Underemployment rising as full-time opportunities decrease
A growing number of people are giving up their dream career, and settling for any job, or jobs, that will put food on the table.
In the March quarter, the unemployment rate jumped to 5.1%, and the number of people in full-time jobs fell by 45,000.
The only area that saw positive growth was part-time work, with 25,000 more people in those roles than the previous year, a 4% rise.
But some Kiwis have said for them, fewer hours is a last resort, applying for hundreds of jobs before settling for a part-time role.
When she's not busy juggling her two part-time jobs in the entertainment industry, Petra Elise is trawling job listings and writing cover letters.
It's been this way for a few years now, after she was made redundant from her full-time role during the pandemic.
Five years on she hasn't found a full-time job, now getting by on 24 hours of work a week.
"The reason I have these two part-time roles is I had to take what I could get pretty much. I obviously would much prefer one full-time role where I don't have to move my mindset out of one role and into the other role the next day."
Even for jobs she's fully qualified for, Elise said it is rare to get a response, let alone an interview.
She receives a $50 wage supplement, but even with that entitlement she says it's incredibly hard to get by.
"How I survive is extremely careful budgeting and not a lot of, in fact no fun. It's not really a life, it's living hand to mouth."
Although it is far from her ideal situation, Elise said managing to get these two jobs was no easy ride.
"I was on a WINZ benefit for about year, the amount I was eligible for was $360, so I was living on less than I'm living on now."
While she is passionate about the work she does, it is far from enough.
"I care deeply about the two part-time jobs I'm doing but there's just not enough money there for me to have as much of an impact, they can't afford to pay me for full-time work."
Elise isn't alone in her struggle to secure full-time work.
Craig Renney, economist at the New Zealand Council of Trade Unions, says the market's so saturated that the number of people settling for any job is also on the up.
"What we're seeing is that growth in that part-time work and often that's a measure of stress in the labour market. This is people who might well want to work full-time, can't find full-time work but will happily take any job just to keep an income coming into their household." Rising underemployed
Part-time workers who want more work but can't find it are classified as underemployed.
In the past two years the number of people in this situation has risen by 26%.
Now over a fifth of people working part-time are struggling to find more work despite looking.
"In the second quarter of 2023, there were around 92,600 people who were basically looking for more work, couldn't find it, basically were underemployed. That number is now 127,000, so there's an extra 30,000 people just inside a couple of years, who are in that want more work can't get it basket." Renney said.
Olivia Duncan has been unemployed for just over a month, leaving her last job after the company ran out of money and her pay checks stopped coming in.
The job hunt has been no easy ride. After applying for close to 100 full-time roles she has had to expand her search to include part-time work.
"I started off looking for just full-time roles, because I've always worked full-time. But then I expanded to also look for part-time roles, just because I was really needing anything and I figured if I took a part-time role, I could always supplement my income with another part-time role or maybe do some kind of side hustle."
Duncan said most jobs she has applied for have had hundreds of applicants.
While she's now ready to settle for any amount of work, she's keeping an open mind and hopes that even a part-time job will send her career in a new direction.
"I do not have a linear career path at all, my career has been all over the place. This has really made me expand my ideas of where I might like my career to go. I'm considering so many different things."
A patchwork career however, isn't always taken on as a necessity, with some choosing to ditch the linear career for something different. A new career path
Amy Wang is all too familiar with creating her own career path.
Suffering from burnout after working in an IT role for seven years, she decided it was time to pave her own way, now following her passions as a musician.
"I quit my job in tech about 2.5 years ago, since then I took a little break after because I was quite burnt out, so I just took a break to rest and try and figure out what I wanted to do and just been trying a whole bunch of things to see what works."
She now works close to seven different jobs; some days teaching music, others producing and performing it, or even leading a kickboxing class.
While it is harder than she expected, she says the benefits are worth it.
"It's just more rewarding, I think, even though it's quite scary I find it more exciting, like I'm creating my own opportunities."
Jeff de Jong, Manager Skills and Employment Policy at the Ministry of Business and Employment said the unemployment rate is forceast to start to reduce from the end of this year.
"Reserve Bank research has shown that during a recession, organisations generally respond to reduced demand for labour by reducing hours first, before resorting to reducing staff numbers. During a recovery, the opposite is true: hours worked by existing employees increase before organisations start bringing on new workers."
"We are currently seeing people wanting more hours than their employer is offering."
