logo
‘Unshrunk' Review: The Toll of the Treatment

‘Unshrunk' Review: The Toll of the Treatment

For nearly 15 years, Laura Delano was, in her own words, a 'professional psychiatric patient.' She believed she had an incurable psychiatric disease that could be managed only with medication, therapy and the occasional hospitalization. Over the course of her long career as a patient, Ms. Delano was medicated with Seroquel, Geodon, Abilify, Zyprexa, Risperdal, Depakote, Topamax, Lamictal, Klonopin, Ativan, Ambien, Provigil, Prozac, Effexor, Celexa, Cymbalta, Wellbutrin, Lexapro, and lithium. So convinced of her condition was Ms. Delano that if anyone had handed her a memoir like the one she has now written, 'Unshrunk: A Story of Psychiatric Treatment Resistance,' she would have been insulted and outraged.
Her story begins when she was 13 years old. A competitive squash player and the soon-to-be president of her eighth-grade class, Ms. Delano was brushing her teeth in front of a mirror one evening when she had a harrowing experience: The edges of her vision blurred; she felt a terrifying sense of disembodiment and fragmentation; and the figure in the mirror was no longer recognizable as her. The episode didn't last very long, but it left her with a profound sense of unease. Reflecting on it in bed later that night, Ms. Delano began to see herself from the outside. The view was unsettling. Convinced that her life was all fakery and mindless rule-following, she resolved to escape.
What followed was a self-destructive spiral that went far beyond adolescent rebellion. Ms. Delano gives us an unsparing account of her alcoholism, cocaine abuse, eating disorders and episodes of self-harm. In the ninth grade, she was diagnosed with bipolar disorder and given prescriptions for an antidepressant and a mood stabilizer. Later came an antipsychotic and a drug to help her sleep. If anything, medication accelerated her decline. By age 19, when she was a sophomore at Harvard, she writes, 'I'd morphed from a raw, suffering, lost young woman . . . into a detached, absorbed, empathyless machine.'
Ms. Delano marks her eventual turnaround at age 27 to a moment of profound revelation in a Vermont bookstore. That was where she encountered Robert Whitaker's 2010 book, 'Anatomy of an Epidemic: Magic Bullets, Psychiatric Drugs, and the Astonishing Rise of Mental Illness in America.' The question Mr. Whitaker asked was simple: How is it possible that rates of mental illness have skyrocketed in parallel with the development of so many supposedly groundbreaking psychiatric drugs? Mr. Whitaker's book forced Ms. Delano to pose a question that had never before occurred to her. 'What if it wasn't treatment-resistant mental illness that had been sending me ever deeper into the depths of despair and dysfunction, but the treatment itself?'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Debate Over Defining Death
The Debate Over Defining Death

New York Times

time18 hours ago

  • New York Times

The Debate Over Defining Death

To the Editor: Re 'We Need a New Definition of Death,' by Sandeep Jauhar, Snehal Patel and Deane Smith (Opinion guest essay, Aug. 1): As a physician and a neuroethicist who has argued for the rights of people with a severe brain injury, I was appalled and confused by the proposal made by these authors to include patients they define as 'hopelessly comatose' in a new definition of death. The phrase 'hopelessly comatose' — which the authors maintain was deleted from a 1968 Harvard Brain Death Report — is a medical oxymoron. Comas are by definition self-limited. Once comatose, you either die, wake up or move into a vegetative state. Regarding 'hopelessly': In 2018 the 'permanent' vegetative state was redesignated as 'chronic' because as many as 20 percent of patients recovered consciousness. The proposal becomes more alarming considering our 2024 New England Journal of Medicine paper demonstrating that 25 percent of patients in a coma or vegetative state had cognitive motor dissociation or covert consciousness. They weren't hopelessly comatose, though they appeared so. Finally, there are emerging drugs and therapeutics that promise to transform hopelessness into hope. In 2012, I resigned from the board of an organ procurement organization because it viewed these patients as reservoirs to harvest organs. We should be beyond utilitarian redefinitions of death that violate the disability and civil rights of vulnerable patients. It will backfire and erode trust in organ procurement and decrease donations. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Always crave a sweet treat? Blame your boring meal.
Always crave a sweet treat? Blame your boring meal.

