Hundreds attend vigil in memory of Sarah Montgomery
Hundreds of people have attended a vigil for pregnant mother-of-two Sarah Montgomery in Donaghadee.
The vigil occurred just hours after a man had appeared in court charged with her murder and child destruction.
Large crowds, some carrying flowers or candles, gathered at the town's resource centre before walking the short distance to the Elmfield Walk home where the body of the 27-year-old was found at the weekend.
Ainsley White became emotional as she addressed the crowd about her best friend.
She described Ms Montgomery as a 'mother, a sister, a granddaughter, a friend'.
She added: 'To Sarah, family meant everything. Her two little girls meant absolutely everything to her.
'Sarah was the best mummy and she couldn't wait to make her family complete with her little boy.'
She said: 'I hope Sarah knew how much she was loved.
'I don't have the words to describe Sarah as a friend, I was honoured to call her my best friend and my sister at the same time.
'She never failed to put a smile on your face. She was a girl's girl, she had your back.'
Ms White said: 'It is an absolutely cruel world that we live in. Sarah was just the best ever.
'Both of you are in the arms of the angels and you are both safe, I hope you both rest in peace and you are looking over us.
'Just know your girls are going to be the most protected kids in this world.'
The crowd then observed a minute's silence before breaking into applause.
Dozens of people then queued to leave flowers at Ms Montgomery's home.
Among those who attended the vigil were some members of the family of Natalie McNally, who was pregnant when she was killed in Lurgan, Co Armagh in December 2022.
Earlier in the day, a 28-year-old man appeared in court charged with the murder of Ms Montgomery
Zak Hughes, from Ardglen Place in Belfast, was also charged with child destruction during a brief appearance at Newtownards Magistrates' Court.
Dressed in a grey tracksuit, he stood in the dock and nodded when asked if he understood the charges.
A PSNI detective chief inspector told the court he could connect Hughes to the offences.
No facts of the case were laid out and there was no application for bail.
The date of the alleged offences given on court papers was June 27.
District Judge Conor Heaney remanded Hughes in custody until July 30.
A 42-year-old woman, who was arrested in Belfast on suspicion of assisting an offender, was released unconditionally on Tuesday.
The death of Ms Montgomery has led to renewed focus on the rate of violence against women and girls in Northern Ireland.
She was the 27th adult woman to be killed in Northern Ireland since 2020.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
37 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
BREAKING NEWS Man in his 30s dies after being stabbed outside luxury hotel and casino in Knightsbridge - as police launch hunt for attacker
Police have today sealed of an exclusive London street and are hunting for a killer after a man was stabbed to death outside a high-end casino. The murder victim died outside the £1,650-a-night Park Tower Hotel and Casino, which is directly across the road from the Harvey Nichols department store in Knightsbridge. The stabbing took place in Seville Street, which is also close to Harrods, a host of luxury stores and also Hyde Park. One witness described the scene as 'bloody' and it remains sealed off and under police guard today. A Scotland Yard spokesman said: 'At 9.24pm on Wednesday, July 9 officers, the London Ambulance Service and London's Air Ambulance responded to reports of a stabbing on Seville Street, Knightsbridge. 'One victim, a man in his 30s, was found at the scene with stab wounds and was treated by paramedics. 'Sadly, despite their best efforts he was pronounced dead shortly after their arrival. 'Emergency services remain at the location. A crime scene has been established. 'Several lines of enquiry are ongoing. At this stage no arrests have been made. Please call police on 101 referencing CAD 8521/09JUL if you were a witness or have any information which might help.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Woman accused of murdering man with hammer leaves chilling note on his bloodied body for cops
A Florida woman was arrested on murder charges after she allegedly killed a man with a hammer and left a chilling note on his bloody body that read, 'PEDO Touches Children,' in green highlighter. Journee McGrew, 21, was arrested on July 2 after officers responded to reports of a dispute in an apartment complex in Jacksonville, according to the Jacksonville Sheriff's Office. Police arrived at the apartment just before 4am and found a man dead in a pool of blood. The victim, later identified as Waduta Woodley, 41, was lying in front of an apartment behind a stairwell, according to an arrest report. 'Large pools of blood were under the victim and copious amounts of blood were observed on the walls and ground,' the report read. The chilling note was placed on top of the victim's chest, and Woodley was pronounced dead at the scene. Officers also observed bloody footprints leading from the doorway to the bathroom and a metal hammer covered in blood in the bathroom sink. Law enforcement collected a pair of pink Crocs, slippers covered in blood, and various items of clothing soaked in blood. They also took the pink notebook and green highlighter as evidence. McGrew's father, Victor Owens Sr., and brother, Victor Owens Jr., arrived at the crime scene and were questioned by police. Her father told cops that McGrew had attempted to contact his wife multiple times during the night. He then decided to check on his daughter around 2am and received a shocking call from McGrew in the car. Owens Sr. told investigators that his daughter informed him Woodley came to her apartment and 'demanded that she have sex with him,' the Miami Herald reported. She allegedly told her dad that after she denied his advances, he grabbed her, so she hit him in the head with a hammer. 'I think he's dead, Daddy,' McGrew allegedly told her father over the phone. The sheriff's office said that McGrew accused Woodley of 'grooming her' since she was eight years old and previously sexually assaulted her. McGrew reportedly told officers that she invited Woodley over and invited him to 'spend time with him and have sex.' After they went out and returned to the apartment, he allegedly pressured her into having sex, and she denied his advances. McGrew then went to grab a metal hammer from her closet and hid it behind her back when she escorted him out of her apartment. She reportedly told police that he turned toward her in an 'aggressive' way, which led to the physical altercation. Police determined that Woodley died after suffering multiple blunt force injuries. McGrew was booked into the John E. Goode Pretrial Detention Facility for second-degree murder and tampering with evidence. Her bond is set at $5,003, according to the Jacksonville Sheriff's Office jail records.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Chemical castration stopped Peter's deviant thoughts. Should it be mandatory for all sex offenders?
