FBI San Diego warns students that ‘hoax threats are not a joke'
In a statement released earlier this week, the agency urged students and parents to understand the dangers — and the legal penalties — tied to making or sharing false threats against schools or public spaces.
'Whether real or fake, the FBI takes every threat seriously, putting our full investigative force behind each one,' said Special Agent in Charge Mark Dargis of the FBI San Diego Field Office. 'My message to the public, and especially our school-age youth is this: if you make a hoax threat, the FBI will work with our law enforcement partners to identify you and hold you accountable.
SDSU named one of Princeton Review's 'Best Colleges' — and among top 'green' campuses
Hoax threats — even when intended as pranks — can trigger full-scale law enforcement responses, disrupt schools and communities, and inflict emotional distress on students, parents, and staff, FBI officials explained. They also waste valuable public resources and may delay responses to real emergencies.
The FBI emphasized that the method of delivery doesn't matter. Whether made through social media, text message, email, or even spoken aloud, any threat deemed a hoax will be investigated and could lead to prosecution.
According to authorities, here's what you should and shouldn't do:
Never post or share hoax threats — ever.
Don't forward threats you receive or see online — report them to authorities instead.
Parents: Talk with your children about the dangers of hoax threats and the importance of responsible online behavior.
Understand that sometimes these posts are a cry for attention or an emotional reaction — help your child find safer, more constructive outlets.
If you see or hear a threat, take action immediately. The FBI says to:
Call 911 during emergencies or threats to life.
Report criminal activity or threats anonymously:
Visit tips.fbi.gov
Call 1-800-CALL-FBI (800-225-5324)
Contact the FBI San Diego Field Office.
Visit the FBI Hoax Threat Awareness Page for more information.
As the new school year begins, authorities want to ensure the focus stays on learning, safety, and support — not lockdowns and investigations.
'Hoax threats are not a joke,' added Special Agent Dargis. 'Think twice before you post.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
9 minutes ago
- CBS News
Rural Colorado county faces deadly trend in traffic crashes, implements zero tolerance policy
One Colorado county has seen a tragic uptick in fatal traffic accidents in recent weeks, including a head-on crash on Highway 40 that killed one person and injured three others last Thursday. Just days earlier, a family of five, including three children, was killed in a crash on Highway 9 near Kremmling after a truck crossed into their lane. In response to these fatalities, the Grand County Sheriff's Office has introduced a zero-tolerance enforcement for reckless driving, focusing on speeding and aggressive driving behaviors. Grand County Sheriff Brett Schroetlin said the policy is aimed at addressing the surge in dangerous driving behaviors, including excessive speeding, illegal passing, and aggressive maneuvers. "We've noticed progressively worse issues with driving behaviors here in the county," Schroetlin said. "This initiative is a direct response to the recent fatalities, including the one that claimed the lives of an entire family." As of mid-2025, Grand County has already experienced five fatal crashes, a stark contrast to zero fatalities in 2023. The Sheriff warned that drivers caught engaging in aggressive behaviors or extreme speeding could face jail time. "We've seen speeds approaching 130 mph -- that's nearly double the posted speed limit," he said. "This isn't just about tickets; it's about saving lives." The sheriff also emphasized the need for legislative action to hold reckless drivers accountable. The Colorado Department of Transportation is ramping up efforts to address impaired driving as well, particularly ahead of the Labor Day weekend, a traditionally busy travel time. July was the deadliest month for impaired driving-related crashes in Colorado, with 26 lives lost. So far this year, 124 people have died in crashes involving impaired drivers. From Aug. 15 to Sept. 3, CDOT will support law enforcement agencies statewide during "The Heat Is On" DUI crackdown. The campaign aims to reduce impaired driving fatalities, which often spike during the "100 Deadliest Days of Summer" between Memorial Day and Labor Day. "Impaired driving-related crashes are tragic and completely avoidable," Col. Matthew C. Packard, chief of the Colorado State Patrol, said in a press release. "Don't make excuses. If you've been drinking, put down the keys and find a safe ride home." A DUI in Colorado can cost drivers an average of $13,530, factoring in fines, legal fees, increased insurance costs, and lost wages. Furthermore, a DUI conviction can result in job loss, particularly for those in driving-dependent careers such as law enforcement and trucking. CDOT has also launched a campaign to educate the public about the consequences of refusing a DUI test under Colorado's Expressed Consent Law, which mandates that drivers consent to a toxicology test after a DUI arrest. The next DUI enforcement period will run from Sept. 11 to Oct. 22, focusing on Fall Festivals. A graph detailing impaired driving-related fatalities in July from 2019 to 2024 shows a persistent pattern of deaths, with July 2024 seeing 28 fatalities, up from 24 in 2023.
