Ukraine calls for talks with Russia next week
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky says he's calling for a meeting with Russia next week to push forward ceasefire talks.
Ukraine's Secretary of the National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine, Rustem Umerov, has already proposed the next meeting with the Russian side for next week, Zelensky said during his daily address on Saturday.
'The dynamics of the negotiations must improve. We need to do everything possible to achieve a ceasefire. The Russian side must stop avoiding decisions regarding prisoner exchanges, the return of children, and the cessation of killings,' Zelensky said.
'A meeting at the leadership level is essential to genuinely secure peace. Ukraine is ready for such a meeting,' he added.
Meanwhile, Russian state media outlet TASS reported that a source close to Russia's negotiating team confirmed that they had received Kyiv's proposal for a meeting.
The last round of ceasefire talks in Istanbul ended swiftly in early June, with Russian and Ukrainian delegates meeting for barely over an hour before calling it quits. According to Russian state media, Russia put forward maximalist territorial demands as part of their preconditions for a ceasefire. Ukraine has previously refused to consider any territorial concessions in exchange for peace.
Zelensky's call for talks arrives just after US President Donald Trump offered Russian President Vladimir Putin a 50-day window to achieve a ceasefire before the US implements high tariffs on Russian goods, alongside 'secondary tariffs' on goods from countries that purchase Russian oil.
'We're going to be doing very severe tariffs if we don't have a deal in 50 days,' Trump said during a meeting with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte in the Oval Office earlier this week.
'I use trade for a lot of things,' Trump added. 'But it's great for settling wars.'
Trump has expressed increasing frustration with Russian President Vladimir Putin in recent weeks, even complaining that Putin's assurances about ceasefire progress are 'bullshit.'
Yet Western analysts and Ukrainian officials say that the president's 50-day-window is unlikely to deter Putin from accelerating Russia's summer offensive in the coming weeks. Moreover, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has dismissed Trump's threatened tariffs as mere bluster.
'Fifty days – it used to be 24 hours,' Lavrov said. 'It used to be 100 days; we've been through all of this.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily News Egypt
6 hours ago
- Daily News Egypt
Southern Syria's Power Vacuum: Will Israel Become the Unlikely Guardian?
As the smoke of Syria's civil war settles—only to rise again in new, unpredictable ways—an entirely different reality has taken hold south of Damascus. There, in the stretch of desert that spills toward the Jordanian frontier and the Golan Heights, no single power commands authority. Instead, a fractured mosaic of Druze fighters, Bedouin clans, jihadist remnants, and rifle-wielding militias carves out territories amid complete state collapse. This is not the Syria we once knew. The United Nations still labels its ruling factions 'terrorist,' yet even that designation obscures the daily drama unfolding on the ground: hundreds slaughtered, wounded, or displaced in clashes between Druze and Bedouin communities around Suwayda. Once, these confrontations were local disputes over pasturelands and water rights—now they have become existential battles, each side convinced its survival hangs in the balance. Since October 2023, the Assad regime has all but vanished from southern Syria. Its vaunted 'Fifth Corps'—propped up by Russian officers and staffed by recruited ex-ISIS fighters—has collapsed under its own contradictions. Bakeries and flour mills lie in ruins, military checkpoints have dissolved, and the 'Al-Sharaa Government' exists only on paper. With 88% of vital infrastructure destroyed and 2.1 million civilians deprived of basic needs, the humanitarian toll is staggering: children starving to death in their mothers' arms, hospitals gasping for medicine, and more than 5,200 wounded or displaced by the violence of competing armed factions. Into this vacuum steps Israel—unannounced but increasingly unavoidable. Tel Aviv has long professed an 'unofficial moral commitment' to Syria's Druze minority, who dwell perilously close to its border. Two months ago, Israeli commandos reportedly intervened directly to protect a Druze enclave under attack. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his defence minister have repeatedly declared that safeguarding Syria's Druze is 'a moral and social obligation' of the Jewish state. For many Druze trapped between collapsing authority and marauding militias, Israel's intervention is not a choice but a lifeline. 