logo
The disturbing thread that ties together Trump's major moves so far

The disturbing thread that ties together Trump's major moves so far

Vox28-03-2025
is a senior politics correspondent at Vox, covering the White House, elections, and political scandals and investigations. He's worked at Vox since the site's launch in 2014, and before that, he worked as a research assistant at the New Yorker's Washington, DC, bureau.
Perhaps the biggest common theme of Donald Trump's second term is that his administration has aggressively used federal power to punish those deemed to be its — or his — enemies.
Some foreign students who criticized Israel have had their visas revoked and have been whisked into ICE detention.
Venezuelan nationals with tattoos — some likely members of a foreign gang, some likely not — have been deported to El Salvador and imprisoned there.
Major law firms that displeased Trump have been hit with executive orders aimed at driving their clients away and destroying their businesses.
Elite universities that were the site of protests or had policies the administration dislikes have seen hundreds of millions of dollars in research funding revoked.
Related A longtime target of the right is finally buckling under Trump pressure
It's a frightening turn for American governance. Trump and the hard-right appointees who staff this new administration seem intent on ruining the lives of the people they've deemed enemies of the state, punishing them with state power.
Trump officials are punishing enemies first — with no process or fairness beforehand
What sets much of this apart is that there is no semblance of process or fairness before any of these decisions are made.
Detentions, executive orders, and funding revocations come first — as do deportations, if the administration can get away with them.
After that, powerful institutions can possibly, with sufficient bowing and scraping, get these harsh actions rolled back (as the law firm Paul Weiss did and as Columbia University is trying to do). Less powerful people can only hope to sue in court and hope a judge will help them.
This lack of process beforehand makes it more likely that innocent people are wrongly swept up. But Trump officials don't seem to mind.
In their rush to deport Tren de Aragua members to El Salvador before the courts could stop them, they don't seem to care that they scooped up a gay Venezuelan makeup artist. In their zeal to revoke visas of 'antisemitic,' 'Hamas-supporting' foreign students, they don't seem to care that they may have detained a PhD student for co-writing op-eds in a campus newspaper.
Trump set the tone, but his appointees are enthusiastically participating
Trump and his MAGA true-believer appointees are clearly personally responsible for many of these policies aimed at their purported enemies. But more broadly, he's set an ethic that's pervaded the administration, even those who are less overtly allied with his movement.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio, for instance, bragged Thursday that he was personally responsible for revoking visas of hundreds of anti-Israel protestors. 'We do it every day. Every time I find one of these lunatics, I take away their visas,' he said.
Another telling anecdote came out of the Social Security Administration, currently run by acting appointee Leland Dudek — a career SSA official who decided to work with Elon Musk's 'Department of Government Efficiency' team and was then promoted to head the agency.
Earlier this month, the agency canceled a contract that allowed parents of newborns in Maine to get Social Security numbers for their new babies at the hospital. After criticism, the decision was reversed, but a mystery remained about why it happened at all. Was it a screw-up? Or was it deliberate punishment of Maine's people because of a frosty public exchange between Trump and the state's Democratic governor, Janet Mills? (Trump had threatened Mills with revoking federal funding over the state's policies on trans athletes, to which Mills responded, 'See you in court.')
It was indeed payback aimed at Mills, Dudek admitted to the New York Times last week. 'I was ticked at the governor of Maine for not being real cordial to the president,' he said, while acknowledging, 'I screwed up.'
Dudek wasn't even a longtime Trump crony (as seen in his willingness to actually admit screwing up). And if his account is correct, no one ordered him to target Maine. He just felt it was the appropriate thing to do when someone was rude to Donald Trump.
There's likely more to come
Though US citizens can't be summarily deported or ordered to leave the country, they can be retaliated against in other ways. For instance, Trump has long been clear about his desire to target his critics or political enemies with criminal prosecutions — but, unlike in his first term, he's appointed people like FBI director Kash Patel and interim US Attorney for the District of Columbia Ed Martin, who seem eager to actually make that happen.
An attempt by Martin to have Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer criminally investigated for comments he made in a speech flopped, but Martin has moved on to new targets.
One of those targets is Andrew Weissmann, who was a top prosecutor in special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation of Trump's ties to Russia, before becoming an MSNBC commentator. Earlier this month, Martin sent a threatening letter to Weissmann, demanding information about a decade-old matter he'd worked on at the Justice Department and alluding to impropriety. This seems like an obvious pretext for targeting Weissmann because he is an enemy of Trump.
Further targeting of blue states through withholding of federal funds is likely coming too, as seen in, for instance, Trump's executive order on elections this week.
Legal experts have said that Trump's revocation of funds in some cases — like the $400 million in grants to Columbia University he canceled — seems flatly illegal. But many targeted institutions have been reluctant to sue in court, fearing even worse retribution.
The problem is, though, that if this tactic keeps 'working' for Trump, he'll just keep using it, in even more dubious or unlawful ways.
Indeed, it's been startling how many institutions — corporations, elite law firms, and universities — have caved to Trump's pressure already. When will it stop? Will it stop?
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Don't Bomb Mexico, Mr. President
Don't Bomb Mexico, Mr. President