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Twenty years ago, my research exposed one of the biggest corporate scandals in U.S. history: It taught me that fraud is everywhere, just waiting to be revealed
Twenty years ago, I published a paper that helped uncover one of the largest corporate scandals in U.S. history. More than 100 public companies were implicated, dozens of executives resigned or faced criminal charges, and billions in earnings had to be restated. I never intended to be a whistleblower. I was simply doing what academics are trained to do: ask questions, follow the data, and let the evidence speak. But what the evidence revealed was staggering: executives at hundreds of companies were manipulating stock option grant dates to enrich their executives at the expense of shareholders. The practice became known as backdating. Now, on the 20th anniversary of that research, I see troubling parallels emerging in other corners of the financial world. A pattern too precise to be chance My journey into this murky corner of corporate behavior began with a desire to understand how executive compensation influenced firm decisions. While analyzing large datasets of compensation and stock prices, I noticed something peculiar: stock option grants often coincided with recent dips in the company's share price. Too often. The pattern was statistically improbable. It was as if executives had a crystal ball, repeatedly receiving options at the most opportune moment. But the truth was more mundane—and more troubling. Companies were retroactively selecting grant dates that coincided with low stock prices, effectively locking in instant, unearned gains. This allowed executives to buy shares at a discount while maintaining the illusion that they had to earn the discount by lifting the stock price. The simplicity of the scheme What made the fraud so insidious was its simplicity. Backdating didn't require complex financial engineering or elaborate cover-ups. It was a quiet manipulation of paperwork—choosing a date in the past when the stock price was low and pretending that was the day the options were granted. That simplicity likely contributed to its spread. There's evidence that individuals on multiple boards passed along the practice. But even isolated executives and directors could easily conceive the scheme, much like someone backdating a check to make it appear they paid a bill on time. Hidden in plain sight What struck me most was that backdating went unnoticed for at least a decade. It was a silent epidemic of opportunism. The option grant data was public. Thousands of participants were involved. Surely some auditors must have seen isolated traces of the fraud. But no one connected the dots. My research, combined with a timely nudge, eventually prompted the SEC to launch targeted investigations. Journalists followed, including a team at The Wall Street Journal with the time, resources, and incentives to pursue the story. Their work earned the paper its first Pulitzer Prize for Public Service. Parallels in other scandals I've since seen parallels of backdating in other financial scandals. For example, backdating is not the only fraud that depends on simply picking prices from the past. Bernie Madoff's infamous Ponzi scheme used fabricated trades based on stale prices. Remarkably, Madoff's investors accepted these reports for years, despite the implausibility of the returns. Similarly, the mutual fund late-trading scandal allowed favored clients to illegally trade mutual funds late in the evening at stale prices from the end of the trading day. These cases show how much easier it is to perform well when you can reach back in time and choose a favorable moment to act. Today, I worry that similar dynamics may be unfolding in private equity. Many funds report valuations based on internal or third-party estimates shortly after acquiring assets. These valuations often appear inflated—sometimes even acknowledged as such by the firms themselves. Yet these funds are increasingly included in pension portfolios, exposing everyday investors to risks—and potentially fraud—they may not fully understand. The paradox of corporate fraud That's the paradox of corporate fraud: it's both obvious and invisible. The data is often there. The patterns are detectable. But with silent perpetrators, the deception persists. What gives me hope is that our tools for detecting fraud are more powerful than ever. We have better data, sharper analytical methods, and a growing community of skeptical citizen watchdogs. Because the next scandal won't be stopped by regulators alone. It will be stopped by someone who notices a pattern, asks a question, and refuses to look away. The opinions expressed in commentary pieces are solely the views of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and beliefs of Fortune. This story was originally featured on Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Flames engulf semi-truck carrying Tesla cars on California freeway
A semi-truck hauling 7 Tesla EVs caught fire under unclear circumstances on the 5 Freeway in Sylmar, California on August 16.