'If Damascus cannot protect us,' they ask, 'who else but Israel?' In a landscape where every actor is suspect, Tel Aviv paradoxically emerges as the only guarantor of stability—at least for those it chooses to defend. This is both an opportunity and a dilemma for Israel. As Foreign Minister Gideon Sa'ar recently put it, Israel seeks to 'extend the circle of peace to Syria and Lebanon,' even as it insists the Golan Heights remains unequivocally Israeli territory. The old agreements once negotiated with Damascus are buried beneath the rubble; 'what is past is dead,' in Sa'ar's words. A new order is rising—one defined not by treaties but by raw power and on-the-ground realities. Yet questions abound. Will Israel's ad hoc security role evolve into a formal arrangement with a Damascus government it never truly recognised? Can Tel Aviv balance its strategic interests with the moral imperative of protecting civilians? And who, ultimately, will guarantee any future accord when the only credible fighting force is tribal loyalty, not national unity? For now, southern Syria remains a test case—of Israel's willingness to police its borderlands, of the international community's readiness to step in where states have failed, and of the Druze community's faith in an unlikely protector. In this fragile interlude, every stray bullet and empty stomach serves as a reminder that, sometimes, peace begins when chaos seems interminable. But peace also demands vision: a durable force to uphold any agreement, clear security arrangements among neighbours, and, most critically, a commitment to human dignity that transcends sectarian lines. Until then, Israel's 'unspoken duty' in Syria's southern chaos may be the only semblance of order—or compassion—left in a land bereft of both. Dr. Hatem Sadek – Professor at Helwan University
Al-Ahram Weekly
10 hours ago
- Al-Ahram Weekly
US to leave UN cultural agency UNESCO again: Diplomats - Region
The United States will leave the United Nations' culture and education agency UNESCO as President Donald Trump continues to pull his country out of international institutions he has long criticized, two European diplomats told Reuters. The White House has not immediately responded to a request from Reuters for comment outside regular business hours. According to Reuters, the move is a blow to the Paris-based agency, founded after World War II to promote peace through international cooperation in education, science, and culture. The New York Post also reported on the US withdrawal, citing a White House official. Trump took similar steps during his first term, quitting the World Health Organization, the UN Human Rights Council, a global climate change accord, and the Iran nuclear deal. Joe Biden reversed those decisions after taking office in 2021, returning the US to UNESCO, the WHO, and the climate agreement. With Trump now back in the White House, the US is once again withdrawing from these global bodies. He has already decided to withdraw the US from the WHO and halt funding to the Palestinian relief agency UNRWA as part of a review of the country's participation in UN agencies, due to be concluded in August. UNESCO — the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization — is best known for designating World Heritage Sites, including the Grand Canyon in the United States and the ancient city of Palmyra in Syria. The United States initially joined UNESCO at its founding in 1945 but withdrew for the first time in 1984, in protest against alleged financial mismanagement and perceived anti-US bias. It returned almost 20 years later, in 2003, under President George W. Bush, who stated that the agency had undertaken the necessary reforms. The United States provides approximately eight percent of UNESCO's total budget, down from around 20 percent at the time Trump first withdrew the country from the agency. Follow us on: Facebook Instagram Whatsapp Short link:
Egypt Independent
10 hours ago
- Egypt Independent
How much do Republicans care about the Epstein files? More than it might seem
CNN — One of the biggest questions looming over President Donald Trump's second term right now is how much his supporters truly care about the Jeffrey Epstein files. The distinction between caring a lot vs. a little is critical. The former could mean a sustained problem for the president that bleeds into the midterm elections and affects turnout among his typically loyal base. The latter would mean this is likely nothing more than an ugly episode that ultimately fades away. So, now that we've had a chunk of time since the Justice Department released their controversial Epstein memo, how much do Republicans care about all this? A bevy of new polls show they're unhappy with how the Trump administration has handled this scandal and suggest it could be a persistent problem for the GOP. The base is about evenly split on the administration's actions, meaning there's a higher degree of skepticism than we almost ever see with Trump. And that might actually undersell the level of lingering GOP concern. Americans overall are negative — and the GOP is unusually split Multiple polls show widespread dissatisfaction overall with the Trump administration's handling of the matter. Both Reuters-Ipsos and Quinnipiac University polling showed