
Why Airdrops in Gaza Pose Risks to Civilians
Britain's prime minister, Keir Starmer, said on Tuesday that 'U.K. aid has been airdropped into Gaza today.' The United Arab Emirates and Jordan started parachuting parcels into Gaza on Sunday in coordination with Israel, according to the Israeli military agency that regulates humanitarian affairs in Gaza.
The Israeli military said in a statement that it expanded aid efforts to include airdrops to 'improve the humanitarian response' and 'refute false claims of intentional starvation in Gaza.' Israeli officials have disputed allegations that they have limited the number of trucks delivering aid to Gaza by road, blaming the United Nations and its partners for failing to distribute hundreds of truckloads in Gaza.
But aid agencies working in Gaza, 21 months into the war, say parachuting crates of aid is a risky and inefficient alternative.
'Why use airdrops when you can drive hundreds of trucks through the borders?' said Juliette Touma, the chief spokeswoman for the United Nations agency for Palestinian refugees. 'It's much easier, more effective, faster, cheaper,' she added.
In a statement, Doctors Without Borders called airdrop parcels, which can weigh one ton or more, 'notoriously ineffective and dangerous,' forcing people to 'risk their lives for food.'
In response to Israel's decision to allow airdrops, the United Nations' humanitarian agency said in a statement that 'All efforts to provide aid to the people who desperately need it are welcome.' It added, however, that the group and its partners 'say that airdrops are the last resort measure and carry risks for people on the ground.'
How airdrops work
Typically, airdrops are done by military planes carrying bundles of supplies and food. The supplies are loaded on pallets, flat platforms, and wrapped in netting to stay in place. Those pallets are attached to parachutes and pushed from the backs of aircrafts to reach delivery sites.
Aid pallets can weigh 1,200 pounds when packed with food and over 2,000 pounds when packed with water, according to an estimate by The Washington Institute, a foreign policy think tank.
Several countries, in coordination with the Israeli Air Force, dropped aid in Gaza last year, but stopped after some falling parcels killed and wounded people, and damaged property, and others landed in the sea or in Israel. Last year, at least five Palestinians were killed and several others injured in airdrop accidents, according to Gaza authorities.
But getting aid on the ground in Gaza has become far more dangerous. Responding to unrest at some aid sites, Israeli soldiers have repeatedly fired at crowds in past two months, killing hundreds of people.
The United Nations said in a statement that injuries were reported Sunday when packages fell on tents.
'When you're airdropping food, there's supposed to be a lot of preparation, planning and communication,' said Jeremy Konyndyk, the president of Refugees International, who previously supervised airdrop operations in Syria and Iraq for the U.S. government. 'You want to make sure you're dropping to a place where people know it's coming, that you can clear the area, and control that area so there's no risk of people being crushed.'
But in conflict zones like Gaza, it can be difficult to obtain such information and coordinate with those on the receiving end to ensure operations go smoothly, Mr. Konyndyk added.
The high cost of airdrops
Among the most common criticisms of airdrops is that they are expensive and inefficient compared to delivering aid by trucks. While the average plane can fit about two truckloads worth of aid, Mr. Konyndyk said, there is a much greater supply of available trucks and people to drive them.
Aid planes require specialized cargo and experienced crews, while any commercial truck driver can deliver aid by land. 'There is a limited volume of airplanes in the world that are available for this, and you need a specialized cargo, you need crews that are experienced' Mr. Konyndyk said. In contrast, there is 'a pretty big universe of people' who can drive trucks, he said.
While costs vary, Mr. Konyndyk estimated from his disaster relief experience in South Sudan that airdropped aid was roughly about 11 times as expensive per commodity as aid delivered by truck.
An analysis last year by the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a Washington-based think tank, calculated that airdrops in Gaza could cost as much as 42 times more than truck delivery, based on the cost-per-mile of each method.
Limits on medicine and water
Fragile goods, like certain medicines and water, are difficult to airdrop because they can be destroyed from the impact of landing.
'You don't fight famine with food alone,' Mr. Konyndyk said. 'Yes you need food, but you also need to be able to provide medical treatment.'
