Letters to the Editor: Campaign spend, pay equity, rabbits and rail
Today's Letters to the Editor from readers cover topics including campaign spending, pay equity, rabbits and KiwiRail. Meaningful ideas beat enormous ad budgets
In response to Mr Bill Southworth's letter (ODT 26.6.25) suggesting that both I and Future Dunedin hold an unfair advantage in the upcoming Dunedin City Council local body elections due to our ability to run a campaign.
While the current rules permit each candidate to spend up to $55,000 on campaigning, Future Dunedin's actual budget is well below that limit. What sets us apart is not the scale of our spending, but the strength of our vision - a vision grounded in genuine change, practical ambition, and a deep commitment to the future of our city.
We look forward to sharing that vision with the people of Dunedin and inviting their support.
Mr Southworth may find reassurance in the fact that, in 2022, the candidate who invested the most in their campaign was ultimately unsuccessful. This underscores a fundamental truth in local democracy: meaningful ideas resonate more deeply than advertising budgets.
Future Dunedin has also made a principled decision not to accept any external donations. We are not aligned with any political party, nor are we funded by outside interests.
Should we be elected, our councillors will answer only to the people of Dunedin.
Andrew Simms
Mayoral and council candidate for Future Dunedin Pearl clutching
''Hipkins said he had changed his position on the appropriateness of the column because of the distraction it was causing, which was 'taking away from what is a very fair issue'.'' (RNZ 15.5.25).
This was the moment Chris Hipkins showed his complete inability to lead and be the next prime minister. Instead of recognising the juicy open goal presented by the most outrageous egregious pearl-clutching episode ever seen in Parliament and treating it with the kind of derision that Helen Clark would have revelled in, he bottled it, conceding weakly to the disingenuous framing of Brooke van Velden and certain media commentators, and threw Jan Tinetti under the bus. The late Bob Jones once called Bill Rowling the ''shiver in search of a spine'': Hipkins owns this now. Pay equity was and is the issue.
Andrew Nichols
Kew Freight hub
What I consider very good news is the proposed freight hub is to be located at Milburn. This is an ideal location and must result in fewer heavy vehicles coming through Dunedin and using SH88 to and from Port Chalmers.
The CEO of Port Otago, Kevin Winders, is very supportive and has indicated this hub will not be in competition with the one to be fully developed in Mosgiel. I suggest Calder Stewart start doing it immediately before all the naysayers get together and act against this plan.
John Neilson
Ravensbourne Oi. Shhh.
Southland Hospital's ban on its staff chatting to each other for more than 5 minutes a day, and never in the afternoon, is brilliant. The management is well aware that talking about the performance of the All Blacks, the Kardashians or Meghan and Harry takes up far too many valuable minutes, and patients may die as a consequence.
To have a taciturn but kindly and efficient staff is clearly the aim, and will surely save the taxpayer many millions.
Mark Stocker
Christchurch We are making rabbits run run run - KiwiRail
I was surprised to read comments highlighting issues with feral rabbits in the rail corridor in Otago, and suggesting that land occupiers and Otago Regional Council staff have had limited success engaging with public agencies to enable effective control of rabbits (ODT 21.5.25).
KiwiRail is committed to controlling rabbits on its land and has been carrying out targeted rabbit control annually since 2019 throughout sections of the rail corridor in Balclutha, Moeraki, Waihola, Milton and Henley.
This has been undertaken in collaboration with both the ORC and the local community.
Pests do not respect boundaries, so pest control is a responsibility of all landowners. KiwiRail is absolutely playing its part.
Ruth Brittain
National vegetation contract manager, KiwiRail Recognition sought
Please could the current government at the very least acknowledge the economic cost that the Labour government had to bear with the four disasters it had to finance during its terms.
Kay Hannan
Weston Somehow not sighting the causal nexus
If the Otago University Staff for Palestine group (Letters ODT 26.5.25) are so blinkered by their prejudice against Israel that they do not see the significant causal nexus between the Hamas attacks of October 7, 2023 and the present situation in Gaza, then there is little hope that the group's efforts can actually make any contribution towards their ostensible aims of improving the plight for Palestinians.
Before October 2023, 18,000 Palestinians from Gaza held work permits allowing them to cross the controlled border between Gaza and Israel for work each day. After October 2023, all of these permits were revoked.
Before October 2023, there were no settlers, settlements, or permanent Israeli forces within Gaza, although Israel still controlled the borders. After October 2023, the idea that Israel should not continue to control its borders is ridiculous.
Malcolm Moncrief-SpittleDunedin
[Abridged - editor.]
