation (CIL with POX) (72%). Initial metallurgical testing indicates that material from Zone 22 is amenable to both cyanide leaching and flotation. Development strategy focuses on advancing the underground resource through: Continued drilling Exploration drift design Flowsheet optimization Metallurgical and engineering studies Permitting activities The Company continued the infill drill campaign at Zone 22, the extension of the Camino Rojo Sulphides. The 15,000-metre drill program was completed in late July 2025. An additional 5,000 metres are planned in 2025 at Zone 22 for infill and expansion along the down-plunge. Results from these drill programs are expected to enhance the Zone 22 resource, which was included in the recently released Camino Rojo Mineral Resource update, as discussed above. A drill campaign to test regional targets started in mid-April, with 1,722 metres drilled in the second quarter. Please see Company's news release dated August 7, 2025, for additional information (Orla Mining Reports New Drill Results from Zone 22 at Camino Rojo, Mexico – High grade intersections outside current resource panels enhances potential). South Railroad Project & South Carlin Complex, Nevada: The South Railroad Project is currently advancing under the guidance of the US Bureau of Land Management (BLM) in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) for permitting. Orla continues to engage with local, state and federal stakeholders to sustain momentum in the permitting process. The Notice of Intent (NOI) is expected to be published in the coming weeks (Q3) with the Company targeting a Record of Decision (final permitting decision) approximately 12 months thereafter. Following this approval, construction on the South Railroad Project would commence, with first gold production targeted for 2028. Orla's 2025 exploration program at the South Carlin Complex is focused on increasing resources at Dark Star, Pinion and satellite deposits, as well as discovering new zones of mineralization. Drilling activities resumed in May at the new Spike target – located south of Pod-Sweet Hollow, as well as at the North Bullion target area. In June, the Dark Star and Bowl drill programs were initiated. Exploration activities are expected to continue through the end of 2025. Musselwhite, Ontario: At Musselwhite, the exploration objective is to define a critical mass of additional reserves and resources to support expansion of the operation and significantly extend the mine life. In the second quarter, underground exploration drilling progressed with three rigs, completing 7,413 metres. The deep directional surface program aimed at confirming the down-plunge extension of the mine trend began in late May with one drill rig. By early June, three rigs were operational, collectively completing 2,757 metres of drilling in the second quarter. The deep directional target zones are expected to be reached in the third quarter. Additionally, the near-mine surface program focused on identifying shallow mineralization as potential open pit mill feed started in June, with 817 metres drilled in the quarter. All exploration drilling programs will continue through the year. 2025 Guidance Update Since the pit wall event on July 23, Camino Rojo has continued to crush and stack stockpiled material at a rate of approximately 20,000 tonnes per day (in addition to 20,000 tonnes per day being truck stacked), to mitigate the short-term impact on production. Based on the current action plan and Camino Rojo's updated pit sequencing, Orla's annual production, cash costs, and AISC guidance has been updated and is shown below. ConsolidatedInitial Guidance Revised Guidance Gold ProductionCamino Rojo110 - 120 95 - 105 Musselwhite 170 - 180 170 - 180 Total Gold Production Koz 280 - 300 265 - 285 Total Cash Cost1 (net of by-product) Camino Rojo$625 - $725 $800 - $900 Musselwhite - April to December$1,000 - $1,200 $1,000 - $1,200 Total Cash Cost (Net of by-product)1 $/oz sold $850 - $1,050 $900 - $1,100 AISC1 – ConsolidatedCamino Rojo$700 - $800 $850 - $950 Musselwhite - April to December$1,550 - $1,750 $1,550 - $1,750 AISC1 $/oz sold $1,300 - $1,500 $1,350 - $1,550 1 Cash cost and AISC include 9 months of production and costs from Musselwhite, and full year from Camino Rojo and Corporate G&A (inclusive of share-based compensation). Cash costs and AISC are non-GAAP measures. Please refer to the Non-GAAP section of this news release for further detail. Financial Statements Orla's unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements and management's discussion and analysis for the quarter ended June 30, 2025, are available on the Company's website at and under the Company's profiles on SEDAR+ and EDGAR. Qualified Persons Statement The scientific and technical information in this news release was reviewed and approved by Mr. J. Andrew Cormier, P. Eng., Chief Operating Officer of the Company, and Mr. Sylvain Guerard, P. Geo., Senior Vice President, Exploration of the Company, who are the Qualified Persons as defined under NI 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects. Second Quarter 2025 Conference Call Orla will host a conference call on Tuesday, August 12, 2025, at 10:00 AM, Eastern Time, to provide a corporate update following the release of its financial and operating results for the second quarter 2025: Dial-In Numbers / Webcast: USA - Toll-Free: +1 (800) 715-9871 USA / International Toll: +1 (646) 307-1963 Canada – Toronto: +1 (647) 932-3411 Canada - Toll-Free: +1 (800) 715-9871 Conference ID: 3544393 Webcast: About Orla Mining Ltd. Orla's corporate strategy is to acquire, develop, and operate mineral properties where the Company's expertise can