Kemp keeps Republicans on edge as he mulls Georgia Senate bid
Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp (R) is at the center of intense speculation as Republicans wait to see whether the popular two-term governor will run against Sen. Jon Ossoff (D-Ga.) next year.
Republicans believe Kemp would clear the field and be the party's most formidable candidate against Ossoff, a first-term senator who beat a Trump-backed Republican in one of the biggest upsets of the 2020 election cycle.
'It's kind of the parlor game in Georgia right now,' quipped prominent conservative commentator Erick Erickson of the 'will-he-or-won't-he' decision Kemp has to make.
'Everybody hopes he runs in '26, but he's not really given an indication right now as to what he does.'
During an interview this week with Martha Zoller, a conservative radio host who once worked for Kemp, the GOP governor — who's been busy trying to pass tort reform before the end of the Georgia Legislature's session in April — offered no indication about his future moves.
At the same time, he didn't waste the opportunity to remind listeners about his role in Georgia's elections last cycle.
'I tell people, Martha, my focus right now is on my day job. I got two responsibilities outside my family and my business, and that is, number one is I'm the governor of the great state of Georgia,' he said.
'And we made a commitment during this last campaign cycle, when I was helping House candidates, helping President Trump win Georgia and lot of other good people on the ballot, that we would deliver on the things that we were promising. And that's what I'm focused on doing the next two and a half months during the legislative session.'
Kemp is under some pressure to challenge Ossoff.
Sen. Tim Scott (R-S.C.), chair of the Senate Republicans' campaign arm, told Semafor last month that 'we are looking for a way to make our No. 1 recruit a senator,' adding that Kemp 'would be the best candidate in Georgia we've had for a very long time.'
The conservative Club for Growth released polling last month offering hypothetical match-ups between Ossoff and a handful of Republican candidates. Kemp was the only Republican who beat Ossoff in a head-to-head match-up scenario.
'I think any conversation about a challenger to Jon Ossoff starts with Brian Kemp,' said Stephen Lawson, a Republican strategist who worked on former Sen. Kelly Loeffler's (R-Ga.) 2020 campaign. 'He would be, hands down, the best candidate to take on and, I believe, defeat Jon Ossoff.'
If Kemp decides against the challenge, several contenders are waiting in the wings.
Rep. Buddy Carter (R-Ga.) and state Insurance Commissioner John King have both expressed interest in the race, and Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) is leaving the door open to run for the Senate or governor.
Ryan Mahoney, a senior political adviser to Rep. Rich McCormick (R-Ga.), confirmed to The Hill that the congressman was mulling a bid.
'Jon Ossoff partnered with Joe Biden to enact a radical agenda that spurred crippling inflation and historic illegal immigration,' Mahoney said in a statement. 'Of course Dr. McCormick is considering a run for Senate. Georgians deserve a champion for their families, our values, and America's future.'
Another name that has been floated is Rep. Mike Collins (R-Ga.), a two-term congressman from Jackson, Ga., who's gained attention for sponsoring the Laken Riley Act, which President Trump signed into law last month.
'I support the Draft Kemp movement,' Collins told The Hill in a statement. 'Our governor can win that seat. But if he takes a pass, I'll talk with President Trump and see who he needs us to support to make sure he has another vote in the Senate.'
Joanna Rodriguez, a spokesperson for the Senate Republicans' campaign arm, said that while Kemp would be the strongest GOP candidate on paper, a number of Republicans could keep the race competitive.
'We do feel like we have a very deep bench in Georgia of talent. It is a very solidly red state, and so while Brian Kemp would be the most formidable candidate, absolutely, it is still a very competitive race, regardless of who our nominee ends up being,' she said.
If Kemp doesn't run, Republicans expressed confidence but expect a close race.
'Somebody that doesn't carry the name ID and reputation and financing of Brian Kemp is going to be in a dogfight against Jon Ossoff, but folks know that he's beatable. Georgia is a center-right state,' said Cole Muzio, a Kemp ally who is the president of Frontline Policy Council and Frontline Policy Action.
Erickson predicted it would be a 'messy primary' if Kemp doesn't run.
Democrats, for their part, see Ossoff as a formidable candidate.
'Sen. Ossoff has quickly established himself as a workhorse in the Senate, and no matter who Republicans nominate, they're going to find that they face a difficult road ahead in this campaign, because of the strength of Sen. Ossoff's record on behalf of his state, as well as the fact that he is a proven and formidable campaigner who knows how to win tough races,' David Bergstein, a spokesperson for the Senate Democrats' campaign arm, told The Hill.