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
15 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Debt-funded grants wrong, councillor says
Tweaking rules to enable theatre venues not owned by the Dunedin City Council to be developed with council debt might be "clever", but also wrong, a councillor says. Cr Bill Acklin was not impressed with his colleagues when they changed the council's revenue and financing policy to enable a particular type of grant to be funded through borrowing, rather than rates. The change, approved last week, meant debt-funded grants could be provided to community organisations constructing or upgrading a building. This made it easier for the council to signal in its 2025-34 long-term plan (LTP) political will existed for spending $17.1 million on theatre space and it intended such grants to apply to redevelopment of the Playhouse Theatre and Athenaeum building, and potentially a new venue suitable for professional theatre. "To fund professional sectors using debt is not what council's ability to borrow is for," Cr Acklin said. He had stayed out of debates about theatre space because of a perceived conflict of interest but expressed thoughts after voting had occurred. Using debt for grants was "very clever", he said disapprovingly. Later in the meeting he said he believed it to be wrong. However, he was happy to see support for the Playhouse, which has a strong children's programme. Another councillor who did not take part in discussions, Lee Vandervis, said changing council policy "so that we can reclassify even more spending as capital" was shameless. He was absent because of hip surgery. He slammed colleagues for their "election-year splurge" on debt after the council added $96.9m of borrowing to the LTP during four days of discussion. Cr Sophie Barker said the debt-funded grants issue was "a useful exploration of how to support a non-council organisation to deliver a project in a building that isn't council-owned". "Otherwise, it would have gone directly on rates — this way it's able to be funded over a longer period of time as an 'intergenerational asset'. "There's a lot of checks and balances around the Playhouse and Athenaeum resolutions that won't allow any funds to be released by council until stringent conditions are met." Council debt is projected to rise by roughly $500m in the next nine years to $1.2 billion in 2034. Much of it is aimed at replacing or upgrading key Three Waters assets and transport infrastructure. The council included $17.1m in its 2021-31 LTP for development of theatre space, but removal of the allocation from draft budgets for its 2025-34 plan was controversial. Reinstating the money was one call last week that added to projected debt. Inclusion of some transport projects intended to reduce carbon emissions and deciding to replace the Edgar Centre roof were others. The council made one move late in deliberations to avoid adding to debt. It chose to start running balanced budgets from the first year of the LTP — a year earlier than had been envisaged — rather than posting another deficit. The council had looked as if it was headed for a rates increase of 10.1% for 2025-26, but having a balanced budget pushed the rates rise to 10.7%.
Otago Daily Times
17 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Four strikes and not out — the Regulatory Standards Bill
The Regulatory Standards Bill — Government Bill 155-1 under the name of the Minister for Regulation — was introduced to Parliament on May 19. It received its first reading on May 23 and has been referred to the finance and expenditure select committee. As alluded to previously in this publication (ODT 4.1.25), earlier attempts to introduce this legislation failed in 2006, 2009 and 2011. In 2021, with the support of the National Party, a Bill to this effect was introduced by the (now) minister, but did not get off the ground. It was condemned as a dangerous constitutional shift undermining public and collective rights and threatening parliamentary sovereignty. Nothing about this Bill has changed except that the National-Act New Zealand coalition agreement provides for support of the Act policy programme by National. In this regard, the situation is different from that of the failed Principles of the Treaty of Waitangi Bill, which National and New Zealand First supported only to the select committee stage, then voted it down. Why is this Bill of such concern? The reasons are the same as they were two decades ago, being: — That the proposal represents a constitutional entrenchment of neo-political principles with an accumulation of power in the hands of the minister of regulation; — Tying principles of good regulation to property rights as a fundamental of good lawmaking overlooks entirely the ancillary fundamental of good lawmaking being strengthening communities, enhancement of environmental standards and protection of vulnerable groups. The proposed primacy of free market and individual rights is false as both are reliant on law and order and inherent obligations to protect the vulnerable (persons or environment) and maintain a reasonable balance where equity and justice is accorded the same value. Existing legislative guidelines from 2021 provide that "legislation should be consistent with the Treaty of Waitangi and should reflect the fundamental values and principles of a democratic society". This Bill does neither. Current guidelines identify the principle that "everyone is subject to the law". This Bill changes that to "every person is equal before the law" which reflects the Act party's policy to eradicate equity-based programmes which seek to redress systemic inequality. Equality in this sense is a procedural right, free of class or status. It is not, and never has been, the right to be treated the same. Equating property rights with personal liberty creates dangerous territory, the focus on which will obliterate the duty to preserve the environment and address substantive inequality issues. Going down this path will open the door to compensation claims in the event of any actions impacting adversely on property rights. There are already in place substantive regulatory controls. The advice to the minister in this instance is, in essence, that the proposed legislation is unnecessary. The extent of powers placed in the hands of the minister, the proponent of the Bill, is excessive. The objective of the Bill is to encapsulate more than 20 years of neo-liberal, libertarian dogma, designed to elevate and protect the interest of property above all else. Successive parliaments have soundly rejected this legislation in the past. The prime minister must ensure that the Bill is amended to recognise all of its defects or simply decline to support it on the basis that it is not good law. Act NZ leader David Seymour would be unlikely to surrender his upcoming deputy prime ministership given the patience shown to date in getting this hobby horse across the line. — Noel O'Malley is a Balclutha lawyer and past president of the Otago District Law Society.