substantially increase stakeholder value. The Company has three material projects, consisting of two operating mines and one development project, all 100% owned by the Company: (1) Camino Rojo, in Zacatecas State, Mexico, an operating gold and silver open-pit and heap leach mine. The property covers over 139,000 hectares which contains a large oxide and sulphide mineral resource, (2) Musselwhite Mine, in Northwestern Ontario, Canada, an underground gold mine that has been in operation for over 25 years and produced over 6 million ounces of gold, with a long history of resource growth and conversion, and (3) South Railroad, in Nevada, United States, a feasibility-stage, open pit, heap leach gold project located on the Carlin trend in Nevada. The technical reports for the Company's material projects are available on Orla's website at and on SEDAR+ and EDGAR under the Company's profile at and respectively. NON-GAAP MEASURES We have included herein certain performance measures ("non-GAAP measures") which are not specified, defined, or determined under generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"). These non-GAAP measures are common performance measures in the gold mining industry, but because they do not have any mandated standardized definitions, they may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers. Accordingly, we use such measures to provide additional information, and you should not consider them in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. In this section, all currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share and per-ounce amounts. AVERAGE REALIZED GOLD PRICE Average realized gold price per ounce sold is calculated by dividing gold sales proceeds received by the Company for the relevant period by the ounces of gold sold. Q2 2024 Q2 2024YTD Q2 2024 YTD Q2 2024 Revenue $ 263,747 $ 84,570$ 404,417 $ 151,848 Silver sales (7,207) (3,256)(12,740) (4,566) Gold sales 256,540 81,314391,677 147,282 Ounces of gold sold 78,909 34,875125,266 66,921 AVERAGE REALIZED GOLD PRICE $ 3,251 $ 2,332$ 3,127 $ 2,201 NET CASH (NET DEBT) Net cash (net debt) is calculated as cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments less total debt adjusted for unamortized deferred financing charges at the end of the reporting period. June 30, 2025 Dec 31, 2024 Cash and cash equivalents $ 215,448 $ 160,849 Less: Long term debt (420,000) — NET CASH $ (204,552) $ 160,849 ADJUSTED EARNINGS AND ADJUSTED EARNINGS PER SHARE Adjusted earnings excludes unrealized foreign exchange, changes in fair values of financial instruments, impairments and reversals due to net realizable values, restructuring and severance, and other items which are significant but not reflective of the underlying operational performance of the Company. Q2 2025 Q2 2024YTD Q2 2025 YTD Q2 2024 Net income (loss) for the period $ 48,212 $ 24,265$ (21,620) $ 41,750 Change in fair values of financial instruments 3,000 —83,725 — Unrealized foreign exchange 2,167 (1,520)4,732 (2,431) One-time Musselwhite acquisition costs 1,699 —11,914 — Increased costs from inventory fair value adjustment 744 —10,513 — Share based compensation related to PSUs 532 1672,628 291 Accretion of deferred revenue 7,828 12210,878 244 ADJUSTED EARNINGS $ 64,182 $ 23,034$ 102,770 $ 39,854 Millions of shares outstanding – basic 324.9 318.0371.1 316.6 Adjusted earnings per share – basic $ 0.20 $ 0.07$ 0.32 $ 0.13 Companies may choose to expense or capitalize costs incurred while a project is in the exploration and evaluation phase. Our accounting policy is to expense these exploration costs. To assist readers in comparing against those companies which capitalize their exploration costs, we note that included within Orla's net income for each period are exploration costs which were expensed, as follows: Q2 2024 Q2 2024YTD Q2 2024 YTD Q2 2024 Exploration & evaluation expense $ 9,412 $ 6,649$ 18,291 $ 11,393 FREE CASH FLOW Free Cash Flow is calculated as the sum of cash flow from operating activities and cash flow from investing activities, excluding certain unusual transactions. Included within the figures for Q1 2025 are $798,504,000 for the acquisition of Musselwhite Mine. Q2 2025 Q2 2024 YTD Q2 2025 YTD Q2 2024 Cash flow from operating activities $ 94,822 $ 48,969$ 506,287 $ 77,119 Cash flow from investing activities (30,632) (4,906)(846,181) (9,130) FREE CASH FLOW $ 64,190 $ 44,063$ (339,894) $ 67,989 Millions of shares outstanding – basic 324.9 318.0323.6 316.6 Free cash flow per share – basic $ 0.20 $ 0.14$ (1.05) $ 0.21 CASH COST AND ALL-IN SUSTAINING COST Cash cost per ounce is calculated by dividing the sum of operating costs and royalty costs, net of by-product silver credits, by ounces of gold sold. All-in Sustaining Cost is intended to reflect all the expenditures that are required to produce an ounce of gold from operations. While there is no standardized meaning of the measure across the industry, the Company's definition conforms to the all-in sustaining cost definition as set out by the World Gold Council in its guidance. The Musselwhite Mine was acquired on February 28, 2025, and accounting rules require metal inventory on hand at acquisition date (February 28, 2025) to be valued on the books at fair value rather than historical cost which is ordinarily the case. Accordingly, Orla management concluded it would not be meaningful to readers to present cash costs and AISC for Musselwhite Mine for the one-month period ended March 31, 2025. The tables below exclude the costs of, and gold sales of, Musselwhite Mine for the period March 1 to March 31, 2025. Consequently, the year-to-date numbers presented in the table below have been adjusted to reflect Musselwhite's