"As the economy strengthens and labour demand recovers, underemployment is expected to decline."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
3 hours ago
- Scoop
ACT Welcomes Game-changing Building Consent Reforms
ACT Housing, Building and Construction spokesman and Licensed Building Practitioner Cameron Luxton is celebrating moves to end joint and several liability and to allow for mergers of Building Consent Authorities. 'Tradies have been railing for years against cost and delays caused by badly incentivised councils. The joint and several liability system leaves councils and ratepayers on the hook for other people's defective work. Under these conditions, it's a miracle when a council signs off on anything. 'ACT has campaigned to fix this madness, and now we're getting there. Moving to proportionate liability, where each party is responsible for their own work, will cut the risk-averse red tape that turns small projects into headaches. "Of course, this leaves the question of what local councils will actually be left liable for, and how far the councils' liabilities will extend in practice if they remain liable for inspections. I look forward to seeing how the legislation handles this. "ACT also welcomes moves to allow mergers of Building Consent Authorities. We've repeatedly highlighted the madness of having 66 different BCAs, each with their own interpretation of the Building Code, meaning a builder's paperwork can be rejected in one district but accepted in the next. "Some councils have maintained positive relationships with builders while others have struggled to keep up, and home builders have had issues with poorly skilled council staff assessing consents. Consolidation will allow poorly performing councils to adopt best practice from their neighbours, and pooling resources will help to ensure a more consistent level of professionalism in processing consents. 'Whether you're building, buying, or renovating, these reforms are good news. Both owners and buyers have a stake in clearing the consenting quagmire. If we want a property-owning democracy, we need a system that's faster, fairer, and less costly. These changes move us closer to that vision, and ACT is proud to see our advocacy reflected in this overhaul. 'With ACT in Government, we're tackling big challenges with positive sum thinking. It would be easy to say the solution to expensive housing is to finger-point and to whack homeowners and investers with new taxes. Instead, we're getting bureaucracy out of the way so Kiwis can build more homes and create the conditions for prosperity.'
Scoop
4 hours ago
- Scoop
How Jacinda Ardern's ‘Groundbreaking' Climate Law Has Become ‘A Shell'
Article – RNZ When New Zealand passed the Zero Carbon Act in 2019, it was hailed as a world-first – a law with cross-party support that would enshrine climate ambition in legislation. Paired with the country's first Emissions Reduction Plan and billions of dollars in ring-fenced climate funding, it represented then-Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern's promise to tackle her generation's 'nuclear-free moment' head on. Six years on, analysis suggests the law has been hollowed out to little more than a husk. While its legal targets remain, nearly every policy designed to meet them has been scrapped, most without replacement. Data collated by RNZ shows that since it came to power in 2023, the coalition government has repealed, defunded, or delayed dozens of climate initiatives – from electric bus funds to agricultural emissions pricing to subsidies for solar and wind. Officials have been ordered to stop planning for lower car use. Climate scientists have lost their jobs. And this month, a ban on exploration for oil and gas was repealed. 'The Zero Carbon Act is a shell,' said 350 Aotearoa strategic adviser Adam Currie. 'It was supposed to be our lifeboat, but this government is deliberately drilling holes in it.' Just a handful of the original policies remain. Instead, the coalition's climate plan leans heavily on a strengthened Emissions Trading Scheme, alongside pledges to double renewable energy, invest in carbon capture, and reduce agricultural emissions through new technology. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has insisted the country is 'doing everything we can' to meet its targets, by focusing on the sectors that produce the greatest emissions. But the Climate Change Commission's 2025 monitoring report is now warning the coalition's plan won't be enough. New Zealand is likely to meet its first emissions budget (to 2025), the commission's July report said. But for the second and third emissions budgets, covering the decade to 2035, the commission finds current policies are unlikely to deliver. 'In many sectors, there is no clear policy pathway to cut emissions at the pace and scale required,' the report said, highlighting agriculture, transport, and energy as risk areas. 'More work is needed – and soon – to lay the groundwork for emissions cuts after 2030.' The commission was particularly concerned about the lack of plans for gross emissions reductions – actually cutting fossil fuel use – as opposed to relying on forestry to offset emissions. It noted that in the third budget period, 46 percent of planned reductions come from forest removals alone. 'There is risk in relying on a single sector for a large proportion of reductions,' it said. Delaying real action risked forcing more costly and disruptive changes later, and increased the burden on future generations, the commission said. The government will formally respond to the commission in October. But Minister for Climate Change Simon Watts said the amendments it had made to the first emissions reduction plan were allowed under the law. 