
The law of driving on Indian roads
However, if the observation, made in a compensation order becomes the basis for wider application, it is likely to come up against the practical difficulties of driving on Indian roads, where one can spot the entire historical trajectory of man's engagement with motion in a single reel — starting with pedestrians, handcarts, bullock cards, bicycles, autos, cars, buses and trucks, many often driving on the wrong lane or in the wrong direction. Speeding, tailgating, jaywalking, lane-changing without signalling, and a raft of other traffic infractions are all too common — as is dereliction of personal safety conduct. Add to this animals straying onto the roads and potholes and craters, and sudden braking becomes both an unavoidable hazard of and survival tactic for driving on Indian roads. It will be no minor challenge to penalise sudden breaking, that is, if the apex court's observation becomes the law. The way forward is to crack down on infractions that prompt sudden braking. Severe penal action is the only way to enforce road rules, and no authority should be spared from action, including when they fail to maintain roads in conditions suitable for safe driving and walking. But such action must also factor in the ground realities.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
In motor accidents, claims not restricted to third party in Supreme Court
Motor vehicle insurance protects a policyholder against claims made by a third party for damages due to the policyholder's actions, but what about a claim against injury/death of policyholder in an accident? Holding that family members of such a policyholder can also claim compensation, the Supreme Court has referred the issue to a larger bench given contradictory prior judgments on the matter. While hearing the compensation plea of a minor girl who lost both parents in a car accident, the SC said section 163A of Motor Vehicles Act could be invoked for such a claim, as it is a special provision which overrides not only the rest of the Act but also any other law in force. The minor had been awarded payout by the insurance company for the death of her mother but not for her father as he was himself the insured party. The insurance company held that the petitioner, legal heir of deceased vehicle owner, cannot at the same time be the liability holder and recipient of compensation. The bench said: '… Section 163A is not restricted to third party claim; without any requirement of establishing negligence, if death or permanent disability is caused by reason of motor accident'. 'It would override Sections 147 & 149 along with other provisions of the Act and the law regulating insurance as also the terms of the policy. This according to us is the intention of incorporating the non-obstante clause under Section 163A providing for no-fault liability claims '.


Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Daily Briefing: The next era of Indian cricket
Good morning! We begin today with a chilling case that seems right out of a Netflix thriller. Sample this: Jain Mathew, 55, went missing in December last year. For months, the police investigation hit a dead end — until two weeks ago, when someone used Jain's mobile phone to make a call. That single call led police to a surprising suspect: 68-year-old Sebastian, a wealthy man who hadn't even been on their radar. His arrest triggered a chain of revelations. Investigators could connect Sebastian to three other missing women cases, spanning nearly 20 years: Bindu Padmanabhan (2006), Aysha (2012), and Sindhu (2020). He was arrested after police recovered charred remains from a pit on his property. My colleague Shaju Philip has more details. On that note, let's get to the rest of today's edition. The young guns have done it! The England vs India Test series ended in a stunning 2-2 draw after both sides fought tooth and nail to secure victory. England was chasing 35 runs and India had four wickets to take at the start of the match on Monday. It was bowlers Mohammed Siraj and Prasidh Krishna's time to shine. One by one, the wickets fell, until England was just six runs away from a 3-1 victory. And they were willing to fight till the end. Chris Woakes was at the pitch with a dislocated shoulder, his one arm in a sling. All they needed was a shot over the ropes. Then Siraj, the tireless warrior, stepped in with a deadly yorker, handing England a crushing defeat. The series will go on to define the next era of Indian cricket. This was the first Test series without stalwarts like Rohit Sharma, Virat Kohli and R Ashwin. But the young team showed that they didn't miss the retired batting giants. When India's trusted fast bowler Jasprit Bumrah had to be rested, Siraj stepped up, leading the bowling attack. Later, Siraj would reveal how he manifested the win with a phone wallpaper with just one word: Believe. Moreover, Shubhman Gill came into his own as the captain, showing he could be both Kohli and Sharma. But he also showed that he wasn't either of them. The coach, Gautam Gambhir, and the selectors would involve him in the selection process, allowing him to take the final call. Read national sports editor Sandeep Dwivedi's riveting profile of Gill and how his hunger for perfection keeps him going. The English camp would have plenty