When Peter* was arrested for indecent exposure in his 40s, what happened next was almost a relief. Plagued by deviant sexual desires since the age of seven, he was consumed by self-hatred but felt unable to control the ideas that came, unbidden, into his head. After his arrest and subsequent conviction (his first), he was handed a community supervision order and presented with another, more unusual path to rehabilitation: 'chemical castration'. The treatment, which involved taking a drug to suppress his sexual urges, was voluntary but Peter (who is now in his 60s) agreed to try it. The decision changed his life and he noticed the difference within a week. 'It gave me back the head space to think about things other than sexual urges,' he says now. 'It has enabled me to be certain of remaining offence-free for the rest of my life. [It] stopped me feeling any need or desire to offend.' Governments have long grappled with the question of how the law should deal with sex offenders. Roughly 20 per cent of the UK prison population is serving a sentence for a sexual offence, while more than 850 men a month are arrested for online child abuse offences in England and Wales. Usually, the answer is to hand down as harsh a sentence as possible; mandatory life imprisonment has been mooted by politicians in the past. Yet, in practice, prisons are full to bursting, and eight in 10 of those convicted of possessing child abuse images in the UK avoid jail. Could so-called 'chemical castration' be the solution? Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood, who is set to unveil plans for a major overhaul of the way the state punishes criminals this week, has said she will consider making the treatment mandatory for paedophiles and other sex offenders. An existing pilot scheme was commended by David Gauke's independent sentencing review and has shown promising results, suggesting recidivism could be cut by up to 60 per cent. Owing to its success, and a recommendation by Gauke, the programme (which offers 34 offenders in eight prisons voluntary chemical castration) is set to be expanded to 20 prisons, before being rolled out nationally. But suggestions the forthcoming Sentencing Bill may one day lead to mandatory medication, have been met with dismay by experts, who warn that forcing treatment on offenders 'will not work'. Not a panacea for sexual abuse Prof Belinda Winder, a forensic psychologist at Nottingham Trent University, has been evaluating the use of 'medication to manage problematic sexual arousal' (MMSA) for the past 15 years. She says mandating the drugs – typically taken in pill form – would be costly, impractical, and possibly illegal. To explain the psychology of an offender with problematic sexual arousal, Prof Winder uses the analogy of a radio turned up to full volume: 'It's like people are carrying a little radio around with them that's saying 'sex, sex, sex'. 'Everything in their world has sexual elements, or they're trying to bring sex into it,' she says. 'You're getting people masturbating ten times a day, every day, or wanting sex with their partner five, six, times a day… the medication gets sexual arousal back either to a low or manageable level.' But it won't work for all offenders, Prof Winder and others argue. It is only truly effective for those who have 'genuine difficulties in managing arousal', and want to change that, says Prof Don Grubin, emeritus professor of forensic psychiatry at Newcastle University. It will not be suitable for offenders who are primarily motivated by anger, or who struggle to moderate their behaviour while using alcohol or drugs, he adds. In fact, Prof Grubin argues, it is only really an option for a sub-section of the offender population: those with 'paraphilias', who are motivated by an intense sexual fixation. As Prof Grubin suggests, the treatment seems to work for some. A study from Scandinavia found that MMSA reduces rates of reoffending by 40 per cent. Results from a small clinical trial of 52 men in Stockholm, Sweden, showed that paedophiles living in the community had a significantly reduced risk of reoffending just two weeks after starting treatment. Indeed, in some jurisdictions, these treatments are already compulsory. Poland, Kazakhstan and a number of US states including California and Florida already have mandatory prescribing of anti-libidinal drugs to some sex offenders. Other countries including Germany, France, Sweden and Denmark offer chemical castration on a voluntary basis, as in the UK. In 2009, Prof Grubin introduced a pilot scheme in the UK, at HMP Whatton, a category-C prison which specifically holds men who have committed sexual offences. Volunteers were treated with chemical castration, or given anti-depressants. 