Donald Trump reveals plans about Tesla model S amid his ongoing feud with Elon Musk
Is Donald Trump planning to get rid of the Tesla Model S that bought to offer support to Elon Musk. When the President was asked about it, he gave a shocking response. The tensions between Musk and Trump escalated when the tech mogul sharpened his attack on President's 'big, beautiful bill'.
US President Trump denies Musk drug rumours; calls Starlink 'good service', says 'won't drop'
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Trump to give away Tesla model?
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Trump on Starlink
President Donald Trump has refuted rumours that he is planning to give away Model S Tesla that be brought to promote Elon Musk 's business amid his ongoing feud with the tech billionaire. Trump said aid he is keeping his red Model S Tesla despite his recent feud with Elon Musk, but it might not stay at the White House, where the electric car has been parked since he bought it, reports NewsWeek. Trump said he might simply 'move it around' to a different location instead.The car, which the US President bought on March 11 during a public show was in support for Elon Musk when Tesla was facing anger and arson. The high-end Model S, estimated to cost over $100,000, is currently parked in the White House lot for staff use, as the president himself is not allowed to drive under security regulations.Speaking to the press at the White House, Trump was asked by a reporter if he would be getting rid of the Tesla as well as the Starlink satellite internet service on Monday. The president said that he might "move the Tesla around alittle bit" after his clash with Musk on social media saw the Tesla CEO claim that Trump was featured in files related to Jeffrey Epstein and that he should be impeached."I may move the Tesla around a little bit," Trump said before adding that the White House would keep using Starlink because "it's a good service.'When asked what the president meant by moving the Tesla around, he said, "I have a lot of locations. I have so many locations, I don't know what to do with them all."Trump purchased the vehicle in March as a show of support for Musk and Tesla amid a backlash against the company due to Musk's role in the sweeping federal cost-cutting initiative known as the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). However, the very public falling-out between the pair after Musk's departure from the White House at the end of May has raised questions about the vehicle's fate.Trump once praised Tesla as a "great American company" amid intense protests targeting the electric vehicle maker. However, his tone shifted after Elon Musk suggested he was the reason behind Trump's 2024 election win. Just last week, Trump remarked that Tesla was "having a hard time" and criticized the company for allegedly wanting "billions of dollars in subsidies."Trump also clarified that he is not going to discontinue Musk's satellite internet venture, Starlink, calling it a 'great service.' When asked if he plans to speak with Elon Musk soon, Trump said, 'If I were him, I would want to speak to me. Maybe he's already called. You'd have to ask him.'Trump and Musk's relationship turned sour recently after the latter sharply criticised Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill,' calling it an 'abomination' over concerns it would explode the federal deficit. In response, Trump threatened to revoke Musk's government contracts, prompting Musk to warn that SpaceX could pull its Dragon program in retaliation. Trump's "big, beautiful bill" is currently awaiting approval in the Senate. Trump has given senators a July 4 deadline to pass the bill and send it to his desk.Despite the tensions, Trump's Tesla, originally intended as a symbolic stand against left-wing attacks on Musk's ventures, remains a visible gesture of support in the White House driveway.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
31 minutes ago
- Mint
Sensex crashes 850 points, investors lose ₹5 lakh crore; why is the Indian stock market falling? EXPLAINED
The Indian stock market suffered strong losses across segments on Thursday, June 12. The Sensex fell nearly 1,000 points, and the Nifty 50 dropped below 24,850 during the session. The Sensex opened at 82,571.67 against its previous close of 82,515.14 and plunged 992 points, or 1.2 per cent, to an intraday low of 81,523.16. The Nifty 50 opened at 25,164.45 against its previous close of 25,141.40 and crashed 1.3 per cent to an intraday low of 24,825.90. Finally, the Sensex closed with a loss of 823 points, or 1 per cent, at 81,691.98, while the Nifty 50 settled 253 points, or 1.01 per cent, lower at 24,888.20. The BSE Midcap and Smallcap indices dropped 1.52 per cent and 1.38 per cent, respectively. The overall market capitalisation of firms listed on the BSE dropped to nearly ₹ 449.6 lakh