Otago Daily Times
17 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Letters to the Editor: defence, flights and elections
Today's Letters to the Editor from readers cover topics including a Trumpian initiative in the South Pacific, supporting flights to the Gold Coast, and declaring election spending. A novel suggestion to address defence needs For those that have largely given up on the strength of peace initiatives and seem to believe we need to throw more money at increasing the size of our armed forces and not be constrained by environmental values either. For them, what about approaching the Donald, by putting forward a proposal his ego would struggle to resist. Dunedin could be the first city ready to Trumpet the initiative to him by offering access to our airport, and shipping port, which he could develop to maybe advantage both parties and over time broaden his scope to include other centres around New Zealand. Dunedin could add a couple of additional sweeteners to persuade Donald to build a sea wall to secure Dunedin's future threats from the rising ocean. He could be gifted Chisholm Park Golf Course and assume the sole naming rights. Furthermore, an irresistible offer of a statue of himself in pride of place in the Octagon replacing Robbie Burns. No need for the Scots to fret, it could be done delicately so that Robbie could be returned later. Surely, the attraction of a major presence based in the southern South Pacific for military purposes, along with the future possibilities once the ice melt exposes mineral deposits in Antarctica is surely a clincher for the likes of the US or another major player. New Zealand would certainly have a more realistic defense capability, but do we really need it or the intrusions this would create? The plane, the plane Not long to go until the direct flights begin with Australia. The Gold Coast may not be the destination that some people wanted but we all need to be grateful that we got one destination. We all know that Dunedin people are not the best at supporting events etc so let's all hope that we do support this service out of principle. Use it or lose it. How sad would it be if the young man who campaigned saw the decline of the service because Dunedin and surrounds didn't support it. There are not many young people around like him so who else would campaign as hard as he did for all of us. Maybe if we support the service well then the airlines will look at other destinations for us? Maybe we could get another airline doing a completely different route? I vote for Fiji Airways and direct flights to the Pacific. Come on Otago let's do this. Point unaddressed In his letter ( ODT 29.5.25) on his and his Future Dunedin Party's heavy campaign advertising spending mayoral candidate Andrew Simms fails to address the essential point. That is that until three months before the election all expenditure by candidates is not monitored by election officials and need not be declared. Monitoring does not start until July. The normal price for the frequent one-page ads Mr Simms and his party have been running in this newspaper is around $8000. Will Mr Simms and his party when they put in their election return include the amount they spent prior to the monitoring period? [Andrew Simms replies: Mr Southworth should be reassured that Future Dunedin candidates will declare their total campaign expenditure which will be well below the allowed limit specified in the Local Government Act. Future Dunedin does not make the rules but we will certainly be complying with them in presenting our vision to the Dunedin community.] Flooded lake out of kilter with energy reward As a final word on the Lake Monowai issue, I assure Prof Mark (Letters ODT 23.5.25) that I was born and bred in Otago and familiar with the rivers and lakes of Otago and Southland. The question as to whether the drowned shoreline is showing "obvious signs of recovery" can be easily answered. The challenge goes out to a group of intrepid Otago canoeists to tour the Lake Monowai shoreline, taking pics along the way. Then do the same for Lake Hauroko, which serves as an unflooded reference lake. A published article would be instructive. The Monowai power station can operate without needing Lake Monowai to remain flooded. There would be reduced power output of less than 2MW. The environmental price of the continued existence of a hydropower drowned lake within a national park is ridiculously out of kilter with the tiny energy reward. School of Science, University of Waikato Address Letters to the Editor to: Otago Daily Times, PO Box 517, 52-56 Lower Stuart St, Dunedin. Email: editor@
