&w=3840&q=100)
Does Trump know why Japan doesn't buy American cars? It's taste, not tariffs
US President Donald Trump and Tesla-owner Elon Musk stand in front of a Tesla Cybertruck at the White House. (Photo: White House)
Last month, US President Donald Trump announced a trade deal with Japan and hailed the opening of the country's market to American cars. But Japan had not charged any tariff on the import of cars since 1970s.
Japanese have never been enthusiastic about American cars not because of tariffs or any conspiracy, but because of a simple reason that they do not find American cars good enough for them. This is also not a new phenomenon borne out of the decline of American manufacturing sector.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Since World War II, the United States has been the principal ally of Japan — the country was under complete US occupation till 1952. But that could never result in American cars becoming popular in Japan.
Last year, top 10 car-sellers in Japan were all Japanese, with Toyota being the best-seller. Among American companies, Mercedes-Benz had a market share of around 1 per cent and General Motors and Tesla had a share of less than 1 per cent each.
The condition for American companies has been such that Ford exited Japan altogether in 2016 after saying that it had no path to profitability in the country.
But why don't Japanese want US cars?
There are a host of practical, economic, and cultural reasons why Japanese do not prefer to buy American cars despite the absence of any tariffs.
Firstly, Japanese customers prefer compact, fuel-efficient cars that suit Japan's narrow roads and streets and tight parking spaces. American cars are usually larger and do not suit such conditions. Hence Japanese prefer domestic cars that are suited for such conditions.
Secondly, Japanese cars are better than American cars when it comes to producing hybrid, fuel-efficient models.
Thirdly, Japanese customers tend to be loyal to domestic brands like Toyota, Nissan, and Honda, and prefer them over foreign brands.
Fourthly, Japan has high safety standards and many American cars simply do not meet them. Japan also has a right-side driving system as opposed to left-side driving system of the United States. This means that many American cars need to be modified, creating additional burden on buyers.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Fifthly, many American cars have servicing issues as service centres for such cars and the availability of spare parts and machinery can also be problematic.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
a minute ago
- Hindustan Times
Trump sending $2000 stimulus check in August? Truth about eligibility and payment date
Rumors about President Donald Trump planning to send a stimulus check, worth $2000, in August are doing the rounds on social media. This speculation has caused confusion among Americans hoping for financial relief. Donald Trump speaks about not using an autopen, after signing a proclamation officially declaring this National Purple Heart Day(REUTERS) But despite viral posts and several unverified articles making bold claims, there is no official confirmation from the US government or IRS about such a payment. What's actually happening? At the heart of the chatter is a July 19 article by Rick Adams, suggesting that lawmakers are considering a fourth round of stimulus payments due to growing public pressure. The piece outlines potential eligibility criteria, such as $75,000 income limits for single filers, $150,000 for married couples, and additional amounts for dependents, with possible direct deposits starting in late 2025 or early 2026. However, no legislative text, IRS statement, or action from Congress supports this claim. What do the IRS and Treasury say? As of now, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and the Treasury Department have not announced any new stimulus payments. The most recent IRS bulletin, IR-2025-75, dated July 15, focused on tax security and extensions, not new relief checks. The last official stimulus checks were distributed in 2021 under the American Rescue Plan, with up to $1,400 per eligible individual. While the IRS is still processing unclaimed Recovery Rebate Credits from that period (worth $2.4 billion), the deadline to file for those expired on April 15, 2025. What about the DOGE payments? Trump mentioned a so-called $5,000 'DOGE dividend' in February 2025, tied to potential savings from the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). However, this remains a proposal only—there is no congressional approval, and it is not linked to a $2,000 check scheduled for August. Social Security checks Regular monthly payments from the Social Security Administration, including retirement, disability (SSDI), and survivor benefits, continue to go out, as usual. These are not stimulus payments, but rather ongoing benefits based on eligibility. The 2025 Cost-of-Living Adjustment (COLA) provides some support to beneficiaries but doesn't match inflation levels impacting food, housing, and healthcare costs, especially for low-income households. IRS warning Misinformation about the $2,000 stimulus has sparked scam attempts, including fraudulent messages and fake application forms. The IRS has warned the public to be cautious and to verify any claims via or other official sources.
