Who's running for Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education in 2025
Why it matters: From immigration fears to federal funding cuts, Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools face major challenges. This board is tasked with steering the nation's 16th-largest school district through it all.
Zoom out: The board will also oversee what's being done to improve student outcomes. While CMS, which has more than 141,000 students, has made strides since the pandemic, it still lags behind the statewide average in student test scores and high school graduation rates.
Primary Election Day is Tuesday, Sept. 9. Early voting starts Thursday, Aug. 21. The general election is Tuesday, Nov. 4.
District 1
🏫 Melissa Easley is an incumbent with two children in CMS. She previously taught science and social studies in suburban Chicago.
Bill Fountain, a former middle and high school teacher, has run before for the school board without success. He believes CMS has prioritized "social and political agendas over core academics."
Charlitta Hatch is a graduate of CMS and has two children: a third-grader and a preschooler. She's an adjunct professor and teaches "History of Racism and Psychology of the Black Experience."
District 2
Thelma Byers-Bailey did not file for reelection.
Juan Hall is a former volunteer coach at West Charlotte High School and is involved with Moms for Liberty, a conservative group championing the parental rights movement.
Shamaiye Haynes has run before in 2023 with the support of the Black Political Caucus of Charlotte — but she said it hurt her chances that Mecklenburg County Democrats didn't include her on their blue ballot.
District 3
✏️ Gregory (Dee) Rankin is running unopposed to keep his seat.
He has a degree in public administration from UNC Pembroke and has taught in CMS as well as private and charter schools. He has also served as chair of the Black Political Caucus education committee.
District 4
🎓 Stephanie Sneed, a trial lawyer, currently serves as the board's chair and formerly chaired the Black Political Caucus of Charlotte-Mecklenburg.
Robert Edwards
Jillian King is a former teacher and stay-at-home parent.
District 5
🚌 Lisa Cline, an incumbent, worked in education for 39 years, including as assistant principal at Phillip O. Berry, West Mecklenburg and Ardrey Kell high schools.
Cynthia Stone attended, taught and sent her children to CMS.
District 6
Summer Nunn is not seeking reelection.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
26 minutes ago
- The Hill
Upset about DC's lack of voting rights? Look to the Democrats.
The deployment of the National Guard in Washington, D.C. has led to a media and political meltdown. In the New York Times, a column lamented that the military had not revolted against the civilian president. Even, so, commentators declared a ' coup ' because the federal government reasserted its constitutional power over the federal district. A Justice Department employee went so far as to scream profanities at federal officers on the street and assault one of them with a submarine sandwich. He was declared a 'freedom fighter' against 'the Gestapo.' The utter lunacy of the left was again triggered by Trump with an almost Pavlovian predictability. Trump rang the bell, and suddenly thousands of Democratic leaders began to salivate. In addition to denying a very real crime crisis in the district, Democrats immediately pivoted on the issue to renew unpopular demands for D.C. statehood. Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), the top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, insisted that this was only happening because 'American citizens lack the protections of statehood.' Ankit Jain echoed that view. Jain occupies a farcical position as 'D.C. shadow senator,' an unpaid position in which he pretends to be a member of the U.S. Senate. Jain wrote that 'it's entirely possible that people will die as a result' of the deployment. He insisted that this would not occur in states where democracy governs: 'We may not have it in Washington, but if you live in any of the other 50 states, you do.' Over the years, I have testified five times in the House and Senate to argue for the restoration of full representation for residents in Washington, D.C. Residents could have a governor, two real U.S. senators, a voting representative in the House, a state legislature, and every other trapping of statehood. It needs only to go back whence it came. D.C. needs to return to Maryland through 'retrocession.' In academic writings, I have advocated for what I called ' modified retrocession ' where Maryland would take back the land given initially to create what was called 'the federal city.' The Framers did not want the capital under the control of any state, so they created the federal enclave to be under the control of Congress as a whole. Originally, the outlines of the federal city were laid out by none other than George Washington as the surveyor. It was a diamond shape, with territory ceded by both Virginia and Maryland. Within a few decades, Virginians in what is now Arlington County and Alexandria came to regret not having direct representatives and were allowed to retrocede back to their state. That left the triangle of territory from Maryland. However, Marylanders did not agree with their Virginian counterparts. They liked living in the federal enclave and decided to remain without direct representation. Congress previously allowed retrocession and could do so again. Under my prior proposal, the federal enclave would be reduced to the small sliver of land upon which our Capitol, Supreme Court, and the White House rest. It would finally give every Washington resident full representation. Also, in a city notoriously mismanaged for years, D.C. residents would be part of a state that excels in areas like education that could materially improve their positions. So if the lack of representation is so intolerable, why wouldn't Washington return to Maryland? It