logo
Ukraine war briefing: Stray Russian drones ‘hit Moldova and Romania'

Ukraine war briefing: Stray Russian drones ‘hit Moldova and Romania'

The Guardian14-02-2025

Moldova and Nato member Romania announced they had summoned Russia's ambassadors after its drones struck their territory. Russia has been targeting port infrastructure in Ukraine's south, close to the borders with Romania and Moldova. 'Shahed drones violated our airspace, two exploded on our soil, putting Moldovan lives at risk' as part of Moscow's 'criminal' war on Ukraine, said Romania's president, Maia Sandu. According to Moldovan authorities, two drones crashed in fields, and drone fragments were later discovered in a third location. Moldova announced it would close the Russian Cultural Centre, which opened in 2009 and employed six Russian diplomats in 2023, according to local media. The pro-Kremlin Socialist party called that 'unprecedented and provocative' and 'Russophobia'.
In Romania, Russia's envoy was also summoned by Bucharest after radar systems identified an aerial target violating airspace and searchers later found drone fragments, determining that two drones that 'carried explosive charges onboard' were destroyed when they hit the ground. 'These illegal and irresponsible attacks must stop, and Romania reserves the right to take the necessary measures,' Romaina's foreign ministry said in a statement.
There were feelings of anger and betrayal on the streets of central Kyiv after Donald Trump's call with Vladimir Putin, Shaun Walker and Artem Mazhulin write from Kyiv. 'There is no certainty that this war will end for us, because Trump does not perceive us as an equal party in these negotiations,' said Oleksii, 34. Serhii, a 39-year-old soldier, said Trump had been 'Putin's doormat' during his last presidency and although he was sceptical about negotiating with 'this bastard' Putin, 'we do have to negotiate, but on Ukraine's terms'. Roman, 20, said it was 'obvious' for Trump to call Putin and direct contact should have been established earlier. 'I'm glad that the parties have started to find a common language, though I'm afraid at what cost.'
On the Russian side, 'Putin has won the first round' of negotiations, a source in the Russian foreign policy establishment told Pjotr Sauer. 'A direct call with Trump was precisely what Putin had been waiting for.' 'Zelenskyy had repeatedly urged Trump to speak with him first before engaging with Putin. Instead, Trump did the exact opposite,' gloated Sergei Markov, a popular Russian commentator.
Volodymyr Zelenskyy, the Ukrainian president, said peace negotiations could not be left to Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin alone, and Ukraine would not accept a deal made that was. He said it was 'unpleasant' that Trump had spoken to Russia before Ukraine.
The EU's top diplomat, Kaja Kallas, said that if a deal was made without Ukraine, 'the Ukrainians will resist and we will support them'. Kallas accused Washington of 'appeasement' towards Russia, insisting that no deal 'behind our backs' could work. 'You need the Europeans, you need the Ukrainians,' she said. 'If Ukraine decides to resist, Europe will back its principles. Yes, we are 20% less if the US decides to withdraw, but still, Ukraine will defend the principles of sovereignty, territorial integrity. And we are there together.'
The German chancellor, Olaf Scholz, rejected any 'dictated peace', arguing that 'a Russian victory or a Ukrainian collapse will not lead to peace – on the contrary … This would put peace and stability in Europe at risk, far beyond Ukraine.'
Ukraine appeared to concede on Thursday that it was holding a third of the territory in Russia's western Kursk region that it initially captured during a shock offensive in 2024. 'Today we have our own security zone on the territory of the Russian Federation, along the border of Ukraine, holding about 500 square kilometres [190 square miles],' said Ukraine's commander-in-chief, Gen Oleksandr Syrsky. The figure is down from previous claims of 1,400 sq km.
Kyiv said Moscow attacked Ukraine with 140 drones overnight into Thursday, injuring one person in the Izmail district of the Odesa region. Out of 140 drones, the Ukrainian air force said it shot down 85 while 52 did not reach their targets, probably due to electronic countermeasures.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What happened to Piers Morgan
What happened to Piers Morgan

