Water industry may be added to list of sensitive business sectors, says minister
Communications, energy and data infrastructure are among the 17 sectors that must notify the investment security unit of certain business deals since the list was created in 2021.
Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster Pat McFadden has asked for businesses' views on extending this requirement to the water sector.
It is not expected to affect large numbers of deals but reflects 'increasing risks to the sector's resilience in a growing threat landscape', the Cabinet Office said.
'Data shows our investment security powers are working well, but there's more we can do to ensure our tool kit keeps pace with the modern economy,' Mr McFadden said.
'We're taking action to hone the type of transactions facing the greatest scrutiny, as well as consulting on updates to the sectors of the economy specified in the legislation.'
Thames Water is battling to secure funding to shore up its creaking finances and stave off temporary nationalisation by the Government.
Southern Water asked its owner, Australian investment firm Macquarie, for an extra £2.1 billion earlier this month to help boost its struggling finances.
Making semiconductors and critical minerals into their own standalone categories and moving computing hardware to fall under semiconductors is also being proposed.
Mr McFadden also said he planned to remove some requirements that are 'very unlikely to present risk'.
Businesses will no longer need to notify the unit of certain internal reorganisations or when appointing liquidators, special administrators and official receivers.
Secondary legislation would be brought to Parliament to put these changes in place.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
North Wales Live
2 hours ago
- North Wales Live
DWP pension changes that could mean people retire later
Sweeping changes to both state and private pensions, overseen by the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP), have been announced. The modifications form part of extensive reforms to the pensions sector by the Labour government. Among the most significant alterations is the prospect of a substantial rise in the state pension age, which could force people to postpone their retirement. Last week, the government revealed a wide-ranging review of the UK pensions system. An independent commission has been formed to examine a series of controversial matters and put forward recommendations for reform. The Government plans to increase the State Pension age from 66 to 67 between 2026 and 2028, affecting those born on or after 6 April 1960. For money-saving tips, sign up to our Money newsletter here. There are proposals for a further rise, lifting the State Pension age from 67 to 68 between 2044 and 2046, though this timeline could be brought forward, reports Birmingham Live. "A faster increase is definitely on the cards," says Rachel Vahey, the head of public policy at investment platform AJ Bell. Sign up for the North Wales Live newsletter sent twice daily to your inbox The Institute for Fiscal Studies thinktank caused a stir when it suggested that the State Pension Age may need to climb to 69 by 2049 and 74 by 2069 if the triple lock safeguarding its value remains in place. Australian employers are presently obliged to pay 11.5% of workers' salaries into their pensions, with this figure set to rise to 12% in 2025. In comparison, whilst the overall minimum contribution in the UK sits at 8%, employers need only provide 3%. Pension firms and sector specialists have repeatedly lobbied for this amount to be raised to 12%. Nigel Peaple, director of policy and advocacy at the Pensions and Lifetime Savings Association, has continually maintained the minimum pension contribution should rise from the current 8% of earnings to 12%. He said: "To minimise the impact on savers and employers, the increases should happen gradually, as they did in Australia, with employers paying more so that, by about 10 years from now, both employers and employees would pay the same. "This approach of a 50/50 split between employers and employees would strike a fair balance; it would involve higher contributions for employers compared to the current UK rules but much lower ones than traditional UK pensions in which the employer usually paid around two thirds of the cost." One concept attracting attention is the "sidecar savings" method. There are different ways to structure a "sidecar account". Two proposed models are the dual account and integrated plan frameworks. Within the dual account structure, the worker keeps a workplace pension whilst simultaneously joining a separate savings account via a savings provider. The saver sets a savings ceiling for the sidecar account, and the savings provider directs the employer to contribute to this sidecar until the limit is reached. Once the threshold is achieved, any extra funds are channelled into the pension alongside the standard pension contributions. Should funds be withdrawn from the sidecar, the individual recommences saving into it until the cap is attained once more. In the in-plan model, employees opt to save via their employer. Employers then remit the total sum contributed by an employee to both a workplace pension and an emergency savings account to a pension provider. The pension provider allocates the contribution between the pension pot and the emergency savings account. Nikhil Rathi, chief executive of the UK's Financial Conduct Authority, remarked: "Australia, New Zealand, the US, Singapore and South Africa all permit citizens to leverage their pension savings to buy a first home. "Some have suggested we consider, carefully, similar approaches in some circumstances here in the UK." This week, the government announced its dedication to "committed to both monitoring and narrowing" the gender pensions gap. Recent Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) figures have revealed that the gender pension gap has escalated to a "stark" 48%. The figures, unveiled as the government declared a 'revival' of the Pensions Commission amid concerns about undersaving, showed that in 2020 to 2022, women aged 55 to 59 had a median wealth of £81,000 compared to £156,000 for men. Approximately 20% of self-employed individuals are contributing to a private pension, with many pointing to the Lifetime ISA as a potential solution. There's talk that ministers may tweak the rules to let over-40s open a Lifetime ISA and boost its appeal by cutting the 25% withdrawal charge. Helen Morrissey, head of retirement analysis at Hargreaves Lansdown, commented: "The 25% government bonus acts in the same way as basic-rate tax relief, and any income can be taken tax-free." She added, "There is also the ability to access money early if needed, subject to a 25% exit charge."
