NGT seeks clarity from T.N. govt. on sand dumping along the Adyar near Thiru. Vi. Ka. Bridge's eastern side
The direction was issued during a recent hearing in a case filed by the Ramaniyam Towers Residents' Association. The matter was originally filed in the Madras High Court as a writ petition and was later transferred to the Bench.
The residents' association has alleged that sand was being dumped under the pretext of strengthening the river bund, but in reality, it was being done to facilitate the construction of a proposed link road. The road is meant to connect Greenways Road with Durgabhai Deshmukh Road via the Tamil Nadu Music College campus.
While the State government claims that the road is essential for easing traffic congestion in the area, the applicant argues that a portion of the proposed route falls within a Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ), where construction is restricted to protect the environment.
The Bench, comprising Justice Pushpa Sathyanarayana and expert member Satyagopal Korlapati, said the Madras High Court had earlier ordered status quo on the CRZ stretch, and this order would continue to remain in effect. At the same time, it clarified that the government was free to carry on with other parts of the road project that did not fall within the CRZ or on the disputed riverbank area.
The Bench also asked the State Highways Department to examine the possibility of realigning the road through the premises of Dr. M.G.R. Janaki College of Arts and Science. It observed that if the road was built entirely within the college compound, the residents would likely have no further objections.
The WRD has also been asked to clearly state whether the sand dumping was being done solely for strengthening the river bund or if it also serves the road construction. Until this is explained, no work can be carried out on the affected stretch along the river, the Bench added, and posted the matter for further hearing on July 30.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
10 hours ago
- The Hindu
Initiative in place for fructification of Anamalayar and Nirar-Nallar multipurpose projects, says T.N. Chief Minister M.K. Stalin
Tamil Nadu will see through fructification of Anamalayar and Nirar-Nallar multipurpose projects for optimal utilisation of water from the west-flowing rivers of Anamalayar, Nirar, Sholayar, Parambikulam and its tributaries Peruvaripallam, Thunakadavu and the Palar and Aliyar, Chief Minister M.K. Stalin informed the farming community in Coimbatore and Tiruppur districts on Monday. 'We are holding talks with Kerala Government for materialising the dream scheme of farmers in the Western districts,' the Chief Minister said while taking part in the government functions at Udumalpet in Tiruppur district and Pollachi in Coimbatore. At Pollachi, Mr. Stalin named the complex housing the Chief Engineer Office of Water Resources Department after C. Subramaniam, former Minister. The Chief Minister inaugurated on the occasion a two-storey building constructed at a cost of ₹4.29 crore. The ground and first floors were named after former MLAs V.K. Palanisamy Gounder and Pollachi N. Mahalingam. He also unveiled the statues of these leaders, and those of late Chief Minister Kamaraj and former Minister C. Subramaniam in the WRD complex, in honour of their efforts for conceptualisation and implementation of Parambikulam Aliyar Project (PAP) scheme. Besides, Mr. Stalin commissioned a photo gallery on the PAP scheme, and inaugurated a memorial dedicated to workers who had lost their lives during the construction of Parambikulam-Aliyar Dam in Pollachi. It was established in Aliyar Dam park at a cost of ₹ 2.83 crore. At Udumalpet, the Chief Minister inaugurated 61 projects completed at a cost of ₹949.53 crore, and laid foundation stones for 35 projects entailing expenditure of ₹182.06 crore. Mr. Stalin also extended assistance to the extent of ₹295.29 crore to 19,785 beneficiaries, under various government schemes. The Chief Minister was accompanied by State Ministers S. Muthusamy M.P. Saminathan, R. Sakkarapani, N. Kayalvizhi, MPs and MLAs, and senior government officials.
