The gripping story of how smuggled books helped end the Cold War
The CIA Book Club: The Best-Kept Secret of the Cold War
Charlie English
HarperCollins, $29.99
In Nazi Germany books considered to be un-German were burnt in public. No such public ritual existed in the Soviet Union, where censorship was secretive and subtle.
During the Cold War (1945-1989), the Polish government suppressed culture behind closed doors too. The most populous central European country was then aligned to Moscow, which meant any criticism of the Kremlin was off limits.
This Sovietisation of Polish culture was resisted by certain writers, such as Czesław Miłosz, who fled to Paris in the early 1950s. The Polish poet won the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1980, but his writing was banned in his native country. As was the work of many western writers, including George Orwell, Hannah Arendt, Albert Camus and Virginia Woolf.
But in communist Poland an underground literary culture still flourished. Books came from the west via various channels and sources. Some were hidden in the toilets of sleeper trains shuttling across Europe. A copy of The Gulag Archipelago, by Russian dissident Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, was said to have been concealed in a baby's nappy on a flight to Warsaw. But banned literature wasn't coming into Poland by sheer chance. '[It was] part of a decades-long US intelligence operation [that built] up libraries of illicit books on the far side of the Iron Curtain,' Charlie English explains in The CIA Book Club.
The British author begins this captivating story in 1955, when Free Europe Press printed 260,000 copies of Orwell's 1945 political fable Animal Farm, which were sent by balloon into East-Central Europe. But the clandestine mission, the brainchild of Free Europe Committee (FEC), an anti-communist CIA front organisation, wasn't very successful. So Langley, CIA headquarters, came up with a more effective strategy: direct mail.
Post was strictly censored behind the Iron Curtain, but some books got through. 'No country responded with greater enthusiasm than Poland,' writes English, a former Guardian journalist. A persistent researcher who writes with flair, he notes that books with more controversial themes were typically sent to privileged intellectuals less likely to be persecuted. Among that list was Cardinal Karol Wojtyla, the Archbishop of Krakow, later elected Pope John Paul II. The world's first Slavic Pope had been receiving books — indirectly at least — from the CIA for years. But like most of the recipients, he had no clue where the books were coming from.
The CIA book programme was 'a complex organisation ... consisting of bookshops, publishers, libraries, book exporters, and Russian and East European personalities' living in various European cities, as George Minden once put it. During the mid-1950s the Romanian exile began working for the Free Europe Press Book Centre in New York, which handled the CIA's mailing project.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The Age
an hour ago
- The Age
‘Shameful': Netanyahu attacks Australia over Palestinian recognition
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has branded Australia 'shameful' in its advocacy for Palestinian statehood and accused foreign leaders of capitulating to public opinion over the Gaza war. In a wide-ranging press conference staged 'to puncture the lies and tell the truth' about Israeli military and humanitarian action, Netanyahu denied Israel had a 'starvation policy' while hitting out at foreign powers for backing the 'absurdity' of recognising Palestine in the pursuit of peace. 'It defies imagination or understanding how intelligent people around the world, including seasoned diplomats, government leaders, and respected journalists, fall for this absurdity,' said Netanyahu, an increasingly isolated leader on the world stage. He claimed that, contrary to growing opinion, Palestinian statehood would bring war rather than peace: ' To have European countries and Australia to march into that rabbit hole, just like that … is disappointing, and I think it's actually shameful.' His defiance came after Australia participated in another joint statement alongside Britain, France, Canada, and other allies condemning Israel's actions in Gaza, this time over the planned large-scale military operation to take control of Gaza City and conquer the entire strip. They said any attempts at annexation or settlement in Gaza violated international law. Last month, Australia took part in a 28-country joint statement urging Israel to dramatically increase the supply of aid in the strip, following repeated reports of Gazans being gunned down outside Gaza Humanitarian Fund depots and images of starving children being spread around the world. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said in a joint statement with New Zealand Prime Minister Christopher Luxon on Saturday: 'Any attempt by Israel to escalate hostilities, including by taking control of Gaza City, would be wrong, risk violating international law, and exacerbate the human catastrophe already unfolding inside the Gaza Strip.' After previously denying people were starving in Gaza, Netanyahu on Sunday conceded there was 'deprivation', albeit caused by Hamas, the militant group that presides over the territory and launched the October 7, 2023, terrorist attack against Israelis that kicked off the war.

