
U.S.-eh? Who are the Canadians who would support a 51st state?
It may surprise and even enrage many people to know there are Canadians out there who wouldn't mind this country becoming the 51st state of the U.S.
It's a small number, to be sure: About 10 per cent of Canadians say they would support Canada joining the U.S., according to a poll by the Angus Reid Institute, completed in January.
Ryan Hemsley, who lives in Victoria, sees himself in that camp.
"It would mean access to jobs, access to wealth, access to a piece of land that I don't necessarily have access to right now," he said.
There is a far more impressive but less surprising number in that poll — a huge 90 per cent of Canadians totally oppose the idea. That some Canadians would actually consider joining our neighbour to the south sparks rage in the face of newly ignited nationalism. When CBC Radio's Cross Country Checkup held a call-in show around the idea, there was massive outcry.
Protesters showed up when Saskatchewan's Buffalo Party held a fundraiser where the concept was discussed. The venue received threats and security had to be hired — a sign of just how dramatic and intense even entertaining such a debate can be. But that's not stopping a small minority of Canadians who look south and see opportunity and personal gain.
WATCH | Why some would support Canada becoming a U.S. state:
90% of Canadians don't want to be a 51st state. What's up with the rest?
10 hours ago
Duration 4:25
Avoiding tariffs
The impetus for the Angus Reid poll is, of course, U.S. President Donald Trump's repeated comments about Canada becoming the 51st state. It's a solution, he says, to Canada avoiding his steep tariffs on most goods.
The quip first came out of a December Mar-a-Lago meeting with Trump, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and then-public safety minister Dominic LeBlanc, who on his return to Ottawa reassured reporters that "the president was teasing us." It may have been treated like a joke then, but coupled with a devastating trade war, it's becoming infuriating to Canadians and the Danes, with Greenland also targeted by Trump.
Becoming an American state, or supporting some kind of economic union with the United States, is the latest campaign for people on the "margins and fringes and feeling underserved" by Canada's political landscape, said Shachi Kurl, president of the Angus Reid Institute.
It was triggered by longstanding grievances. Many who side with the president also took issue with Canada's vaccine mandates, or don't like the British monarchy — or they want the Western provinces to secede from the country.
The small number of Canadians who feel this way are getting attention south of the border, including in a segment on Fox News, which featured Hemsley in late December, and in an Oval Office news conference on Feb. 25, when a pro-Trump media personality asked Trump about a "movement" of Canadians who want to join the U.S.
"It's true," Trump responded. (It's not true on any significant scale.)
That so-called "movement" is more like a "fringe minority," says Jared Wesley, a political science professor with the University of Alberta.
Angus Reid data shows people who support the idea are more likely to live in Alberta or Saskatchewan and less likely to support a major political party, said Kurl. But she stresses that they could really come from anywhere, with any kind of political leaning.
Looking to the U.S.
Like Hemsley, who is 33 and originally from Ottawa. He moved to Vancouver Island to escape bitter winters, and now sells cars. But the relocation also means that on a clear day, he can ogle the U.S., just 25 kilometres away, straight across the Salish Sea.
There, he says he sees the potential to be more successful, in a way that he says hasn't been possible for him in Canada.
"I know that just based on my work ethic, how hard I work, I know that if I were to pay less taxes and have more access to trade and business opportunities ... I would be able to make more money," he said.
On top of that, Hemsley says he struggles to access Canada's in-crisis health-care system and he's unvaccinated for COVID-19, which he says has made finding work difficult.
But erasing a border is not an instant recipe for prosperity, said Jim Stanford, an economist and director at the Centre for Future Work, a Vancouver-based think-tank. It's a common misconception that the U.S.'s higher GDP per capita means Americans are wealthier than Canadians, he said — Americans don't get paid in per capita; they get paid in wages.
"Our workers are paid more and at the median, the average person, they pay less tax, even though we get health care for free and other public benefits," said Stanford. "So the idea that Americans somehow have a land of opportunity that we're denied in Canada? Absolutely false."
Is the grass greener?
The perceived economic benefit is a common reason for Canadians to support the idea of joining the U.S., said Kurl.
Another poll by Ipsos, also in January, found three in 10 Canadians would consider annexation if they were offered U.S. citizenship and conversion of Canadian assets to U.S. dollars.
However, Stanford says, if this were ever made reality, it would dramatically undermine Canada's economy, said Stanford.
"Because suddenly everything in Canada, including our wages and our workers, would look much, much more expensive. Too expensive and Canada would become a depressed backwater," he said.