'As a government we are prioritising policies that deliver cost-effective climate action for New Zealand,' Watts said. 'We removed actions that weren't expected to directly reduce emissions and, based on our current projections, we're still on track to meet our first emissions budget.' At a time when many governments are backing away from climate goals, National has said – despite pressure from its coalition partners – it will not repeal the Zero Carbon Act. But critics argue that undermining it is no better. 'In our view, the Act clearly requires a more ambitious and credible climate strategy – one that is less high-risk and reliant on pine trees,' said Lawyers for Climate Action NZ's Jessica Palairet. 'The government is also falling short of a core purpose of the Act – to provide a framework for clear, stable climate policy.' Labour's climate spokesperson Deborah Russell said the coalition's sole focus on the Emissions Trading Scheme, rather than considering other measures, had rendered the Act largely ineffective. 'They're fulfilling the letter of the law in responding to the budgets and doing the plans, but they're not showing how they're going to get the emissions down.' When is a law not a law? The Zero Carbon Act 2019 was not a standalone law – it amended the existing Climate Change Response Act 2002, transforming it from a policy tool into a legislative backbone for emissions reduction. The main function was to set legally binding long-term targets, intended to align with global efforts to limit warming to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels. The Act committed Aotearoa to reaching net zero greenhouse gas emissions (excluding biogenic methane) by 2050, and to cutting biogenic methane from livestock and waste by 24-47 percent by 2050, with an interim target of 10 percent by 2030. To ensure progress, the Act also introduced a system of five-yearly emissions budgets, which cap total emissions across the economy. These budgets are not sector-specific but are supported by Emissions Reduction Plans (ERPs), which outline how the government intends to meet them through policies and funding across energy, transport, agriculture, and industry. This was meant to 'anchor climate ambition in legislation', making a stable framework that would survive election cycles. The rest of the climate policies – from transport subsidies to decarbonisation incentives – were meant to fill out its bones. The following sections show what remains of that original body of work, what has been stripped away, and what has replaced it. Still standing (sort of) NZ Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS): The ETS is the main market tool used to reduce emissions. The Labour government aimed to adjust its settings to balance direct emissions cuts and offsets like forestry. The coalition government instead wants to restore confidence by ending vintaging, treating forestry NZUs (New Zealand Units) equally, and reducing the number of credits available. Centre for Climate Action on Agricultural Emissions: The centre is a core component of the Luxon government's climate change response and one of the only major policies to continue from the Labour government. It houses both the national agriculture emissions research centre and a public/private partnership named AgriZeroNZ, designed to accelerate the development and uptake of emissions-reduction tools, practices, and technologies on farms. Electric Vehicle (EV) charging infrastructure: Labour's prior commitment to improving electric vehicle charging infrastructure across New Zealand continues, although the coalition government shifted from using grants to using concessionary loans, and light EVs began paying Road User Charges (RUCs) from April 2024. The government's target is 10,000 public EV charging points by 2030, however there are currently under 1400 in commission. Improved insulation standards: Efforts to improve insulation standards for new buildings, aiming for significantly reduced energy requirements for heating, remain ongoing despite initial plans to roll them back. Grant scheme for clean heavy vehicles: The Low Emissions Heavy Vehicle Fund aims to encourage businesses to adopt cleaner heavy vehicles, including trucks, heavy vans, and non-public transport buses. The fund received new funding in 2024. Cheaper public transport: Half-price public transport for under 25s and free transport for kids ended last year, but the discount remains in place for community service card holders. Regulated product stewardship for refrigerants: A mandatory product stewardship scheme for refrigerants, initially investigated under ERP1, is coming into effect from 2025. Sustainable aviation fuels partnership: Collaboration with Air New Zealand on sustainable aviation fuels remains ongoing. Coal boiler phase-outs: The government's commitment to replace all remaining coal boilers in schools by 2025 remains in place, alongside the broader ban on new low- and medium-temperature coal boilers and the phase-out of existing ones by 2037. Develop a Māori climate strategy: This initiative is intended to elevate te ao Māori and mātauranga Māori within the overall climate response. Despite a funding cut, this initiative remains ongoing. Delayed, defunded or discontinued Many distinct policies and the overall framing of the Ardern era's emissions reductions plan (ERP1) have been altered, put on hold, or had funding cut by the current government. These include: Agricultural