logo
Trump officials are vowing to end school desegregation orders. Some parents say they're still needed

Trump officials are vowing to end school desegregation orders. Some parents say they're still needed

Hindustan Times3 days ago

FERRIDAY, La. — Even at a glance, the differences are obvious. The walls of Ferriday High School are old and worn, surrounded by barbed wire. Just a few miles away, Vidalia High School is clean and bright, with a new library and a crisp blue 'V' painted on orange brick.
Ferriday High is 90% Black. Vidalia High is 62% white.
For Black families, the contrast between the schools suggests 'we're not supposed to have the finer things,' said Brian Davis, a father in Ferriday. 'It's almost like our kids don't deserve it,' he said.
The schools are part of Concordia Parish, which was ordered to desegregate 60 years ago and remains under a court-ordered plan to this day. Yet there's growing momentum to release the district — and dozens of others — from decades-old orders that some call obsolete.
In a remarkable reversal, the Justice Department said it plans to start unwinding court-ordered desegregation plans dating to the Civil Rights Movement. Officials started in April, when they lifted a 1960s order in Louisiana's Plaquemines Parish. Harmeet Dhillon, who leads the department's civil rights division, has said others will 'bite the dust.'
It comes amid pressure from Republican Gov. Jeff Landry and his attorney general, who have called for all the state's remaining orders to be lifted. They describe the orders as burdens on districts and relics of a time when Black students were still forbidden from some schools.
The orders were always meant to be temporary — school systems can be released if they demonstrate they fully eradicated segregation. Decades later, that goal remains elusive, with stark racial imbalances persisting in many districts.
Civil rights groups say the orders are important to keep as tools to address the legacy of forced segregation — including disparities in student discipline, academic programs and teacher hiring. They point to cases like Concordia, where the decades-old order was used to stop a charter school from favoring white students in admissions.
'Concordia is one where it's old, but a lot is happening there,' said Deuel Ross, deputy director of litigation for the NAACP Legal Defense Fund. 'That's true for a lot of these cases. They're not just sitting silently.'
Last year, before President Donald Trump took office, Concordia Parish rejected a Justice Department plan that would have ended its case if the district combined several majority white and majority Black elementary and middle schools.
At a town hall meeting, Vidalia residents vigorously opposed the plan, saying it would disrupt students' lives and expose their children to drugs and violence. An official from the Louisiana attorney general's office spoke against the proposal and said the Trump administration likely would change course on older orders.
Accepting the plan would have been a 'death sentence' for the district, said Paul Nelson, a former Concordia superintendent. White families would have fled to private schools or other districts, said Nelson, who wants the court order removed.
'It's time to move on,' said Nelson, who left the district in 2016. 'Let's start looking to build for the future, not looking back to what our grandparents may have gone through.'
At Ferriday High, athletic coach Derrick Davis supported combining schools in Ferriday and Vidalia. He said the district's disparities come into focus whenever his teams visit schools with newer sports facilities.
'It seems to me, if we'd all combine, we can all get what we need,' he said.
Others oppose merging schools if it's done solely for the sake of achieving racial balance. 'Redistricting and going to different places they're not used to ... it would be a culture shock to some people," said Ferriday's school resource officer, Marcus Martin, who like Derrick Davis is Black.
The district's current superintendent and school board did not respond to requests for comment.
Concordia is among more than 120 districts across the South that remain under desegregation orders from the 1960s and '70s, including about a dozen in Louisiana.
Calling the orders historical relics is 'unequivocally false,' said Shaheena Simons, who until April led the Justice Department section that oversees school desegregation cases.
'Segregation and inequality persist in our schools, and they persist in districts that are still under desegregation orders,' she said.
With court orders in place, families facing discrimination can reach out directly to the Justice Department or seek relief from the court. Otherwise, the only recourse is a lawsuit, which many families can't afford, Simons said.
In Concordia, the order played into a battle over a charter school that opened in 2013 on the former campus of an all-white private school. To protect the area's progress on racial integration, a judge ordered Delta Charter School to build a student body that reflected the district's racial demographics. But in its first year, the school was just 15% Black.
After a court challenge, Delta was ordered to give priority to Black students. Today, about 40% of its students are Black.
Desegregation orders have been invoked recently in other cases around the state. One led to an order to address disproportionately high rates of discipline for Black students, and in another a predominantly Black elementary school was relocated from a site close to a chemical plant.
The Trump administration was able to close the Plaquemines case with little resistance because the original plaintiffs are no longer involved — the Justice Department was litigating the case alone. Concordia and an unknown number of other districts are in the same situation, making them vulnerable to quick dismissals.
Concordia's case dates to 1965, when the area was strictly segregated and home to a violent offshoot of the Ku Klux Klan. When Black families in Ferriday sued for access to all-white schools, the federal government intervened.
As the district integrated its schools, white families fled Ferriday. The district's schools came to reflect the demographics of their surrounding areas. Ferriday is mostly Black and low-income, while Vidalia is mostly white and takes in tax revenue from a hydroelectric plant. A third town in the district, Monterey, has a high school that's 95% white.
At the December town hall, Vidalia resident Ronnie Blackwell said the area 'feels like a Mayberry, which is great,' referring to the fictional Southern town from 'The Andy Griffith Show.' The federal government, he said, has 'probably destroyed more communities and school systems than it ever helped.'
Under its court order, Concordia must allow students in majority Black schools to transfer to majority white schools. It also files reports on teacher demographics and student discipline.
After failing to negotiate a resolution with the Justice Department, Concordia is scheduled to make its case that the judge should dismiss the order, according to court documents. Meanwhile, amid a wave of resignations in the federal government, all but two of the Justice Department lawyers assigned to the case have left.
Without court supervision, Brian Davis sees little hope for improvement.
'A lot of parents over here in Ferriday, they're stuck here because here they don't have the resources to move their kids from A to B," he said. 'You'll find schools like Ferriday — the term is, to me, slipping into darkness."
The Associated Press' education coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. is solely responsible for all content. Find 's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at .org.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Elon Musk regrets some posts about Donald Trump, says ‘went too far…'
Elon Musk regrets some posts about Donald Trump, says ‘went too far…'