would give every Washington resident a voting representative in the U.S. House, two senators, a governor in a sovereign state, and a state legislature. The reason is politics at its most cynical and hypocritical. Democrats only want two senators representing D.C. if it boosts their numbers. It's not good enough to give them Maryland's senators. What's more, Maryland Democrats will not suffer a shift in the center of their state's political gravity from Baltimore to Washington. Finally, D.C. Democratic leaders are not eager to share power with Maryland Democrats, as they might gain all the trappings of a state. This is why, for decades, Democrats have settled to leave D.C. voters without direct representation in Congress. They decided it is better to lament the lack of representation on license plates than to give residents such representation through retrocession of the residential sections of D.C. to Maryland. Polling shows that most Americans still oppose statehood for this one city — a Vatican-like city-state. That is why Democrats are not keen on attempting a new constitutional amendment to change the status of the city. They would rather bewail the lack of direct representation while, ironically, trying to achieve effective statehood without a direct vote of citizens on a constitutional amendment. The fact is, Trump has every right to deploy the National Guard in Washington and to take over the D.C. police. Those are entirely lawful and constitutional orders. Yet the New York Times appears to have changed its position on the danger of insurrection. The Times recently ran a bizarre column by former Obama officials Steven Simon and Jonathan Stevenson, ' We Used to Think the Military Would Stand Up to Trump. We Were Wrong.' They complain that 'it now seems clear to us that the military will not rescue Americans from Mr. Trump's misuse of the nation's military capabilities.' The 'rescue' would have meant military personnel disobeying a direct order from the commander-in-chief because they disagreed with the need for the deployment. In fairness to the New York Times, that is not exactly an insurrection — it is more of a mutiny. What is striking about this debate is how entirely untethered it is from anything that touches upon reality. Statehood remains easily attainable for Washington, if Democrats would only stop opposing retrocession. Meanwhile, the deployment is clearly constitutional, regardless of how many columns or submarine sandwiches you throw about in another furious fit. The only thing that is clear is that Washington residents are again being played. They remain political props left stateless because returning them to full representation is not politically advantageous. They are given make-believe 'shadow senators' and protest license plates rather than restoring their prior status. As with the debate over crime, few want to discuss how to solve this problem. Given the opposition of the Democrats, Trump should take the lead and order federal officials to develop a blueprint for retrocession. He should use his office to fully inform the American people, and particularly D.C. residents, of the benefits of returning to Maryland.
Politico
27 minutes ago
- Politico
Texas Democrats who left the state over redistricting will take part in national demonstration
'It's been really hard for the members to stay away from Texas, from their jobs, from their kids and families,' said state Rep. Vikki Goodwin, who's also running for the lieutenant governor seat in 2026. 'It's also very expensive with the $500 a day fine. So some members just felt like we can make a commitment for one session quorum break, but we really can't do it indefinitely.' Activists are holding more than 150 rallies in 34 states over the weekend to call attention to the Texas redistricting issue and President Donald Trump's support for changing congressional maps. The goal is to send a message that 'we see what Trump is doing, and we won't stand for it,' according to a statement from organizers. The Texas Democrats, and members of the party nationwide, were helped when California Gov. Gavin Newsom announced his state would also redistrict in order to counteract Texas' moves. On Friday, California presented its own redrawn map favoring Democrats. The ballot measure, which goes before voters in November, would take effect only if Texas Republicans follow through on their plans. 'Califorina coming on board gives us more options,' said Texas House Democratic Caucus Chair Gene Wu in an interview Friday. 'If California passes a trigger bill, then there will be real incentive for Texas to not pass its [redistricting] bill.' During the past two weeks, the Texas Democrats have met with Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker, whose team found them hotel rooms — they had to move once after a bomb threat — and a few members of the group also met Gov. Kathy Hochul in New York and Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear via Zoom. The Texans made two trips to California for key meetings in conjunction with Newsom pushing for his state to come up with its own adjusted boundaries for the U.S. House, potentially giving Democrats an edge in Congress in 2026. Newsom's move 'changed everything,' said state Rep. Sheryl Cole, recalling the sacrifice of leaving her 87-year-old mother behind to watch TV coverage of Abbott threatening FBI arrest warrants. 'It made a difference with the sacrifice.' Her colleague state Rep. Diego Bernal put it more bluntly: 'When we knew definitively that they were going to do something, it felt like wind. Like something was happening. You feel less isolated.'
Fox News
27 minutes ago
- Fox News
Bill Maher slams Democrats like Kamala and the Clintons for being 'afraid' to come on his show
"Real Time" host Bill Maher slammed Democrats like former Vice President Kamala Harris and the Clintons on Friday for being "afraid" to come on his show while praising Republicans for showing up and taking 'their beating like a man.'