Spectator

timean hour ago

  • Spectator

What happened to Piers Morgan

'What happened to Piers Morgan?' asked a Spectator writer last weekend. The answer, according to slavishly pro-Israel commentator Jonathan Sacerdoti, is that I'm now 'dark, degraded, dismal and debased' – because I've become more critical of how Israel is prosecuting its war in Gaza. For a long time on my YouTube show Uncensored, I defended the country's right to defend itself after 7 October attacks. But I now believe Benjamin Netanyahu's government has crossed the 'proportionality' line with its recent food and aid blockade and relentless bombardment of civilians. Self-evidently, Israel is failing in its mission to eliminate Hamas and get the remaining hostages released. Its forces have been killing and starving a horrendous number of children as they go after the terrorists – and if finance minister Bezalel Smotrich is to be taken at his genocidal-sounding word, its new mission is to kick all Palestinians out of Gaza, which would constitute ethnic cleansing. Even former Israeli prime ministers now say it's committing war crimes. When I defended Israel, I was subjected to a ferocious onslaught from pro-Palestinian trolls who branded me a 'Zionist genocide-enabler'. Now, I've had an equally vile barrage of abuse and threats from pro-Israeli trolls branding me a 'Jew-hating anti-Semite'. How can I be both? Amid the pro-Israeli hate, I criticised Dawn French for offensively downplaying 7 October as just 'a bad thing' in a mocking video, and I described the insufferably tedious Greta Thunberg as an attention-seeking narcissist for preposterously claiming she'd been kidnapped by the IDF on her puerile selfie-yacht stunt. I was instantly attacked as an Israeli stooge by the same pro-Palestinian trolls who'd been lauding me and praised by the pro-Israeli trolls who'd been howling 'Hamas lover!' at me for days. 'You can't win, Piers,' I hear you say. But for a journalist to be attacked by both sides in a war of this historical complexity is a win. It means I'm doing my job properly. The answer to 'What happened to Piers Morgan?' is that I'm right where I want to be. 'Cambio de Tercio tonight? x' read the anonymous text as I attended the Champions League final. I was intrigued; that's my favourite Spanish restaurant in London. 'Who's this?' I replied. 'I'm in Munich.' 'Rishi.' I've regularly texted with our former prime minister, and Cambio is also one of his favourite restaurants, so this made perfect sense. 'Ah! You've got a new number. Are you there tonight? Let's have dinner soon.' 'I have a new number. Would love dinner. Will you be in LA over the summer?' (Rishi and I, with our wives, dined together in Beverly Hills last August.) 'Great,' I replied, 'And yes, will be in LA.' He then said he'd get one of his advisers, a mutual friend, to sort the date. 'PSG ripping Inter Milan to pieces,' I added. 'I'm watching on TV,' he said. 'I was rooting for Inter, always backing the underdog!' Again, very Rishi. It was only the next day that I spotted the 'x' at the end of his initial message and alarm bells rang. Rishi and I are friendly, but not 'x' friendly. Sure enough, our mutual friend confirmed it wasn't him. Coincidentally, during my trip to Qatar to attend the Emir's state dinner for President Trump, one of the latter's aides reminded me of the time a prankster once chatted to The Donald on the phone by pretending to be me. Incredibly, the imposter persuaded the White House switchboard to put 'me' through to Trump and they had a lengthy conversation. Obviously, all hell broke loose when one of his team later asked me how the call had gone and I said I hadn't made any calls. The aide said they assumed the fake chat would get leaked somewhere, and prompt several firings, but nothing ever appeared. Which raises the question, as with the fake Rishi: why do it? Five years ago, on a family villa holiday in Saint-Tropez, we were burgled by a gang that broke in while we were asleep. A local detective revealed they were ruthless teenage girl thieves with petite mains or 'little hands'. This week, Deadline Hollywood announced that Universal Studios and Working Title had won a 'ten-way bidding war' to land a rights deal in the 'six-figure against seven figures' for my wife Celia's new novel Little Hands, about a gang of girl thieves operating on the French Riviera. And they say crime doesn't pay. I'm 33-1 to be London's next mayor. In light of Sir Keir Starmer's winter fuel allowance U-turn, broken tax promises and unachievable plan to build 1.5 million new homes during this parliament, if I ever do become a politician, my only pledge will be to make no pledges.

'No Kings Day' protests expected to draw millions of people across 1,800 cities
'No Kings Day' protests expected to draw millions of people across 1,800 cities