Indian Express
12 hours ago
- Indian Express
Punjab govt withdraws land pooling policy
Buckling under pressure from farmers and landowners, the Punjab government has withdrawn its controversial land pooling policy, just four days after the Punjab and Haryana High Court stayed its operation for four weeks. Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann signed the withdrawal file on Monday evening. The housing department had put up the file earlier in the day, and sources said the decision followed an assessment that the protests against the policy had become 'too hot to handle.' According to insiders, the top leadership of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) felt the backlash had 'overshadowed' the government's other achievements. The government will now seek the Cabinet's ex-post facto approval, deciding not to wait for the next Cabinet meeting before acting. In a statement, Principal Secretary, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Vikas Garg, said: 'Government hereby withdraws the Land Pooling Policy dated 14.5.2025 and its subsequent amendments. Consequently, all actions, like LOIs issued, registries done or any other action taken thereunder shall be reversed henceforth.' The policy, which had identified over 40,000 acres for pooling, had faced fierce opposition from farmers, landowners and political parties. At least 115 panchayats had passed resolutions refusing to offer land under the scheme. On Friday, the HC Bench of Justice Anupinder Singh Grewal and Justice Deepak Manchanda stayed the policy till September 10, flagging multiple legal and procedural flaws — from the absence of environmental and social impact assessments to the lack of timelines, grievance redressal and budgetary clarity. The court observed it was 'prima facie… of the view that the policy appears to have been notified in haste' without addressing key requirements such as Social Impact Assessment (SIA), Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), fixed timelines, and a grievance redressal mechanism. It noted that the State planned to 'take over tens of thousands of acres of fertile land' without conducting SIA or EIA, despite Supreme Court directives making such studies mandatory before urban development. Citing Resident's Welfare Association vs UT of Chandigarh (2023), the Bench reiterated that governments must strike 'a proper balance… between sustainable development and environmental protection.' While the State argued the policy was 'purely voluntary,' the court pointed to Clause 6 of the May 14 notification, which allowed compulsory acquisition under the 2013 land acquisition law for land not offered under pooling. This, the Bench held, brought the scheme within the scope of the law, triggering requirements for impact studies and safeguards. The judges flagged the absence of any rehabilitation plan for landless labourers, artisans, MGNREGA workers and others dependent on the land. 'Payment of subsistence allowance has been provided to the land owners, but there is no provision for rehabilitation of those… dependent on the land,' the order said. The Bench also reminded that acquisition of multi-cropped land was barred under the 2013 law, except in exceptional circumstances. Other gaps included the lack of prescribed timelines for voluntary participation, possession, start or completion of development, delivery of developed land to owners, and payment of subsistence allowances. The policy also had no grievance redressal mechanism or penalty provisions for delays and non-delivery. The court noted that the Amicus Curiae had pegged development costs at ₹1.25 crore per acre — around ₹10,000 crore for Ludhiana district alone — and that the State's counsel had 'no instructions' on any budgetary provision. Referring to past pooling schemes, the judges cited examples where landowners surrendered plots but did not receive developed land for years. In one Mohali case, 'developed plots have not been allotted even after ten years' and development had not begun in the designated sectors. Calling the targeted land 'amongst the most fertile in the State of Punjab,' the Bench warned the acquisition could 'impact the social milieu' and stressed the need for careful evaluation before proceeding. The policy, notified on May 14 and June 4 and amended on July 25, was stayed 'lest any rights are created,' with the matter listed for September 10. The State has been directed to address all concerns and file its reply before that date.
The Hindu
a day ago
- The Hindu
Farmers submit demand to CM against road project in Coimbatore
The federation opposing the Coimbatore-Sathyamangalam bypass and Coimbatore A4 scheme road, submitted a memorandum to Chief Minister M.K. Stalin on Sunday (August 10, 2025) demanding removal of the bypass road plan from Coimbatore Master Plan 2041. The federation said in the memorandum that farmers and residents of Kurumbapalayam and Karegoundanpalayam have opposed the bypass road project and submitted their opposition to the Revenue and Highways Department officials. However, it is learnt that the State Highways Department is trying to implement the bypass road project as a scheme road, making a few changes in the alignment. This has disappointed the farmers and residents. The road threatens to hit agricultural activity and hence, the road proposal should be removed from the alignment, they said. The federation members submitted the memorandum to the Chief Minister when he arrived in Coimbatore on Sunday evening.