Wall Street Journal

time3 minutes ago

  • Wall Street Journal

Don't Bomb Mexico, Mr. President

The State Department designated eight organized-crime syndicates based in Latin America as 'foreign terrorist organizations,' or FTOs, in February. In July it added a ninth. Last week the New York Times reported that President Trump has signed a secret 'directive' to the Pentagon to 'begin using military force against certain Latin American drug cartels.' The White House declined to tell me if the Times story is true. But on Thursday Reuters reported that the U.S. deployment of air and naval resources to the Caribbean to combat cartels had begun. Whether their mission is interdiction or something more invasive remains unclear.

Fatal explosion at U.S. Steel's plant raises questions about its future despite heavy investment
Fatal explosion at U.S. Steel's plant raises questions about its future despite heavy investment

Los Angeles Times

time5 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Fatal explosion at U.S. Steel's plant raises questions about its future despite heavy investment

HARRISBURG, Pa. — The fatal explosion last week at U.S. Steel's Pittsburgh-area coal-processing plant has revived debate about its future just as the iconic American company was emerging from a long period of uncertainty. The fortunes of steelmaking in the United States — along with profits, share prices and steel prices — have been buoyed by years of friendly administrations in Washington that slapped tariffs on foreign imports and bolstered the industry's anticompetitive trade cases against China. Most recently, President Trump's administration postponed new hazardous air pollution requirements for the nation's roughly dozen coke plants, including Clairton Coke Works, where the blast occurred, and he approved U.S. Steel's nearly $15-billion acquisition by Japanese steelmaker Nippon Steel. Nippon Steel's promised infusion of cash has brought vows that steelmaking will continue in the Mon Valley, a river valley south of Pittsburgh long synonymous with steelmaking. 'We're investing money here. And we wouldn't have done the deal with Nippon Steel if we weren't absolutely sure that we were going to have an enduring future here in the Mon Valley,' David Burritt, U.S. Steel's chief executive, said at a news conference Tuesday, a day after the explosion. 'You can count on this facility to be around for a long, long time.' The explosion killed two workers and hospitalized 10 with a blast so powerful that it took hours to find two missing workers beneath charred wreckage and rubble. The cause is under investigation. The plant is considered the largest coking operation in North America and, along with a blast furnace and finishing mill up the Monongahela River, is one of a handful of integrated steelmaking operations left in the U.S. The explosion now could test Nippon Steel's resolve in propping up the nearly 110-year-old Clairton plant, or at least force it to spend more than it had anticipated. Nippon Steel didn't respond to a question as to whether the explosion will change its approach to the plant. A spokesperson for the company said in a statement that its 'commitment to the Mon Valley remains strong' and that it sent 'technical experts to work with the local teams in the Clairton Plant, and to provide our full support.' Meanwhile, Burritt said that he had talked to top Nippon Steel officials after the explosion and that 'this facility and the Mon Valley are here to stay.' U.S. Steel officials say that safety is their top priority and that they spend $100 million a year on environmental compliance at Clairton alone. Repairing Clairton, however, could be expensive, an investigation into the explosion could turn up more problems, and an official from the United Steelworkers union said it's a constant struggle to get U.S. Steel