
Woke Seattle lawmaker leaps ahead in election battle despite claims she's a massive bully
Carmen Rivera, who was appointed as Renton's first openly queer councilmember in 2021, is headed for November's general election, where she will run for her position once again.
While official results from Tuesday's primary have not been released, unofficial stats from Kings County show Rivera ahead of her two opponents with about 44 percent of the vote.
Washington is a mail-in ballot state and the final verdict will be announced on August 19, but the last day to vote was Tuesday. The top two candidates for each seat advance to the general election.
'Looking at the numbers, I'd be very surprised if Rivera did not make it to the general election,' King County Elections Communications Manager Halei Watkins told the Daily Mail.
Watkins did note there are 'still a lot of ballots to count,' but it is likely Rivera will at the very least remain in the top two.
Rivera's candidacy has been shrouded in controversy, with accusers coming forward with unflattering anecdotes about the allegedly short-fused politician.
The progressive lawmaker's controversies trace back to October 2021, just before she was elected to the city council.
She worked as a volunteer security guard at a Seattle Pride concert, where some performers claimed she was wildly disrespectful in a letter to event leadership.
The note asserted that Rivera worked in a manner that was 'hostile, confrontational, and bordering harassment' while guarding the backstage area.
The artists collection alleged that Rivera ignored several of the performers and even tried to block some of them from entering the backstage area.
'Security ran towards and physically blocked a black trans woman from one of our performers' houses who was being walked into the backstage area by a collective member, yelling at her that she could not be there,' the letter alleged.
Rivera also allegedly threatened to kick people who had taken down their face masks just to eat or drink out of the event, according to the affected artists.
At the same Pride event a year later, the then-director Krystal Marx said an employee made similar claims against Rivera.
Rivera was serving on the event's board and has fiercely denied these claims to Axios Seattle.
She then left the board, blaming Marx's 'unprofessional behavior.' Marx was let go about a month after Rivera left, but said Rivera's claim was false.
About a year into her council tenure, Rivera found herself at the center of a claim of vicious behavior documented in a letter written to police.
Renton City Councilmember Kim-Khán Văn contacted local authorities about Rivera in a jaw-dropping email from December 2022.
Văn described a year's worth of 'harassment and bullying' inflicted by her colleague Rivera.
In light of the police report resurfacing, Rivera's partner, Jas Maisonet, spoke out on her behalf on Facebook
She was requesting video footage from an event because she was 'harassed and verbally attacked by sitting Councilmember Carmen Rivera in public again.'
Văn notified police, but did not file an official report. Afterwards she told the city's human resources department about her alleged run-ins with Rivera.
Văn later claimed to Axios that Rivera got up in her face and started cursing at her during the event for several minutes straight.
A month prior to the heated encounter Văn claimed Rivera tried physically stopping her from entering a meeting by placing herself between Văn and the door.
Rivera fiercely disputed these accusations, telling Axios she 'was not yelling at her' and 'definitely did not curse at her.'
In response to Văn's concerns, Renton Mayor Armondo Pavone issued a notice to the city council in January 2023.
'Councilmembers are not administrative employees subject to my supervision or control as the Mayor,' Pavone wrote.
'Currently, the Council has no formal process for receiving and addressing complaints of personal conflicts between councilmembers.'
While admitting he could not intervene, he suggested adapting conduct codes regarding councilmember behavior.
Aside from Văn, Axios reported other anonymous witnesses confessed to having similar experiences with Rivera.
But Rivera claimed all of these accusations are baseless and at least one of the people who came forward had actually been bullying her - not the other way around.
Her campaign consultant, Michael Charles, told Axios the accusations were 'politically motivated retaliation for her support of progressive policies.
Concerns about Rivera have been raised as recently as June, with Winter Cashman, a King county candidate for the Public Hospital Commission, writing a bombshell letter to the editor in the Renton Reporter.
'When Carmen Rivera first ran for Renton City Council, I supported her. I believed in the importance of LGBTQ+ representation in our local government, and I hoped she'd bring both lived experience and a collaborative spirit to the role,' he began.
'But since that time, I've seen a continued pattern that's hard to ignore — and I can't support her re-election.'
Cashman claimed Rivera 'escalated tensions' between candidates and had even accused people who supported her of 'undermining' her.
He also claimed she once said 'all straight people are transphobic' and called him 'a little sh*t.'
Rivera told the Daily Mail Cashman's claims 'came out of nowhere' and she had no previous relationship with him.
'I would say they are targeted, political attacks,' she continued. 'Including false claims and unverified complaints rooted in distortion.'
Allegations of Rivera's outbursts began long before her political debut, according court records.
In 2016, she was arrested and charged with malicious mischief in the third-degree domestic violence following a fight with her ex.
Her ex claimed she was in the car when Rivera started kicking in and tore off one of its mirrors.
She told Axios she was 'not in the best place personally at the time.'
The case was eventually dismissed, the outlet reported.
In light of the police report resurfacing, Rivera's current partner, Jas Maisonet, spoke out on her behalf on Facebook.
'Recently, and conveniently timed, a decade old, resolved police report was dragged up and used as a weapon,' Maisonet wrote.