contribution as of April 1, months ended June 30, 2025Six months ended June 30, 2025 CASH COST Camino Rojo Mussel-white Corporate Total Camino Rojo Mussel-white Corporate Total Cost of sales – operating costs $ 21,600 $ 63,979 $ — $ 85,579$ 42,583 $ 63,979 $ — $ 106,562 Inventory valuation adjustment at acquisition — (744) — (744)— (744) — (744) Cost of sales - royalties 2,823 3,577 — 6,4005,588 3,577 — 9,165 Silver sales (6,943) (264) — (7,207)(12,476) (264) — (12,740) CASH COST $ 17,480 $ 66,548 $ — $ 84,028$ 35,695 $ 66,548 $ — $ 102,243 Ounces sold 26,591 52,318 n/a 78,90957,103 52,318 n/a 109,421 Cash cost per ounce sold $ 657 $ 1,272 $ n/a $ 1,065$ 625 $ 1,272 $ n/a $ 934 Three months ended June 30, 2025Six months ended June 30, 2025 ALL-IN SUSTAINING COST Camino Rojo Mussel-white Corporate Total Camino Rojo Mussel-white Corporate Total Cash cost, as above $ 17,480 $ 66,548 $ — $ 84,028$ 35,695 $ 66,548 $ — $ 102,243 Office and administration — — 6,202 6,202— — 11,789 11,789 Share based payments (excl PSUs) 33 355 592 98063 355 1,685 2,103 Accretion of site closure provisions 140 786 — 926260 786 — 1,046 Amortization of site closure provisions 19 661 — 680169 661 — 830 Sustaining capital 519 889 — 1,408969 889 — 1,858 Sustaining capitalized exploration and development expenses — 17,552 — 17,552— 17,552 — 17,552 Lease payments 165 194 — 359303 194 — 497 ALL-IN SUSTAINING COST $ 18,356 $ 86,895 $ 6,794 $ 112,135$ 37,459 $ 86,895 $ 13,474 $ 137,918 Ounces sold 26,591 52,318 n/a 78,90957,103 52,318 n/a 109,421 All-in sustaining cost per ounce sold $ 690 $ 1,663 $ n/a $ 1,421$ 656 $ 1,663 $ n/a $ 1,260 (note, the tables above exclude costs and gold sales for Musselwhite Mine for the period March 1 to March 31, 2025) EXPLORATION AND PROJECT DEVELOPMENT COSTS Exploration and project development costs are calculated as the sum of costs related to exploration and to project development. Some of these costs have been expensed, while some of these have been capitalized, in accordance with our accounting policies. Q2 2025 Q2 2024 YTD Q2 2025 YTD Q2 2024 Exploration and evaluation expense $ 9,412 $ 6,649$ 18,291 $ 11,393 Expenditures on mineral properties capitalized 22,851 3,10329,783 6,979 EXPLORATION AND PROJECT DEVELOPMENT $ 32,263 $ 9,752$ 48,074 $ 18,372 Forward-looking Statements This news release contains certain "forward-looking information" and "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Canadian securities legislation and within the meaning of Section 27A of the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended, Section 21E of the United States Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, or in releases made by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, all as may be amended from time to time, including, without limitation, statements regarding the impact of the pit wall event on the Company's operations; the Company's estimates of material to be removed from the north wall of the pit, including the strip ratio, expected grade, the stacking of such material on the heap leach over the coming months, tonnage, and the extent of the pushback; the Company's revised 2025 guidance, including production and AISC; the Company's exploration programs, including timing, expenditures, and the goals and results thereof; the timing of permitting, construction, and production at South Railroad; the initial mineral resource estimate for Camino Rojo; and the Company's goals and objectives. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical facts which address events, results, outcomes or developments that the Company expects to occur. Forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs, estimates and opinions of the Company's management on the date the statements are made and they involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Certain material assumptions regarding such forward-looking statements were made, including without limitation, assumptions regarding: the impact of the pit wall event on Camino Rojo; the future price of gold and silver; anticipated costs and the Company's ability to fund its programs; the Company's ability to carry on exploration, development, and mining activities; the Company's ability to successfully integrate the Musselwhite Mine; tonnage of ore to be mined and processed; ore grades and recoveries; decommissioning and reclamation estimates; currency exchange rates remaining as estimated; prices for energy inputs, labour, materials, supplies and services remaining as estimated; the Company's ability to secure and to meet obligations under property agreements, including the layback agreement with Fresnillo plc; that all conditions of the Company's credit facility will be met; the timing and results of drilling programs; mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates and the assumptions on which they are based; the discovery of mineral resources and mineral reserves on the Company's mineral properties; the obtaining of a subsequent agreement with Fresnillo to access the sulphide mineral resource at the Camino Rojo Project and develop the entire Camino Rojo Project mineral resources estimate; that political and legal developments will be consistent with current expectations; the timely receipt of required approvals and permits, including those approvals and permits required for successful project permitting, construction, and operation of projects; the timing of cash flows; the costs of operating and exploration expenditures; the Company's ability to operate in a safe, efficient, and effective manner; the Company's ability to obtain financing as and when required and on reasonable terms; that the Company's activities will be in accordance with