Washington Post

time3 days ago

  • Washington Post

Always crave a sweet treat? Blame your boring meal.

Well+Being Always crave a sweet treat? Blame your boring meal. August 15, 2025 | 5:36 PM GMT Finished with dinner but still craving something sweet? Here's how to trick your brain into feeling satisfied, without always having to reach for a post-meal sweet treat. Internal medicine physician, Harvard Medical School instructor and Ask a Doctor columnist Trisha Pasricha (@trishapasrichamd) explains that diversifying the tastes and flavors in your main meal can curb those unwanted cravings. This content was created independently by The Washington Post and is not influenced by the advertiser and their affiliates. The advertiser had no involvement in the reporting, writing, or editing of this article or video. Presented by Amazon One Medical.

The app will see you now: New AI scans faces to predict diseases, disorders, and early death
The app will see you now: New AI scans faces to predict diseases, disorders, and early death

Yahoo

time3 days ago

  • Yahoo

The app will see you now: New AI scans faces to predict diseases, disorders, and early death

Facial recognition apps detect pain in dementia patients, trauma in children, and diagnose infections. I tried Harvard's FaceAge app using photos to estimate biological age and, in turn, overall health. This article is part of "Transforming Treatments," a series on medical innovations that save time, money, or discomfort. I look like I'm about 28. Or maybe 38. That's according to Harvard's "FaceAge" algorithm, which uses photos to determine a person's supposed biological age — meant as a quick proxy for wellness. This app is one of several new efforts to turn selfies into diagnostic tools. There's one for diagnosing nasal congestion, another for seasonal allergies, and a few safe driving apps that watch your face for signs of drowsiness. Some face scanners measure pain, illness, or signs of autism. One aims to track PTSD in kids to spare them from having to talk about traumatic issues over and over again. Since 2022, facial recognition for the clinic has blossomed, alongside rapid advancements in artificial intelligence and chipmaking. This year, new face technologies promising to diagnose diseases earlier, treat patients better, and ostensibly predict early death are taking off. "It's a medical biomarker, not just a gimmick," said FaceAge creator and radiologist Dr. Raymond Mak, who's leading the team at Harvard and Mass General Brigham developing facial recognition technology that Business Insider recently tested. Ethics experts worry about what we're barreling into, without better understanding exactly what this tech is measuring, or why. "AI is entering these spaces fast," Malihe Alikhani, an assistant professor of machine learning at Northeastern University, told Business Insider. "It's about making sure that it is safe and beneficial." Your face is a reflection of your health Our faces say a lot about our physical, mental, and biological health. While this is new territory for computers, humans have read faces to make quick judgments for thousands of years. Research suggests we developed a third type of cone in our eyeballs about 30 million years ago, specifically to scan each other's faces for signs of health or sickness. That cone allows us to read faces in shades of red and green. "People look at rosy cheeks and they see that as a sign of health. When we want to draw a face that's sick, we'd make it green," Professor Brad Duchaine, a neuroscientist who studies facial perception at Dartmouth, told Business Insider. It's true: A flush can indicate good blood flow, or high levels of carotenoids in the skin from fruits and veggies we eat. Dr. Bahman Guyuron, a plastic surgeon in Cleveland, studied identical twins with different lifestyles to see how factors like smoking and stress impact their faces. Consistently, the twin with more stress and more toxins in their bodies looked several years older. Sagging skin and wrinkles can reflect poorer internal health, with lower collagen production and higher levels of stress hormones. Conversely, studies show that superaging centenarians — whose organs and cells are working unbelievably efficiently — look, on average, about 27 years younger than they are. I tried a face scanning app One of the first medical applications of face-reading tech was Face2Gene, an app first released in 2014 that helps doctors diagnose genetic conditions. Studies suggest Face2Gene is better than human doctors at extracting information from a person's face and then linking those features to a specific genetic issue. The