Daily Mirror

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mirror

'No Kings Day' protests expected to draw millions of people across 1,800 cities

The protests are planned in cities across all 50 states and Puerto Rico as well as several countries abroad, including Colombia, Germany, Italy, Malawi, Portugal and the United Kingdom, according to organizers This weekend, millions of people across the United States are set to attend over 1,800 "No King's Day" protests in response to President Donald Trump's military parade in Washington D. C. on Saturday. The demonstrations are planned in cities across all 50 states and Puerto Rico, as well as several countries abroad, including Colombia, Germany, Italy, Malawi, Portugal and the UK, according to organisers. These protests are expected to be the largest demonstrations against the Trump administration since he took office in January. ‌ The aim of these protests is to counter Trump's 250th anniversary U.S. Army parade scheduled to take place in the nation's capital on Saturday, which coincides with his 79th birthday. The event, which officials project will cost between $25-$45 million and cause upwards of $16 million in damages to the city streets, will see hundreds of military tanks and aircraft roll through the streets of Washington, D. C, reports the Mirror US. ‌ Protest organisers said: "On June 14-Flag Day-President Trump wants tanks in the street and a made-for-TV display of dominance for his birthday. A spectacle meant to look like strength. But real power isn't staged in Washington. It rises up everywhere else,". "No Kings is a nationwide day of defiance. From city blocks to small towns, from courthouse steps to community parks, we're taking action to reject authoritarianism-and show the world what democracy really looks like. We're not gathering to feed his ego. We're building a movement that leaves him behind." Organisers stress that the demonstrations will remain peaceful and have cautioned participants against bringing weapons or instigating altercations with any objectors. The most significant protests are anticipated in several major cities, including Atlanta, Charlotte, Chicago, Houston, New York City, Philadelphia, and Phoenix. The organisers have clarified that there will be no protest in Washington D.C. to avoid potential conflicts with the MAGA movement. "We want to create contrast, not conflict," Leah Greenberg, co-executive director of Indivisible, one of the partnering organisations for the protest, stated. "The choice to hold No Kings events in every city but D.C. is a deliberate choice to keep the focus on contrast, and not give the Trump administration an opportunity to stoke and then put the focus on conflict." ‌ In the meantime, anti-ICE demonstrations that started on Friday in Los Angeles are continuing into their sixth day with no apparent conclusion. President Trump has ignited a fierce dispute with California Governor Gavin Newsom following his decision to send 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines to LA to address the pro-immigration protesters. The Pentagon revealed the deployment of troops to the city came at a cost of $134 million. Their arrival on Sunday was met with widespread criticism, with many arguing it disrupted the previously peaceful atmosphere. ‌ California Governor Newsom's office responded by filing a motion to block Trump's decision to send in troops. Nationwide, over 25 cities have been the site of anti-ICE protests, according to NBC News. In a separate event, thousands are expected to attend a mass in Chicago on Saturday, where Pope Leo XIV will deliver an address to young people in his hometown. The Women's March movement is also organizing a protest, dubbed 'Kick Out the Clowns,' with over 320 events planned and more than 13,000 people set to attend. On their website, the group stated, "June 14 is our chance to reflect the absurdity of the MAGA regime and the clowns who lead it." This latest wave of civil unrest echoes the widespread protests seen in 2020, including the 'Black Lives Matter' movement against police brutality and systemic racism, as well as the 'Women's March' in response to the #MeToo movement during Trump's first inauguration in 2017.

Fifa warned about free speech restrictions at 2026 World Cup
Fifa warned about free speech restrictions at 2026 World Cup

South Wales Argus

timean hour ago

  • South Wales Argus

Fifa warned about free speech restrictions at 2026 World Cup

The warnings follow recent US government policies under President Donald Trump, which include a travel ban affecting 12 countries, such as World Cup qualifier Iran, and heightened criticism over responses to civil unrest. The United States will co-host the tournament alongside Canada and Mexico, with California's Rose Bowl also set to host matches during the upcoming FIFA Club World Cup, which starts on Saturday. Ronan Evain, executive director of Football Supporters Europe, said: "Fans travel to the World Cup to celebrate and express their passion and any attempt to curtail our fundamental rights, including the right to free speech, is a betrayal of the spirit of football. "We're particularly concerned about the potential for selective enforcement and discrimination against fans based on our perceived political views or national origin. "FIFA must obtain the necessary guarantees to ensure fans from all over the world are able to safely travel and attend the games." Human rights organisations have voiced concerns about increasing restrictions on freedom of expression, particularly regarding pro-Palestinian protests. Minky Worden, director of global initiatives at Human Rights Watch, said: "FIFA should publicly acknowledge the threat US immigration and other anti-human rights policies pose to the tournament's integrity and use its leverage with the US government to ensure that the rights of all qualified teams, support staff, media and fans are respected as they seek to enter the United States, regardless of nationality, gender identity, religion or opinion." The US government has stated that the travel ban will not apply to players or team staff from qualified nations. However, it will prevent fans from Iran and other affected countries from attending matches in person. FIFA and the US State Department have been contacted for comment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store