of takeaways as well. As Sriram Veera points out, England must now reckon with the reality that their much-hyped Bazball philosophy may have done more harm than good. If anything, this young Indian team has exposed the mediocrity of the cricketing approach that Ben Stokes and his side continue to champion. Also read: How Prasidh Krishna found redemption in England Article 370 of the Constitution was abrogated on August 5, 2019, reorganising the state of Jammu and Kashmir into two Union Territories. The move was billed as the turning point that would bring peace and development to the Valley. In these past six years, a lot has changed in J&K. Political activity has resumed, but questions of full statehood hang heavy on the government. The recent Pahalgam terror attack has exposed gaps in the 'normalcy' narrative. We take a comprehensive look at the past six years. In our Opinion pages, meanwhile, Haseeb A Drabu, former finance minister of J&K, spotlights how the abrogation belied promises of economic prosperity, when in reality the UTs face a growth slowdown and high unemployment rates. Read. Unfair: Amid US President Donald Trump's criticisms of India's purchase of Russian oil and the subsequent tariff threats, New Delhi has issued a sharp response. A statement by the Ministry of External Affairs asserted that the targeting of India was unjust and unreasonable, given that the US and the European Union continue to trade with Russia. Meanwhile, as an India-US trade deal remains elusive, and the tariff deadline (August 7) looms near, one question is resonating in New Delhi's policy circles: What does a bad deal look like? The answer lies in the US-EU trade agreement, which is now being seen as a lopsided arrangement. Eye-opening: As eyewear unicorn Lenskart prepares for its Initial Public Offering (IPO), it filed the draft red herring prospectus (DRHP), aiming to raise Rs 2,150 crore through a fresh issue. Beyond its financials, the DRHP offers a lens into India's $10-billion eyewear market, one shaped by worsening eyesight among children, too much screen time, and too few optometrists. Rest in peace: Shibu Soren, former Jharkhand Chief Minister and JMM co-founder, passed away on Monday after a prolonged illness. Soren, known for his charisma and candour, was a cult-like figure among adivasis. From consolidating the Jharkhandi identity to fighting for its statehood, read all about Soren's political journey. Does the idea of doing nothing sound intriguing to you? Well, slow living is just that. But not in an unproductive, lazy way. Slow living is the deliberate act of giving your mind space to rest, wander, and simply be. Read my colleague Stela Dey's piece on why more and more millennials and Gen Z are choosing cosy night-ins over night-outs. 🎧 Before you go, do tune in to today's '3 Things' podcast episode, where the host sits down with reporters Sadak Modak and Apurva Vishwanath to break down the verdict that acquitted all accused in the Malegaon blast case. That's all for today, folks! Until tomorrow, Sonal Gupta

Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Former Brazilian President Bolsonaro faces house arrest after defying court orders
Troubled former Brazilian president Jair Bolsonaro has been placed under house arrest for his role in the country's attempted coup. This comes after he broke a social media ban, escalating a dramatic standoff between the court and the far-right politician accused of plotting a coup. The beleaguered politician has said that he will appeal the house arrest order and expressed surprise since he did not breach any terms. To be sure, it was Bolsonaro's supporters who broadcasted a live call with the leader, breaking the court's imposed social media ban on the former army captain. Bolsonaro, a close ally of US President Donald Trump, is currently facing trial in the Supreme Court over allegations that he attempted to remain in power following his defeat in the 2022 presidential election to Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva. Just last month, the court ordered him to wear an ankle monitor and imposed a ban on social media use after claims emerged that he sought to interfere with the trial through provocative online statements, which were amplified by his sons and supporters. Under the ban, third parties are barred from sharing his public remarks. On Sunday, allies of Bolsonaro, 70, defied the court order by broadcasting a live call between the former army captain and his son at a solidarity rally in Rio de Janeiro, one of several held across Brazil. Bolsonaro himself did not attend the rallies, having been ordered by the Supreme Court to stay home at night and at weekends throughout the trial. He faces a heavy prison sentence in the trial, which is expected to be concluded in the coming weeks. Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes reacted furiously, declaring Monday that the judiciary would not allow a defendant to "treat it like a fool" because of his "political and economic power." Criticizing Bolsonaro's "repeated failure" to comply with the court's restrictions, he ordered him placed under house arrest at his home in the capital Brasilia. He also barred the country's former leader (2019-2022) from receiving visitors, apart from his lawyers, and from using any mobile phones.