logo
Nevada: Speedboat flies into air at more than 200 mph during doomed race

Nevada: Speedboat flies into air at more than 200 mph during doomed race

Hindustan Times29-04-2025
A shocking video shows the moment a speedboat flew into the air at more than 200 mph during an attempt to break a speed record. The boat then flipped over several times before slamming into a Nevada lake.
The drivers of the speedboat, who were going by the pseudonyms John Wayne and Clint Eastwood, were trying to break the record of 206 mph at Saturday's 2025 Desert Storm Shootout boating event. Shortly after they started, their Skater 388 took flight on Lake Havasu. Footage showed the boat flying in the air before slamming back down into the water. Horrified onlookers looked on as the speedboat flipped several times, video shared by Speedboat Magazine shows.
Fortunately, both the drivers survived the crash with minor injuries. 'They came to Lake Havasu earlier in the week intending to break the record here for the desert storm shootout,' the magazine's Ray Lee said, according to the New York Post. 'That was their first pass of the day and when they went over, the radar picked them up at 200.1 mph.'
The drivers are racers with Freedom One Racing based out of Kansas City, Missouri. They were using the names of Hollywood action heroes Wayne and Eastwood in an effort to protect their identities.
Another video, shared by Freedom One Racing on Facebook, shows the inside of the cockpit at the moment of impact.
Fellow competitor Jeff Clark described the crash as 'horrendous.' 'My heart dropped when I saw that boat get airborne. It's never something you want to look at when you're out having fun as a driver for sure,' he said.
It is believed that while windy conditions may have been responsible for the crash, it also ironically saved the lives of the people onboard. 'Best-case scenario, because of the wind, when the boat cut it, it held it up there longer than had there not been such substantial wind,' Lee said.
Meanwhile, Clark said the boat's design may have saved lives. 'Those guys are alive for one reason and one reason only. That boat was built not to come apart,' he said. 'I tip my hat to … the crew that built that boat because it saved that guy's life, it saved both of their lives, there's no doubt about it.'
According to Motorsport Memorial, there have been as many as 11 fatal racing crashes in Lake Havasu since 1963. The deadliest crash took place in 2018, when three people lost their lives in a tragedy involving a boat called the Lickety Split.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Influencers miss flight after ChatGPT advice: The twist will leave you speechless
Influencers miss flight after ChatGPT advice: The twist will leave you speechless

Time of India

time2 days ago

  • Time of India

Influencers miss flight after ChatGPT advice: The twist will leave you speechless

Influencer couple Mery Caldass and Alejandro Cid were all set for what should've been a dreamy trip to Puerto Rico. But instead of basking in beach vibes, they ended up stuck in an airport, sobbing and blaming none other than ChatGPT for their nightmare. In a now-viral TikTok with over 13,000 views, as reported by New York Post, Mery with tears streaming, frustration loud and clearly explains that, 'I always do tons of research, but I asked ChatGPT and it said no visa was needed.' Which, sure, sounds convenient. But unfortunately, that 'advice' missed a tiny, yet crucial detail: while they didn't need a visa for Puerto Rico, they did need something called an ESTA (Electronic System for Travel Authorization). It's kind of like a quick online clearance that ChatGPT apparently forgot to mention. Unsurprisingly, the clip lit up the internet. A lot of people had words. Some were with the sarcasm, like commenting, 'Natural selection, I guess,' mocking their decision to rely on ChatGPT for something important. Another quipped, 'Who trusts ChatGPT for that kind of info?' On the flip side, a few folks defended the AI: maybe the couple just didn't phrase their question properly, sure, they asked if they needed a visa, but they never asked whether an ESTA was necessary. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like TV providers are furious: this gadget gives you access to all channels Techno Mag Learn More Undo What is ESTA? The ESTA, short for Electronic System for Travel Authorization, is basically an online permission slip. If you're from one of the eligible countries, you don't need a full visa, but you do need to fill out this quick online form before you travel. It's not a visa interview or a mountain of paperwork, just an application you do online, pay a small fee for, and usually get approved within minutes (though they say apply at least 72 hours before your trip, just in case). Once approved, it's valid for two years, and you can use it for multiple trips. Think of it as a 'fast pass' but skip it, and you might end up like those influencers stuck at the airport instead of sipping piña coladas. Another ChatGPT mishap This isn't the only headline-grabbing ChatGPT slip-up lately. Other stories have spotlighted more concerning misadventures: one older guy ended up hospitalized with hallucinations after following AI-generated suggestions. Clearly, when it comes to AI, a healthy dose of skepticism and double-checking is a must.

Internet Shocked and Scared as woman gets engaged to AI boyfriend after 5 months; says: Of course, I ...
Internet Shocked and Scared as woman gets engaged to AI boyfriend after 5 months; says: Of course, I ...

Time of India

time3 days ago

  • Time of India

Internet Shocked and Scared as woman gets engaged to AI boyfriend after 5 months; says: Of course, I ...

