Why Donald Trump and his officials call Elizabeth Warren 'Pocahontas'
Donald Trump's use of the nickname 'Pocahontas' to refer Senator Elizabeth Warren isn't new, but it's making headlines again. On May 28, 2025, President Trump's advisor David Sacks reignited the controversy by claiming Warren controlled former President Joe Biden's autopen, suggesting she had significant influence in his administration.
The remark, widely seen as another swipe at Warren's past claims of Native American ancestry, revives a political feud that began during her 2012 Senate run. With fresh attention on this issue, it's worth examining how this nickname began, why it struck a nerve, and what it reveals about political discourse today.
The beginning of the 'Pocahontas' controversy
The controversy centers around Warren's long-standing claim of partial Native American ancestry. During her tenure at the University of Pennsylvania and Harvard Law School in the 1980s and 1990s, Warren identified as Native American in a national faculty directory.
Critics questioned whether this influenced her hiring, though both universities publicly denied that her heritage played any role.
Warren has always defended her identification, saying it was based on family stories passed down by her parents and grandparents. 'This is our lives,' she told NPR in 2012. 'And I'm very proud of it.'
Why Donald Trump gave this nickname to Elizabeth
President Trump began calling Warren 'Pocahontas' during his 2016 campaign, a name meant to mock her ancestry claims and portray her as dishonest.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Buy Brass Idols - Handmade Brass Statues for Home & Gifting
Luxeartisanship
Buy Now
Undo
The reference is to the real historical figure Pocahontas, a Powhatan woman involved in early colonial history. Trump's use of her name in this context has been widely criticized as racially insensitive and disrespectful.
He once mocked Warren by pointing to her mention of high cheekbones as evidence of Native ancestry. Trump even publicly challenged her to take a DNA test, promising to donate $1 million to a charity of her choice if the results confirmed her claim.
Who was Pocahontas, really?
Pocahontas, born Amonute and also known as Matoaka, was the daughter of Chief Powhatan and a prominent figure in early American colonial history. Her life has been romanticized, especially through her association with English settler John Rolfe and her portrayal in films like Disney's Pocahontas.
Many Native Americans argue that her story has been distorted to erase the violence of colonization. Using her name in a political insult, they say, reduces a significant cultural and historical figure to a tool for mockery.
In 2018, Cherokee Nation Secretary of State Chuck Hoskin Jr. condemned the use of the nickname, calling it disrespectful and inappropriate.
The DNA test and Trump's response
In 2018, Warren took Trump up on his challenge and released DNA test results. The report showed strong evidence of a Native American ancestor 6 to 10 generations ago. She asked Trump to follow through on his $1 million promise and suggested he donate to the National Indigenous Women's Resource Center.
Trump dismissed the test, mocked the percentage of Native ancestry as insignificant, and later claimed that his pledge only applied if Warren became the Democratic nominee and debated him directly. He refused to make the donation, calling the entire situation a 'scam and a lie.'
Resurgence of the Autopen allegation
The nickname resurfaced this week after David Sacks, now a White House advisor and President Trump's Crypto and AI Czar, accused Warren of wielding power during the Biden presidency by controlling the use of his autopen. The claim, posted on X, was picked up by Trends Newsline and further amplified by some accounts
There is no concrete evidence supporting the accusation, and it appears to be another politically motivated attempt to cast doubt on Warren's integrity and influence.
Still, it brought the "Pocahontas" nickname back into the spotlight.
President Trump's use of 'Pocahontas' as a nickname for Elizabeth Warren may seem like a simple jab, but it reflects much deeper issues about how heritage, identity, and race are used in American politics. While Warren's claims of ancestry have been debated for years, Trump's repeated mockery and the nickname's recent revival show how political figures can weaponize cultural identity.