Those types of aid require on-the-ground service delivery and personnel.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
12 minutes ago
- New York Post
Mob of anti-Israel protestors clash with police after attempting to storm Grand Central Terminal: cops
Anti-Israel protesters clashed with police outside Grand Central Terminal Saturday — resulting in four arrests, cops and sources said. The chaos erupted around 3:30 p.m. when hundreds of demonstrators that had been marching in Manhattan attempted to storm the transit hub's doors, forcing officials to lock and barricade the iconic building. The unruly crowd was part of a protest organized by Palestinian activist group Within Our Lifetime that started outside City Hall earlier in the afternoon, according to police. Advertisement The group, waving Palestinian flags and chanting, scuffled with NYPD and MTA officers outside the station's Vanderbilt Hall entrance, according to cops and shocking videos on social media. One video of the melee showed protesters hurling profanities at a female officer before a group of cops tackled an agitator, while others formed a barrier to keep the hostile group from entering the terminal. 4 NYPD and MTA police officers confronting Palestine protestors at Grand Central Station. Some cops were seen using batons to fend off the protestors. Advertisement 4 NYPD officers detaining Palestine protestors at Grand Central Terminal. 4 Some cops were seen using batons to fend off the protestors. A handful of the rowdy flag-waving demonstrators, shouting 'Free Palestine' and banging on drums, made it into the main concourse, but were removed by authorities, a video shared by WOL showed. Advertisement None of the arrested protesters were publicly identified by cops. Two of them were arrested by the NYPD, charged with trespassing and disorderly conduct and issued Criminal Court summonses, a police spokesperson said. 4 Footage of a scuffle between NYPD officers and Palestine protestors at Grand Central Terminal. MTA officers took two other demonstrators into custody, but no details about what charges may be facing were immediately made public. Advertisement Train service didn't seem to have been disrupted after the wild skirmish. A heavy police presence remained hours later, blocking off the area where the tussle erupted.


New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Michael Goodwin: The 2-state delusion must be scrapped — a ‘jihadist' state would solve nothing
Just months after Adolf Hitler started World War II, Winston Churchill smartly summarized why Europe's hopes for peace had been shattered. 'An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last,' the new prime minister said in a speech. His stark imagery mocked the foolish efforts to head off war, infamously led by Churchill's predecessor, Neville Chamberlain, who insisted Hitler really wanted peace. Chamberlain was delusional and the global conflict that followed turned his name into a permanent warning about the wages of weakness. Yet here we go again, with the current leaders of Britain, France and Canada falling into the trap. Their delusion is that Palestinians, including Hamas and other terror groups, really want peace and will live in harmony with Israel once they have a nation of their own. The clamor for a Palestinian state is the appeasement of our times. It travels under the disguise of a 'two-state solution.' Who can be against a solution? 'River to the sea' Except a Palestinian state wouldn't solve anything. Quite the opposite, it would set the stage for another round of bloodletting. As such, think of it as the two-state delusion. That's what it is because too many Islamists, from Iran to Arab lands and around the world, remain committed to destroying the Jewish state. They don't want to live in peace with Israel. They want to eliminate it. That's the essence of the antisemitic chant heard on American college campuses: 'From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free.' Translation: Palestine will be free of Jews, and Israel will be no more. That isn't a problem at the Jew-hating United Nations, which held a two-day conference on the topic last week. Prime Minister Keir Starmer calls Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky from his office. It was little noted that Palestinians already have a state of their own. Instead of living in peace with their Jewish neighbors, they turned Gaza into a terror state. Nearly two years after their barbaric invasion of Israel, and while they continue to hold some of the 250 hostages they took on Oct. 7 of 2023, the push to give them a nation isn't just foolish — it's obscene. As President Trump correctly said last week, 'You're rewarding Hamas if you do that. I don't think they should be rewarded.' Thankfully, he added that the US is 'not in that camp,' referring to support for a Palestinian state by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, French President Emmanuel Macron and Canada's Prime Minister Mark Carney. Each is beset by radical Islamist immigrants, and so their pandering illustrates Churchill's observation about feeding the crocodile in hopes of being spared. They are aided and abetted by the Western media outlets that have fallen for the two-state ruse. 'A Hamas state' Typical is the nakedly anti-Israel coverage of The Associated Press, which described the UN conference as a serious bid 'to end one of the world's longest conflicts.' It claimed 'the plan would culminate with an independent, demilitarized Palestine living side by side peacefully with Israel.' That's a fairy tale, and at least deserves the caveat that it would be necessary to enforce a peaceful Palestinian state to guarantee Israel's security. British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain. Getty Images Good luck persuading the Israelis that their security can be outsourced to the United Nations. Jews there and around the world have said for decades: 'If Palestinians lay down their guns, there will be peace. But if the Israelis lay down our guns, there will be no Israel.' The Jewish nation's Foreign Minister Gideon Sa'ar said last week that Israel would not cave in to the 'international pressure.' 