Nikola Just Filed for Bankruptcy. Which EV Stock Will Be Next?
Last week, Nikola (NKLA), once valued at around $30 billion, filed for bankruptcy. The news was not unexpected, given Nikola's cash burn and dilutive shares sales, which were just unsustainable.
Things reached a point where Nikola's market cap fell below its quarterly cash burn. This means the company would have needed to quadruple its outstanding share count just to fund its cash-guzzling operations for a year. That was almost impossible, and as I noted previously, Nikola needed a strategic partner who could have backed the company.
That did not happen, and Nikola eventually determined that Chapter 11 bankruptcy 'represents the best possible path forward under the circumstances for the Company and its stakeholders.' The company is now looking to sell its assets to a strategic or financial investor.
EV Bankruptcies
Nikola's bankruptcy is yet another sign that the sun has set for high-flying EV startups that went public between 2020 and 2021, particularly those that opted for a special purpose acquisition company (SPAC) merger instead of the traditional IPO.
Nikola is not the first EV startup to have filed for bankruptcy from that lot. Last month, Canoo (GOEVQ) also filed for bankruptcy. The ever-growing list includes Arrival (ARVLF), Bird Global (BRDSQ), Lion Electric, Lordstown Motors, Lightning eMotors, Electric Last Mile Solutions (ELMSQ), Volta Trucks, and Proterra. This list is not exhaustive, and several other companies in the green energy ecosystem have gone out of business.
What Went Wrong with the EV Industry?
By 2021 it became quite obvious that there was a bubble in EV stocks considering the exorbitant market caps that newly listed companies were commanding. The sector's joyride ended in 2022, when the Federal Reserve started hiking interest rates to curb inflation. This effectively pulled the plug on the supply of easy money, which was the lifeline for startup EV companies.
Higher interest rates also make vehicle ownership costly and turned away some buyers from electric cars. Moreover, the demand for EVs didn't turn out to be as strong as expected, and even Tesla (TSLA), which once could sell as many cars as it could produce, reported a year-over-year fall in deliveries for 2024 – for the first time in history.
To make things worse, the EV market was heavily oversupplied with both startups and legacy automakers coming up with new models. This demand-supply mismatch led to a price war as companies tried to push sales by lowering vehicle prices. The price war further added to the losses of EV startups, and while legacy automakers have their hugely profitable internal combustion engine (ICE) operations to absorb these losses, startups didn't have such luxury. With capital market conditions hardening, EV companies weren't able to raise cash by selling stock as easily as they did during their heydays.
EV Companies' Near-Term Outlook Is Cloudy
If these troubles weren't enough for EV companies, Donald Trump's return to the White House adds another layer of complexity.
Trump's energy policies are in stark contrast to his predecessor Joe Biden, who took multiple actions to spur EV adoption rates in the U.S. The near-term outlook for EV companies looks cloudy at best given uncertainty over Trump's policies and the still-tepid demand for electric cars. The macroeconomic slowdown and fears of interest rates staying higher for longer aren't helping the cause of the EV industry.
Which EV Companies Might Go Bankrupt Next?
To survive the current challenging market environment, EV companies need a compelling product, deep financial pockets with backing from strategic investors, and credible management teams. Most startup EV companies that have gone bust lacked in either one or all of these criteria – or worse, were built around lies and fake promises.
Looking at the current environment, I believe Rivian (RIVN) and Lucid Motors (LCID) are two names that can stick around for a much longer time as they score well on all three parameters.
However, things might start getting problematic for weaker players like Mullen (MULN) and Faraday Future (FFIE). While we cannot be certain about which EV company will go bust next, we can be reasonably sure that Nikola is not the last on that list.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
36 minutes ago
- CTV News
U.S. and China agree on trade framework after two days of talks in London, Chinese negotiator says
U.S. President Donald Trump, left, meets with Chinese President Xi Jinping during a meeting on the sidelines of the G-20 summit in Osaka, Japan, June 29, 2019. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh, File) The United States and China have agreed on a trade framework after two days of negotiations in London, China's trade negotiator Li Chenggang told reporters on Wednesday, according to Chinese state broadcaster CGTN. The two sides 'have agreed in principle on the framework for implementing the consensus reached by the two heads of state during their phone talks on June 5 and at Geneva talks last month,' he said. This is a breaking story. More to come...