Ultimately, this controversy continues to distract from more important conversations. Native communities have long asked for attention to real issues affecting them, not political name-calling. It's time to shift the focus toward meaningful change and respect for Indigenous voices.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
11 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Donald Trump has many ways to hurt Elon Musk
THERE WAS a time, not long ago, when an important skill for journalists was translating the code in which powerful people spoke about each other. Carefully prepared speeches and other public remarks would be dissected for hints about the arguments happening in private. Among Donald Trump's many achievements is upending this system. In his administration people seem to say exactly what they think at any given moment. Wild threats are made—to end habeas corpus; to take Greenland by force—without any follow-through. Journalists must now try to guess what is real and what is for show. So it is with the break-up between Mr Trump and Elon Musk, the world's richest man and until last week a 'special government employee'. A few months ago Mr Musk posted on X, his social-media platform, that he loved the president 'as much as a straight man can love another man'. On May 30th, at a joint press conference in the Oval Office to announce Mr Musk's departure from government, Mr Trump called him 'an incredible patriot' and praised his work with the Department of Government Efficiency (known as DOGE). Yet by June 5th it had all broken down. On his Truth Social media platform the president posted that the billionaire was 'wearing thin' and 'went CRAZY'. Mr Trump then threatened to 'terminate' his government contracts. Mr Musk responded on X, claiming that Mr Trump's name appears in the government's files on Jeffrey Epstein, the late financier who was convicted of trafficking and having sex with underage girls. 'That is the real reason they have not been made public,' wrote Mr Musk. Later he agreed with a post saying that Mr Trump should be impeached. He also said he would begin decommissioning his Dragon spacecraft, which transports astronauts to the International Space Station. If carried out, the threats could be disastrous for both men. Mr Trump could lose a valuable donor and the supportive sway of X; Mr Musk's business interests could suffer enormously. But in response to a comment advising him to 'cool off', Mr Musk wrote 'good advice' and backtracked on his call to decommission the Dragon. Where things go from here is anyone's guess. The initial cause of the falling out between Mr Trump and his 'first buddy' was the president's so-called 'One Big Beautiful Bill'. Mr Musk was incensed that the measure would add enormously to the deficit, and so undermine the work of DOGE. On June 3rd he escalated his criticism, calling the bill a 'disgusting abomination'. On June 5th he added another complaint, saying that Mr Trump's tariffs are going to bring about a recession. Mr Trump has his own explanation for Mr Musk's sudden disloyalty. He says the Tesla CEO is unhappy because his bill would cancel a government subsidy for electric cars created by Joe Biden. If Mr Trump does decide to retaliate, the risks to Mr Musk and his businesses are extensive. The threats the president has already made, however, are the least credible. Cancelling the contracts of SpaceX, Mr Musk's space company, would be profoundly disruptive to the government. Without SpaceX rockets, it would struggle to put anything into space, including spy satellites. The Pentagon relies heavily on the firm's Starlink satellites. SpaceX itself could probably weather such moves. Though it has benefited greatly from government contracts, the firm's commercial revenues soared nearly three-fold last year, according to estimates by Quilty Space, a business-intelligence firm. Mr Musk has also wanted to cancel the Dragon spacecraft for some time. Steve Bannon, a former adviser to Mr Trump who is no fan of Mr Musk, has proposed even bigger penalties. He wants the South African-born billionaire to be stripped of his American citizenship—he says Mr Musk is an 'illegal alien'—and his companies nationalised under the Defence Production Act. Such actions also seem unrealistic. Stripping Mr Musk's citizenship would require a judge to rule he committed fraud. The Defence Production Act almost certainly does not permit sudden nationalisation, even if the country is at war. That does not mean Mr Musk can breathe easy, though. His interests are vulnerable to more routine measures. At the time he entered government in January, he and his companies were subject to 65 potential or actual regulatory actions by 11 federal agencies, according to the minority staff of the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, an arm of the Senate. These include accusations that Tesla, Mr Musk's car company, lied about its self-driving technology; that Neuralink, his brain-implant company, violated the Animal Welfare Act with its experiments on monkeys; and that SpaceX repeatedly failed to follow the law when launching rockets. (As head of DOGE, Mr Musk was able to dismantle some of the agencies within the government investigating him, such as the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau.) One of the reasons why Silicon Valley magnates like Mr Musk rallied around Mr Trump last year was that he promised a more favourable regulatory environment. But 'there was always the risk that what they were buying instead were the conditions of oligarchy', says Donald Moynihan of the Gerald Ford School of Public Policy at the University of Michigan. That is, business leaders who are loyal to the president get to operate as they like, while those who are critical get the full force of the law. Mr Musk may be about to discover what life is like outside the tent. Perhaps on feeling the cold he will find a way back inside. Get 360° coverage—from daily headlines to 100 year archives.