crore from about ₹ 455.6 lakh crore in the previous session, making investors poorer by ₹ 6 lakh crore in a single session. Experts point out the following five factors behind the selloff in the Indian stock market: Rising tensions in the Middle East weighed on markets globally. Major Asian and European markets suffered significant losses during the session on signs of rising tensions between the US and Iran. The US is pulling out non-essential personnel from the Middle East due to rising regional tensions as nuclear negotiations continue to break down, according to statements from the US State Department and the military reported by The Times of Israel on Wednesday. Speculations are rife that Israeli forces would carry out an attack against Iran's nuclear program. Meanwhile, US President Donald Trump has reiterated that the US won't allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon. The US-China trade deal has failed to boost market sentiment as investors hoped for a more sweeping deal. Trump announced on Wednesday that China will supply the US with rare-earth minerals and magnets and that the US administration will allow Chinese students into US universities. However, Trump and his Chinese counterpart still need to agree on the deal. 'Our deal with China is done, subject to final approval with President Xi and me. Full magnets and any necessary rare earths will be supplied, up front, by China. Likewise, we will provide to China what was agreed to, including Chinese students using our colleges and universities (which has always been good with me!). We are getting a total of 55% tariffs, and China is getting 10%. The relationship is excellent! Thank you for your attention to this matter!' Trump wrote on Truth Social. "There are reports of a possible agreement between the US and China. But the Chinese haven't officially confirmed anything. President Trump is talking about a 55 per cent tariff on China and a 10 per cent tariff on the US. Trump's credibility being what it is, it would be too early to discount this as positive for markets," said VK Vijayakumar, Chief Investment Strategist, Geojit Investments. Concerns over an economic slowdown in the US due to Trump's tariff policies remain a key concern for markets globally. The World Bank on Tuesday warned that US tariff policies will cause a slowdown in both the US and global economies. The World Bank has revised its economic growth projections, now expecting a slowdown to 2.3 per cent in 2025 (0.4 percentage points below the January forecast), 2.4 per cent in 2026 (0.3 percentage points lower) and 2.6 per cent in 2027. "The tariff crisis is not yet over. President Trump has declared that he will be sending letters to trade partners in the next two weeks setting universal tariffs. Market participants will be waiting and watching for clarity on this," said Vijayakumar. Despite softer-than-expected May US CPI prints, experts believe the US Federal Reserve will remain cautious and avoid any rate cuts in the June policy meeting due to persisting uncertainty about the US tariff policy. Concerns are rising that tariff-related uncertainty will delay interest rate cuts in the US, weighing on market sentiment. "The sharp sell-off was triggered by a combination of global and domestic factors. Weak global cues, particularly concerns around sticky US inflation data and the possibility of delayed interest rate cuts by the Federal Reserve, weighed heavily on investor sentiment," said Pranay Aggarwal, Director and CEO of Stoxkart. The US Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting is scheduled for June 17-18. "The market continues to price in two Fed cuts in 2025, with this print barely moving the needle on rate cut pricing. The probability of a cut next week is literally zero, with the next cut expected in October," said Madhavi Arora, Chief Economist, Emkay Global Financial Services. "While May US CPI print is somewhat reassuring, there remains very little signal in the data, with firms continuing to manage tariffs for now – tariffs will likely only show up in the data (either through higher inflation or lower profit margins) a few months down the line. In such a scenario, the Fed will remain in wait-and-watch mode," Arora said. Stretched valuations in the Indian stock market have been one of the key reasons behind intermittent profit booking by both domestic retail and foreign investors. Experts point out that the current P/E ratio of the Nifty 50, at 22.60, is above its one-year average of 22.19 and is close to its six-month high of 22.80. With the domestic market lacking fresh positive triggers, stretched valuations are prompting caution among investors. Read all market-related news here Read more stories by Nishant Kumar
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
32 minutes ago
- First Post
Is the US quietly stepping back from the F-35 it wants India to buy?