Sydney Morning Herald
an hour ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
‘Shameful': Netanyahu attacks Australia over Palestinian recognition
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has branded Australia 'shameful' in its advocacy for Palestinian statehood and accused foreign leaders of capitulating to public opinion over the Gaza war. In a wide-ranging press conference staged 'to puncture the lies and tell the truth' about Israeli military and humanitarian action, Netanyahu denied Israel had a 'starvation policy' while hitting out at foreign powers for backing the 'absurdity' of recognising Palestine in the pursuit of peace. 'It defies imagination or understanding how intelligent people around the world, including seasoned diplomats, government leaders, and respected journalists, fall for this absurdity,' said Netanyahu, an increasingly isolated leader on the world stage. He claimed that, contrary to growing opinion, Palestinian statehood would bring war rather than peace: ' To have European countries and Australia to march into that rabbit hole, just like that … is disappointing, and I think it's actually shameful.' His defiance came after Australia participated in another joint statement alongside Britain, France, Canada, and other allies condemning Israel's actions in Gaza, this time over the planned large-scale military operation to take control of Gaza City and conquer the entire strip. They said any attempts at annexation or settlement in Gaza violated international law. Last month, Australia took part in a 28-country joint statement urging Israel to dramatically increase the supply of aid in the strip, following repeated reports of Gazans being gunned down outside Gaza Humanitarian Fund depots and images of starving children being spread around the world. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said in a joint statement with New Zealand Prime Minister Christopher Luxon on Saturday: 'Any attempt by Israel to escalate hostilities, including by taking control of Gaza City, would be wrong, risk violating international law, and exacerbate the human catastrophe already unfolding inside the Gaza Strip.' After previously denying people were starving in Gaza, Netanyahu on Sunday conceded there was 'deprivation', albeit caused by Hamas, the militant group that presides over the territory and launched the October 7, 2023, terrorist attack against Israelis that kicked off the war.


7NEWS
2 hours ago
- 7NEWS
White House hasn't ruled out Zelensky being in Alaska during Trump-Putin meeting
A diplomatic scramble unfolded at the weekend after US President Donald Trump announced he would meet his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin, next week in Alaska, as European leaders rushed to understand the terms of the meeting and ensure Ukraine was not being left out of discussions about its future. In the English countryside on Saturday, European officials presented their case to Vice President JD Vance in a hastily arranged meeting. The leaders of several European nations said afterward that while they supported Trump's diplomatic efforts, any peace talks must be preceded by a ceasefire and Ukraine itself must be actively involved. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky was not named as a participant in the Alaska summit, to take place Friday between Trump and Putin. However, the White House has not completely ruled out including Zelensky in some meetings, two sources familiar with the matter told CNN. One White House official stressed that anything involving Zelensky would likely happen after the Trump-Putin meeting. The summit has come together very quickly, and details are still in flux. An exact location has yet to be announced. A White House official said Trump remained 'open to a trilateral summit with both leaders' but that 'the White House is planning the bilateral meeting requested by President Putin.' Since Trump unveiled plans to meet with Putin in a post to social media Friday, there has been an intensive diplomatic effort behind the scenes to get US allies on board. Trump's announcement notably did not say whether or when Zelensky would be included in the process. Zelensky and European leaders, meanwhile, have been emphatic that Ukraine needs to be part of any discussions about ending the war. In the Saturday meeting hosted by Vance at the manor home of the British foreign secretary, European officials laid out their terms and sought more information from US officials about the plan Putin presented Wednesday to US envoy Steve Witkoff. They emphasised a number of points, Western officials said: that Ukraine must be involved in the talks, that a ceasefire is in place before other steps are taken, and that if Ukraine makes territorial concessions, Russia must also concede land it currently occupies. A statement afterward from the leaders of France, Italy, Germany, Poland, the United Kingdom, the European Union and Finland said the group welcomed 'President Trump's work to stop the killing in Ukraine, end the Russian Federation's war of aggression, and achieve just and lasting peace and security for Ukraine.' Volodymyr Zelensky on Sunday said he 'appreciates and fully supports' the joint statement. But it spelled out terms of a peace plan that appeared to differ from the one Putin has put forward, in which he is seeking significant territorial concessions, according to Western officials. 'Ukraine has the freedom of choice over its own destiny. Meaningful negotiations can only take place in the context of a ceasefire or reduction of hostilities. The path to peace in Ukraine cannot be decided without Ukraine,' the joint statement read. 'We remain committed to the principle that international borders must not be changed by force. The current line of contact should be the starting point of negotiations.' The statement also said any diplomatic agreement to end the war must include 'robust and credible security guarantees that enable Ukraine to effectively defend its sovereignty and territorial integrity.' The terms amounted to an attempt by European leaders to scramble a response to the rapidly unfolding diplomacy, which was set in motion this week with Witkoff's meeting in Moscow. Pressed by reporters for details on the contours of a deal, Trump indicated Friday that it could include 'some swapping of territories.' The way the Europeans understand it, Putin presented a proposal that would require Ukraine to give over the entire eastern Donbas region, which Russia partially occupies. But the exact contours of the plan remained somewhat unclear, even after several follow-up phone conversations between the Europeans and Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Witkoff. The fate of the two other regions that have been in Moscow's sights — Kherson and Zaporizhzhia, which Russia only partially occupies — wasn't clear. Nor was the status of US security guarantees going forward, the officials said. That has left European leaders, who have expressed concern about the possibility of Ukraine ceding territory, rushing to get more details on what a ceasefire would entail. To allay some of those concerns, Vance convened the hours-long meeting Saturday with UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy and European and Ukrainian officials to lay out the US' view of negotiations, as well as American officials' understanding of Russia's stance. Witkoff attended the meeting virtually. A US official told CNN that 'significant progress' was made, but it is still unclear whether there is European or Ukrainian buy-in heading into Friday's critical meeting. After Saturday's meeting, Zelensky said he believed the US was listening. 'Our arguments are being heard. The dangers are being taken into account,' he said in an address.