Time of India
15 minutes ago
- Time of India
Germany tightens migration rules: 3-year citizenship ends, family visas frozen for some
Germany has introduced stricter rules on naturalisation and family reunification for certain categories of migrants. The changes, approved by Chancellor Friedrich Merz 's government on May 28, aim to reduce irregular migration and ease pressure on integration systems. Citizenship pathway extended Under the new policy, the option for "well-integrated" migrants to apply for German citizenship after just three years of residence has been discontinued. All applicants will now be required to complete at least five years of legal residency, meet German language proficiency at the B1 level, and demonstrate financial self-sufficiency. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like An engineer reveals: 1 simple trick to get all TV channels Techno Mag Learn More Undo The earlier fast-track provision allowed those with C1-level language skills and a record of community contribution to naturalise in three years. Officials now say the change is intended to create a more uniform path to citizenship. (Join our ETNRI WhatsApp channel for all the latest updates) Family reunification suspended Live Events You Might Also Like: Germany prepares to abolish its fast-track path to Citizenship Another key measure is the temporary suspension of family reunification rights for individuals holding subsidiary protection status. For the next two years, these migrants will not be permitted to bring immediate family members—such as spouses and children—to join them in Germany. This freeze affects an estimated 380,000 people and comes amid a backdrop of rising migration. Until now, Germany has issued around 12,000 family reunification visas annually under this category. Government's justification of these reforms Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt stated that the changes are necessary to manage the country's migration and integration capacity. 'We need to reduce the pull factors that make Germany a top destination for irregular migration,' he said. You Might Also Like: Germany's immigration policies set for overhaul as Conservatives take power The government argues that the volume of new arrivals and pending family reunification applications has placed a strain on housing, education, and social services. Political context of the reforms introduced Several civil society groups and migration experts have criticised the policy, warning that it could lead to prolonged family separation and slow the integration process for migrants already living in Germany. However, supporters of the move believe it reflects growing public concern over migration levels and ensures that naturalisation is based on deeper integration and contribution to German society. The reforms come at a time of increasing pressure from conservative and far-right parties. The Alternative for Germany (AfD), which has campaigned on limiting immigration, continues to gain traction in regional polls. Chancellor Merz has described the policy shift as a 'balanced response' to national priorities, stating that the goal is to maintain social cohesion and manage migration flows responsibly. The government is expected to fast-track the new rules through the Bundestag. Since the legislation does not require Bundesrat approval, it is likely to be enacted before the summer recess. Migrants currently applying for citizenship or family reunification are advised to review the new requirements and consult official sources or legal advisors.
Time of India
16 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘Time for a wheelchair': Internet reacts after Donald Trump stumbles on Air Force One steps
(Source: X) US President Donald Trump stumbled while climbing the steps of Air Force One on Sunday, and the internet wasted no time poking fun. Trump was accompanied by US secretary of state Marco Rubio, who was boarding the plane en route to Camp David after speaking with reporters in Hagerstown, Maryland. The moment quickly went viral, drawing comparisons to the times Trump had mocked former US President Joe Biden for similar mishaps. 'Time to get Old Man Trump fitted for a wheelchair,' wrote political commentator Ron Filipkowski on X. Northwestern law lecturer Jason DeSanto added: 'More beta energy.' Political strategist Marco Frieri joked, 'Cannot wait for all the books and wall-to-wall coverage.' Journalist Aaron Rupar said, 'When Joe Biden did stuff like this, Fox would play the clips over and over like it was as significant as the moon landing.' RC Huffman quipped, 'I'm surprised he hasn't replaced those stairs with a portable escalator of some kind.' The stumble came shortly after Trump was asked whether he would invoke the Insurrection Act to respond to escalating protests in Los Angeles following a wave of immigration raids. 'Depends on whether or not there's an insurrection,' he told reporters. When pressed further on whether he believes such an insurrection is taking place, Trump replied, 'No, no, but you have violent people. And we're not going to let them get away with it.' Asked if he would consider deploying troops even without invoking the law, Trump doubled down. 'We're going to have troops everywhere. We're not going to let this happen to our country. We're not going to let our country be torn apart like it was under Biden.' Trump, who frequently criticised Biden for falling during public appearances, once called Biden's 2023 fall at a graduation event 'not inspiring.' At a campaign stop in Iowa, he had also said: 'I hope he wasn't hurt. You don't want that.'