'It would be wrong to think of it as a magic bullet,' he says, but 'when these drugs work, it's really dramatic. People's whole outlook and motivation changes.' Medications for sex offenders have actually been trialled in some UK prisons for more than 15 years, and used across the world for more than 60. Previously, they have been employed with ill-intent – most famously in the case of Alan Turing, the computer scientist and code-breaker, who was convicted of homosexuality in 1952 and accepted chemical castration as a way of avoiding imprisonment. He took his own life two years later, and received a posthumous royal pardon in 2013. More recently, critics have argued the treatment diminishes the responsibility of men who have committed appalling crimes, potentially allowing them to shorten or avoid time in prison. Earlier this year, Zhenhao Zou, a 28-year-old Chinese PhD student at University College, London, and one of Britain's most prolific serial rapists, offered to undergo chemical castration in the wake of his conviction, according to court documents. Rather than a show of remorse for his 'predatory' behaviour, this was adjudged to be an attempt by Zou to avoid a life sentence. It was refused and he was jailed for 24 years. Still, a growing body of experts believe the treatment can also be used to do good – to improve the lives and prospects of men who have committed sexual offences, and to cut rates of reoffending. 'Not every sex offender wants to be a sex offender' In UK prisons, chemical castration primarily involves the use of anti-androgens or Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone (GnRH), both of which lower levels of the male sex hormone testosterone to pre-pubescent levels, effectively wiping out sex drive and rendering the patient functionally impotent. They can also provoke severe side effects – including breast development, hormonal hot flushes, osteoporosis and cardiovascular changes. SSRI's, a class of antidepressant which can reduce compulsive sexual thoughts, are also used (most commonly Fluoxetine). But Prof Grubin says criminals don't feel angered by the impotence and loss of libido these medications cause. Quite the opposite: they have taken them voluntarily and often feel only relief, having been freed from the intense sexual urges that drove them to criminality. The three-year trial he piloted at HMP Whatton, which ended in 2012, delivered promising results. The treatment was formally adopted, and later introduced in other prisons. Along with Prof Winder, Prof Grubin is now running a double-blind controlled trial [where neither the participants nor researchers know who is receiving the active treatment, and who is receiving a placebo] to prove its efficacy – an important step, given the key criticism of the medication to date has been its lack of exposure to this type of testing. Dr Adarsh Kaul, a forensic psychiatrist who works in prisons in Nottinghamshire, says that 'most, if not all of' the men who are referred to him are relieved by the results. Contrary to the public perception of people who commit sexual offences, he says, 'it is not the case that every sex offender wants to be a sex offender'. 'There are some for whom you might compare it to alcohol,' says Dr Kaul. 'Does every person who drinks to excess want to screw up their life and destroy their health? No. There's a whole range of people.' It is often so effective that some of his patients consider themselves 'cured', though medics stress such a conclusion (as well as the term 'chemical castration' itself) is misleading because the results are reversible. 'There are people who I treat who get better, and at some point they say to me, 'I'm well now, and I don't need the treatment any more',' says Dr Kaul. 'But many of them, after a few weeks or months, will come back to me and say, 'You know what, you were right – I'm not cured, and the reason I thought I was is because I was taking this medication.'' It's not up to the Government to say, 'this man needs medication' Indeed, some have seized on arguments that the medication is not a silver bullet, criticising Mahmood's mooting of a nationwide, mandatory scheme. Shadow justice secretary, Robert Jenrick, has dismissed Mahmood's suggestion as a 'gimmick', designed to draw the public's attention away from major sentencing reform that could see swaths of prisoners released from jail just a third of the way through their sentences, in order to deal with an overcrowding crisis. '[Sir Keir] Starmer cannot mandate chemical castration without ripping up human rights legislation. Pigs will fly before that happens,' he said in May. Mahmood and her fellow officials appear undeterred. 'Chemical castration works. Unlike the last Conservative government, this Government won't be squeamish about doing what works to keep the public safe. That starts by rolling chemical castration out nationwide – with two new regions soon to be announced. And we continue to explore mandation,' a Government source told The Times this week. But experts with experience of administering these drugs warn of potential trouble ahead, particularly if criminals end up needing to be sectioned in order to be treated – something the Government has not ruled out – or taking the medication is made a condition of their parole licences. 'We treat patients, we don't treat risk,' says Prof Grubin, who adds that medics risk being turned into 'agents of social control' if the plan is pushed through. 'It's not up to the Government to say, 'this man needs medication'.' Prof Grubin suggests doctors may even refuse to administer the treatment under such circumstances. After all, he argues, the reason they have been successful so far is because the men taking the drugs want to reduce their own risk. * Name has been changed
