WhatsApp tells BBC it backs Apple in legal row with UK over user data
The messaging app's boss, Will Cathcart, said the case "could set a dangerous precedent" by "emboldening other nations" to seek to break encryption, which is how tech firms keep their users' data private.
Apple went to the courts after receiving a notice from the Home Office earlier this year demanding the right to access the data of its global customers if required in the interests of national security.
It and other critics of the government's position say the request compromises the privacy of millions of users.
The BBC has approached the Home Office for comment.
It has previously declined to comment directly on the Apple case.
But it has told the BBC the government's "first priority" is "to keep people safe" and the UK has a "longstanding position of protecting our citizens from the very worst crimes, such as child sex abuse and terrorism, at the same time as protecting people's privacy."
WhatsApp has applied to submit evidence to the court which is hearing Apple's bid to have the Home Office request overturned.
Mr Cathcart said: "WhatsApp would challenge any law or government request that seeks to weaken the encryption of our services and will continue to stand up for people's right to a private conversation online."
This intervention from the Meta-owned platform represents a major escalation in what was an already extremely high-profile and awkward dispute between the UK and the US.
Apple's row with the UK government erupted in February, when it emerged ministers were seeking the right to be able to access information secured by its Advanced Data Protection (ADP) system.
The argument intensified in the weeks that followed, with Apple first pulling ADP in the UK, and then taking legal action against the Home Office.
It also sparked outrage among US politicians, with some saying it was a "dangerous attack on US cybersecurity" and urging the US government to rethink its intelligence-sharing arrangements with the UK if the notice was not withdrawn.
Tulsi Gabbard, the director of US National Intelligence, described it as an "egregious violation" of US citizens' privacy.
Civil liberties groups also attacked the UK government, saying what it was demanding had privacy and security implications for people around the world.
Apple's ADP applies end-to-encryption (E2EE) to files such as photos and notes stored on the iCloud, meaning only the user has the "key" required to view them.
The same technology protects a number of messaging services, including WhatsApp.
That makes them very secure but poses a problem for law enforcement agencies.
They can ask to see data with lower levels of protection - if they have a court warrant - but tech firms currently have no way to provide access to E2EE files, because no such mechanism currently exists.
Tech companies have traditionally resisted creating such a mechanism not just because they say it would compromise users' privacy but because there would be no way of preventing it eventually being exploited by criminals.
In 2023, WhatsApp said it would rather be blocked as a service than weaken E2EE.
When Apple pulled ADP in the UK it said it did not want to create a "backdoor" that "bad actors" could take advantage of.
Further complicating the argument around the Home Office's request is that it is made under the Investigatory Powers Act, the provisions of which are often secret.
When the matter came to court, government lawyers argued that the case should not be made in public in any way for national security reasons.
However, in April, a judge agreed with a number of news organisations, including the BBC, and said certain details should be made public.
"It would have been a truly extraordinary step to conduct a hearing entirely in secret without any public revelation of the fact that a hearing was taking place," his ruling stated.
At the time, the government declined to comment on the proceedings but said: "The UK has robust safeguards and independent oversight to protect privacy and privacy is only impacted on an exceptional basis, in relation to the most serious crimes and only when it is necessary and proportionate to do so."
What Apple pulling Advanced Data Protection means for you
Apple pulls data protection tool after UK government security row
Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the world's top tech stories and trends. Outside the UK? Sign up here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Here's what Tim Cook thinks about AI replacing the iPhone
Apple CEO Tim Cook waved off concerns about advanced AI replacing the iPhone. Speaking on Thursday's earnings call, Cook said, "It's difficult to see a world" without iPhones. Apple has been slow to release AI features, leaving analysts mixed on its competitive edge. Apple CEO Tim Cook appears unfazed by concerns that advancements in AI could topple the iPhone's dominance. During Thursday's earnings call, Wamsi Moen, an analyst with Bank of America, asked Cook directly how Apple is preparing for a world where dependence on screen-based devices "significantly diminishes," thanks to advances in AI. Cook didn't seem to see an imminent threat to Apple's hero product. "When you when you think about all the things an iPhone can do, from connecting people to bringing app and game experiences to life, to taking photos and videos, to helping users explore the world and conduct their financial lives and pay for things and so much more, you know, it's difficult to see a world where iPhone's not living in it," Cook said. "And that doesn't mean that we are not thinking about other things as well," Cook added, "but I think that the devices are likely to be complementary devices, not substitution." While Cook didn't appear worried about advances in AI disrupting the tech giant's business, Apple has been slow to release new Apple Intelligence features, leaving analysts with mixed opinions about its competitive edge. EMARKETER analyst Jacob Bourne told Business Insider that, "while the AI arms race may pressure Apple toward bolder moves, including potential acquisitions, its disciplined approach to product quality over speed should help it maintain a competitive advantage in the premium market over the long haul, provided it makes the necessary R&D investments in AI." Wedbush analyst Dan Ives said in a research note after the call that the company's revenue beat was "a major step in the right direction," adding that "now it's time to address the elephant in the AI strategy, which remains absent while the rest of the tech world is laser focused on the AI Revolution at warp speed." Read the original article on Business Insider Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Nasdaq Covered Call ETFs for Growth & Income