With the US slashing its own F-35 orders and Canada facing a massive cost surge, doubts grow over America's push to sell the fighter jet to India. As Russia pitches co-production of the Su-57 and India prepares its AMCA bid, is New Delhi looking elsewhere for its fifth-generation fighter needs? read more Lockheed Martin's F-35 fighter jet is displayed during the International Bali Airshow at Ngurah Rai International Airport in Kuta, Bali, Indonesia. File Image/Reuters The Lockheed Martin F-35 stealth fighter jet, once a flagship programme representing the cutting edge of American airpower and a cornerstone of international defence partnerships, is now seeing reduced orders from its primary buyer — the United States military itself. This decline, revealed through recent defence budget documents and procurement figures, comes at a time when the aircraft is being marketed to India, which is simultaneously exploring a competing Russian offer. India's options for acquiring fifth-generation fighter jets are rapidly becoming a topic of urgent importance, as the country seeks to revamp its ageing combat aircraft fleet and address a widening capability gap with regional adversaries. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD However, the recent developments surrounding the F-35 programme — its cost, reduced orders, and uncertain trajectory — raise pressing questions about whether the United States remains committed to this platform, and if the aircraft remains a viable solution for India's strategic needs. Pentagon slashes F-35 orders According to procurement documentation obtained by Bloomberg and sent to Capitol Hill this week, the Pentagon has sharply reduced its request for new F-35 fighter jets for the US Air Force in the upcoming fiscal year. Only 24 jets are being sought for FY2025 — exactly half the number requested the previous year. In addition to the Air Force reduction, procurement figures also indicate that the US Navy and Marine Corps will receive fewer F-35s than originally planned. An F-35 fighter jet on the deck of the US nuclear-powered aircraft carrier George Washington. File Image/AP The US Navy is now requesting 12 of the carrier-based F-35 variant, fewer than the 17 approved the previous year. The Marine Corps has similarly reduced its ask by two aircraft compared to the current fiscal cycle, reported Bloomberg. The new budget allocates $3.5 billion for F-35 acquisitions for the US Air Force, in addition to $531 million earmarked for pre-production materials. These numbers come in the wake of newly announced US defence spending constraints. US Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth has initiated an 8 per cent reduction in overall military spending over the next five years, directly impacting flagship projects like the F-35. Lockheed Martin faces market pressure The impact on the defence industry has been immediate. Shares of Lockheed Martin dropped following reports of the order cuts, reflecting investor concern about the shrinking procurement pipeline for one of the company's most lucrative programmes. Lockheed's F-35 project alone accounts for around 30 per cent of its total revenue. In 2024, the company managed to deliver 110 aircraft to US services and allied nations. However, future contracts remain in limbo. The defence manufacturer is still waiting on a finalised agreement with the Pentagon to secure the next round of production — already delayed due to technological upgrades that have yet to be fully integrated into the jet's systems. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The F-35, despite its advanced stealth, AI-enabled combat systems and sensor fusion capabilities, has been the subject of recurring criticism due to its high cost, extended development timelines and maintenance demands. International customers have also begun raising flags. Canada, which signed up to acquire 88 F-35 jets, is now confronting a potential 50 per cent increase in the total projected cost, bringing the estimated expense to C$27.7 billion. A recent audit revealed that factors such as infrastructure upgrades, delays in airbase readiness and pilot shortages have all contributed to the rising bill. These issues are not isolated to Canada, but reflect broader systemic challenges surrounding the F-35 programme that could influence future buyers like India. Trump-Vance revive F-35 offer to India Despite the turbulence in the programme, the F-35 remains central to US defence diplomacy, especially with strategic partners like India. The proposal to offer the aircraft to New Delhi resurfaced under the current US administration, with the US reportedly reaffirming its willingness to facilitate a sale of the fighter jet. India, for its part, is still weighing its options. The F-35 is widely acknowledged as one of the most technologically sophisticated jets available globally. But its high cost — estimated at $80 million per unit — and the complications associated with acquiring such a sensitive platform have kept the discussions tentative. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD India's long-term defence planning must also account for delivery schedules, technology transfer commitments, and compatibility with existing systems. With the US reducing its own procurement and allied nations facing ballooning costs, the Indian defence establishment may increasingly question whether the F-35 is the best fit for its immediate and strategic needs. Russia makes Su-57 offer Meanwhile, a parallel and highly competitive offer is being pursued by Russia. Moscow has formally proposed that India join hands to co-produce the Su-57, Russia's own fifth-generation stealth fighter jet, reported CNBC TV18. At the India Today Conclave 2025, Russian Ambassador to India Denis Alipov declared: 'We're offering our fifth-generation fighter. We have the best machine — the Su-57. We just showed it, displayed it at Aero India last month in Bangalore (Bengaluru) and it performed, and you know, stole the show. It is very competitive; we are offering not only to sell but to co-produce. We offer technology sharing, we offer… you know industry with the creation of necessary industrial facilities for the production of this. We are open to configuration changes. So this is a very lucrative deal that we offer to India.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Russia's offer for India is three-dimensional — it will commence the local production of Su-57E, upgrade the Su-30MKI fighter jets with advanced technology, and will back and assist India towards its own fifth-generation Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA) program. File Image/Firstpost According to reports, the Su-57 proposal includes transfer of technology provisions allowing India to integrate its indigenous radars, avionics, and weapon systems into the aircraft. This is particularly significant given India's focus on enhancing domestic capabilities under its 'Make in India' initiative. Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) already operates a production line for the Su-30MKI in Nashik, which could potentially be adapted for the Su-57, reducing the infrastructural burden of adopting a new fighter. The offer also fits within India's strategic vision to develop fifth-generation fighter jet engines domestically. To this end, the Indian government is evaluating proposals from Safran and Rolls-Royce, both of which have reportedly offered full technology transfer for indigenous engine development. Indian Air Force's three-tier strategy India's defense establishment has been urgently reviewing options to address the gap in its fighter fleet. Air Chief Marshal AP Singh has said that the Air Force needs to induct 35 to 40 fighter jets every year to maintain operational readiness and air superiority, reported CNBC TV18. Currently, India has just 31 active combat squadrons, well below the sanctioned strength of 42. In contrast, China has inducted 435 fighter and ground attack aircraft over the past ten years, while India has lost 151 aircraft in the same timeframe. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD To manage this challenge, the Indian Ministry of Defence has outlined a three-phase plan: short-term acquisitions to meet immediate needs, medium-term partnerships for co-development and co-production, and long-term strategies focused on indigenous capabilities. As part of its medium- and long-term planning, the government is expected to issue a Request for Proposal (RFP) for the Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA) project within days. Pre-bid consultations are scheduled within two weeks of the RFP release, and final bidding is expected in about 45 days. India's Defence Secretary has also acknowledged the urgency, noting that the ministry has submitted a comprehensive report outlining steps to close the fighter jet capability gap. This report aligns with the ongoing evaluation of international proposals — including both the American F-35 and Russian Su-57 — and domestic developmental initiatives. With inputs from agencies
Time of India
36 minutes ago
- Time of India
Mollycoddling Munir: What's Trump planning with Pakistan military?
Counter-terrorism: A convenient justification? Live Events You Might Also Like: US has to have relationship with Pakistan, India: American general The shadow of Iran attack Containing China's influence in Pakistan You Might Also Like: Trump travel ban: Why did he spare Pakistan? A bargaining chip against India? Trump's strategic pivot (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel In January 2018, then-President Donald Trump began the new year with a blistering tweet aimed at Pakistan. He accused the country of betrayal. "The United States has foolishly given Pakistan more than 33 billion dollars in aid over the last 15 years, and they have given us nothing but lies & deceit, thinking of our leaders as fools. They give safe haven to the terrorists we hunt in Afghanistan, with little help. No more!" Trump's administration subsequently suspended security assistance to Pakistan, accusing it of harboring terrorists and undermining US interests in now, during his second term in office, there is a remarkable shift in tone and policy. General Michael Kurilla, the head of US Central Command (CENTCOM), recently hailed Pakistan as "a 'phenomenal partner in the counter-terrorism world'. The Pakistani Army Chief, General Asim Munir , is reportedly invited to attend a grand military parade Trump will host on June 14, celebrating the US Army's 250th anniversary, coinciding with his 79th birthday. This is an unmistakable symbol of warming ties. This rapprochement begs the question: Why is the US mollycoddling the very military establishment it once condemned for sheltering terrorists?The official narrative emerging from the US is that Pakistan is once again a vital partner in America's counter-terrorism efforts. Given the resurgence of militant groups like ISIS-K in the region and ongoing instability in Afghanistan following the US withdrawal, Pakistan's geography and intelligence apparatus make it a useful