Telegraph
a day ago
- Telegraph
Labour quietly relaxes rules for £100k civil servant payouts
Labour has relaxed rules allowing civil servants to receive up to £100,000 in 'golden goodbye' severance payments, even if they leave by choice. Previously, government departments had to seek Treasury approval to compensate departing junior and mid-level employees for unused employee benefits or shortened notice periods. However, changes announced this week mean that departments can hand out payments worth thousands of pounds without having to consult the Treasury. It comes as Labour battles to trim the size of what Sir Keir Starmer described in an article for The Telegraph as an 'over-cautious, flabby state'. In April, it emerged that up to 1,200 employees from the Cabinet Office, headed by Pat McFadden, were facing redundancy. Statutory redundancy payments and payment for unused leave are separate from special severance payments, which in some cases can be worth tens of thousands of pounds. Special severance payments are paid to employees if they resign, are dismissed or reach an agreed termination of their contracts. They are not a legal right, and are instead treated as a special payment. They are commonly awarded to ministers when there is a change in government. Jeremy Hunt, the former Chancellor, was paid £16,876 last year, according to Treasury accounts. Employees may receive a special severance payment if, for example, they have unused employee benefits that continue beyond their last working day. Payments may also be awarded as compensation in lieu of notice. Last year, the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) paid out £370,000 in special severance payments to 21 civil servants, with a median value of £10,000. The highest individual payment awarded was £96,000, according to DWP accounts. HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) similarly spent £85,535 on nine severance payments last year, the highest of which was worth £25,000. John O'Connell, of the TaxPayers' Alliance campaign group, said it was 'frustrating' to see the large cost to the taxpayer 'just to get rid of staff'. He said: 'Taxpayers will be furious to find out that there is going to be even less control on the size of these payouts now that the Treasury's role in approving exit payments is being reduced. 'Ministers need to be reversing this decision, as well as bringing in a long overdue cap of £95,000 on all golden goodbyes.' The guidance issued to departments grants accounting officers the power to approve severance payments worth up to £100,000 without Treasury approval. However, documents passed to departments grant accountants the power to approve payments exceeding the £100,000 threshold for early severance cases linked to upcoming redundancy programmes. The changes do not affect payments to senior civil servants, special advisers and 'anyone earning over the senior level pay threshold'. Departments have also been warned against payments that are 'not affordable', and against making payments that 'add unfunded pressure to departmental spending budgets'. Accountants have been similarly urged not to make any payment that would 'set a precedent or have implications for wider government policy or other settlements' by paying out sums that 'differ markedly' from previous settlements.
ITV News
a day ago
- ITV News
Australia to ban YouTube accounts for under 16s in policy u-turn
Australia has announced YouTube will join the list of social media platforms that must ensure account holders are at least 16 years old when laws come into effect in the country from December. YouTube was previously exempt from the upcoming law change when it originally passed through Parliament in November of 2024. The Australian government says the decision to include YouTube in the age restrictions was influenced by a survey released by Australia's independent online regulator, the e-safety Commission. The regulator found that 37% of children surveyed reported seeing harmful content on the website. Under the new law, children under the age of 16 will be banned from holding accounts on social media sites, which also includes Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, Snapchat, and X. The age restrictions will come into effect from December 10, with platforms facing fines of up to 50 million Australian dollars (around £24 million) for "failing to take responsible steps", a government statement said. Anika Wells, Australia's Communications Minister, defended the decision, telling reporters: "The evidence cannot be ignored that four out of ten Australian kids report that their most recent harm was on YouTube.' She added the government will not be intimidated by legal threats made by the platforms' US owner, Alphabet Inc. "This is a genuine fight for the well-being of Australian kids, a fight the parents beside me have tragic reasons to wage with fearless determination," she said. "There is no perfect solution when it comes to keeping young Australians safe online, but the social media minimum age laws will make a meaningful difference." Under the new laws, children will still be able to access YouTube but will not be able to make an account. YouTube said the government's decision "reverses a clear, public commitment to exclude YouTube from this ban". A spokesperson added: "We share the government's goal of addressing and reducing online harms. "Our position remains clear: YouTube is a video sharing platform with a library of free, high-quality content, increasingly viewed on TV screens. It's not social media." The website said it will consider next steps and engage with the government. Australia's Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said his country will campaign at the United Nations forum in New York this September, for international support to ban children from social media platforms. Online services exempt from the ban include messaging, education, online gaming, and health apps as they are considered less harmful to children.
