My daughter was struggling to read. A private tutor didn't help, but glasses did.
We hired a private tutor and doubled her teaching, but neither helped.
We finally realized learning wasn't the issue. She couldn't physically see the words.
My daughter Rylie loves to get lost in otherworlds.
In print, she soars the skies with "Phoebe and Her Unicorn." On screen, she wades through the swaying hand-drawn grass of "Kiki's Delivery Service." And, together, we kick it into hyperspace to cruise the galaxy in " Star Wars."
There are no limits to where she's excited to explore. It wasn't always like this, though. Rylie turned 8 this June. Just 14 months ago, she couldn't read.
Plus, as we found out later, she had been missing key elements of the worlds that wowed her in books and movies.
That all changed with a conversation that had my wife and me wondering how we missed the signs of her struggles for so long.
Rylie's reading struggle surprised us
Rylie is an intelligent child. She retains song lyrics and grasps complex game rules. She can quickly end a fight between my wife and me by replaying word-for-word the conversation we had the day before.
Yet, at age 6, she could not read. Rylie's teacher raved about her work ethic and overall educational acumen.
Rylie clearly had the drive and the tools, yet her reading marks were low. My wife and I could not understand why she struggled.
We doubled down with more teaching and hired a private tutor for $60 an hour, once a week. Rylie's language skills improved, but she didn't make a breakthrough with her reading.
That changed with one question.
Rylie's issue came into focus
The first "aha" moment came one spring day when my wife volunteered in Rylie's first-grade class. After school, I joined them. That's when my wife asked Rylie, "What is the word of the day written on the chalkboard?"
"What do you mean, 'What word?'" my wife and I asked.
"I can't see the words," Rylie said without emotion.
Everything came into focus on our end.
"Oh! You need glasses!" we said gleefully in unison.
Rylie's eye-opening revelation
We took Rylie to an optometrist who confirmed what we'd suspected: Rylie struggled to read because she struggled to see. The doctor diagnosed her with moderate myopia, aka nearsightedness.
After she got glasses, Rylie's reading marks went up from below average to reading at the level of her classmates. Her math and writing marks have also gone up.
I wish I'd taken a picture of Rylie putting on her glasses for the first time. She had a permagrin as the world around her shifted into focus.
That weekend, we rewatched one of her favorite movies, "Star Wars: A New Hope." During the attack on the Death Star near the end, she hollered out, "Wow, there's so much going on in the background!"
My wife and I locked eyes as we realized Rylie's vision kept her from seeing beyond the central characters in movies. It was another aha moment for me.
I write about family films for Rotten Tomatoes, SlashFilm, and Not Another Kid Movie. While Rylie has seen many more films than the average child, she's missed a lot of the details.
Because of this, we're rewatching a lot of films. Her eyes move from corner to corner in amazement. I watch her dazzled eyes with equal dazzled amazement.
What parents should look for
Looking back, there's one more clue I didn't notice that other parents should keep an eye out for. Rylie used to get sick on car rides. Sometimes, a mere 20 minutes would make her stomach lurch.
The discomfort was caused by a sensory mismatch. Her brain sensed motion, but her eyes struggled to focus on anything outside the car. The more she looked inside than out, the dizzier she got.
Now, with her glasses keeping her eyes focused and not blurry, she rarely gets sick, even on Oregon's winding coastal roads.
If I could go back, I'd ask my pediatrician for more specialized testing to earn Rylie back several years missed exploring the world around her, both in reality and in her stories.
She's making up for it, though. Rylie reads before and after school—graphic novels and chapter books. She asks for movies with powerful cinematography and expansive effects like twisted alien landscapes and bustling animated metropolises, details she couldn't see before.