But there are other 51st-state supporters who have long held onto the idea of some kind of secession from Canada, like Peter Downing.
He's most known for being the founder of Wexit, a political party that advocated for Western Canada to split off from the rest of the country. He's now one of the people behind a giant billboard in Bowden, Alta., featuring a picture of Alberta Premier Danielle Smith next to Donald Trump with the line "Let's join the USA!"
"Everybody envies the power of the Americans, the freedom of the Americans, the accomplishments of the Americans," said Downing.
Defending Canada
Security in a changing world is also a big part of Downing's desire to join the U.S. He sees threats from China and Russia and to Canada's coveted Northwest Passage as good reasons, since Trump began taunting his northern neighbour's relative lack of military strength.
"They think we're going to ... protect them with our military, which is unfair," Trump said in the Oval Office on Feb. 13.
Asked about the Bowden billboard on Feb. 24, Alberta's Premier Smith said she has seen "no enthusiasm for that notion"; in fact, all Canadian politicians have soundly rejected any form of union with the U.S.
"No major policy initiative, let alone some form of annexation, is going to see the light of day unless mainstream political leaders start to advocate in favour of it," said Wesley, from the University of Alberta.
Misunderstandings of the reality and mechanics of becoming a U.S. state are common in polls like this, said Wesley, noting a small number of people often vote in a way that expresses their frustration with the government or status quo in Canada.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Winnipeg Free Press
37 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
The Latest: Air India plane bound for London crashes with 242 passengers onboard
Air India says a London-bound flight crashed shortly after taking off from Ahmedabad airport Thursday with 242 passengers and crew onboard. The airline said flight AI 171, a Boeing 787-8, crashed into a residential area near the airport in Ahmedabad, a northwestern city with a population of more than 5 million, five minutes after taking off at 1:38 p.m. local time. The plane was bound for London Gatwick Airport and was carrying 169 Indians, 53 Britons, seven Portuguese and one Canadian, Air India said. Visuals on local television channels showed smoke billowing from the crash site. Here's the latest: ___ Shares of Boeing tumble in pre-market trading Boeing said in a brief statement: 'We are aware of initial reports and are working to gather more information.' The crash comes days before the opening of the Paris Air Show, a major aviation expo where Boeing and European rival Airbus will showcase their aircraft and battle for jet orders from airline customers. Boeing has been in recovery mode for more than six years after Lion Air Flight 610, a Boeing 737 Max 8, plunged into the Java Sea off the coast of Indonesia minutes after takeoff from Jakarta, killing all 189 people on board. Five months later, Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302, a Boeing 737 Max 8, crashed after takeoff from Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, killing 157 passengers and crew members. Shares of Boeing Co. tumbled nearly 9% before trading opened in the U.S. ___ Last major passenger plane crash in India was in 2020 In August 2020 an Air India Express Boeing-737 skidded off a hilltop runway in southern India, killing 21 people. The worst air disaster in India was on Nov. 12, 1996, when a Saudi Arabian Airlines flight collided midair with a Kazakhastan Airlines Flight near Charki Dadri in Haryana state, killing all 349 on board the two planes. ___ India's foreign minister says 'deeply shocked' by the crash India's foreign minister, Subrahmanyam Jaishankar, said he was 'deeply shocked to learn about the flight crash in Ahmedabad' in a post on X. 'Our prayers are with the passengers and their families,' he said. ___ Passengers included Indian, British, Portuguese and Canadian nationals Air India in a statement said there were 242 passengers and crew members on board the Boeing 787-8 aircraft. Of these, 169 are Indian nationals, 53 British, one Canadian and seven Portuguese. The injured are being taken to the nearest hospitals.