to invest in its plants. Besides that, production at the facility could be affected for some time. The plant has six batteries of ovens, and two — where the explosion occurred — were damaged. Two others are on a reduced production schedule because of the blast. There is no timeline to get the damaged batteries running again, U.S. Steel said. Accidents are nothing new at Clairton, which heats coal to high temperatures to make coke, a key component in steelmaking, and produces combustible gases as byproducts. An explosion in February injured two workers. Even as Nippon Steel was closing the deal in June, a breakdown at the plant dealt three days of a rotten egg odor into the air around it from elevated hydrogen sulfide emissions, the environmental group GASP reported. The Breathe Project, a public health organization, said U.S. Steel has been forced to pay $57 million in fines and settlements since Jan. 1, 2020, for problems at the Clairton plant. A lawsuit over a Christmas Eve fire at Clairton in 2018 that saturated the area's air for weeks with sulfur dioxide produced a withering assessment of conditions there. An engineer for the environmental groups that sued wrote that he 'found no indication that U.S. Steel has an effective, comprehensive maintenance program for the Clairton plant.' Clairton, he wrote, is 'inherently dangerous because of the combination of its deficient maintenance and its defective design.' U.S. Steel settled, agreeing to spend millions on upgrades. Matthew Mehalik, executive director of the Breathe Project, said U.S. Steel has shown more willingness to spend money on paying fines, lobbying the government and buying back shares to reward shareholders than making its plants safe. It's unclear whether Nippon Steel will change Clairton. Central to Trump's approval of the acquisition was Nippon Steel's promises to invest $11 billion into U.S. Steel's aging plants and to give the federal government a say in decisions involving domestic steel production, including plant closings. But much of the $2.2 billion that Nippon Steel has earmarked for the Mon Valley plants is expected to go toward upgrading the finishing mill, or building a new one. For years before the acquisition, U.S. Steel had signaled that the Mon Valley was on the chopping block. That left workers there uncertain whether they'd have jobs in a couple of years and whispering that U.S. Steel couldn't fill openings because nobody believed the jobs would exist much longer. In many ways, U.S. Steel's Mon Valley plants are relics of steelmaking's past. In the early 1970s, U.S. steel production led the world and was at an all-time high, thanks to 62 coke plants that fed 141 blast furnaces. Nobody in the U.S. has built a blast furnace since then, as foreign competition devastated the American steel industry and coal fell out of favor. Now, China is dominant in steel and heavily invested in coal-based steelmaking. In the U.S., there are barely a dozen coke plants and blast furnaces left, as the country's steelmaking has shifted to cheaper electric arc furnaces that use electricity, not coal. Blast furnaces won't entirely go away, analysts say, because they produce metals that are preferred by automakers, appliance makers and oil and gas exploration firms. Still, Christopher Briem, an economist at the University of Pittsburgh's Center for Social and Urban Research, questioned whether the Clairton plant really will survive much longer, given its age and condition. It could be particularly vulnerable if the economy slides into recession or the fundamentals of the American steel market shift, he said. 'I'm not quite sure it's all set in stone as people believe,' Briem said. 'If the market does not bode well for U.S. Steel, for American steel, is Nippon Steel really going to keep these things?' Levy writes for the Associated Press.

