📹 'Uai + irmão' shine: OneFootball's BR 25 round 10 team
This article was translated into English by Artificial Intelligence. You can read the original version in 🇧🇷 here.
Hey, everyone! Matchday #10 of the Brasileirão has come to an end, and it's time for the OneFootball Team of the Week!
Check it out below!
Remember that Botafogo vs Ceará has been postponed to a later date.
The match was originally scheduled for last Saturday (24th), the same day as Fluminense vs Vasco, but was postponed due to security concerns.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Kristi Noem said undocumented immigrant sent Trump death threat. Police say he was framed.
Kristi Noem said undocumented immigrant sent Trump death threat. Police say he was framed. Milwaukee police quickly suspected a man arrested by ICE was framed in Trump death threat. Then DHS Secretary Kristi Noem accused him of the crime. Show Caption Hide Caption Community rallies against ICE raids after high school student detained Communities in California and Massachusetts protested recent ICE raids that resulted in arrests of restaurant workers and a high school student. A suspect awaiting trial on robbery and battery charges in Wisconsin had a brazen idea to get off scot free: Get rid of his victim, the main witness in his case, by persuading authorities to deport him. So Demetric D. Scott, pretending to be the victim, wrote a series of letters to state and federal officials threatening to assassinate President Donald Trump, prosecutors say. The letters had the return address and name of the victim, Ramón Morales-Reyes, and noted he would "self-deport" after killing the president. The Department of Homeland Security took the bait. One day after receiving the letter, immigration agents arrested Morales-Reyes, 54, after he dropped his daughter off at school in Milwaukee. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem soon blasted out news of the arrest, noting in a press release that a dangerous threat from an undocumented individual had been removed. 'Thanks to our ICE officers, this illegal alien who threatened to assassinate President Trump is behind bars,' Noem said. But the story quickly began to fall apart. Morales-Reyes' attorney and family said he cannot speak or write in English. Within days, Scott admitted his ruse and police searched his cell and found a pen and an envelope containing the Milwaukee ICE office's address and phone number. Scott was charged June 2 with felony witness intimidation, identity theft and two counts of bail jumping. His attorney, Robert Hampton III, declined to comment to the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, part of the USA TODAY Network. But the man he framed is still in federal custody, due to appear at an immigration hearing June 4. And Noem and DHS have yet to retract their false allegations he was behind the threat to kill Trump. As of June 4, Noem's original statement remained online without any correction or additional information. The agency has said he is in the country illegally and has a criminal record so will remain in custody. Morales-Reyes' deportation defense lawyer Cain Oulahan has said he is trying to find ways for Morales-Reyes to receive any form of immigration relief to be protected from deportation while his case is pending. How investigators unearthed the plot to frame Ramón Morales-Reyes Authorities sussed out Scott's scheme in part by listening to calls he made while in jail, court records show. "This dude is a (expletive) illegal immigrant and they just need to pick his (expletive) up," according to a call recording linked to Scott's jail inmate ID that is cited in the complaint. The man later added on the same call: "And the judge will agree cause if he gets picked up by ICE, there won't be a jury trial so they will probably dismiss it that day. That's my plan." On May 22, the day Morales-Reyes was arrested and six days before DHS sent out it's press release, Milwaukee Detective Timothy Keller, who is assigned to the FBI-Milwaukee Joint Task Force, interviewed Morales-Reyes. He learns Morales-Reyes cannot read, write, or fluently speak English. He also notices Morales-Reyes' handwriting is "completely different" from what is on the letters. Keller asks Morales-Reyes who might want to get him in trouble. Morales-Reyes tells him the only person he can think of is Scott. Undocumented crime victim applied for U-visa but could still be deported Morales-Reyes' attorney Kime Abduli described her client as humble, soft-spoken and hard-working. She said he has three children who are U.S. citizens. 'I'm just glad that they have identified who it was or have a better sense of who it was,' said . 'And that Ramon is being cleared of any involvement in this.' Morales-Reyes is in the process of applying for a U-visa, a visa that allows undocumented victims and witnesses of certain crimes to stay in the U.S. for up to four years if they help with the investigation. He applied for the visa as a victim and witness of a robbery Scott is accused of. According to Abduli, his application was delivered to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services over a month ago, and no receipt has been issued by the agency yet. Abduli said this is not uncommon. Due to the significant backlog of cases, it takes about two months to get a receipt and at least seven to eight years to receive the visa. In the meantime, a pending application would not protect Morales-Reyes from deportation. Calls for Kristi Noem and DHS to retract statement about Morales-Reyes Since DHS issued its statement, Morales-Reyes' family has received numerous death threats, according to his lawyers and immigrant advocacy organization Voces de la Frontera. At a news conference May 30, the organization's executive director, Christine Neumann-Ortiz, urged DHS to issue a correction to clear his name. "Every minute that passes without the DHS issuing a correction to the serious allegation represents a real threat and danger to the family," Neumann-Ortiz said. On May 29, DHS