Economic Times
31 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Trump blasts jobs report as ‘Rigged' — Nobel economist Paul Krugman fires back with brutal dig
Synopsis Paul Krugman slams Trump after President Donald Trump called the July 2025 jobs report rigged and fired the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Trump claimed the weak job numbers were politically manipulated, sparking outrage from economists. Krugman fired back, saying, 'every accusation is a confession,' warning that dismissing data undermines democracy. Experts explained job data revisions are routine, not rigged. This political clash over economic facts is fueling deep concerns about transparency and trust. Paul Krugman, the Nobel Prize-winning economist, is calling out President Donald Trump after the release of the July 2025 jobs report, which showed much weaker job growth than expected. Trump didn't just criticize the numbers—he went a step further by firing the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) chief and calling the report 'rigged.' Paul Krugman slams Trump over 'rigged' jobs report claim as economists warn of deeper crisis- In a fiery response that's stirring headlines across the political and economic world, Paul Krugman, the Nobel Prize-winning economist, has lashed out at President Donald Trump for claiming that the latest U.S. jobs report is 'rigged.' The report, which showed far weaker-than-expected job growth in July 2025, has sparked a wave of controversy after Trump accused federal officials of manipulating economic data against him — a move Krugman and other economists are calling dangerous, dishonest, and deeply destabilizing. The controversy began with the July 2025 U.S. jobs report released by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). The report showed that only 73,000 jobs were added in July, falling far short of Wall Street expectations. More alarmingly, the government revised previous months' job gains down significantly—by a total of 258,000 jobs across May and June. This sharp downward revision has raised concerns that the American economy is slowing more rapidly than previously thought. It also sent shockwaves through financial markets, reignited fears of a possible recession, and put the Federal Reserve in a tricky position regarding potential interest rate cuts. President Donald Trump, who is seeking re-election this fall, did not hold back in his reaction. Within hours of the BLS release, Trump publicly called the numbers 'rigged,' 'a scam,' and fired the Bureau's Commissioner, Dr. Erika McEntarfer, who was originally appointed under President Biden. Trump accused McEntarfer and the agency of political manipulation, claiming the negative jobs report was deliberately skewed to damage his administration's record on the economy. He went as far as calling the data a 'deep state lie' intended to fuel voter distrust just before the election. This isn't the first time Trump has attacked federal institutions, but this move has sparked widespread criticism from economists, policymakers, and media outlets across the spectrum. Leading the intellectual pushback is Paul Krugman, a longtime Trump critic and respected economist. Writing in response to Trump's accusations, Krugman stated that 'every accusation is a confession,' suggesting that Trump often blames others for the very things he's guilty of doing. Krugman accused Trump of embracing a 'paranoid style of politics' that undermines trust in core democratic institutions like the BLS. He stressed that data revisions are normal, especially during periods of economic volatility, and that Trump's response only highlights his discomfort with reality. In Krugman's words, the danger isn't just in Trump's rhetoric — it's in what he's willing to dismantle to protect his image. 'When leaders start dismissing facts as lies and firing neutral officials, democracy suffers,' he warned. Stripping away the noise, here's a clearer picture of what the latest labor market data actually shows: July 2025 : 73,000 jobs added (vs. 180,000 expected) : 73,000 jobs added (vs. 180,000 expected) May & June revisions : Total jobs cut by 258,000 : Total jobs cut by 258,000 Unemployment rate : Slight uptick to 4.1% : Slight uptick to 4.1% Wage growth: Still steady at 3.7% year-over-year This data reflects a slowing but stable economy, not a collapse—and certainly not a government-led data conspiracy. Most independent economists agree that the labor market is adjusting as expected after years of aggressive post-pandemic growth and inflation-fighting monetary policy. Several independent economists have stepped forward to clarify what's really happening with the job numbers. According to Jeffrey Roach, Chief Economist at LPL Financial, 'downward revisions are common when the economy begins to slow down. Employers typically report data late or revise their numbers as trends shift.' Jamie Cox of Harris Financial Group added that the weak jobs data and revisions could nudge the Federal Reserve to consider rate cuts to keep the economy from tipping into recession. While the headlines were shocking, most experts agree that the changes reflect real-time corrections — not conspiracy. In fact, experts pointed out that job market reports often undergo revisions for accuracy, and this cycle is no different from previous economic slowdowns. Despite the political drama, economists say there is real concern beneath the headlines. A consistent theme across recent data points to a gradual slowdown in job growth, falling from the robust pace seen earlier in the year. While 73,000 new jobs in July may still reflect expansion, it's far from the 200,000+ averages seen in the first quarter. Coupled with the large downward revisions to prior months, experts believe the economy may be entering a cooling phase, likely influenced by: High interest rates by the Federal Reserve Slower consumer spending Reduced business hiring amid political uncertainty These shifts don't signal a recession yet, but they do suggest that America's post-COVID boom is tapering it's not unusual for presidents to spin economic data in their favor, Trump's decision to fire the head of the BLS has drawn sharp criticism from economists, political analysts, and even former government officials. Many see it as a direct threat to the independence of federal institutions responsible for delivering unbiased, factual information to the public. Critics argue that politicizing trusted data not only damages credibility but also sets a dangerous precedent, where economic reports could be shaped by political agendas rather than truth. This move has raised serious concerns about transparency, accountability, and the future of data integrity in American governance. Q: Why did Paul Krugman criticize Donald Trump over the jobs report? A: He said Trump's 'rigged' claim was dishonest and dangerous to democracy. Q: What did Donald Trump do after the July 2025 jobs report? A: He fired the BLS chief and claimed the data was fake.
Time of India
31 minutes ago
- Time of India
Give the bully an inch, he'll take a mile: China envoy amid tariff war
NEW DELHI: "Give the bully an inch, he will take a mile," wrote Chinese ambassador Xu Feihong in a post on X, a day after US President Donald Trump slapped an additional 25% tariff on India for its trade with Russia. The remark was seen by some as expressing solidarity with countries like India and Brazil, at the receiving end of Trump's trade war. Xu's post also tagged Chinese foreign minister Wang Yi's remarks, after his talks with the Brazilian president's chief advisor Celso Amorim, that using tariffs as a weapon to suppress other countries violates the UN Charter, undermines WTO rules and is both unpopular and unsustainable. Amid the trade standoff with the US, PM Narendra Modi is likely to visit China this month for the SCO summit where he will meet Chinese President Xi Jinping and also Russian President Vladimir Putin.