the Company's public statements and stated goals; and that there will be no material adverse change or disruptions affecting the Company or its properties. Consequently, there can be no assurances that such statements will prove to be accurate and actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Forward-looking statements involve significant known and unknown risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated. These risks include, but are not limited to: uncertainty and variations in the estimation of mineral resources and mineral reserves; risks related to the Company's indebtedness and gold prepayment; risks related to exploration, development, and operation activities; foreign country and political risks, including risks relating to foreign operations; tailings risks; reclamation costs; delays in obtaining or failure to obtain governmental permits, or non-compliance with permits; environmental and other regulatory requirements; loss of, delays in, or failure to get access from surface rights owners; uncertainties related to title to mineral properties; water rights; risks related to natural disasters, terrorist acts, health crises, and other disruptions and dislocations; financing risks and access to additional capital; risks related to guidance estimates and uncertainties inherent in the preparation of feasibility studies; uncertainty in estimates of production, capital, and operating costs and potential production and cost overruns; the fluctuating price of gold and silver; risks related to the Cerro Quema Project; unknown labilities in connection with acquisitions; global financial conditions; uninsured risks; climate change risks; competition from other companies and individuals; conflicts of interest; risks related to compliance with anti-corruption laws; volatility in the market price of the Company's securities; assessments by taxation authorities in multiple jurisdictions; foreign currency fluctuations; the Company's limited operating history; litigation risks; the Company's ability to identify, complete, and successfully integrate acquisitions; intervention by non-governmental organizations; outside contractor risks; risks related to historical data; the Company not having paid a dividend; risks related to the Company's foreign subsidiaries; risks related to the Company's accounting policies and internal controls; the Company's ability to satisfy the requirements of Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002; enforcement of civil liabilities; the Company's status as a passive foreign investment company (PFIC) for U.S. federal income tax purposes; information and cyber security; the Company's significant shareholders; gold industry concentration; shareholder activism; other risks associated with executing the Company's objectives and strategies; as well as those risk factors discussed in the Company's most recently filed management's discussion and analysis, as well as its annual information form dated March 18, 2025, which are available on and Except as required by the securities disclosure laws and regulations applicable to the Company, the Company undertakes no obligation to update these forward-looking statements if management's beliefs, estimates or opinions, or other factors, should change. Cautionary Note to U.S. Readers This news release has been prepared in accordance with Canadian standards for the reporting of mineral resource and mineral reserve estimates, which differ from the previous and current standards of the United States securities laws. In particular, and without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the terms "mineral reserve", "proven mineral reserve", "probable mineral reserve", "inferred mineral resources", "indicated mineral resources", "measured mineral resources" and "mineral resources" used or referenced in this news release are Canadian mineral disclosure terms as defined in accordance with NI 43-101 and the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (the "CIM") – CIM Definition Standards on Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves, adopted by the CIM Council, as amended (the "CIM Definition Standards"). For United States reporting purposes, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") has adopted amendments to its disclosure rules (the "SEC Modernization Rules") to modernize the mining property disclosure requirements for issuers whose securities are registered with the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The SEC Modernization Rules more closely align the SEC's disclosure requirements and policies for mining properties with current industry and global regulatory practices and standards, including NI 43-101, and replace the historical property disclosure requirements for mining registrants that were included in Industry Guide 7 under the U.S. Securities Act. As a foreign private issuer that is eligible to file reports with the SEC pursuant to the multijurisdictional disclosure system (MJDS), the Company is not required to provide disclosure on its mineral properties under the SEC Modernization Rules and provides disclosure under NI 43-101 and the CIM Definition Standards. Accordingly, mineral reserve and mineral resource information contained in this news release may not be comparable to similar information disclosed by United States companies. As a result of the adoption of the SEC Modernization Rules, the SEC now recognizes estimates of "measured mineral resources", "indicated mineral resources" and "inferred mineral resources." In addition, the SEC has amended its definitions of "proven mineral reserves" and "probable mineral reserves" to be "substantially similar" to the corresponding CIM