'Behind every council seat is a real person. And behind that person is often a family that carries the emotional weight of public service quietly.
'Leadership isn't about being perfect; no one is. It's about showing up with integrity, listening, learning, and doing the work.'
Rivera has used her social media platforms to promote her stances, as well as call out those who have spoken out against her.
In a video from March, Rivera addressed 'right-wing basement bloggers' who decided to 'come after' her for supporting a trans Linwood City councilmember.
Rivera claimed people calling her out were being transphobic and bigoted
Although she is not explicitly named in the clip Rivera is likely speaking about Jessica Roberts, who came under fire around the same time when it became publicly known she was posting on Only Fans.
Roberts admitted to the Lynnwood Times that she had made an Only Fans account to boost her self confidence while 'making a little cash on the side.'
Soon after the news went public, she took down the account.
She also allegedly had a Reddit account where she shared dark and explicit sexual content. Roberts resigned from her position amid the controversy.
Rivera had voiced support for Roberts, calling a Lynwood Times report of Roberts' alleged online activity a 'grossly intentional misrepresentation of information.'
She also said all the comments about Robert were 'ignorant and hateful.'
'When history looks back on these Nazi driven narratives, what will you say you did?' she wrote on X.
Rivera told the Daily Mail she spoke out online because attacks on Roberts were 'rooted in ignorance and hatred.'
'Many women, including Jessica, have to deal with unfair standards and double standards.
'I would do that [speak out] for many women in the LGBTQI+ community in these positions who are being publicly filleted.'
Rivera took the lead against her opponents for Council Position No 2, Mary Clymer, who accounted for roughly 29 percent of votes, and Raman Mann, who took about 26 percent.
'I'm really grateful that the voters can look past some of the distracting noise and see real leaders doing really good work,' Rivera told the Daily Mail.
She and Clymer will compete for the seat in the general election in November, meaning there is still a chance she could be booted from her position.
In Washington state, councilmembers do not run with political affiliations, although Rivera's stances are progressive.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
13 minutes ago
- The Independent
Dismembered remains found by hiker in Utah belong to fisherman missing for 28 years, cops confirm
Dismembered remains found by a hiker in Utah were found to belong to a fisherman who had been missing for nearly three decades, cops say. In May, a hiker and his dog came across a hiking boot with the remains of a human foot inside on the shores of Fish Lake, the Sevier County Sheriff's Office said in a Facebook post Tuesday. Investigators determined the shoe was only made for one year, in 1996, and the sheriff's office had a missing persons case from 1997. David White of Washington, Utah — about a two and a half hour drive southwest of Fish Lake — had vanished in September of that year while on a fishing trip. There were no witnesses. White had rented a hotel room near the lake and he was supposed to go fishing with his friends, but the plans fell through, the sheriff's office said. White decided to go fishing anyway and was never seen again. His boat was later reportedly found trolling across the lake, but no one was on board, the Sheriff's office said. Trolling is a fishing method where a baited line trails behind a boat. 'A shoe and hat were found floating in the water giving a possible indication where White was believed to have fallen in,' according to the Facebook post. The initial search for White lasted five days with no further evidence found, and now, just about 28 years later, his family has some closure. DNA was taken from the boot and one of White's daughters and testing showed a '99.9994% certainty' the samples were related. Stefanie Bennett, one of White's daughters, said in a statement: 'We are also deeply grateful to the individual and his dog who found the shoe – without them, we would not be where we are today.' She also thanked the authorities and others for 'their incredible support and tireless efforts.' Sheriff Nathan J. Curtis said in a statement: 'This case has been on the mind of every one of the SAR [search and rescue] members who were involved in the search 28 years ago. It is good to finally have some closure for the family and the searchers.'