Australian app PainChek has tracked the pain of nursing home patients since 2017. It is mostly used for dementia patients who may not be able to verbalize pain. In a recent announcement, the company said it is awaiting FDA approval and could be cleared by September 2025. I wanted to try one of these apps for myself. Since I write a lot about aging, I decided to try FaceAge, Harvard's new app that ostensibly measures your biological age. It is not yet available for public use; it is being used as a research tool for now. The ultimate goal, researchers say, would be to use selfies to do better diagnostic work. FaceAge could one day improve cancer treatments by tailoring them to a patient's unique biology and health status, or maybe even help flag other health issues before they happen. The FaceAge algorithm pays attention to two main areas of the face: the nasal labial folds, from the nose to the lips, and the temples between the eyes and ears. The idea is to spot premature or accelerated signs of aging that could be a red flag for internal problems. "If your face age is accelerating quicker than your chronological age, it's a very poor prognostic sign," Mak, one of the developers behind FaceAge, told Business Insider. I submitted four photos to the app. In the darkest, blurriest photo I provided, the app thought I was 27.9 years old — a little more than a decade below my actual age. The picture I took with no makeup on, and my face thrust out into the bright mid-day sunshine, gave me the oldest FaceAge, even though all of these pictures were taken within the past year. One selfie taken in the dark of winter and another on a cloudy day ended up somewhere in the middle, making me look young-ish. Humans (and face-scanning apps) use the proliferation of lines, sharp edges, and more details to assess someone's age. That's why people look younger in blurry photos — or with surgery or makeup to smooth over their wrinkles. In "a really, really, really blurry photograph of a face, what you've done is you've stripped out all of the high spatial frequency information," neuroscientist Bevil Conway, a senior investigator at the National Institutes of Health, told Business Insider. Direct light, like a ring light, can help mask old age. The midday sun, coming down on my face from above, had the opposite effect. So, what did I learn from my experiment? FaceAge told me I'm looking great (and young!) and should keep up my healthy habits. Still, its assessments were all over the place. Face Age is confident each time you run it, but that confidence masks the fact that it can't really tell how well I'm aging over time. Is my body 10 years younger than me, or just one? While I do eat a relatively healthy diet and exercise regularly, I'm curious how much the differences in lighting affected my results. The ethics are blurry Even if it's something as seemingly innocuous as measuring your age, bringing AI into the doctor's office is fraught with ethical conundrums. "We have been through a few years now of companies coming up with these systems, selling them to hospitals, selling them to doctors, selling them to border protection, and then after a while they're like, 'oops,'" Alikhani, the AI ethics expert, said. Readers may remember the uproar over the highly controversial Stanford study that developed "gaydar" AI in 2017. The app purported to spot someone's sexual orientation. Critics said it was just picking up on social and environmental cues that had nothing to do with sexuality, like makeup, facial hair, and sun exposure. Another team of researchers from Shanghai Jiao Tong University developed an algorithm that promised to identify criminals and terrorists, or people with law-breaking tendencies. These efforts feel uncomfortably close to the pseudoscientific practice of physiognomy, a deeply flawed practice that's been used for centuries to justify racism and bigotry, Alikhani said. Facial expression is highly context-dependent, varying not only based on a person's gender and culture, but also by the individual and the moment, she said. "Better healthcare involves patients more in the decision-making," Alikhani said. "What are we doing if we're putting that in the hands of AI?" Read more from the Transforming Treatments series: In an era of quiet glow-ups, no-prep veneers are the new 'it' cosmetic procedure Colonoscopies are no fun. These at-home colon cancer screenings offer a shortcut. Skin tightening is getting more advanced — and less painful. Here are the new techniques replacing facelifts. Read the original article on Business Insider

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store