emissions pricing: ERP1 envisioned an emissions pricing mechanism for agriculture by 1 January 2025. The current government has delayed this to no later than 2030 and committed to keeping agriculture out of the NZ ETS. This is a fundamental change from the previous government's approach under the He Waka Eke Noa model. Climate Emergency Response Fund (CERF): The ERP1 established the CERF, which ring-fenced revenue from the ETS for climate initiatives, with an initial payment of NZ$4.5 billion. The current government ended the CERF in May 2024, meaning future climate investments will go through the usual Budget process. This discontinuation is estimated to result in a loss of 11-24 million tonnes CO2e of abatement over the first, second, and third emissions budget periods. Clean car discount: This initiative, which aimed to make electric vehicles more affordable, was an ERP1 policy. It was stopped on 31 December 2023. Sustainable biofuels obligation: This was an ERP1 initiative aimed at reducing freight emissions. It was discontinued as part of a government policy refocus in February 2023. Oil and gas exploration ban: The Labour-led government banned offshore oil and gas exploration. The current government reversed this ban. This reversal is estimated to lead to an extra 14.2 million tonnes of emissions to 2035, and 51.5 million tonnes of CO2 emissions up to 2050. Subsidies to large carbon polluters: Climate Change Minister Simon Watts rejected advice from Inland Revenue and Treasury to review hundreds of millions of dollars in climate grants to major emitters like NZ Steel, Methanex, Rio Tinto, and Fletcher Building, despite findings of 'very limited results'. Science sector reforms and cuts: The Te Ara Paerangi – Future Pathways science-system reform programme has been discontinued. There have also been job cuts at the National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research (NIWA) which critics say will negatively impact climate change science, including marine biodiversity, climate modelling, and physical oceanography. Transport initiatives: The ERP1 aimed to improve travel choices by providing convenient, affordable public transport, walkways, and cycle lanes. The current government has ordered officials to end work on programmes that would reduce vehicle kilometres travelled (VKT) by passenger cars through providing alternatives like public and active transport. It also cut an initiative to increase the uptake of e-bikes, ended some public transport subsidies, got rid of equity measures to help low-income households access low-emissions cars, and defunded a $56 million fund specifically for electric buses. Auckland Light Rail and Let's Get Wellington Moving were canned, although the City Rail Link and extra Auckland busways will continue. A commitment to set a high threshold for investing in new roads was also discontinued. The current government is instead prioritising motorway funding and increasing speed limits. Equity and 'just transition' focus: Several ERP1 actions related to an equitable transition have been discontinued, including those which seek to support industries and workers to retrain in low-emissions jobs. The development of an income insurance scheme was also cut. Circular economy and bioeconomy strategy: ERP1 included a Circular Economy and Bioeconomy Strategy and supporting businesses moving to circular economy models. These actions have been stopped. Energy efficiency rebates: ERP1 included rebates for energy-efficient equipment. This has been stopped. New fossil-fuel baseload generation ban: ERP1 included a ban on new fossil-fuel baseload generation. This has been cancelled. New Zealand Battery Project: ERP1 stated that options for dry-year electricity storage through the New Zealand Battery Project would be investigated. This has been cancelled. Gas transition plan: ERP1 included developing a gas transition plan. This was associated with the Labour government's ban on offshore oil and gas exploration and has been abandoned with the reintroduction of exploration. Government Investment in Decarbonising Industry (GIDI) Fund: In 2020, the government created a $70m fund to incentivise companies with large fossil-fuel boilers to decarbonise. It has been closed to new applications. The estimated loss in emissions reductions from discontinuing the GIDI fund is 4.3 million tonnes of CO2e for 2026-2030. Forestry in the ETS: The Labour government introduced changes for 'permanent forestry' in the ETS from 1 January 2023. The National-led coalition has announced an independent review of forestry in the ETS. The government is also limiting whole-farm conversions to NZ ETS forestry to protect highly productive farmland. Monitoring renewable electricity target: While ERP1 set an aspirational target of 50 percent of total final energy consumption from renewable sources by 2035, monitoring progress towards this target has been stopped. Climate finance: The New Zealand Green Investment Finance (NZGIF), a fund established to support renewable energy and other low-emission projects, has been stopped. Pacific climate finance: Future climate finance to help our Pacific neighbours was cut from $250m to $100m this year. Climate-Related Disclosures (CRD) Regime: The government has proposed raising thresholds so the regime applies to fewer large entities and reducing the liability exposure for entity directors. Warmer Kiwi Homes initiative: Funding for the Warmer Kiwi Homes scheme, including subsidies for hot water heating, low-cost energy efficiency measures, and an LED lighting scheme were cut, alongside funding for a community-focused