
Four arrested after break-in at home reportedly owned by Brad Pitt, say police
Police said at the time that suspects broke in through the front window, ransacked the home and fled with miscellaneous property.
Detectives have made four arrests, Officer Drake Madison said on Tuesday. He said the suspects' names could be released later in the day.
Officials could not identify who owned or lived in the home, and no information was available on what was stolen.
Pitt reportedly bought the property for 5.5 million US dollars (£4 million) in April 2023, according to Traded, a commercial real estate website.
A representative for the actor declined to comment on Tuesday.
Pitt had been out of the country in June on a globe-spanning promotional tour for his new movie, F1.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
5 hours ago
- Reuters
StanChart shares fall 9% after US lawmaker calls for probe
LONDON, Aug 15 (Reuters) - Standard Chartered (STAN.L), opens new tab shares fell nearly 9% on Friday after a U.S. Republican lawmaker wrote to the Attorney General, Pam Bondi, asking for a probe to be launched into the bank, claiming it was involved in sanctions evasion. Elise Stefanik, a New York Republican, requested in a letter shared on the X social media platform and published on her website that a special attorney be appointed to look into Standard Chartered's alleged failings. Stefanik said that an unspecified case against Standard Chartered was due to expire next week and urged action before that date. Standard Chartered said in a statement that the underlying allegations in a long-running civil case were "entirely false" and had been rejected by U.S. courts multiple times. The claimant had been pursuing the claims since 2012, the bank has previously said. "We expect the dismissal of this case will continue to be upheld on appeal," the bank said on Friday, adding it would fully cooperate with any relevant authorities and was committed to fighting financial crime. The Attorney General's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The bank's shares, which had been about 1.5% lower earlier on Friday, plunged almost 9% before closing down 7.2%. One trader linked the share move to the letter. Like other European lenders, Standard Chartered's stock has risen sharply this year on robust earnings and hit a near 12-year high earlier this week. Standard Chartered has previously been the subject of U.S. scrutiny. The bank agreed to pay $1.1 billion in 2019 to U.S. and British authorities over transactions which breached sanctions against Iran and other countries. The bank was also the subject of a U.S. deferred prosecution agreement, which in 2019 was extended for two years.


Telegraph
6 hours ago
- Telegraph
Children's video game branded ‘perfect place for paedophiles'
A video game played by millions of children in the UK is the 'perfect place for paedophiles' and 'fails to implement basic safety controls', a US state lawsuit has claimed. Roblox has become a 'breeding ground for sex predators' where child abusers 'thrive, unite, hunt and victimise our kids', according to Liz Murrill, the Republican attorney general of Louisiana. The lawsuit alleged that 'far from creating a safe place for children' Roblox, which has an age rating of seven in the UK, had 'provided a perfect place for paedophiles' that 'lacks safety features to protect children from predators and lacks warnings for parents and child users'. The video game, which is played by an estimated 61pc of British children aged between eight and 14, allows children to build virtual worlds and customised games that they can share with others. It has more than 380 million players globally and is one of the world's most popular video games among children, allowing children under the age of 13. It has almost 5 million players in the UK alone. However Roblox – which can be played on consoles, PCs and smartphones – has long faced claims that abusers have targeted the game to attempt to contact children. According to the lawsuit, for many years most of Roblox's parental controls within the game were off by default, even when the account was linked to a child. Child users could easily chat to others with no parental oversight and potentially be directed away from the game onto other messaging apps. Its settings allowed adults to 'easily communicate with children ... creating a virtual world where predators can freely target and groom children', the lawsuit claimed. Children were also able to access games with adult themes, according to a report by an investment firm last year. These included user-generated games such as 'Escape to Epstein Island'. Roblox, which was founded in 2004 and is now valued at more than $80bn (£59bn), tightened up many of its parental settings in November last year after a series of reports detailed instances of predators targeting children in the game. Children under the age of 13 now need parental permission to access most of its messaging features and parents can add screen time limits or monitor friend lists. The Louisiana lawsuit alleged that, in July, a man suspected of possessing child-abuse material was arrested while 'actively using' Roblox and a 'voice-alerting technology designed to mimic the voice of a young female'. A Roblox spokesman said: 'We can't comment on pending litigation. But we dedicate substantial resources, including advanced technology and 24/7 human moderation, to help detect and prevent inappropriate content and behaviour, including attempts to direct users off platform, where safety standards and moderation may be less stringent than ours. 'While no system is perfect, Roblox has implemented rigorous technology and enforcement safeguards, including restrictions on sharing personal information, links, and user-to-user image sharing. The safety of our community is a top priority.' In July, Roblox added additional age verification checks in the UK in response to the Online Safety Act. These require users to undergo an age estimation check to access additional online chat features.


The Guardian
7 hours ago
- The Guardian
I am a gender non-conforming woman: here is what my life is like
Re your article ('I've been spat on': gender non-conforming women tell of toilet abuse after UK's supreme court ruling, 12 August), while it is possible that these women's experiences are as a result of the recent supreme court ruling, this has been happening to me and others I know for a long time. A very long time. My experience as a gender non-conforming 37-year-old woman is that, since I was about eight, I have been regularly mistaken for a boy or man, and that a few times a year, these incidents are deeply embarrassing to me or involve someone being openly hostile. For example, in 2022, when flying to the US, I was detained for an enhanced search because they did not believe that I was female, as stated in my passport. I was humiliated to the point of tears, not least because I had recently shaved my head for brain surgery for a tumour and had a prominent scar. I have long lived in a world where I expect to be mistaken for a man and feel on edge as a result. My crimes? Being 5ft 8in, slim-ish, with short hair, an angular face, a deeper voice, and preferring loose clothing. Perhaps my walk is a little confident. The chromosomes remain XX. This isn't about the trans or non-binary debate. The real issue is that in this country, we have an extremely reductive view of what even a biological woman should look like, sound like and dress like. To an extent, the challenge to binaries has unfortunately and bizarrely played a role in reducing the visual and social footprint of natal womanhood even further. I am regularly asked by well-meaners my pronouns too – something I find just as insulting. The way I am is no statement, no protest, no challenge. It is simply how I have always been. Comfy, lazy, functional. Why should those be the preserve of men?Felicity HawksleyYork Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.