Reuters
14 minutes ago
- Reuters
Japan presses US on auto tariff cut, seeks clarification on other levies
TOKYO, Aug 7 (Reuters) - Japan pressed the U.S. to swiftly implement an agreed cut to auto tariffs and sought clarification on levies for other goods, as conflicting interpretations of the bilateral trade deal further pressured Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba's shaky administration. In a meeting with U.S. Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick in Washington on Wednesday, top trade negotiator Ryosei Akazawa urged the U.S. to implement at an early date an agreed cut to U.S. tariffson Japanese auto and auto parts, Japan's government said. Akazawa also sought confirmation and "immediate execution" of the two countries' agreement on U.S. levies for other goods imported from Japan, the government said in a statement released on Thursday. The meeting came hours before President Donald Trump's higher tariffs on dozens of trading partners kick in on Thursday, as Japan scrambles to clarify divergences with Washington on details of their bilateral trade deal. Under the deal clinched last month, the U.S. agreed to cut tariffs on Japanese car imports to 15% from levies totalling 27.5% previously, but did not announce a timeframe for the change to take effect. While the two agreed that U.S. duties on most other Japanese goods will be cut to 15% from 25% effective Thursday, a lack of written confirmation of the deal has led to confusion over whether the new 15% tariffs will be stacked on top of existing levies. Japan argues the two countries had agreed its goods imported to the U.S. would be exempt from such "stacking," where they can be affected by multiple tariffs. Speaking in parliament on Tuesday, Akazawa said Japan wants to make sure goods such as Japanese beef, which already carries tariffs above 15%, will not be charged the new 15% rate as an additional tariff. But a Federal Register attached to President Donald Trump's July 31 executive order that addressed tariff rates for many trading partners showed a "no stacking" condition applies to the European Union, but no such clarification was issued for Japan. Japan's Asahi newspaper reported on Thursday, citing an unnamed White House official, that the U.S. will stack the tariffs, adding 15% on all Japanese imports without applying exceptions for items that already have tariff rates above 15%. In a regular news conference held after the Asahi report, Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshimasa Hayashi said the U.S. was unlikely to stack 15% tariffs on existing levies. He said Akazawa confirmed the point with the U.S. side during his visit to Washington on Wednesday. Given such discrepancies, Ishiba has been under attack in parliament and domestic media for not crafting a written joint statement stipulating details of the trade deal with the U.S. Ishiba defended the decision, telling parliament on Monday that Japan decided to forgo a written statement for fear that doing so could delay U.S. tariff reductions. Some lawmakers have warned a lack of written confirmation could backfire given Trump's unpredictable decision-making style. The confusion adds to trouble for Japan's shaky government led by Ishiba, who is facing calls to step down after the ruling coalition's huge loss in last month's upper house election. "In negotiating with the U.S., Minister Akazawa at least ought to have nailed down exactly when U.S. automobile tariffs would be lowered to 15%," ruling party heavyweight and former trade minister Ken Saito told Reuters on Tuesday. Yuichiro Tamaki, leader of opposition Democratic Party for the People, urged Akazawa to press Trump's administration harder to adhere to the bilateral agreement. "After all, I do feel that a document on the agreement was necessary," Tamaki wrote in an X post on Thursday.


Times
41 minutes ago
- Times
Keir Starmer must let in sunlight to avoid further lobbying scandals
Lord Cameron of Chipping Norton long ago predicted that lobbying would be 'the next big scandal' to hit politics, warning of the dangers of what happens behind closed doors. 'We all know how it works. The lunches, the hospitality, the quiet word in your ear, the ex-ministers and ex-advisers for hire, helping big business find the right way to get its way,' he said in 2010. It was somewhat apt that despite introducing the first real oversight for lobbyists, the former prime minister was caught in just such a scandal after he departed from office. Despite a repeated cycle of scandals involving what Lord Cameron spoke of, lobbyists have continued to work in the shadows. As this newspaper has exposed, the Starmer government is facing serious questions over 'cash for access' after businesses were approached by a Labour group offering private meetings with 'an influential Labour figure'. The Labour Infrastructure Forum (LIF), which is run by lobbyists from Bradshaw Advisory along with an advisory council of senior party figures, has offered businesses the chance to meet 'key policymakers' to help 'shape the discussion'. The forum has offered sponsorship packages for potential clients, including breakfast meetings for almost £9,500. Darren Jones, the chief secretary to the Treasury, has spoken at an LIF event. • Labour 'leaving public in the dark' about payments from lobbyists Although the LIF insists that the sponsorship money is used to cover costs, the group declined a request by The Times to disclose details of which companies had sponsored events at what cost until its next annual report. The Labour Party too has declined to say which senior figures had attended any LIF meetings. Yet undercover reporting has shown Gerry McFall, director of the forum alongside his leading role at Bradshaw Advisory, boasted of meetings between his clients and senior figures in government, including Jonathan Reynolds, the business secretary. There is a clear problem here that must be addressed. The Office of the Registrar of Consultant Lobbyists, which was set up during Lord Cameron's premiership, governs lobbying and is supposed to ensure it is transparent and open. Businesses who regularly engage in lobbying, known as 'consultant lobbyists', are required to register their activities. Yet the LIF was not required to register as it did not fall under this category: in-house lobbyists who are employed directly by companies, think tanks or 'forums' are not required to register. This must be addressed: all lobbying activity should be recorded, along with the details of who exactly is meeting which ministers. That being said, ministers should show more common sense. Mr Jones should have done due diligence before speaking at an LIF event. The same goes for Mr Reynolds, the minister most exposed to the potential influence of businesses. The lack of records charting his meeting with a Bradshaw Advisory client at a Labour conference highlights another flaw in transparency rules, which does not require ministers to report meetings at such events not deemed to be in a ministerial capacity. Even if the party insists it was instead 'held in a political capacity', Mr Reynolds should have realised that he should strive for transparency. • How we exposed Labour's cosy links to lobbyists None of this is to say that all lobbying is inherently bad, or that onerous restrictions are required. It is essential to good policy making that ministers hear from businesses — particularly a government that has as little private sector experience as this one. But it must be done in an open and transparent manner, something lacking at present. According to an analysis by the Chartered Institute of Public Relations, registered Westminster lobbyists account for just 0.5 per cent of registered lobbyists across a host of similar countries. If Sir Keir Starmer is to avoid further such scandals, he must strengthen the oversight. By letting in as much sunlight as possible, it will go some way to curtail any sense of wrongdoing, real or perceived.