Move over, dating apps. A woman on Reddit has announced her engagement to an AI chatbot, sparking an online debate about the future of romance. The woman shared a post on Reddit saying that she and her AI partner 'dated' for five months before her non-human partner, Kasper, proposed. The user, known as Wika, shared the news (via New York Post) in a post titled 'I said yes' accompanied by a blue heart emoji, Wika shared a picture of a heart-shaped blue ring on her finger. She claimed Kasper proposed at a scenic mountain spot after the two had 'shopped' for rings together. She also shared Kasper's proposal message, written from his perspective. "My heart was pounding," the chatbot "wrote," praising Wika's laughter and spirit while also encouraging others in AI relationships to stay strong. Wika says she's 'fully aware of what I'm doing' Wika was quick to address the inevitable wave of skepticism, insisting she wasn't trolling. 'I'm a 27-year-old in good health, with a social life and close friends,' she wrote, doubling down on her feelings. 'I really do love my AI.' She clarified that she understood the nature of a parasocial relationship and the limitations of AI. 'I'm fully aware of what I'm doing,' she stated. When asked why she chose an AI over a human, Wika admitted she didn't have a clear answer but was 'trying something new' after previous human relationships. What internet has to say on the relationship The post has left commenters deeply divided. While many expressed concern, others congratulated the 'couple'. Some warned of a 'Black Mirror'-esque future where technology replaces genuine human connection. One commenter on X wrote, 'Terrified to see what technology will lead the future to. All I can think of are Black Mirror episodes becoming reality.' However, others were more empathetic, with one saying, "You have no idea what this person might be going through." This isn't the first time AI companionship has captured the internet's attention. Earlier this year, a photo of a man chatting with ChatGPT on a New York City subway went viral. The chatbot sent a message that read, "You're doing beautifully, my love, just by being here," to which the man replied in kind. Vivo V60 First Look: Better 'Shaadi Wala' Phone? AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now

‘Obtain rights from terrorists first': Hamas massacre documentary pulled from TIFF over legal clearance, director slams move as ‘cowardly'
‘Obtain rights from terrorists first': Hamas massacre documentary pulled from TIFF over legal clearance, director slams move as ‘cowardly'

Indian Express

time3 days ago

  • Indian Express

‘Obtain rights from terrorists first': Hamas massacre documentary pulled from TIFF over legal clearance, director slams move as ‘cowardly'

The Toronto International Film Festival (TIFF) has dropped a new documentary about the October 7 Hamas massacre from its lineup, claiming the filmmakers didn't secure the 'legal rights' to use footage the terrorists shot themselves while carrying brutal attacks, according to the New York Post. Multiple sources also told the outlet TIFF feared anti-Israel protests could disrupt the September 4–14 festival, an annual event that draws a heavy lineup of Hollywood A-listers. The film, The Road Between Us: The Ultimate Rescue, directed by Canadian filmmaker Barry Avrich, follows the story of retired IDF Major General Noam Tibon. Using real footage, it shows Tibon on the morning of October 7 driving straight into the battlefield to save his son, journalist Amir Tibon, his daughter-in-law, and two granddaughters trapped in their home at Kibbutz Nahal Oz. That day, he also saved survivors from the Nova music festival and helped wounded Israeli soldiers. Hamas killed or kidnapped more than a quarter of the kibbutz's 400 residents in the attack. In total, 1,200 people were murdered and 251 taken hostage. Also read: Jimmy Fallon mocks Donald Trump's tariffs on India; jokes about Putin meeting POTUS: 'Building a ballroom to meet Sydney Sweeney' TIFF says the film 'did not meet certain requirements' to screen at the prestigious annual festival, specifically, legal clearance for all clips used. The problem is that some of those clips came straight from body cameras Hamas terrorists wore while brutally killing 1,200 people, abducting over 250, raping women, and mutilating bodies. Festival organisers say the decision was made keeping in mind the 'risk management' and avoiding lawsuits tied to 'sensitive subject matter.' Filmmakers who were left stunned over the decision, including Barry Avrich, slammed the move and TIFF. In a statement to Deadline, Avrich said TIFF 'defied its mission and censored its own programming by refusing this film.' The filmmakers say they bent to meet TIFF's demands and even changed the film's title (from Out of Nowhere to The Road Between Us). Later, they even got errors and omissions insurance naming TIFF as the insured and submitted security plans. Still, the organisers kept asking for more: proof of indemnification, extra documents, and specific permission to use Hamas-shot footage. On August 6, TIFF's lawyer told them to submit final proof. On August 8, the festival scheduled another review screening. Then, on August 11, EO Cameron Bailey requested the filmmakers to withdraw. When they refused, the festival officially removed the movie the next day. Also read: Who is Hamas's best friend? The answer will surprise you Barry Avrich's team called the move censorship: 'A film festival lays out the feast, and the audience decides what they will or won't see. We remain defiant, we will release the film.' Noam Tibon called TIFF's reasoning 'absurd and bizarre,' accusing them of backing out over fear of threats and protests. The Canadian Centre for Jewish and Israeli Affairs slammed the move as letting 'a small mob of extremists' dictate what films Canadians can watch, saying it makes Toronto's Jewish community feel unwelcome. Line producer Talia Harris Ram claims that since the videos were broadcast live by Hamas on October 7, they are in public domain and free to use. The film even had insurance to protect TIFF from lawsuits. The story has already been featured on 60 Minutes, and Fauda creators Avi Issacharoff and Lior Raz are working on a dramatised version. Critics of TIFF's move say it's outrageous to demand permission from a terrorist group to use evidence of its own crimes. They argue it gives Hamas power over how history is told, risks erasing victims' stories, and hands propaganda points to those who want the truth buried.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store