Green claims: confusion surrounds the EU's anti-greenwashing directive
After U-turns on the duty of vigilance directive and later on the need to display the environmental score on apparel products, the EU's tendency to back down on its green deal has once again been confirmed. This time, it all started on June 18, with a request from the European People's Party (EPP) to drop the so-called 'Green Claim' directive.
The directive originally targeted vague marketing expressions such as 'green product', 'biodegradable', 'climate-neutral' and '100% natural', aiming to force brands to demonstrate the veracity of their sustainability claims. The European Council stated its position on it a year ago, and its approval was eagerly awaited by brands, NGOs and industry associations, including European textile industry association Euratex.
On Friday June 20, it came as a surprise when a European Commission representative confirmed, following the EPP's request, its 'intention to withdraw its proposals' for defining the terms associated with sustainability. It was enough to stop short the debate on the directive, which had begun in 2023, despite the fact that a final meeting was scheduled for June 23 between the Commission, the Council and the European Parliament.
A few hours later, the EU Commission clarified its position, saying it is still willing to push forward the directive, but not if it incorporates provisions for micro-companies, as was the case in the text's last draft. There are 30 million such companies active in Europe.
This back and forth is consistent with the simplification drive the European Commission has been pushing since January. A politically motivated drive that notably led to a first package of comprehensive measures being presented in March. Measures which included a watering down of the duty of vigilance directive, and which have enraged NGOs while also not convincing companies and retailers.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
28 minutes ago
- Euronews
Fourteen member states oppose the Commission's EU budget overhaul
With the proposal for the next EU budget after 2027 just around the corner, the political landscape is far from calm. The latest sign of unrest: fourteen member states have endorsed a non-paper opposing the European Commission's plans to centralise the management and distribution of EU funds. 'Only a distinct and robust budget and a region-based allocation methodology, reflecting the different development levels of regions, together with a stand-alone Cohesion Policy dedicated legislation, can ensure that the next Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) will deliver long-term unity, competitiveness and convergence across EU regions,' states the document. Bulgaria, Czechia, Greece, Spain, Hungary, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovenia and Slovakia signed the non-paper on 'Cohesion Policy in the Future MFF,' aiming to secure a separate pot for narrowing the socio-economic gap between the richest and poorest European regions. The call from more than half of the member states comes in response to a leak about the Commission's plans to create a single funding pot for each EU country (covering around 530 programmes) and to link the receipt of funds to the fulfilment of policy objectives. The potential centralisation of the management and access to EU money would give greater power to national governments and Brussels, while proving detrimental to regions and other departments within the European Commission. European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen is expected to present the budget proposal for the next long-term financial period (2028–2034) on July 16 — but criticism from regions, member states, MEPs, and industry representatives continues to mount. Both Poland and the centre-left Socialists and Democrats (S&D) group in the European Parliament have raised concerns about the Commission's intention to merge dozens of individual funding streams into a single cash pot per member state, as detailed in their respective position papers on the next MFF. 'We will strongly oppose the 'one national plan per member state' approach, as well as the possibility for national plans to be underpinned by a 'payments against reforms' rule,' the Socialists wrote in a letter to von der Leyen sent on Monday. The Socialists — the second-largest group in the Parliament — also called on the Commission chief to propose a larger and more ambitious long-term budget, exceeding the current 1% of the EU's GDP, which is equivalent to around €1.2 trillion. Poland's conservative government, meanwhile, emphasized that future reforms should not lead to further centralisation or the merging of funding instruments. 'Regions should remain at the core of cohesion policy,' its position paper, dated 1 July, states. The EU's Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) and cohesion policy together account for more than two-thirds of the total EU budget — and Poland, which receives the most funding from cohesion policy, insists that their combined share in the MFF should not be less than it is currently. 'One of the priorities of the next MFF should be increasing the importance of economic, social, and territorial cohesion within the EU and striving for convergence,' Poland defends in its position paper. 'Competitiveness and cohesion are the two sides of the same coin,' they conclude.
Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
How could the US-China trade rearrangement affect Europe?
Since United States President Donald Trump's inauguration, he has announced more than 50 new or revised tariffs, including pauses, backdowns, escalations and de-escalations. As the state of US-China trade relations remains uncertain, many US firms are considering alternative sources of supply. Without a shift to different sources, prices may rise, and US companies and consumers might need to reduce or replace one product with another, virtually similar one. In this scenario, Europe could play a key role, both as an exporter and an importer. "Europe faces an increasingly difficult challenge: how to transition from being a recipient of decisions made by China and the US to actively shaping its own future," stated Francesca Ghiretti, director of the RAND Europe China Initiative, in a commentary piece. On average, Europe already supplies 55% of the available global export market for products which the US imports from China. According to nine varied simulations conducted by the global management consulting firm McKinsey & Company, the European Union, along with Norway, Switzerland, and the UK, could potentially replace about 30% to 65% of US imports from China with its exports, even in the face of high US tariffs on European goods. In each simulation, it is assumed that the value of US imports from China for each product falls to zero, and that instead, the US sources each product from other exporters. Products trade Europe's role in this scenario is most pronounced when it comes to electronics, other manufacturing, and textiles. The US has $191 billion, $52 billion, and $45 billion within each of these industries to rearrange, respectively. These are the same sectors for which the US currently imports mainly from China. In electronics, especially, Europe could be the primary substitute supplier in the US market. Another example is toys. Europe could supply the US market with Czech and German toys, replacing those made in China. This could see European consumers increasingly buy Chinese-made toys. As Europe has increased its exports to the US, it has also become a significant destination for Chinese exports, absorbing up to 55% of China's current shipments to the US. This shift could lead to deeper trade interdependence between Europe and China, as well as geopolitical tensions. "The next months and years will challenge whether Europe can stay the course, or it will lose itself trying to respond to ongoing challenges," said Francesca Ghiretti.
Fashion Network
an hour ago
- Fashion Network
Moda Management Global links with REPT to secure fashion deals for top female footballers
As the Women's European championship come into full focus in Switzerland this week, international fashion-linked agency Moda Management Global has formed a strategic partnership with REPT, the sports management agency representing some of the world's top female footballers. Using its expertise in the fashion industry, Moda will be working alongside REPT to secure fashion partnerships for its roster of soccer talent including Grace Clinton, Celin Bizet, Lauren James, Keira Walsh and Alex Greenwood. To support the new phase of growth, Moda has also appointed Alice O'Connor as head of Communications & PR. She joins with a decade of experience in the fashion industry including global communications roles at Burberry and Alexander McQueen. O'Connor joins the team alongside Florence Huntington-Whiteley, who became Moda's 'client connector' in March. Moda Management founders Faye Browne & Lauren Clinton said: 'This is a really exciting time for [us]. Working alongside REPT [we can] capitalise on the huge opportunity between women's football and fashion, and welcome two new members, Florence and Alice to our growing team.' Sam Stapleton, founder & CEO of REPT, added: 'We pride ourselves on providing the best service to our athletes. As the women's game continues to evolve at pace, the crossover between football and fashion has probably never been more important.'