Definition Standards that are required under NI 43-101. While the above terms are "substantially similar" to CIM Definition Standards, there are differences in the definitions under the SEC Modernization Rules and the CIM Definition Standards. There is no assurance any mineral reserves or mineral resources that the Company may report as "proven mineral reserves", "probable mineral reserves", "measured mineral resources", "indicated mineral resources" and "inferred mineral resources" under NI 43-101 would be the same had the Company prepared the reserve or resource estimates under the standards adopted under the SEC Modernization Rules. Accordingly, information contained in this news release may not be comparable to similar information made public by U.S. companies subject to the reporting and disclosure requirements under the United States federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder. Appendix: Camino Rojo Underground Mineral Resource Estimate Table 1: Camino Rojo Underground Mineral Resource Estimate: DescriptionsMeasured Indicated Measured & Indicated Inferred kt g/t koz kt g/t koz kt g/t koz kt g/t koz GOLD (Au) Heap leach 7 1.95 0 1,704 2.90 159 1,711 2.90 159 214 2.29 16CIL - - - 12,475 2.07 832 12,475 2.07 832 2,549 1.81 148FLOT/POX/CIL - - - 35,900 2.56 2,958 35,900 2.56 2,958 2,813 2.57 232Total - Gold 7 1.95 0 50,079 2.45 3,949 50,086 2.45 3,950 5,576 2.21 396 kt g/t koz kt g/t koz kt g/t koz kt g/t koz SILVER (Ag) Heap leach 7 31.5 7 1,704 13.2 722 1,711 13.3 729 214 15.1 104CIL - - - 12,475 8.7 3,480 12,475 8.7 3,480 2,549 10.2 835FLOT/POX/CIL - - - 35,900 11.1 12,847 35,900 11.1 12,847 2,813 11.2 1,010Total - Silver 7 31.5 7 50,079 10.6 17,048 50,086 10.6 17,055 5,576 10.9 1,949 kt % Mlb kt % Mlb kt % Mlb kt % Mlb ZINC (Zn) Heap leach - - - - - - - - - - - -CIL - - - - - - - - - - - -FLOT/POX/CIL - - - 35,900 0.35 278 35,900 0.35 278 2,813 0.42 26Total - Zinc 0 0 0 35,900 0.35 278 35,900 0.35 278 2,813 0.42 26 kt g/t koz kt g/t koz kt g/t koz kt g/t koz AUEQ (Au) Heap leach 7 2.11 1 1,704 3.03 166 1,711 3.03 166 214 2.44 17CIL - - - 12,475 2.11 848 12,475 2.11 848 2,549 1.85 152FLOT/POX/CIL - - - 35,900 2.72 3,142 35,900 2.72 3,142 2,813 2.75 249Total - AUEQ 7 2.11 1 50,079 2.58 4,156 50,086 2.58 4,156 5,576 2.33 418 kt g/t koz/Mlb kt g/t or % koz/Mlb kt g/t or % koz/Mlb kt g/t or % koz/Mlb TOTALS Au 7 1.95 0 50,079 2.45 3,949 50,086 2.45 3,950 5,576 2.21 396Ag 31.5 7 10.6 17,048 10.6 17,055 10.9 1,949Zn - - 0.25 278 0.25 278 0.21 26AuEq 2.11 1 2.58 4,156 2.58 4,156 2.33 418 Mineral Resources Notes: CIM (2014) definitions were followed for Mineral Resources. The mineral resource estimate for Camino Rojo has an effective date of March 31, 2025. The Qualified Person responsible for the mineral resource estimate is Marie-Christine Gosselin, Senior Resource Geologist of SLR Consulting (Canada) Ltd. Mineral resources are estimated using a long-term price of US$2,300 /oz gold, US$1.25 /lb zinc and US$29 /oz silver and the following smelter terms: for oxide 99.9% payable Au and 98% payable Ag, and for sulphide 95% payable Au, 90% payable Ag and 95% payable Zn. Offsite costs (refining, transport and insurance) of US$145 /wmt transportation and US$230 /dmt treatment; a 2.5% NSR royalty. Metallurgical recoveries vary according to geometallurgical domains from heap leach, CIL, and flotation CIL with POX and are either constant or formula based. Heap leach recoveries range from 40% to 70% for gold and from 11% to 34% for silver. For CIL and CIL with POX, gold and silver recoveries are calculated using grade dependent formulae. The underground CIL mean recovery is 92% for gold and 36% for silver. The underground CIL with POX mean recovery is 85% for gold and 41% for silver. Zinc recovery by flotation is 80%. Mineral Resources are estimated in underground resource panels using NSR cut-off grades of 59.02 US$/t for leach material, 68.73 US$/t for CIL material, and 76.23 US$/t for CIL w/POX material. Underground resource panels have a minimum width of 2m. The NSR for heap leach material is calculated with the following formula: NSR ($/t) = US$71.98 x Au recovery x Au grade + US$0.84 x Ag recovery x Ag grade (g/t). The NSR for CIL material is calculated with the following formula: NSR ($/t) = US$68.34 x Au recovery x Au grade (g/t) + US$0.73 x Ag recovery x Ag grade (g/t). The NSR for CIL w/POX material is calculated with the following formula: NSR ($/t) = US$68.34 x Au recovery x Au grade (g/t) + US$0.73 x Ag recovery x Ag grade (g/T) + US$0.00146 x Zn recovery x Zn grade (ppm). The gold equivalent (AuEq) for heap leach material is calculated with the following formula: Au grade (g/t) + (US$0.84 x Ag recovery x Ag grade (g/t)) /(US$71.98 x Au recovery). The AuEq for CIL material is calculated with the following formula: Au grade (g/t) + (US$0.73 x Ag recovery x Ag grade (g/t)) / (US$68.34 x Au recovery). The AuEq for CIL w/POX material is calculated with the following formula: Au grade (g/t) + (US$0.73 x Ag recovery x Ag grade (g/t)) / (US$68.34 x Au recovery) + (US$0.00146 x Zn recovery x Zn grade (ppm)) / (US$68.34 x Au recovery). Numbers may not add due to rounding. The Mineral Resource estimate includes Inferred Mineral Resources that are considered too speculative geologically to have economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to be categorized as mineral reserves. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. The following factors, among others, could affect the mineral resource estimate: commodity price and exchange rate assumptions, pit slope angles, assumptions used in generating the resource pit shell and underground resource panels, including metal recoveries, and mining and process cost assumptions. SOURCE Orla Mining Ltd. View original content to download multimedia: Sign in to access your portfolio