One looming variable is what role Trump might play, if any, in the GOP primary.
Trump and Kemp haven't always seen eye to eye after the governor and Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger (R) rejected efforts to overturn the 2020 election results in Trump's favor.
Kemp received Trump's endorsement in his first bid for governor in 2018, but the president backed former Sen. David Perdue (R-Ga.) in the GOP primary against Kemp during the governor's 2022 reelection bid. Kemp went on to handily defeat Perdue by more than 50 points in the primary.
The rift bubbled up again last year when Trump railed against Kemp on Truth Social, noting Kemp's wife's remarks that she would write in her husband's name in the presidential race. The GOP governor pushed back at Trump on social platform X, saying 'leave my family out of it.'
The two have since worked to patch up their relationship, sharing kind remarks about each other while touring storm damage following Hurricane Helene months later. The two were also seen together at Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida last month ahead of Inauguration Day.
'Everything's been positive,' a Georgia GOP operative who requested anonymity to speak candidly said of the relationship between the two men, adding 'there's been no indication that the, you know, relationship would sour or anything like that.'
Republicans don't want to lose an opportunity to defeat Ossoff because of their candidate.
The GOP felt it had a plum opportunity to beat Sen. Raphael Warnock (D-Ga.) during the 2022 cycle. Trump endorsed former football star Herschel Walker, who won the GOP primary but whose personal controversies dogged him in the general election.
Jay Morgan, a lobbyist and former executive director for the state GOP, noted many positions, including Senate, governor and lieutenant governor, would be on the ballot in the state next year.
'You go right down the line, so it's going to have to be a team effort, and nobody wants a statewide candidate who's the weak link,' he said. 'We've gone down that road.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gizmodo
30 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
MAGA Freaks Out as Man Arrested for Allegedly Handing Out ‘Bionic' Face Shields to Protesters
Chaos has been happening in isolated areas of Los Angeles, where federal forces and the LAPD are clashing with angry protesters and rioters. The Trump administration claims it is maintaining public order against lawlessness. California's governor, Gavin Newsom, meanwhile, says that the White House is engaged in an authoritarian power grab. As the drama in the city continues, a recent arrest would seem to be yet another opportunity for both sides to bicker with one another about who is right. A man named Alejandro Theodoro Orellana was arrested by the FBI on Thursday morning and is now expected to face a charge of conspiracy to commit civil disorders. U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli, who was appointed by Trump's Attorney General Pam Bondi in April, announced Orellana's arrest on social media, writing, 'Alejandro Theodoro Orellana was arrested this morning by @FBILosAngeles on an allegation of Conspiracy to Commit Civil Disorders (18 USC 371) for distributing face shields to suspected rioters on Tuesday.' He added: 'We are moving quickly to identify and arrest those involved in organizing and/or supporting civil disorder in Los Angeles.' In case you missed that, it would appear that Orellana has been arrested because he helped distribute gas masks to protesters. Pictures of the supposed masks that have circulated on social media seem to show that they are a 'bionic' face shield designed to protect against tear gas. Orellana's arrest is now being used by authorities to bolster a claim made by President Trump, which is that the protests in LA are being funded and organized by outside groups. 'These are radical left lunatics that you're dealing with. They're tough. They're smart. They're probably paid many of them. As you know, they're professionals,' Trump said during a press conference on Wednesday. Relatedly, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt highlighted Orellana's arrest on social media on Thursday. 'Once again, President Trump was right,' Leavitt wrote on X. 'The President rightfully raised the important question of who is organizing and funding these dangerous riots in Los Angeles. This morning, the FBI arrested Alejandro Theodoro Orellana for conspiracy to commit civil disorders after handing out face shields to anti-ICE rioters.' This whole thing is bizarre for many reasons, but perhaps the most bizarre is that, despite the fact that cars have been set on fire and federal buildings have been attacked, one of the only people whose arrest has been actively platformed by the Trump administration is a guy whose sole alleged crime (as far as we know) is helping to hand out protective face coverings so that people's eyes don't get burned by tear gas. Also, handing out gas masks is not a crime, so what are officials even really talking about? It's not totally clear. It's easy to feel like they just arrested this guy for nothing. Many other things about the incident remain unclear. The Daily Mail reports that Orellana was not the person who actually handed out the masks, and was only driving the vehicle that delivered them. Another, so far unidentified woman, is said to have actually handed