Russiagate prosecutions a must, DSA ties should disqualify and other commentary
Russiagate prosecutions a must, DSA ties should disqualify and other commentary

New York Post

time5 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Russiagate prosecutions a must, DSA ties should disqualify and other commentary

Conservative: Russiagate Prosecutions a Must 'Damning evidence' now shows 'conclusively' that 'Russiagate was a conspiracy — hatched, implemented and relentlessly promoted by top officials in the CIA, FBI and across the Obama-Biden-Clinton political machine to rig a presidential election and undermine a duly elected president,' fumes Tom Fitton at The Hill. And it corrupted 'institutions essential to protecting American liberty.' Yet 'those responsible' remain unpunished. CIA chief John Brennan and National Intelligence boss James Clapper 'lied to Congress and the American public.' Top 'Justice Department officials, such as Bruce Ohr,' acted as 'a conduit for anti-Trump smears.' James Comey and other 'leaders at the FBI' used 'the intelligence community's credibility to spread what they knew to be their own fiction as if it were truth.' 'America is a republic, not a banana republic. It's time for accountability, reform and a sharp reminder' that 'the people are sovereign, not unelected bureaucrats.' Culture desk: Fitness Test Offers Valuable Lessons For many children, recalls The Free Press's Kat Rosenfeld, the old Presidential Fitness meant confronting 'the humiliation and discomfort of being weak and slow,' hence its 2012 'retirement' as President Barack Obama promoted 'a kinder, gentler, more progressive worldview' that preferred 'inclusivity to merit.' Yet this leveling could 'move the nation toward institutionalized mediocrity' by 'making it taboo to even have standards at all.' Progressives faced with a high bar have sought 'to get rid of the bar'; let's welcome President Trump's return of the Fitness Test, since important 'lessons' come only with 'the bitter taste of failure on your tongue.' That is: Failure is 'one of the greatest motivators to self-betterment there is.' From the right: DSA Ties Should Disqualify Zohran Mamdani, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and other prominent progressives' membership in the Democratic Socialists of America membership have 'been treated gingerly,' gripes Commentary's Seth Mandel. Yet 'affiliation with the DSA should finally and rightfully be regarded as disqualifying for an elected official.' After all, the recent DSA national convention included a resolution making 'it an expellable offense to say 'Israel has a right to defend itself' or to 'have knowingly provided material aid to Israel,'' plus one 'censuring Ocasio-Cortez for being too pro-Israel.' Who wants to be associated with a 'hate group?' No way 'any politician's membership in such a group should be acceptable.' Eye on hate: The Left's Obsession With Assassins Praise for Shane Tamura, who killed four people, including the CEO of BlackStone, in a mass shooting in New York City last month, 'points to a growing belief,' especially on the left, that 'violent extremism is the only way to challenge a corrupted system,' warn Max Horder & Olivia Rose at City Journal. Most evidence suggested Tamura was targeting NFL offices, but 'an alternative narrative quickly emerged' on social media that 'claimed that Tamura was following in the footsteps' of Luigi Mangione. 'The prevalence of this chatter on social media reflects the unabated growth of what the Network Contagion Research Institute has termed 'assassination culture,'' which glorifies and cheers on political violence. 'The consequences for American civic life are ominous,' and the 'slow but steady rise' of this mentality 'bodes ill for any democracy.' Campus watch: Vindicated for Resisting DEI 'I was heartened to see my former employer, Duke University Health System, quietly reverse its commitment to woke racism this year,' cheers Kendall Conger at RealClear Investigations. A physician, Conger questioned Duke's insistence, supposedly 'guided by science,' that 'racism is a public health crisis' — and 'was fired because of it.' After a nurse reported him for his views on the subject, Duke forbade him to talk about it. Though counseled to keep quiet, he continued to ask questions, knowing that evil comes from 'good men holding their tongues.' In 2024, he was let go for being disruptive and had trouble finding work nearby. But now Duke has changed — and he feels 'vindicated.' He tells his kids: 'Never shy away from asking questions in the pursuit of truth.' — Compiled by The Post Editorial Board

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store