outreach programme to target hard-to-reach households. Waste management: The government put four out of five waste minimisation policies on hold in 2024, including plans to improve recycling systems and introduce a kerbside food scraps composting scheme. The Waste Minimisation Fund also had its funding cut. Tikanga-based agriculture programmes: Dedicated funding for programs to support Māori aspirations in agriculture was cut. Native trees to absorb carbon: Funding for Establishing Native Forests at Scale, a research and planting programme, was cut by $50m in Budget 2024. Dedicated climate-focused farm advisory and extension services: This was intended to include multichannel information campaigns, extension programmes (workshops, action groups), and growing a pipeline of trusted industry advisers. This has been stopped, although support continues through existing public and private advisory services. National Adaptation Plan: The coalition government discontinued a number of measures from the first National Adaptation Plan (NAP1) including work on risk management and planning for managed retreat. Although ERP2 outlines three adaptation goals, the Climate Change Commission noted there was not enough information to assess whether they are achievable. What's Replacing It Carbon Capture, Utilisation, and Storage (CCUS): The government is developing an enabling regulatory regime for CCUS, with legislation expected this year, to allow industries to access this technology for emissions reduction and removal. Fast-track approvals bill: The controversial Fast-track Approvals Bill is designed to streamline and accelerate the consenting process for various development and infrastructure projects, including renewable energy. Critics say it allows the 'override of environmental laws' and does not give sufficient weight to climate considerations, potentially making it more difficult to meet emissions budgets. Methane review: An independent review of biogenic methane science and targets has been initiated to provide up-to-date scientific evidence regarding methane's warming impact. It is widely expected the government will drop the methane target post-review. Electrify NZ: This aims to double renewable energy by 2050. This includes streamlining consenting processes through the Fast-track Approvals Bill. Work is underway to develop a regime for offshore renewable energy by mid-2025. Adaptation framework: Work is underway on an adaptation framework that aims to minimize long-predictable funding, improve information flows, and address market failures.
Scoop
7 hours ago
- Scoop
Street Smart And Keep New Zealand Beautiful Partner To Tackle Litter And Protect New Zealand's Environment
Street Smart, a community initiative focused on reducing street litter that enters stormwater systems and pollutes our oceans, has announced a partnership with Keep New Zealand Beautiful (KNZB), New Zealand's leading not-for-profit organisation dedicated to protecting and enhancing the environment. Every year, tonnes of litter dropped on our streets wash into drains and can end up in rivers, harbours, and oceans. Street Smart was created to make it easier for people to do the right thing - right when it matters most. A Simple Solution with a Big Impact Street Smart uses highly visible decals and stickers to signal that a business or household is doing their part - and inviting others to join in. The message is simple: 'My bin – is your bin.' For Businesses: A Street Smart window decal means the business commits to clearing litter within a 10-metre radius of their premises each day. Members of the public are welcome to place street litter in their bin - no need to carry it further or leave it behind. For Residents: A Street Smart wheelie bin sticker shows the household supports the initiative. If there's space in the bin, anyone can drop in litter they've picked up nearby, helping keep the street clean for all. This visible commitment builds a culture of shared responsibility, making it easier for communities to stop litter at the source before it reaches our waterways. Strength in Partnership By partnering with KNZB, Street Smart gains a national platform to grow awareness and participation, while KNZB is able to extend its environmental impact with a practical, community-driven tool. Together, they aim to inspire more New Zealanders to protect their streets, waterways, and coastlines. Quotes: 'Street Smart is about creating awareness that what we drop on the street doesn't just vanish - it travels through stormwater systems and ends up polluting our oceans. Partnering with KNZB allows us to take that message to a national scale.' – Richard Harri, Founder, Street Smart 'Keep New Zealand Beautiful is proud to partner with Street Smart. Together we can empower more New Zealanders to understand the journey of litter and take simple steps that make a big environmental difference.' – Wayne Gazley, National Support Manager, KNZB About Street Smart: Street Smart is a grassroots initiative that raises awareness of how litter on our streets ends up in stormwater systems and pollutes our oceans. Through simple decals for businesses and residents, Street Smart makes it easier for people to do the right thing and take collective action for cleaner communities. About Keep New Zealand Beautiful (KNZB): Since 1967, KNZB has been New Zealand's leading environmental charity, inspiring Kiwis to care for and protect their local environments. Through initiatives like Clean Up Week and nationwide beautification projects, KNZB works to create cleaner, greener, and more beautiful communities.