I happily oblige, sharing the fictional worlds I roamed as a kid and getting a tour of the new worlds she's discovered thanks to her new glasses.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
I watched Waterworld to see if it's as bad as I've always heard and I've got some takes
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. On July 28, 1995, Waterworld, the Kevin Costner-led sci-fi blockbuster, set sail. I was too young to see it when it first came out and by the time that I started watching older movies the few things I heard about Waterworld was generally how bad it was and that Costner's hero had webbed feet. So, as the movie's 30th anniversary is upon us — and it's streaming on Peacock in the US — I decided to finally give Waterworld a watch and see if what I've heard about it… holds water (sorry, couldn't resist). FYI, I'll be getting into some Waterworld SPOILERS below. Waterworld, directed by Kevin Reynolds (who also directed Costner's Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves) from a script by Peter Rader and David Twohy, is set in a future where the polar ice caps have melted and covered the Earth in water. Costner plays a drifter simply known as the Mariner, a mutant with webbed feet, gills and a dislike of normal humans. However, he ends up having to protect a woman, Helen (Jeanne Tripplehorn), and young girl, Enola (Tina Majorino), as they are being pursued by a maniacal Dennis Hopper (his character is named Deacon in the movie, but I just kept referring to him as Dennis Hopper) as the girl holds the secret to finding dry land. Looking at the actual reaction to Waterworld and its box office, I was actually surprised there wasn't as much vitriol as its reputation had led me to believe. While the movie does have a 'Rotten' score of 45% from critics and a 44% from audiences on Rotten Tomatoes, actually reading reviews from some of the biggest critics of 1995 — Roger Ebert, Todd McCarthy and Owen Gleiberman — the reactions were more middling than downright bad. At the box office, the movie earned $88 million in the US, which today wouldn't be a lot of money but was good enough for top 10 for the whole year of 1995. Having now watched the movie with my own two eyes, I can see where those critics were coming from. As pure blockbuster fare, there's some halfway decent action sequences and it's not an interminable way to spend two hours. But I wouldn't go as far as saying Waterworld is good or deserving of cult classic status, but it also isn't so bad it's fun to watch. It's more just blah. Waterworld desperately wants to be Mad Max with boats. Its bare bones plot basically checks all the boxes — loner comes across individuals that he reluctantly has to save from a crazy villain, eventually forming a bond before deciding he must move on and continue his loner ways. The biggest reason why that doesn't work as well here as it does with the Mad Max franchise is Costner. Most people today know Costner from his role as John Dutton in Yellowstone (also streaming on Peacock), where a scowl was basically his default setting, but his gruffness was part of the character's appeal. But in Waterworld, Costner's orneriness does him no favors. While the movie attempts to go through the motions of establishing why Costner's Mariner is this way and how his time with Tripplehorn and Majorino's characters eventually softens his heart, I just don't buy it. It's a flat performance and his character honestly struggles to be likeable for a lot of the movie. I'm just not sure if at the time, Costner could play this type of character. In the late 1980s and 1990s, Costner was best known for roles where he may have had some gruffness to him, but his natural charisma shone through (Bull Durham, Tin Cup) or when he's playing a much more affable character (Field of Dreams, Dances with Wolves). Even if we look at his character in Yellowstone, or his rough cowboy in Horizon: An American Saga, the toughness comes alongside a noble quality that tells us this is someone we can respect even if they're not dolling out hugs. None of those qualities are present in Costner's performance as the Mariner. The other big issue with Waterworld is that there are details that just don't make any sense. For instance, it's supposedly been at least a few generations since the melting polar ice caps flooded the Earth, to the point where some believe that any remaining dry land is a myth. Not even the Mariner has found dry land, yet he has a plant (albeit a small one that's not looking so great) at the beginning of the movie and then comes across a tomato plant on the atoll he meets Helen and Enola on. What we see from that atoll, it's unlikely it was growing any tomato plants. Where did these plants come from, and wouldn't