Investors seeking higher income have been flocking to ETFs that use options to generate attractive dividends. There has been a recent surge in new products as providers develop innovative ways to package derivatives into ETFs, aiming to meet growing investor demand. In addition to offering high yields, these strategies generally help reduce portfolio volatility. However, investors should remember that there's no free lunch in investing. These products tend to perform best in sideways markets and often underperform during strong bull runs. That said, they can offer some downside protection when stocks decline. While the JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF JEPI launched the option income craze, its younger sibling—the JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF JEPQ—has been growing at a faster pace lately. JEPQ aims to generate income and capital appreciation by investing in a portfolio of stocks that closely mirrors the Nasdaq-100 Index, while using call options to generate income. The NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF QQQI follows a similar strategy but emphasizes tax efficiency. The Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF QDVO invests in large-cap dividend growth stocks with strong earnings and cash flow. NVIDIA NVDA, Microsoft MSFT, and Apple AAPL are top holdings in these ETFs. To learn more, please watch the short video above. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Apple Inc. (AAPL) : Free Stock Analysis Report Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) : Free Stock Analysis Report NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) : Free Stock Analysis Report JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPI): ETF Research Reports JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ): ETF Research Reports Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD): ETF Research Reports Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF (GPIQ): ETF Research Reports This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘Only a Monopoly Can Pull That Off': Billionaire Grant Cardone Calls Apple's 30% App Store Fee 'Insane'
Grant Cardone, a prominent real estate investor, entrepreneur, and business educator, has publicly questioned the legitimacy of Apple's (AAPL) long-standing 30% commission on in-app purchases, describing it as 'insane' and suggesting it is only possible for companies with monopolistic power. 'The fact Apple charges developers 30% on in-app purchases is insane. No company should be able to make 30% of gross fees charged,' Cardone wrote on X in July. He continued, 'There's no justification for it & it cost the end user. Only a monopoly can pull that off.' More News from Barchart Morgan Stanley Says Nvidia Has 'Exceptional' Strength. Should You Buy NVDA Stock Here? Dear MicroStrategy Stock Fans, Mark Your Calendars for July 31 2 Growth Stocks Wall Street Predicts Will Soar 74% to 159% Markets move fast. Keep up by reading our FREE midday Barchart Brief newsletter for exclusive charts, analysis, and headlines. Cardone's perspective is based on his extensive experience as both an entrepreneur and outspoken advocate for small businesses. Having built a multi-billion-dollar real estate portfolio and a portfolio of media and education businesses, Cardone frequently touts competitive openness and strategies to empower individuals and organizations in markets often dominated by major players. His business philosophy revolves around challenging industry norms and questioning practices that disadvantage smaller participants, as reflected in his criticism of Apple's fee structure. For more than a decade, Apple enforced a 30% commission on all revenue generated through in-app purchases on its App Store, a model that became a significant source of revenue for the company and an industry benchmark. Apple defended the fee as necessary to support platform maintenance, security, and distribution, yet many developers and business leaders argued it stifled competition, limited consumer choice, and cut deeply into the already narrow margins of app makers. Notably, Cardone's assertion that 'only a monopoly can pull that off' resonates with findings from recent regulatory battles. Criticism of Apple's approach has not only come from business figures like Cardone, but also from regulators in the United States and Europe. These authorities have found Apple's rules in violation of antitrust standards and, in some regions, forced the company to reduce its fee or permit alternative payment methods. A recent landmark federal court decision concluded that Apple must allow app developers to direct users to alternative payment systems outside of Apple's commission structure. The court criticized Apple's persistent efforts to shield its revenue even after initial legal interventions, highlighting how integral the fee had become to Apple's business model and how resistant the company was to outside scrutiny. The wide-reaching implications of these decisions support Cardone's view that such a sizable fee is unsustainable in a truly competitive environment. From a market dynamics perspective, Cardone's comments tie into ongoing concerns about digital platforms' gatekeeping power, and the negative impacts on both developers and consumers. As the global app economy evolves and as regulators increase pressure, Apple's decades-old commission policy is being dismantled. The shift is likely to encourage more competition, lower costs for developers, and potentially better pricing or innovation for end users — all outcomes Cardone has championed throughout his business career. In essence, Cardone's critique speaks to larger questions of what constitutes fair play in modern digital marketplaces and who ultimately bears the cost of entrenched market power. In that regard, his voice underscores a movement pushing for greater accountability and opportunity across the technology sector. On the date of publication, Caleb Naysmith did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
