Evanston voters re-elect Daniel Biss as mayor, per unofficial results
Mayor Daniel Biss declared victory over challenger Jeff Boarini after unofficial results showed he had captured about 60% of the vote to about 40% for Boarini.
'I want to thank Jeff for running, for giving the community a choice, for making points and bringing forward issues that I think we'll all be better off for having discussed together,' Biss said to his supporters at an election-night campaign gathering.
With 100% of Evanston's precincts tabulated in the April 1 election, unofficial results from the Cook County Clerk's office show incumbent Evanston Council Members Clare Kelly, Krissie Harris, Bobby Burns, Jonathan Nieuwsma and Juan Geracaris leading in their races. City Councilmember Devon Reid (8th) was the only incumbent to be losing Tuesday night, unofficial results show, to former Evanston Land Use Commission Chair Matt Rodgers.
City Councilmember Tom Suffredin was showing about a 9% lead over his challenger Candance Chow for the hotly contested 6th ward race, unofficial results showed.
Newcomers Shawn Iles and Parielle Davis were also in the lead for open seats in the 3rd and 7th wards, respectively.
In his next term, Biss will face big issues in Evanston, including charting the future of the Lorraine H. Morton Civic Center, continuing to oversee Ryan Field and dealing with a K-8 school district, Evanston-Skokie District 65, in dire financial straits.
The next City Council's first big items will include the consideration of Envision Evanston, the city's comprehensive 20-year plan and an updated zoning code, which received heavy pushback from Evanston residents in the months leading into the election.
Previously, Biss campaigned hard for the Envision Evanston plan, but the city had to dramatically slow the pace of the project due to dissenting voices.
'Envision Evanston 2045 was a tough issue in this campaign,' Biss said. 'To those who are concerned about some of the changes we've been discussing, I hear you. I respect you. I appreciate that your voice is just as critical as every other voice, and that's why we slowed this down. That's why we created opportunities for more discussion and more engagement.'
'I need to say that every voice counts equally and so to those of you, or those maybe not in this room, who would say, 'Hey, nobody is asking for this,' I say simply, 'you are wrong.''
'You don't know my friend, Katie, who, when you ask her how she feels about Evanston, she says, 'The thing I love best is the new bagel shop in my neighborhood, and I just want more people so there can be more customers for more small businesses like that,'' Biss said.
'And you don't know the couple whose door I knocked on a couple months ago in the Fourth Ward who are way too busy with their multiple jobs and their small child to even really be paying attention to municipal politics at all.
'But when I ask them what's on their mind, they said, you know, we live in this two-unit building, and it was so hard for us to find something like this in this town… Could you do something so we could have more of those in this town?'
Biss, a former state representative and state senator, has maintained that he will not seek higher office during his next term as Evanston mayor.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
a day ago
- Bloomberg
Tim Cook's White House Visit Shows the True Cost of Tariffs
One of the most provocative items in my wardrobe is a plain dark T-shirt designed by a libertarian economist. In 10 lines across the front, it reads: 'Tariffs not only impose immense economic costs but also fail to achieve their primary policy aims and foster political dysfunction along the way.' In related news, Apple Chief Executive Tim Cook went to the White House last week to give President Donald Trump a large piece of gold. In exchange, Trump said that Apple would be exempt from a new 100% tariff the US is imposing on imported microchips. Officially, Apple gets the exemption because it committed to making a $100 billion investment in the US. Apple had already announced earlier this year a $500 billion investment program, which itself was a modest expansion of previous plans.