said the investigation into the threat against Trump was ongoing and that Morales-Reyes would remain in custody, given his undocumented status and record. Publicly available documents show Morales-Reyes is connected to a hit-and-run incident and an incident of disorderly conduct and property damage related to domestic abuse in 1996. Based on the documents, he received a non-criminal conviction for the disorderly conduct charge, which is usually a ticket. The other charges were dismissed or not prosecuted. What was the robbery case against Scott? The trial Scott was trying to avoid had already gone to trial once, in January 2024 but a judge declared a mistrial when the jury could not reach a decision. A new trial date was set for July 14. The case revolved around a bicycle. On Sept. 26, 2023, Morales-Reyes was riding a bicycle his wife had purchased a few weeks earlier, getting some exercise to help with his diabetes, when a man approached him and started shouting, he said in court. The man attacked Morales-Reyes with a corkscrew and cut him under his left armpit, an altercation captured on a neighbor's Ring doorbell camera. When police arrived, an officer interviewed Morales-Reyes in Spanish, getting a description of the suspect. Police arrested Scott within hours and he was charged with armed robbery, aggravated battery, and second-degree recklessly endangering safety and bail jumping. Scott told police, and later a jury, that the bicycle was actually his and had been stolen days earlier. He said he was trying to get his property back and that Morales-Reyes had threatened him first, when they were out of view from the Ring doorbell. 'I told the truth,' Scott later said in court. 'I told him that I accidentally cut him.' At the time of his arrest, Scott had an open warrant for skipping court in a burglary case. He was charged with breaking into his mother's apartment building and stealing a ladder and other items. He was booked into Milwaukee County Jail on Sept. 26, 2023, and has remained there since on $10,000 bail. A list of past convictions Scott has past criminal convictions that date back to 2000 including battery, disorderly conduct and third-degree sexual assault. In 2010, Scott was charged with felony murder in the death of Steve Allen, according to previous Journal Sentinel reporting. Scott was seen punching and kicking Allen, who was lying on the pavement while demanding the return of property, the Journal Sentinel reported. Allen died two days later. Online court records show Scott was convicted of second-degree recklessly endangering safety in that case and sentenced to five years in prison and five years on extended supervision.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
RCMP statement regarding media reports on the structural investigation into the Israel-Hamas conflict
LONDON, ON, June 4, 2025 /CNW/ - In light of recent media coverage regarding the Royal Canadian Mounted Police's (RCMP) involvement in matters related to the Israel-Hamas armed conflict, we wish to clarify the nature and scope of our activities. In early 2024, the RCMP initiated a structural investigation in connection with this ongoing conflict. A structural investigation is a broad, intelligence-led intake process designed to collect, preserve, and assess information potentially relevant under Canada's Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act. This includes gathering open-source material and voluntary submissions from individuals wishing to provide information. The primary objective is to proactively collect relevant information that may support future investigative steps, should jurisdictional and legal thresholds be met. It is important to emphasize that a structural investigation is not a criminal investigation. The RCMP employs a well-established structured protocol to efficiently triage and process incoming information related to global conflicts, this standardized initial procedure serves as a foundation for every case, after which specialized investigative techniques are applied to address the unique aspects of each investigation, including the Israel-Hamas structural investigation. Should a perpetrator of core international crimes—such as genocide, war crimes, or crimes against humanity—with the appropriate nexus to Canada be identified, the RCMP will initiate a separate criminal investigation. To date, the RCMP has not initiated any related criminal investigations. Although this work has been underway in a developmental capacity since early 2024, it has not been publicly announced as the RCMP continues to develop essential supporting operational tools. This includes a secure online portal available in French, English, Hebrew and Arabic, to facilitate the structured and secure any submissions of information by the public and potential witnesses. Unfortunately, technical challenges have resulted in delays to the rollout of this critical tool; once this online portal is ready for access, we will advise the public. The RCMP remains committed to its mandate under Canadian law, to assess credible allegations of war crimes and crimes against humanity. We conduct this work with impartiality, relying on evidence-based assessments in alignment with the principles of the rule of law. Given the sensitivity of the matter, we urge the public to refrain from drawing premature conclusions about the RCMP's role or intent. This initiative is solely focused on collecting relevant information and does not target any community or group. Further updates will be provided once the public reporting portal has been made available. Contact information RCMP Central Region (Ontario)Communications & Media RelationsEmail: CR Media Relations RCMP / Relations Médias GRC RC CR_Media_Relations_RCMP-Relations_Medias_GRC_RC@ Twitter: @RCMPONTFacebook: rcmpontarioYouTube: RCMP_Ontario_GRCWebsite: RCMP in Ontario SOURCE Royal Canadian Mounted Police - Central Region View original content: Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
A guide to multi-club ownership: How does it work?