Business Wire
an hour ago
- Business Wire
MediaCo Reports Second Quarter Net Revenue of $31.2 Million and First Half of 2025 Net Revenue of $59.3 Million
NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- Financial Results Net Revenue. Year-to-date Net Revenue was $59.3 million, up $26.4 million, or 80%, from the prior year, driven primarily by new Audio and Video segment assets from the April 2024 Estrella Acquisition. Net Loss. Year-to-date Net Loss was $17.4 million, an improvement of $34.6 million from the prior year, primarily due to higher revenue and lower corporate costs related to the April 2024 Estrella Acquisition. These gains were partially offset by higher operating, depreciation, and amortization expenses tied to the Estrella Acquisition, along with a prior-year change in fair value of warrant shares liability. Net Loss margin improved to (29)% from (158)% in the prior-year period. Adjusted EBITDA. Year-to-date Adjusted EBITDA was $2.9 million, up $7.4 million from the prior year, driven by higher revenue and improved operational management. Adjusted EBITDA margin improved to 5% from a negative margin in the prior-year period. Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA margin are non-GAAP measures. Please refer to the 'Definitions and Disclosures Regarding Non- GAAP Financial Information' section herein, the reconciliations at the end of this press release and additional information on our website. 2025 Second Quarter Financial Summary 2025 First Half Financial Summary (1) Net Income margin is Net Income as a percentage of Net Revenue. Adjusted EBITDA margin is Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of Net Revenue. (2) Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA margin are non-GAAP measures. Please refer to the 'Definitions and Disclosures Regarding Non-GAAP Financial Information' section herein, the reconciliations at the end of this press release and additional information on our website. Expand Albert Rodriguez, MediaCo CEO and President, commented, 'We're proud to report a 19% year-over-year revenue increase this quarter, clear proof that our business is not only strong but gaining real momentum. Even more compelling is the 345% surge in first half digital revenue, which now accounts for 33.0% of our total ad income. This growth is fueled by our deep connection with multicultural audiences and the cultural relevance we deliver across every platform. It's a powerful validation of our strategy and indicates that MediaCo is leading the charge in today's digital-first economy. This quarter delivered record revenue, with P18–49 growth in five of the last seven months. EstrellaTV was the only Spanish-language broadcast network to post year-over-year prime-time growth for the full quarter—proof of our consistent performance and enduring audience connection.' Debra DeFelice, CFO and Treasurer, commented, 'MediaCo delivered a record second quarter, reflecting continued strength across our portfolio. Growth was driven by increases in radio and TV advertising revenue, record-breaking digital performance, and disciplined expense management. Our successful integration of Estrella Media assets from the most recent acquisition, combined with the progressive realization of synergies across markets and multiple delivery platforms, is fueling strong, sustainable results. We remain focused on delivering strong operating performance, enhancing cash flow, and executing on our long-term growth strategy, while advancing our content offerings and accelerating digital expansion. These initiatives position us to capitalize on emerging opportunities in the second half of the year.' Company and Business Highlights MediaCo Holding Inc. (Nasdaq: MDIA) is a diverse-owned, multi-platform media company serving multicultural audiences across the U.S. Through a network of iconic brands—including Hot 97, WBLS, EstrellaTV, Estrella News, Que Buena Los Angeles and the Don Cheto Radio Network—MediaCo reaches over 20 million people monthly via television, radio, digital, and streaming platforms. The company's innovative and culturally resonant content spans music, news, and entertainment across major local and national markets. New Programming: EstrellaTV is poised for continued growth with new sports, original, and acquired programming. The network secured multi-year rights to all Tigres, Tigres Femenil, Juarez, and Juarez Femenil Liga MX home games across all platforms. It also acquired multiplatform rights to the live music reality show Objetivo Fama and greenlit another season of Tengo Talento, Mucho Talento: Nueva Era for fall. Events: The 31st annual Summer Jam sold out the Prudential Center, featuring A Boogie, Wit Da Hoodie, Gunna, GloRilla and more and is back in June 2026, promising an even bigger show. In celebration of Cinco de Mayo, MediaCo's Spanish-language radio stations hosted sold out music festivals in Los Angeles, Houston and Dallas with over 40,000 in attendance. Digital & Streaming: MediaCo expects remarkable year-over-year digital and streaming revenue growth, fueled by EstrellaTV's Spanish-language brands and rising demand for CTV and FAST channels on major platforms. FAST watch time and monetized CTV ad inventory grew significantly in Q2. EstrellaTV and Estrella News were ranked as the top Latino-focused mixed IP FAST channels in the most recent Amagi/Ampere report. In Q2, FAST monthly watch time topped 310M minutes and monetized premium CTV ad inventory rose 290% YoY. MediaCo expanded its FAST footprint and ad mix with WAPA+ and Todos Novelas via Hemisphere