NBC News
3 days ago
- NBC News
How Tim Cook convinced Trump to drop made-in-USA iPhone — for now
President Donald Trump has made clear that he wants Apple to make iPhones in the U.S. Apple CEO Tim Cook is doing what he can to appease the commander in chief, without making that ultimate concession. Cook on Wednesday appeared at the White House with Trump to announce plans to spend about $600 billion over four years in the U.S. Apple didn't announce the made-in-USA iPhone that Trump wants, but Cook got to tout Apple's position on U.S. production. Some of Apple's most valuable parts, such as its glass and facial recognition sensor, are made by U.S. companies that Apple has worked with for years. Final assembly is only a small, though very critical, part of iPhone production. 'The final assembly that you focus on, that will be elsewhere for a while,' Cook said Wednesday in the Oval Office. Trump appeared happy enough, for now. 'He makes many of the components here, and we've been talking about it,' Trump said. 'The whole thing is set up in other places, and it's been there for a long time in terms of cost and all, but I think we may incentivize him enough that one day he'll be bringing that back.' Experts said Cook's announcement seemed designed to get Apple out of Trump's crosshairs with respect to tariffs. Trump announced during the public meeting that the administration planned to place a tariff on chips that would double their price, but Apple — which relies on hundreds of different chips for its devices — would be exempt. 'CEOs are realizing that they do have to do something, and what they've discovered is that if they give the president something to brag about without destroying their company, that the problem might go away for a certain amount of time,' said Peter Cohan, professor of strategy and entrepreneurship at Babson College who has written case studies on Apple. The gambit worked. Apple stock rose 5% on Wednesday and another 3% on Thursday. 'What Tim Cook demonstrated in the first administration was a real savvy navigation of the treacherous waters,' said Nancy Tengler, CEO of Laffer Tengler Investments, which holds a position in Apple. 'I thought this announcement was super-important symbolically, because the president is looking for headlines.' What Apple announced The centerpiece of Apple's announcement was the so-called American Manufacturing Program, which Apple said was designed to incentivize other companies to make parts for computers in the U.S. By Apple committing to purchase parts and expand its relationship with U.S. suppliers, it could give those companies the skills and capacity to expand their business. And it lets Apple take some credit for supporting the 450,000 total jobs at its suppliers. A closer look at the members of the program shows that Apple is leaning on some of its longest-tenured partners. All together, Apple said that its U.S. suppliers are on track to make 19 billion chips for its products this year. That level of business doesn't appear overnight. For example, Apple said that all of its cover glass for iPhones and Apple Watches would be made by Corning, in Kentucky, and that it would spend $2.5 billion on that effort. It's a powerful symbol — while the phone might be screwed together in China or India, the surface that users touch around the world will be made in the U.S. But Apple has pointed to Corning as a critical American supplier in the past. The company's glass has been used on the iPhone since its first version in 2007. While Apple typically doesn't let its suppliers talk about their relationships, former COO Jeff Williams hailed Corning's glass in 2017, when it got an 'investment' from the Apple Advanced Manufacturing Fund. Apple followed that up with a $250 million commitment in 2019, and $45 million in 2021. Analysts are skeptical that the partnership could substantially improve Corning's revenue. Morgan Stanley analysts wrote on Thursday that Corning 'already produces 100% of the cover glass for Apple's phones and tablets,' adding that Corning's glass business called Specialty Materials is worth about $2 billion per year. Apple also highlighted its partnership with Coherent, a longtime supplier of lasers for Apple's facial recognition hardware, which is made in Texas. Morgan Stanley pegged the business at about $100 million per year, and said Apple has options including Lumentum and Sony. The iPhone maker said it expanded a partnership with Texas Instruments to make chips in Texas and Utah. Texas Instruments has long supplied chips for the iPhone, such as circuits to control USB interfaces or power displays. Apple said it would partner with Samsung, another key supplier of parts like iPhone displays, to launch an 'innovative new technology for making chips,' without offering additional details. Apple declared that it will partner directly with companies in the semiconductor chain, even if they typically sell services or goods to Apple suppliers. Other partnerships are with Applied Materials, a tooling company, GlobalFoundries, a chip foundry, and GlobalWafers America, which is supplying Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. and Texas Instruments with made-in-USA wafers, the starting point for a batch of chips. GlobalFoundries manufactures chips for Broadcom, which supplies wireless chips for iPhones. Both will work with Apple to develop and manufacture 5G components in the U.S. Meanwhile, Apple will buy millions of advanced chips made by TSMC in Arizona, where it will be the factory's largest customer. Cook joined former President Joe Biden at the plant in 2022 and committed to buying chips from the factory. Apple said it would invest in and become a customer at an Arizona Amkor facility, which packages and tests chips, the final stage before installation in a computer. Apple also said it would expand existing data centers for artificial intelligence in North Carolina, Iowa, Nevada and Oregon. It's highlighted these data centers in the past in spending commitments. While Apple's announcement sent partner stocks up, JPMorgan Chase analysts warned in a note on Thursday that 'the new and expanded engagements might not be completely incremental to global revenues and outlook.' Trump had a different take. 