ally. Pakistan offers critical overflight access, potential staging areas, and intelligence cooperation that could help prevent another large-scale terror threat to US interests. General Kurilla has praised Islamabad for extraditing Mohammad Sharifullah aka Jafar, an ISIS-K member, to the US. In March, the US Justice Department charged Sharifullah for his role in the August 2021 suicide bombing at Afghanistan's Kabul international this explanation, while plausible, appears overly simplistic given the scale of the diplomatic about-face. There is strong reason to believe that deeper geopolitical considerations are driving the US to re-engage Pakistan's military establishment and they may have little to do with counter-terrorism. Trump's softening attitude towards Pakistan coincided with the country's leaders, including Munir, offering lucrative deals to a cryptocurrency company, World Liberty Financial, owned by Trump's sons, Eric Trump and Donald Trump Jr. However, there could be several strategic reasons too for Trump's pivot to of the most pressing developments in the Middle East is the possibility of an Israeli military strike on Iran's nuclear facilities, a scenario that seems increasingly imminent. Recent US moves, including the evacuation of non-essential personnel from diplomatic missions and military outposts across the region, suggest serious contingency planning and an imminent attack by Israel in Iran's nuclear this context, Pakistan's role could become strategically significant. As a large Muslim-majority country with nuclear capabilities and deep ties in the Islamic world, Pakistan's position during a US-backed or Israeli-led strike on Iran would matter immensely. The US may be seeking to ensure that Pakistan offers covert help such as use of its military bases and assets and remains supportive during a wider regional conflagration that could involve Iranian proxies in the Middle East. Additionally, Pakistan shares a border with Iran through Balochistan, where anti-Iran insurgent groups operate with alleged tacit support from Pakistan. If the Israel-Iran conflict escalates, Pakistan could serve as a quiet front for logistical or intelligence operations for the US military strategic dimension is the growing Chinese footprint in Pakistan, exemplified by the multi-billion-dollar China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), a flagship of Beijing's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). For the US, this presents a long-term threat. The US is wary of China gaining a secure land route to the Arabian Sea and potentially leveraging ports like Gwadar for military Pakistan, especially its powerful military which remains the dominant power over civilian government, offers the US an opportunity to pull Islamabad away from Beijing's orbit. While reversing Pakistan's deepening ties with China may not be feasible, the US can at least aim to diversify Pakistan's dependencies, offering military aid, diplomatic legitimacy and economic incentives in exchange for strategic US-India relations have improved considerably in recent years, friction remains, particularly over trade, technology transfer and India's balancing act between the West and Russia. India has resisted aligning fully with the US geopolitical priorities, especially in its reluctance to criticize Russia over Ukraine and its continued oil and weapons trade with warming up to Pakistan, the US may be signaling to India that it has other options in South Asia. This could serve as leverage in trade negotiations and defense deals, pressing India to make concessions on tariffs, data localization laws or arms procurement. In effect, the US may be using its outreach to Pakistan as a diplomatic tool to extract more favorable terms from Pakistan, foreign policy, particularly with the US, is often the domain of the military, not the civilian government. By dealing directly with Pakistan's army leadership, the US is engaging with the true power center in Islamabad. The military is not only capable of delivering on security guarantees but also enjoys considerable autonomy and continuity compared to Pakistan's unstable civilian inviting Army Chief Asim Munir to the high-profile military parade, the US is sending a clear signal -- the bilateral relationship is back, and it is firmly rooted in ties with the military. For Trump, who values transactional diplomacy, dealing with Pakistan's generals may seem like a more predictable and practical the language of counter-terrorism dominates official statements, the US re-engagement with Pakistan is more likely motivated by a confluence of broader strategic imperatives. The Pakistani military, once shunned by Trump for alleged duplicity, is now being courted as a critical player in America's strategic calculus. Trump's volte-face reflects the realpolitik that often defines US foreign policy. If the interests align, yesterday's adversary can be an ally today. The same approach played out in Syria recently. The US removed the $10 million bounty on Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) leader Ahmed al-Sharaa, also known as Mohammad al-Jolani, after he led a successful offensive, ousting Assad from power in Syria. Trump later met him and praised him too. Trump said the meeting with Sharaa, who he described as a young, attractive guy with a very strong past, was "great".For Pakistan's military, the positive attention from Trump is a big victory. It signals that, despite Trump's past grievances, it remains an indispensable actor in regional geopolitics.