Winnipeg Free Press
37 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
House will vote on Trump's request to cut funding for NPR, PBS and foreign aid
WASHINGTON (AP) — House Republicans are moving to cut about $9.4 billion in spending already approved by Congress as President Donald Trump's administration looks to follow through on work by the Department of Government Efficiency when it was overseen by Elon Musk. The package to be voted on Thursday targets foreign aid programs and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which provides money for National Public Radio and the Public Broadcasting Service, as well as thousands of public radio and television stations around the country. Republicans are characterizing the spending as wasteful and unnecessary, but Democrats say the rescissions are hurting the United States' standing in the world. 'Cruelty is the point,' Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries of New York said of the proposed spending cuts. The Trump administration is employing a tool rarely used in recent years that allows the president to transmit a request to Congress to cancel previously appropriated funds. That triggers a 45-day clock in which the funds are frozen pending congressional action. If Congress fails to act within that period, then the spending stands. The benefit for the administration of a formal rescissions request is that passage requires only a simple majority in the 100-member Senate instead of the 60 votes usually required to get spending bills through that chamber. So, if they stay united, Republicans will be able to pass the measure without any Democratic votes. The administration is likening the first rescissions package to a test case and says more could be on the way if Congress goes along. Republicans, sensitive to concerns that Trump's sweeping tax and immigration bill would increase future federal deficits, are anxious to demonstrate spending discipline, though the cuts in the package amount to just a sliver of the spending approved by Congress each year. They are betting the cuts prove popular with constituents who align with Trump's 'America first' ideology as well as those who view NPR and PBS as having a liberal bias. In all, the package contains 21 proposed rescissions. Approval would claw back about $900 million from $10 billion that Congress has approved for global health programs. That includes canceling $500 million for activities related to infectious diseases and child and maternal health and another $400 million to address the global HIV epidemic. The Trump administration is also looking to cancel $800 million, or a quarter of the amount Congress approved, for a program that provides emergency shelter, water and sanitation, and family reunification for those forced to flee their own country. About 45% of the savings sought by the White House would come from two programs designed to boost the economies, democratic institutions and civil societies in developing countries. The Republican president has also asked lawmakers to rescind nearly $1.1 billion from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which represents the full amount it's slated to receive during the next two budget years. About two-thirds of the money gets distributed to more than 1,500 locally owned public radio and television stations. Nearly half of those stations serve rural areas of the country. The association representing local public television stations warns that many of them would be forced to close if the Republican measure passes. Those stations provide emergency alerts, free educational programming and high school sports coverage and highlight hometown heroes. Advocacy groups that serve the world's poorest people are also sounding the alarm and urging lawmakers to vote no. 'We are already seeing women, children and families left without food, clean water and critical services after earlier aid cuts, and aid organizations can barely keep up with rising needs,' said Abby Maxman, president and CEO of Oxfam America, a poverty-fighting organization. Rep. Jim McGovern, D-Mass., said the foreign aid is a tool that prevents conflict and promotes stability but the measure before the House takes that tool away. 'These cuts will lead to the deaths of hundreds of thousands, devastating the most vulnerable in the world,' McGovern said. 'And at a time when China and Russia and Iran are working overtime to challenge American influence.' Republicans disparaged the foreign aid spending and sought to link it to programs they said DOGE had uncovered. Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, said taxpayer dollars had gone to such things as targeting climate change, promoting pottery classes and strengthening diversity, equity and inclusion programs. Other Republicans cited similar examples they said DOGE had revealed. 'Yet, my friends on the other side of the aisle would like you to believe, seriously, that if you don't use your taxpayer dollars to fund this absurd list of projects and thousands of others I didn't even list, that somehow people will die and our global standing in the world will crumble,' Roy said. 'Well, let's just reject this now.'


Winnipeg Free Press
an hour ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Standoff with troops in Los Angeles reignites old feud as Newsom resists Trump's immigration raids
WASHINGTON (AP) — It was earlier this year that California Gov. Gavin Newsom was making nice with President Donald Trump as he sought help for his wildfire-battered state and moderating his approach ahead of a potential bid for the White House. But now the gloves are off after Trump took the extraordinary step of federalizing the National Guard in Los Angeles over Newsom's objections and the governor responded by suing the administration, alleging abuse of power that marked an 'unmistakable step toward authoritarianism.' The escalating clash pits the leader of the Republican Party against a Democrat with ambitions of leading his own party, with a striking backdrop of a domestic troop deployment meant to control a city in unrest and now to assist in arresting migrants — the centerpiece of the president's agenda. For Trump, it's another chance to battle with Newsom, a frequent foil who leads a heavily Democratic state the president has long criticized. And for Newsom, the feud has handed him a national platform as a beleaguered Democratic Party seeks a leader able to resist Trump. 