Americans overall disapproved of how the Trump team has handled this by huge margins: 54-17 percent in the former and 63-17 percent in the latter. (The former poll's question was about Trump personally, while the latter was about the administration more broadly.) So that's just 17 percent of Americans who said Trump and the administration have gotten this right, in both polls. The vast majority in that group are, of course, Republicans. But delving into the GOP-specific takeaways, the party is about evenly split — which is unusual on the Trump administration's actions. They leaned slightly towards approving the handling of the Epstein probe, 35-29 percent in the Reuters-Ipsos poll and 40-36 percent in the Quinnipiac poll. It's difficult to recall an issue on which Republicans were so lukewarm about major Trump actions. For instance, even shortly after the January 6, 2021, attack on the US Capitol, an event that led many to conclude that Trump's political career was over, a CNN poll showed Republicans approved of Trump's response by a strong margin: 63-32 percent. Many Republicans aren't dinging Trump yet — that could change Being disenchanted isn't the same as ditching someone politically, however. Precisely how much people actually care is a critical point. There's some evidence that Republicans are downplaying the significance of this. A new CBS News-YouGov poll released Sunday, for instance, showed just 11 percent of Republicans said Epstein-related issues matter 'a lot' in their evaluation of Trump's presidency. That's compared to 36 percent of overall voters who said that. To the extent that's true, it would seem this is something Trump could move past. But polling has a persistent weakness: Respondents aren't always totally honest with themselves or pollsters. For instance, ahead of the 2022 midterm elections, the conventional wisdom was that Democrats' focus on democracy after the January 6 attack wasn't panning out and that the issue might even spur GOP turnout. The results ultimately showed that the issue was a significant benefit to Democrats, and election-denying Republicans did significantly worse than other Republicans. On Epstein, the CBS-YouGov poll suggests there are gaps between how much people say they care about the issue vs. what their other feelings or behavior reveals. While it showed 50 percent of Republicans said they were at least somewhat satisfied with the administration's Epstein actions, 83 percent of polled Republicans said the Justice Department should release all the information it has on Epstein — something the Trump administration has decidedly not done. (The administration late last week moved in court to unseal grand jury testimony. But that's only a small portion of the information, and much of it could remain secret.) The same poll also showed 90 percent of Republicans believed the Epstein files probably includes damaging information about wealthy or powerful people. Similarly, the Reuters-Ipsos poll showed Republicans said 55-17 percent that they believed the federal government is hiding information about Epstein's death, and 62-11 percent that it is hiding information about his clients. Those responses suggest Republicans aren't happy with the administration's meager disclosures, even if they're not looking to register that dissatisfaction when explicitly asked. Trump's support is very lukewarm The polling also reveals that even many of those who stand by Trump aren't doing so with a high degree of confidence. While the Reuters-Ipsos poll showed Republicans were about split on Trump's actions; only 11 percent 'strongly' approved of Trump's actions. And while half of Republicans in the CBS-YouGov poll said they were at least somewhat satisfied with the Trump administration's actions, just 10 percent were 'very' satisfied. That's only about 1 in 10 Republicans who look at this and say they completely sign off. The CBS-YouGov poll also showed MAGA Republicans were more likely to lean towards being satisfied (60 percent were at least 'somewhat' satisfied) than non-MAGA Republicans (41 percent). So are MAGA Republicans — the ones who have vociferously called for releasing more information on Epstein — more satisfied than their non-MAGA breathren? Or are they just feeling compelled to toe the Trump party line, at least somewhat? Regardless, those numbers don't mean this won't be a problem with a significant section of Trump's base. Those voters could sour on him, at least somewhat, perhaps in combination with other recent Trump actions they don't love, like on the war in Ukraine. A Wall Street Journal report last week on a letter Trump allegedly wrote for Epstein's 50th birthday back in 2003 appeared to unite even many Epstein-focused influencers behind Trump and against the media, their frequent common enemy. Trump denied he wrote the letter and has sued the Journal; his base seems to largely believe he's being railroaded. But that doesn't mean they're satisfied overall and ready to let the issue go. The data suggest that, for now, this remains a minefield for Trump.