'Oh, I love that you're doing this,' the president said, after reading a list of Apple's commitments. 'Cost of doing business' Apple has little to worry about when it comes to who will hold the company accountable for its promises. The company doesn't break out U.S. spending, and most of Apple's suppliers are contractually required to keep the information secret. Apple doesn't report how much its new campuses in Austin, Texas, or North Carolina end up costing. Additionally, the $600 billion headline number likely includes lots of regular expenses. Apple said in February that its $500 billion commitment included payments to U.S. suppliers, direct employment, data centers for Apple Intelligence and corporate facilities, as well as spending on Apple TV+ productions in 20 states. Apple started publicly announcing U.S. spending during Trump's first administration in 2018, at a rate of about $70 billion per year. In February, the company committed to $125 billion per year. Wednesday's announcement brings that figure to $150 billion annually. That's still a fraction of Apple's total spending. In Apple's fiscal 2024, the company spent $210 billion globally on cost of goods sold, $57.5 billion on operating expenses and $9.45 billion in capital expenditures for nearly $275 billion in global spending during the period. Teffler said she didn't think the newly announced spending would be material to Apple's profitability, especially since it already has relationships with the various companies such as Corning. 'They're going to spend money somewhere,' Tegler said. Wedbush analyst Dan Ives, who previously predicted a made-in-USA iPhone would cost billions to produce and would leave consumers paying $3,500, said the Wednesday announcements indicate a much different approach. He said it's 'the cost of doing business.'
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
County prosecutors' union bid should get tossed out, judge finds
A decades-old Illinois Supreme Court decision bars Cook County prosecutors from unionizing, an administrative law judge for the state's labor board found Wednesday. A bid from the International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 700 to represent nearly 700 assistant state's attorneys should therefore get tossed out, the judge, Michelle N. Owen, found. 'The petition is clearly inappropriate,' she wrote. Earlier this year, county prosecutors launched the first major union drive the office had seen in decades, saying they were seeking parity with Cook County public defenders, who have been unionized since the 1980s. The Teamsters said they believed the legal winds had changed since the 1995 state Supreme Court decision that found prosecutors were 'managerial' employees barred from union membership. The union argued the state's Workers' Rights Amendment, which since 2022 has enshrined the 'fundamental right' to collective bargaining in the Illinois Constitution, should pave the way for a prosecutors' union. But in her order, Owen found that the labor board lacked jurisdiction to determine whether state law should be preempted by the relatively new constitutional amendment. Matt McGrath, a spokesperson for the state's attorney's office, said the office was 'pleased' with the order. 'Our position all along has been that this is a well-established legal matter that requires a legislative solution, and the (labor board) agreed,' McGrath said in a statement. 'State's Attorney (Eileen O'Neill) Burke supports organized labor and the right of workers to collectively bargain, but as the county's chief law enforcement official and former judge, she will always follow the law first and foremost.' The labor board judge also wrote that the Teamsters had failed to demonstrate that a majority of the prosecutors had signed union cards, though the union had previously claimed to have secured support from a majority of the ASAs. Pasquale Gianni, director of government affairs for the Illinois Teamsters, said the union still believed it had filed its petition with more than 51% support and that it was not sure how the labor board had reached that determination. The union can appeal the order. Gianni declined to say definitively whether or not the Teamsters would do so, but said in a statement the union was 'charting our new direction forward.' 'Obviously, we are disappointed with the decision, which amounts to the disenfranchisement of working people who wish to be represented by a union. It is our intention to leave no stone unturned to achieve that end,' he said. The union has soured on its relationship with O'Neill Burke, whom Local 700 endorsed, since she took office. While she was on the campaign trail, the Teamsters have said, the union secured a promise from O'Neill Burke that, if elected, she would recognize a prosecutors' union if a majority of her staff wanted one. Before filing a petition for union representation earlier this year, the Teamsters asked for that voluntary recognition. O'Neill Burke didn't provide it, after which the union filed a petition with the state labor board. The Teamsters — including the union's general president, Sean O'Brien, who at a May rally in Chicago said the union had gathered to give O'Neill Burke 'a dose of truth-cillin' — have accused the state's attorney of reneging on a promise. O'Neill Burke's office has maintained throughout the union push that she supports the right of ASA's to unionize 'once Illinois law allows for it.' Solve the daily Crossword