CTV News
2 hours ago
- CTV News
Trump's tax bill could raise taxes on foreign companies, hurting investment from abroad
President Donald Trump speaks during an "Invest in America" roundtable with business leaders at the White House, Monday, June 9, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci) WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump likes to say he's bringing in trillions of dollars in investments from foreign countries, but a provision in his tax cuts bill could cause international companies to avoid expanding into the United States. The House-passed version of the legislation would allow the federal government to impose taxes on foreign-parented companies and investors from countries judged as charging 'unfair foreign taxes' on U.S. companies. Known as Section 899, the measure could cause companies to avoid investing in the the U.S. out of concern they could face steep taxes. The fate of the measure rests with the Senate — setting off a debate about its prospects and impact. A new analysis by the Global Business Alliance, a trade group representing international companies such as Toyota and Nestlé, estimates that the provision would cost the U.S. 360,000 jobs and $55 billion annually over 10 years in lost gross domestic product. The analysis estimates that the tax could cut a third off the economic growth anticipated from the overall tax cuts by Congress' Joint Committee on Taxation. 'While proponents say this punitive tax hike is intended as a retaliatory measure against foreign governments, this report confirms that the real victims are American workers in states like North Carolina, South Carolina, Indiana, Tennessee and Texas,' said Jonathan Samford, president and CEO of the Global Business Alliance. Republican Rep. Jason Smith of Missouri, chair of the House Ways and Means Committee, has defended the provision as protecting U.S. interests by giving the president a tool that can be used against countries with tax codes that, in the federal government's opinion, put American companies at a disadvantage. 'If these countries withdraw these taxes and decide to behave, we will have achieved our goal,' Smith said in a statement last week. 'It's just common sense. I urge my colleagues in the Senate to move quickly to pass this bill and protect Americans from economic bad actors around the world.' House Republicans have been looking into the issue for a long time and the bill provides the flexibility so that a president doesn't have to levy taxes. There were concerns among GOP lawmakers during Joe Biden's presidency that an agreement among countries on corporate tax codes could cause foreign governments to charge U.S. companies more. The tax gets at a fundamental tension within Trump's policy agenda: a contradiction in the broad strokes of Trump simultaneously trying to tax imports and foreign profits at higher rates while also seeking investments from companies headquartered abroad. In late May, Trump defended his approach by saying that his tariffs were causing more countries to invest in the U.S. to avoid imports getting taxed. While some countries and companies have made announcements, there is not evidence of the investments pushing up spending on new factories as measured in the government's monthly report on construction spending. The Republican president said his tendency to impose steep tariffs, then retreat to lower rates, had succeeded. 'We have $14 trillion now invested, committed to investing,' Trump said then. 'You know we have the hottest country anywhere in the world. I went to Saudi Arabia, the king told me, he said, you got the hottest -- we have the hottest country in the world right now.' The Global Business Alliance was among the groups that signed a letter on Monday warning of the consequences of Section 899 to Senate Majority Leader John Thune of South Dakota and Senate Finance Committee Chairman Mike Crapo of Idaho, both Republicans. The Investment Company Institute, representing financial firms, said the provision 'could limit foreign investment to the U.S. — a key driver of growth in American capital markets that ultimately benefits American families saving for their futures.' The analysis performed by EY Quantitative Economics and Statistics notes there is a degree of uncertainty in how the taxes under Section 899 could be implemented and other countries would respond. But they could be charged against companies based in countries that tax digital services, as is the case in parts of Europe. If the U.S. judged the taxes unfair, there would be a 30% tax rate on foreign companies' profits and income. People working in the U.S. for the companies who are not citizens could also be taxed, among other provisions. Still, an exemption is in place so that the foreign holders of U.S. debt are not affected by the potential new taxes. The possibility of the taxes and seemingly arbitrary nature by which they could be imposed is also a challenge, said Chye-Ching Huang, executive director of New York University's Tax Law Center. 'Section 899 creates a game of political chicken with trade partners that risks harming businesses, consumers, and workers in the hopes of securing US multinationals the ability to shift more of their profits out of the US to tax havens,' Huang said in an email. 'It's a high-risk strategy that could expand the damage of the failed tariff war.' There could also be political repercussions if key states in Trump's political coalition from 2024 suffer layoffs or simply find job growth slowing. The Global Business Alliance finds job losses could amount to 44,200 in Florida, 27,700 in Pennsylvania, 24,500 in North Carolina and 23,500 in Michigan. ___ Associated Press writer Fatima Hussein contributed to this report. Josh Boak, The Associated Press
The Market Online
5 hours ago
- The Market Online
@ the Bell: Markets steady as investors eye trade talks
Canada's main stock index climbed on Tuesday, despite a dip in oil prices though the energy sector grew. Meanwhile, the Canadian government announced plans to increase military spending to meet NATO's target of 2 per cent of GDP within the current fiscal year—a move some analysts believe could smooth the way for a trade agreement with the United States. Investors continued to monitor the progress of US-China trade negotiations, hoping for a resolution that avoids the imposition of significant tariffs by either side. Last month, both countries agreed to temporarily reduce their tariffs, a development seen as a positive step following President Donald Trump's proposal for sweeping import duties. Looking ahead, traders are turning their attention to Wednesday's US inflation report, which is expected to shape market expectations around potential interest rate cuts by the Federal Reserve. The Canadian dollar traded for 73.04 cents US compared to 73.03 cents US on Monday. US crude futures traded $0.59 lower at US$64.70 a barrel, and the Brent contract lost $0.45 to US$66.59 a barrel. The price of gold was down US$12.02 to US$3,321.54. In world markets, the Nikkei was up 122.94 points to ¥38,211.51, the Hang Seng was down 18.56 points to HK$24,162.87 the FTSE was up 20.80 points to ₤8,853.08, but the DAX was down 186.76 points to €23,987.56. The material provided in this article is for information only and should not be treated as investment advice. For full disclaimer information, please click here.