they be arguably the most precious things to these characters? But after we see them, they're barely acknowledged again. A couple of other things that I just found odd. I still don't understand how all they needed to do to understand the tattoo on Enola's back to find dry land. It whittles down to them translating the Chinese-looking symbols to be latitude and longitude coordinates and something involving the magnetic poles of the Earth being inverted, but it's not easily understandable in the context of the movie (this video does a deep dive to explain it, though). Another part comes at the very end, when the group gets to dry land and they find a small village where people once lived. There, they find two skeletons, and one of them suggests they bury them under the dirt, believing it was their way. Again, how would he know this? It's been generations since anyone they knew would have been on dry land and the skeletons they find are simply lying on a bed, there's no evidence that these people dug graves, or any that we see at least. This one is nitpicky, admittedly, but it's just another detail that wasn't thought out or properly explained. There are a few things that worked for the movie, particularly Hopper's fun performance. Still, Waterworld's biggest fault is that it's middling at best, with Costner unable to give us a main character worth rooting for. I wouldn't put it up amongst some of the worst movies I've seen, but it's not one I'm going to have much desire to ever watch again. However, if you disagree and actually love Waterworld, or want to try it for yourself to see if you agree or not with my takes, then you can stream Waterworld on Peacock in the US; in the UK the movie is available via digital on-demand. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Prime Video's latest No. 1 show is a 'Bosch' spinoff with Maggie Q — and it's 100% on Rotten Tomatoes
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. "Bosch" fans, rejoice: it sounds like Prime Video's follow-up is going to continue the series' legacy as a compelling crime drama. On July 9, the Amazon streaming service dropped the full first season of "Ballard," a new spin-off that shifts focus from Titus Welliver's Harry Bosch over to Renée Ballard (Maggie Q), the detective introduced in April's "Bosch: Legacy" series finale. One day after release, the show had risen to the No. 2 spot on the Amazon streamer (putting it second only to the lackluster action thriller, "Countdown"), but in the few days since, "Ballard" has become the streamer's top watch. Plus, "Ballard" has continued to hold onto that impressive 100% critics' score on Rotten Tomatoes, meaning reviewers who've tuned in have liked what they saw. Ready to dive in? You can stream all 10 episodes of "Ballard" on Prime Video right now, or you can find a little more info — and hear what critics have to say — about Prime's newest release below. What is 'Ballard' about? If you're not up to speed, "Ballard" is Prime Video's next series based on Michael Connelly's books. Here, we follow Detective Renée Ballard (Maggie Q), who is charged with leading the LAPD's underfunded cold case division and taking on some of Los Angeles' toughest long-forgotten cases. Per the series synopsis, we know the series sees her investigating layers of crime that go back decades, including a serial killer's string of murders; as she does so, Ballard unearths a deadly conspiracy within the force, and enlists the help of her team and Harry Bosch (Titus Welliver) to crack her cases, navigating personal and professional challenges along the way. In addition to Q and Welliver, "Ballard" also features Courtney Taylor, John Carroll Lynch, Michael Mosley, Rebecca Field, Victoria Moroles, Amy Hill, Ricardo Chavira, Noah Bean, and more. Should you stream 'Ballard' on Prime Video? If you haven't already started binging the 10-episode series on Prime Video, you'll be pleased to know that the first "Ballard" reviews are in... and the new "Bosch" spin-off has been warmly received. As we mentioned above, the series has earned a rare 100% approval rating from critics on the review aggregate site, Rotten Tomatoes. Admittedly, that score's only aggregated from nine individual reactions, but it's still an encouraging sign to see every critic who's reviewed the series (at the time of writing) liked what they saw. Reviewing for Variety, Aramide Tinubu, for example, called "Ballard" "one of the best police procedurals on TV," adding: "Smartly acted, beautifully paced and genuinely engaging, "Ballard" is a thrilling ride from start to finish." Similarly, Sherin Nicole praised the series for its "well sculpted" characters and for being "grounded by grit, genuine leads, and complex cases," adding: "This series fits right in