'He has shown he's not going to be intimidated, and we're all for that,' Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said of Newsom on Wednesday. Conservative commentator Ben Shapiro, a former California resident, said Newsom's motivations for taking on Trump are clear. 'This is all about Gavin Newsom running for president in 2028, and what he is hoping is that becoming the face of a resistance to Trump is going to jog him to victory in Democratic primaries,' he said in his podcast 'The Ben Shapiro Show.' Trump wages a war against California Trump has long been a foe of California, which overwhelmingly rejected him in all three of his presidential campaigns. Over the years, Trump has threatened to intercede in the state's long-running homeless crisis, vowed to withhold federal wildfire aid as political leverage in a dispute over water rights, called on police to shoot people robbing stores and warned residents 'your children are in danger' because of illegal immigration. As a candidate in 2023, Trump said California was once a symbol of American prosperity but is 'becoming a symbol of our nation's decline.' 'This is not a great state anymore. This is a dumping ground,' Trump said at the time. 'The world is being dumped into California. Prisoners. Terrorists. Mental patients.' Newsom would learn to balance the dueling imperatives of a governor who needs to work with the federal government with being one of the Democratic Party's most prominent figures. As governor-elect, Newsom joined Trump in November 2018 as the then-president viewed wildfire damage in Paradise, California, and they pledged to put aside political differences to help the community recover. He was also overly complimentary of the Trump administration's assistance to California during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, praising Trump's 'focus on treatments' for the virus and thanking him for sending masks and gloves to his state. But Newsom was also a top surrogate for Democrats in the 2024 campaign and frequently warned of the consequences of Trump's return to the White House. Trump and Newsom make nice over wildfire catastrophe There was a handshake and a warm pat on the back. Newsom was there on the tarmac in Los Angeles in January, welcoming Trump and first lady Melania Trump, who had traveled west to survey the damage from the deadly wildfires in Southern California. Then they spoke to reporters together, pledging cooperation to rebuild the area and appreciating each other's presence. 'You were there for us during COVID. I don't forget that,' Newsom said. 'And I have all the expectations that we'll be able to work together to get this speedy recovery.' Trump added: 'We will. We're going to get it done.' Newsom also traveled to Washington in February to press Trump and lawmakers for more federal wildfire relief. The governor called his meeting with Trump 'productive' and one that was marked with a 'spirit of collaboration and cooperation.' The cordial attitude was part of Newsom's unmistakable appeal to the center, painting himself as a pragmatist to reach out to those who had fled from a party that had just lost all battleground states in the 2024 presidential election. Newsom spoke to conservative allies of Trump on a new podcast the governor billed as a way for Democrats to learn from the political successes of Trump's 'Make America Great Again' movement. He voiced opposition to transgender athletes participating in female sports while shifting focus away from efforts in Sacramento to 'Trump-proof' California — which Newsom embarked on after Trump's victory in November — as the wildfires raged. In an April interview with YouTube commentator Brian Tyler Cohen, Newsom acknowledged Trump's ability to appeal to the public. 'His success is his ability to win every damn news cycle and get us distracted and moving in 25 different directions,' he said. Newsom warns of democracy 'under assault' as Trump sends troops The Democratic governor and Trump have been feuding publicly about the response to protests, with Newsom claiming Trump didn't warn him he'd deploy troops in a Friday phone call and Trump claiming the conversation was about that. Newsom has taunted Trump administration officials with arresting him, and Trump first appeared receptive to the idea and then walked back earlier remarks. After Newsom filed an emergency request in federal court Tuesday to block the Trump administration from using the National Guard and Marines to assist with immigration raids in Los Angeles, he gave a public address accusing Trump of going beyond arresting criminals. 'California may be first, but it clearly will not end here,' he warned. 'Other states are next. Democracy is next. Democracy is under assault before our eyes.' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt dismissed Newsom's speech as performative. 'I know Gavin Newsom had a big address to the nation last night — I guess he thought that's what it was for maybe his future political ambitions,' Leavitt said Wednesday. 'But he spoke a lot of words. We haven't seen action.' The filing this week wasn't the first time this year that California had sued the Trump administration. In April, Newsom filed a lawsuit that challenged Trump's authority to impose sweeping tariffs that the governor asserted would inflate prices and inflict billions of dollars in damage to California, which has the nation's largest economy. And California — not just Newsom — continues to be a foil. Just this month, the Trump administration signaled that it intends to cut off federal funding for a long-delayed California high-speed rail project plagued by multibillion-dollar cost overruns. He's threatened to pull federal funding in California if the state did not bar transgender students from participating in girls sports. The Justice Department warned districts they could face legal trouble if they don't bar trans athletes from competition. And on Thursday, he's expected to sign a measure blocking California's vehicle emissions rules. ___ Gomez Licon reported from Fort Lauderdale, Fla., and Blood from Los Angeles. Associated Press writer Kevin Freking in Washington contributed.