Media. HOT 97's digital platforms amplified Summer Jam with record engagement in social reach up 1,000% to 38M users and web/app visitors up nearly 80% YoY. Hot 97 TV, a new FAST channel for Hip Hop and Afro culture, is set to launch this summer and is an example of the many initiatives with Trace to expand Afro-Urban content globally. HOT 97 and WBLS also launched commercial-free stations on TuneIn's premium service for new revenue opportunities. Radio: In early 2025, MediaCo's radio division grew primetime A25-54 audiences 24% vs. the prior four months, outpacing the market's 18% growth. Gains were led by KBUE/LA (+56%), KRQB/Riverside/San Bernardino (+46%), Dallas stations (+38% combined), Houston (+19%), and New York (+14% combined). Broadcast TV: EstrellaTV posted year-over-year prime time growth in five of the last seven months. Q2 P18-49 Mon–Sun prime averaged 15.3k viewers, up 23% YoY, driven by new originals and news programming. On May 14, the semifinal Liga MX match (Tigres UANL vs. Toluca) delivered the network's largest full coverage P18-49 audience ever (+157% vs. season average). June marked the third straight monthly gain, with Mon–Fri prime up 29% YoY. Local TV: EstrellaTV Local saw strong year-over-year growth in the combined April–May book averages. Three of the network's largest owned-and-operated stations posted gains in weekday prime among P18-49: KRCA/LA nearly doubled its audience (+96%), QFAA/Dallas grew +49%, and KZJL/Houston surged +143%. WGEN/Miami also delivered impressive results, up +198% in weekday prime among P25-54. Forward-Looking Statements This communication includes or incorporates forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended ('Exchange Act'). You can identify these forward-looking statements by our use of words such as 'intend,' 'plan,' 'may,' 'will,' 'project,' 'estimate,' 'anticipate,' 'believe,' 'expect,' 'continue,' 'potential,' 'opportunity' and similar expressions, whether in the negative or affirmative. Such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof, are based on managements' estimates, assumptions and beliefs regarding our future plans, intentions and expectations. We cannot guarantee that we will achieve these plans, intentions or expectations. All statements regarding our expected financial position, business, results of operations and financing plans are forward-looking statements. Actual results or events could differ materially from the plans, intentions or expectations disclosed in the forward-looking statements we make. We have included important facts in various cautionary statements in this communication that we believe could cause our actual results to differ materially from forward-looking statements that we make. The forward-looking statements do not reflect the potential impact of any future acquisitions, mergers or dispositions. We undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements because of new information, future events or otherwise. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this release. For more details on factors that could affect these expectations, please see MediaCo's other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Definitions and Disclosures Regarding Non-GAAP Financial Information We define Adjusted EBITDA as consolidated Operating loss adjusted to exclude restructuring expenses, business combination transaction costs, unusual and non-recurring expenditures and non-cash compensation included within operating expenses, as well as the following line items presented in our Statements of Operations: Depreciation and amortization, Loss on disposal of assets, change in fair value of warrant shares liability and Other income. Alternatively, Adjusted EBITDA is calculated as Net loss, adjusted to exclude Provision for income taxes, Interest expense, net, Depreciation and amortization, Loss on disposal of assets, Change in fair value of warrant shares liability, Other income, and Other adjustments. We use Adjusted EBITDA, among other measures, to evaluate the Company's operating performance. This measure is among the primary measures used by management for the planning and forecasting of future periods, as well as for measuring performance for compensation of executives and other members of management. We believe this measure is an important indicator of our operational strength and performance of our business because it provides a link between operational performance and operating income. It is also a primary measure used by management in evaluating companies as potential acquisition targets. We believe the presentation of this measure is relevant and useful for investors because it allows investors to view performance in a manner similar to the method used by management. We believe it helps improve investors' ability to understand our operating performance and makes it easier to compare our results with other companies that have different capital structures or tax rates. In addition, we believe this measure is also among the primary measures used externally by our investors, analysts and peers in our industry for purposes of valuation and comparing our operating performance to other companies in our industry. Since Adjusted EBITDA is not a measure calculated in accordance with GAAP, it should not be considered in isolation of, or as a substitute for, operating loss or net loss as an indicator of operating performance and may not be comparable to similarly titled measures employed by other companies. Adjusted EBITDA is not necessarily a measure of our ability to fund our cash needs. Because it excludes certain financial information compared with operating loss and compared with consolidated net