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Red Bull-related clubs Leeds United (top-left), Salzburg (top-right), Leipzig (bottom-left) and New York (bottom-right). | Credit: Future Multi-club ownership is increasingly common in football, with plenty of big-money owners splashing out to take control of several clubs around the world. Advertisement Take Red Bull, for instance. They have varying stakes in Leeds United, FC Liefering, New York Red Bulls, Paris FC, RB Leipzig, TV Omiya Ardija, Red Bull Bragantino and Red Bull Salzburg. Several English clubs are part of similar models to different degrees, including Manchester City, Chelsea, Manchester United, Crystal Palace, Aston Villa, Arsenal, Nottingham Forest, and… well, loads more, including down in the lower leagues. So what are the rules on multi-club ownership? Can you own two clubs in the same league? Sir Jim Ratcliffe was linked with buying Chelsea before he bought Manchester United – and he certainly couldn't buy the Blues now | Credit: Getty Images Not in England you can't, certainly not at Premier League and EFL level. The EFL Owners and Directors' Test will automatically disqualify directors who hold an 'interest' in more than one club within the EFL, while the Premier League's own rules say that 'no Person may either directly or indirectly be involved in or have any power to determine or influence the management or administration of more than one [Premier League] Club.' Advertisement While that only applies within each league, the FA have an overarching rule with the same wording as the Premier League that applies to the entire English football pyramid. There is some suggestion that one person/company could own a stake of less than 25%, which would not represent significant control of any one club. That's a higher threshold than is set by UEFA; their rules mean a majority owner of one club could have a less than 50 per cent stake in another club playing in the same competition. That's the lowest bar available, though, and it's up to individual countries' FA to decide if they want to be stricter. Can two clubs from the same ownership compete in Europe? Girona's participation in Europe asked questions of UEFA | Credit: Getty Images This increasingly contentious issue came to a head in 2024 after Girona qualified for the Champions League and Nice qualified for the Europa League. Advertisement The issue was the Girona are part of the City Football Group alongside Manchester City, who also qualified for the Champions League. Manchester United meanwhile joined Nice in the Europa League; both clubs are at least part-owned by INEOS, headed by Sir Jim Ratcliffe. UEFA ultimately decided that each pair of clubs could compete in the same continental competition as long as: No one is simultaneously involved, directly or indirectly, in any capacity whatsoever in the management, administration and/or sporting performance of more than one club participating in a UEFA club competition; and No one has control or decisive influence over more than one club participating in a UEFA club competition. Essentially, then, no one person can be involved in the running or decision-making of two or more clubs within a single UEFA competition. City Football Group and INEOS swiftly made sure they were in line with that, and all four clubs were permitted entry to their respective competitions. That's why Nottingham Forest owner Evangelos Marinakis recently officially ceased to be a 'person of significant control' at the club. Advertisement Forest could potentially end up qualifying for either the Champions League or Europa League with Greek side Olympiacos next season. They're also owned by Marinakis, and so he had to officially step away from Forest to ensure they didn't run into any trouble should that occur. On top of that, clubs in that kind of situation have to apply to UEFA to get the all-clear to proceed into competition against one another. For 2024/25, UEFA allowed clubs to transfer the club to an 'independent third party', like a blind trust, which would be appointed to look out for the interests of that club only, without any consideration for the wider ownership group. Do clubs from the same ownership share resources? City are part of a much bigger network | Credit: Getty Images As far as we can tell, there's nothing to stop them from sharing scouting info and things like that as long as they're not in the same European competition as one another. Advertisement UEFA are keen to ensure that clubs remain independent from one another. To that end, they got a commitment from City Football Group and INEOS that they would not transfer players to one another until September 2025, nor would they 'conclude any kind of cooperation, joint technical or commercial agreements between each other' or 'use any joint scouting or player database'. It seems likely that they would ask for a similar commitment from any other clubs who face a similar situation in future. What's to stop clubs from the same ownership transferring players to each other for free? Red Bull players have often moved between clubs | Credit:Three words: 'associated party transactions'. Advertisement In the Premier League, the rules say that any transfers between 'associated parties' (i.e. clubs within the same ownership group) need to be assessed by the Premier League first to see whether they represent 'fair market value'. What that means is a judgement call for the Premier League assessors, but they could put a halt to any proposed transfer that was 'evidently not' at fair market value. We're not sure it would really be in clubs' interests to try and fiddle it that way, anyway. Each league has its own version of the Premier League's Profit & Sustainability Rules that need to be met. In their current form, both clubs would generally be better off just doing trades between themselves at 'fair market value' anyway, for boring accounting reasons that we won't get into here.