out the masks. When reached for comment by Gizmodo, a public information officer for the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Central District of California did little to clarify the situation. They said, 'Mr. Orellana was arrested today. We expect his initial appearance will be scheduled for tomorrow at 1:30 p.m. PDT in U.S. District Court in Los Angeles.' The officer added that the office anticipates that Orellana will be charged with conspiracy to commit civil disorders and aiding and abetting civil disorders. There have been over 350 arrests in recent days, and the LA district attorney is expected to begin bringing cases soon, so Orellana is unlikely to be the last protester to grace the headlines. Still, right-wingers have been having a field day with his arrest and have used the incident to spin a larger conspiratorial narrative. The usual cast of MAGA voices have jumped into the fray to imply that Orellana is associated with some sort of vast conspiracy to 'fund' and coordinate the protests in LA. 'This militant and his network are part of the conspiracy to raise cash to buy riot gear,' MAGA influencer Any Ngo posted on Thursday. 'Who is funding and supplying the insurgents in Los Angeles and in other cities? The FBI has arrested the insurgency leader observed handing out $60 'bionic shield' face masks to rioters,' another frequent conspiracy poster with over 600,000 followers wrote. The Daily Signal, a conservative news site that was originally created by the Heritage Foundation, recently ran a news article entitled: 'Who Organized the LA Anti-ICE Protests That Escalated Into Riots?' It's incredibly unclear who is doing what in LA, so—hypothetically—it's not totally out of the realm of possibility that someone is giving supplies to some of the activists. But, last I checked, that's not a crime—nor is not wanting to get hit in the face with tear gas.
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ask Jordan: Who authorized the El Salvador prison contract?
'Who authorized the $6 million contract with taxpayer money [to imprison immigrants in El Salvador]?' — Gina Hi Gina, Your question provides a platform to spotlight a new lawsuit — the first of its kind, per the plaintiffs who brought it. The suit aims to invalidate the agreement between the Trump administration and El Salvador to remove people from the U.S. and hold them incommunicado and potentially indefinitely in a Salvadoran prison known for human rights abuses. To answer your specific question, the complaint that launched the suit said the State Department made the agreement. As for the possible legal basis to strike down the deal, the complaint cites a federal law called the Administrative Procedure Act, which requires federal agency actions to be both reasonable and reasonably explained. The lawsuit argues the agreement fails to meet those requirements because it is 'arbitrary and capricious' and 'was entered into without any legal basis.' While it called the facts 'extraordinary,' the suit says the application of the law to the deal is an 'ordinary' one requiring striking it down. The plaintiffs are a coalition of groups: Robert F. Kennedy Human Rights, the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, Immigrant Defenders Law Center, Immigration Equality and the California Collaborative for Immigrant Justice, all of whom are represented by Democracy Forward. (RFK Human Rights, which is named for former senator and attorney general Robert F. Kennedy Sr., not the current health and human services secretary, is also representing itself.) It's still early in the new case, which was assigned to U.S. District Judge James Boasberg, Washington, D.C.'s chief federal trial judge, who is also presiding over separate litigation stemming from the administration's illegal Salvadoran renditions. The government hasn't yet responded in court to this latest suit; we don't know how it's going to play out or when it will be resolved. But the case provides another possible legal tool against one of the centerpieces of Trump's second-term agenda. Whatever the result of this latest litigation, it may uncover more information about the agreement along the way. Have any questions or comments for me? Please submit them on this form for a chance to be featured in the Deadline: Legal Blog and newsletter. This article was originally published on
32 minutes ago
As legal fight over Guard deployment plays out, Noem vows to continue Trump's immigration crackdown
LOS ANGELES -- Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem pledged to carry on with the Trump administration's immigration crackdown despite waves of unrest across the U.S. Hours after her comment Thursday, a judge directed the president to return control to California over National Guard troops he deployed after protests erupted over the immigration crackdown, but an appeals court quickly put the brakes on that and temporarily blocked the order that was to go into effect on Friday. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals scheduled a hearing on the matter for Tuesday. The federal judge's temporary restraining order said the Guard deployment was illegal and both violated the Tenth Amendment and exceeded President Donald Trump's statutory authority. The order applied only to the National Guard troops and not Marines who were also deployed to the LA protests. The judge said he would not rule on the Marines because they were not out on the streets yet. Gov. Gavin Newsom who had asked the judge for an emergency stop to troops helping carry out immigration raids, had praised the order before it was blocked saying 'today was really about a test of democracy, and today we passed the test" and had said he would be redeploying Guard soldiers to 'what they were doing before Donald Trump commandeered them.' White House spokesperson Anna Kelly said the president acted within his powers and that the federal judge's order 'puts our brave federal officials in danger. The district court has no authority to usurp the President's authority as Commander in Chief." The developments unfolded as protests continued in cities nationwide and the country braced for major demonstrations against Trump over the weekend. Noem said the immigration raids that fueled the protests would move forward and agents have thousands of targets. 'This is only going to continue until we have peace on the streets of Los Angeles,' she said during a news conference that was interrupted by shouting from U.S. Sen. Alex Padilla, a California Democrat who was forcibly removed from the event. Newsom has warned that the military intervention is part of a broader effort by Trump to overturn norms at the heart of the nation's democracy. He also said sending Guard troops on the raids has further inflamed tensions in LA. So far the protests have been centered mostly in downtown near City Hall and a federal detention center where some immigrants are being held. Much of the sprawling city has been spared from the protests. On the third night of an 8 p.m. curfew, Los Angeles police arrested several demonstrators who refused orders to leave a street downtown. Earlier in the night, officers with the Department of Homeland Security deployed flash bangs to disperse a crowd that had gathered near the jail, sending protesters sprinting away. Those incidents were outliers. As with the past two nights, the hourslong demonstrations remained peaceful and upbeat, drawing a few hundred attendees who marched through downtown chanting, dancing and poking fun at the Trump administration's characterization of the city as a 'war zone.' Elsewhere, demonstrations have picked up across the U.S., emerging in more than a dozen major cities. Some have led to clashes with police and hundreds have been arrested. The immigration agents conducting the raids in LA are 'putting together a model and a blueprint' for other communities, Noem said. She pledged that federal authorities 'are not going away' even though, she said, officers have been hit with rocks and bricks and assaulted. She said people with criminal records who are in the country illegally and violent protesters will 'face consequences.' 'Just because you think you're here as a citizen, or because you're a member of a certain group or you're not a citizen, it doesn't mean that you're going to be protected and not face consequences from the laws that this country stands for," she said. Noem criticized the Padilla's interruption, calling it "inappropriate.' A statement from her agency said the two met after the news conference for about 15 minutes, but it also chided him for 'disrespectful political theater.' Padilla said later that he was demanding answers about the 'increasingly extreme immigration enforcement actions' and only wanted to ask Noem a question. He said he was handcuffed but not arrested. 'If this is how this administration responds to a senator with a question, I can only imagine what they are doing to farmworkers, to cooks, to day laborers throughout the Los Angeles community,' he said. The administration has said it is willing to send troops to other cities to assist with immigration enforcement and controlling disturbances — in line with what Trump promised during last year's campaign. Some 2,000 Guard soldiers were in the nation's second-largest city and were soon to be joined by 2,000 more, along with about 700 Marines, said Maj. Gen. Scott Sherman, who is in charge of the operation. About 500 of the Guard troops deployed to the Los Angeles protests have been trained to accompany agents on immigration operations, Sherman said Wednesday. The Guard has the authority to temporarily detain people who attack officers, but any arrests must be made by law enforcement. With more demonstrations expected over the weekend, and the possibility that Trump could send troops to other states for immigration enforcement, governors are weighing what to do. Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, a Republican, has put 5,000 National Guard members on standby in cities where demonstrations are planned. In other Republican-controlled states, governors have not said when or how they may deploy troops. A group of Democratic governors earlier signed a statement this week calling Trump's deployments 'an alarming abuse of power.' There have been about 470 arrests since Saturday, the vast majority of which were for failing to leave the area at the request of law enforcement, according to the police department. There have been a handful of more serious charges, including for assault against officers and for possession of a Molotov cocktail and a gun. Nine officers have been hurt, mostly with minor injuries. ___ Rodriguez reported from San Francisco and Seewer from Toledo, Ohio. Associated Press writers Julie Watson in San Diego, Jesse Bedayn in Denver, and Jim Vertuno in Austin, Texas, and Hallie Golden in Seattle contributed.