loss, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures, users of this financial information should consider the types of events and transactions which are excluded. For a reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measurements to the GAAP financial results cited in this news announcement, please see the supplemental tables at the end of this release. About MediaCo Holding Inc. MediaCo Holding Inc. (Nasdaq: MDIA) is a diverse-owned, multi-platform media company serving multicultural audiences across the U.S. Through a network of iconic brands—including Hot 97, WBLS, EstrellaTV, Estrella News, Que Buena Los Angeles and the Don Cheto Radio Network—MediaCo reaches over 20 million people monthly via television, radio, digital, and streaming platforms. The company's innovative and culturally resonant content spans music, news, and entertainment across major local and national markets. More info at MEDIACO HOLDING INC. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited) Six Months Ended June 30, Change (Dollars in thousands) 2025 2024 $ % NET REVENUES $ 59,275 $ 32,908 26,367 80 OPERATING EXPENSES: Operating expenses 63,986 41,297 22,689 55 Corporate expenses 3,147 6,835 (3,688 ) (54 ) Depreciation and amortization 3,466 1,564 1,902 122 Loss on disposal of assets 144 5 139 2,780 Total operating expenses 70,743 49,701 21,042 42 OPERATING LOSS (11,468 ) (16,793 ) 5,325 (32 ) OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE): Interest expense, net (7,609 ) (3,918 ) (3,691 ) 94 Change in fair value of warrant shares liability — (31,027 ) 31,027 N/A Other income 2,230 20 2,210 11,050 Total other expense (5,379 ) (34,925 ) 29,546 (85 ) LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES (16,847 ) (51,718 ) 34,871 (67 ) PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES 559 266 293 110 NET LOSS $ (17,406 ) $ (51,984 ) 34,578 (67 ) Expand MEDIACO HOLDING INC. NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES RECONCILIATIONS OF NET LOSS TO EBITDA AND ADJUSTED EBITDA (1) AND NET LOSS MARGIN TO ADJUSTED EBITDA MARGIN (1) Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30, (Dollars in thousands) 2025 2024 2025 2024 Net revenues $ 31,245 $ 26,202 $ 59,275 $ 32,908 Net Loss $ (8,521 ) $ (48,125 ) $ (17,406 ) $ (51,984 ) % Margin (28 )% (184 )% (29 )% (158 )% Provision for income taxes 279 182 559 266 Interest expense, net 3,855 3,782 7,609 3,918 Depreciation and amortization 1,697 1,431 3,466 1,564 EBITDA $ (2,690 ) $ (42,730 ) $ (5,772 ) $ (46,236 ) Loss on disposal of assets 5 5 144 5 Change in fair value of warrant shares liability — 31,027 — 31,027 Other income (2,119 ) (10 ) (2,230 ) (20 ) Other adjustments 6,595 6,486 10,776 10,725 Adjusted EBITDA (1) $ 1,791 $ (5,222 ) $ 2,918 $ (4,499 ) % Margin (1) 6 % (20 )% 5 % (14 )% (1) We define Adjusted EBITDA as consolidated Operating loss adjusted to exclude restructuring expenses, business combination transaction costs, unusual and non-recurring expenditures and non-cash compensation included within operating expenses, as well as the following line items presented in our Statements of Operations: Depreciation and amortization, Loss on disposal of assets, change in fair value of warrant shares liability and Other income. Alternatively, Adjusted EBITDA is calculated as Net loss, adjusted to exclude Provision for income taxes, Interest expense, net, Depreciation and amortization, Loss on disposal of assets, Change in fair value of warrant shares liability, Other income, and Other adjustments. We define Adjusted EBITDA margin as Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of net revenue. We use Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA margin, among other measures, to evaluate the Company's operating performance. These measures are among the primary measures used by management for the planning and forecasting of future periods, as well as for measuring performance for compensation of executives and other members of management. We believe these measures are an important indicator of our operational strength and performance of our business because they provide a link between operational performance and operating income. They are also primary measures used by management in evaluating companies as potential acquisition targets. We believe the presentation of these measures is relevant and useful for investors because it allows investors to view performance in a manner similar to the method used by management. We believe they help improve investors' ability to understand our operating performance and make it easier to compare our results with other companies that have different capital structures or tax rates. In addition, we believe these measures are also among the primary measures used externally by our investors, analysts and peers in our industry for purposes of valuation and comparing our operating performance to other companies in our industry. Since Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA margin are not measures calculated in accordance with GAAP, they should not be considered in isolation of, or as a substitute for, operating loss or net loss, or net loss margin as indicators of operating performance and may not be comparable to similarly titled measures employed by other companies. Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA margin are not necessarily measures of our ability to fund our cash needs. Because they exclude certain financial information compared with operating loss, consolidated net loss, and consolidated net loss margin, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures, users of this financial information should consider the types of events and transactions which are excluded. Expand