'Establishing a Palestinian state today is establishing a Hamas state. A jihadist state,' said Sa'ar. 'It ain't gonna happen.' The only positive development to come out of the conference was that the Arab League, including Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Egypt, Jordan and Turkey, condemned for the first time Hamas' 2023 invasion and called on the terrorists to release all hostages, disarm and end their rule of Gaza. But even that progress was undercut by a tone of both-sideism that included outrageous attacks on Israel because of how it responded to the invasion. The final declaration also urges Israel to cooperate with UN agencies, including UNRWA, whose employees openly fanned the flames of Hamas terror. It also defends the Gazan Health Ministry, which acts as a Hamas mouthpiece in distorting Palestinian casualties. 'Right of return' farce Worse, the conference supported the Palestinians' so-called 'right of return' to places in Israel they left or were expelled from during the 1948 creation of Israel. That would undermine Israel's security and its existence as a Jewish state. My view about the push for a Palestinian state is informed by 25 years of covering the topic. In the summer of 2000, I was on my first trip to Israel just before its Prime Minister, Ehud Barak, and Palestinian chairman Yasser Arafat were scheduled to meet with President Bill Clinton at Camp David to iron out the terms and boundaries of such a state. Keep up with today's most important news Stay up on the very latest with Evening Update. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters The American Embassy had helped arrange an interview for me with a top aide to Arafat in Ramallah, the de facto capital of the West Bank. The night before the interview, the late Martin Indyk, then the US ambassador to Israel, suggested a question I might ask. It ran something like this: If Arafat can't accept the 92% of the West bank Barak's government is offering, how would Arafat feel when a more conservative government offers as little as 72% of the West Bank? When I asked the question, the Arafat aide responded with a phrase he'd used in response to other questions about Arab violence. 'Well, you know,' he said, 'there are these groups we can't control.' He didn't name names, but his meaning was clear: There will be violence against Israelis, but don't blame Arafat because he can't stop it. No partner in peace It was a convenient lie, but the terror leader obviously feared for his own life if he signed a deal. Much to the shock of Clinton and Barak, Arafat walked away from Camp David without accepting a Palestinian state. Since then, several Israeli governments have made similar offers of a Palestinian state. All have been rejected in part because of the Sadat example. Recall that Egypt's bold leader, Anwar-el Sadat, was assassinated in 1981 by Islamist extremists two years after signing a peace treaty with Israel's Prime Minister Menachem Begin in a process facilitated by President Jimmy Carter at Camp David. Sadat and Begin shared the 1978 Nobel Peace Prize. Yet 47 years later, there is still no Palestinian state because no Palestinian leader has felt safe enough to recognize Israel's right to exist in its own secure borders. Hamas has made it clear it will never accept Israel. Its leaders have promised that given the chance, the horrors of Oct. 7 will be repeated again and again. The threats prove that a point Israelis have made about Palestinians still prevails: We have no partner for peace.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
German foreign minister tones down Palestinian recognition talk on West Bank trip
German foreign minister tones down Palestinian recognition talk on West Bank trip By Riham Alkousaa BERLIN (Reuters) -German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul sought to tone down previous comments about his country's position on Palestinian statehood during a trip to the West Bank on Friday, saying Germany had no immediate plans to recognise a Palestinian state. Wadephul's comment followed sharp criticism from Israeli officials over his earlier suggestion, before he left for the trip, that Germany could respond to any unilateral Israeli actions with recognition of a Palestinian state. Far-right Israeli government minister Itamar Ben-Gvir had written on X: "80 years after the Holocaust, and Germany returns to supporting Nazism". After meeting Israel's foreign minister, prime minister and president on Thursday evening, Wadephul explained on Friday that Germany did not plan to recognise a Palestinian state immediately, "as that is one of the final steps to be taken" as part of a two-state solution. Wadephul's attempt to clarify his remarks highlights Germany's longstanding difficulty in taking a clear position on the issue, caught between growing international pressure to hold Israel accountable for its actions and Germany's own post-Holocaust commitment to ensuring Israel's security. He called on Israel to ensure safe access for United Nations agencies to deliver humanitarian aid to Gaza, saying the current restrictions were worsening the crisis. "The humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza must end now," Wadephul said, stressing that aid distribution through the UN had long worked effectively and needed to resume without obstacles. He said Germany would provide an additional 5 million euros ($5.7 million) to the UN World Food Programme to support bakeries and soup kitchens and fund a field hospital in Gaza City. Asked about Israeli concerns that aid could be diverted by Hamas, Wadephul acknowledged that misuse could not be fully ruled out but said it was no reason to block relief efforts. "The best way to prevent Hamas from misusing supplies is to deliver more aid and ensure full coverage for the population," he said. He also condemned rising violence by Israeli settlers in the West Bank, adding that Berlin would continue pushing at the European level for sanctions on violent settlers. ($1 = 0.8759 euros) Solve the daily Crossword