with 'Bosch' and 'Bosch: Legacy': strident, true-to-life characters doing emotionally crushing work while dealing with the people and things that make life harder." CBR's Brittany Frederick gave the series an 8/10 score, arguing it was "rougher around the edges" than the previous Michael Connelly shows, but was nevertheless entertaining in its own right. "While "Ballard" isn't as iconic as its predecessor," she writes, "it is a worthy addition to the "Bosch" universe and a high-quality crime drama that will keep viewers satisfied for hopefully years to come." Comparatively, audience reactions for "Ballard" have been a little more split; it's landed an 80% rating from fans on Rotten Tomatoes. There are still a number of 5-star reviews present on the platform — one viewer branding it "another Michael Connelly masterpiece" — but some fans aren't nearly as keen; in a 1.5-star rating, one viewer said the series was "one cliché after another" and "a dull parody of a police procedural." Nevertheless, there are more positive takes logged at present, and, in tandem with the critics' takes, the consensus seems to be that "Ballard" is worth your time. In short, if you were sad to see "Bosch" come to an end, or you just love getting wrapped up in a fresh case, most people who've streamed the show recommend you stream "Ballard" on Prime Video as soon as possible. However, if police procedurals and crime dramas just aren't your thing, we can still help you find your next must-watch show. Check out our round-up of the best shows on Prime Video for tons more top streaming recommendations fit for any watchlist. More from Tom's Guide You can skip the Prime fee and still get Prime Day deals Best movies like "Heads of State," and where to stream them Prime Video just added a ridiculously fun dark comedy movie Solve the daily Crossword
Geek Tyrant
2 hours ago
- Geek Tyrant
New Updates For Taika Waititi and Shawn Levy's Upcoming STAR WARS Movies — GeekTyrant
There's been movement in the galaxy far, far away. Lucasfilm's Star Wars slate is finally showing signs of life with two highly anticipated projects, Taika Waititi's long-gestating film and Shawn Levy's Star Wars: Starfighter , both getting new updates. Waititi's mysterious Star Wars project has been in development limbo since it was first announced five years ago. Now, it finally has a working title: Cosmic Doom . The production will reportedly go by the name Ghost Truck 6 , according to Nexus Point News. Details about the plot are still under tight wraps, but Waititi is set to direct from a script written by Oscar-nominated screenwriter Tony McNamara ( The Favourite , Poor Things ). Despite the delays, Lucasfilm president Kathleen Kennedy remains optimistic about the project and is allowing Waititi full creative breathing room. 'Taika is on Taika time. I've just continually said to him, look, when you feel that you're ready and you can really devote the time, we're going to do it. We'll be waiting. I'm just hoping we get there. That will be a great Star Wars movie.' Waititi previously talked about the project, saying: "I've been developing [the Star Wars film] for a few years, but I think with any film, but that one in particular, it's something I'd really like to get right, so I don't want to rush it. It's going to bubble along on the side." "I wanna capture that joy and entertainment of those early ones like The Empire Strikes Back and Return of the Jedi and all those ones, so I'm trying to figure that out. It'll happen." The director also came out and said: "It will pause...a Taika Waititi film. It's gonna piss people off." Waititi has explained that he's looking to create something new with the franchise and expand the universe beyond all of the characters and locations that we're familiar with. While Waititi's film still doesn't have a release date, Shawn Levy's Star Wars: Starfighter is much further along. The studio is targeting a production start this September in London with filming expected to wrap in December. The movie, starring Ryan Gosling and Mia Goth, is set for a theatrical release on May 28, 2027. Initially developed under the working title Kyber Mist with the production name Blue Mist Productions , Starfighter is described as a standalone story set five years after the events of The Rise of Skywalker . According to the studio, the film 'is an entirely new adventure featuring all-new characters set in a period of time that has not been explored on screen yet.' With both films promising fresh characters and timelines outside the main Skywalker saga, these updates mark a hopeful shift for Star Wars storytelling on the big screen. It's been a quiet stretch for the franchise theatrically, but things are starting to look more active on the hyperspace horizon.