Mint

time22 minutes ago

  • Mint

Elon Musk regrets some posts about Donald Trump, says ‘went too far…'

Billionaire Elon Musk has posted on his social media platform X, expressing regret about some of his posts regarding United States President Donald Trump last week. Notably, Elon Musk and Donald Trump engaged in a public fued over TV interviews and X posts after the Tesla and SpaceX CEO left his role in the government and criticised the Republican party's new tax bill proposal. One such post by the world's richest man alleged that Donald Trump is on the infamous Jeffrey Epstein files, and implied that this is why the government is not releasing the documens to the public. 'Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT! Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out,' alleged Elon Musk in his post, which was deleted on June 7. 'I regret some of my posts about President Donald Trump last week. They went too far,' Elon Musk posted on X on June 11. Earlier on June 10, Donald Trump and Elon Musk appeared to take a step back from their highly publicised feud that dominated headlines. When asked by reporters if he plans to speak to the Elon Musk, the US President said, 'I haven't really thought about it actually. I would imagine he wants to speak to me. If I were him, I would want to speak to me. Maybe he's already called. You'd have to ask him. We had a good relationship and I just wish him well, very well actually.' Reacting to a clip posted on X, Elon Musk posted a simple heart emoji, indicating that the hostilities were at least on pause, if not stopped. The relationship took a turn for the worse, after the world's richest person openly criticised the Republican's 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' and lambasted it as 'outrageous, pork-filled' and a 'disgusting abomination,' urging GOP lawmakers to 'kill' it. In retaliation, Donald Trump said the tech billionaire 'went crazy' and 'lost his mind', while threatening to halt federal contracts for Elon Musk's companies, including removing SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft from NASA missions.

Allies To Rivals To Allies Again? Timeline Of Musk-Trump Feud
Allies To Rivals To Allies Again? Timeline Of Musk-Trump Feud

NDTV

time23 minutes ago

  • NDTV

Allies To Rivals To Allies Again? Timeline Of Musk-Trump Feud

It was the third week of Donald Trump's second term in the Oval Office. His most trusted lieutenant, Elon Musk, led a massive initiative, Department of Government Efficiency (DoGE), to slash federal spending. On February 7, the billionaire, who spent roughly $300 million on the Republican candidate's election campaign, posted on X, "I love@realDonaldTrump as much as a straight man can love another man." Much water has flown under the bridge since Musk proclaimed his love for Trump. Almost everything has changed. The Tesla CEO is no longer a part of the Trump administration, and the duo has had an ugly fallout, all in public. And now, Musk has blinked, admitting he went "too far" in his recent online attacks against Trump. "I regret some of my posts about President @realDonaldTrump last week," the Tesla CEO wrote on X. "They went too far." The feud started after Musk called Trump's tax bill a "disgusting abomination." It quickly spiralled, with the billionaire suggesting the President be impeached and accusing the government of hiding his ties to Jeffrey Epstein, the late convicted sex offender. Timeline: The Trump-Musk Feud May 29 Elon Musk announced he would be stepping down from his role in the Trump administration after finishing his term as a special government employee. He led DoGE. June 2 Donald Trump defended his landmark economic proposal, known as the "One Big Beautiful Bill," on Truth Social, "Many false statements are being made about our big, beautiful bill." June 3 Elon Musk posted a fiery critique of Trump's spending bill. "I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it," he wrote on X. He added in a follow-up post, "It will massively increase the already gigantic budget deficit to $2.5 trillion (!!!) and burden American citizens with crushingly unsustainable debt." June 4 Elon Musk suggested Congress needs to write a new bill. "A new spending bill should be drafted that doesn't massively grow the deficit and increase the debt ceiling by 5 TRILLION DOLLARS," he said. June 5 Musk asked to " Kill the bill." "Call your Senator, Call your Congressman, Bankrupting America is NOT ok! KILL the BILL." The same day, in response to Trump saying Musk was upset over EV subsidy cuts, Musk posted, "Keep the EV/solar incentive cuts in the bill, even though no oil & gas subsidies are touched (very unfair!!), but ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill." "In the entire history of civilization, there has never been legislation that is both big and beautiful. Everyone knows this!" "Either you get a big and ugly bill or a slim and beautiful bill. Slim and beautiful is the way." Then came the bombshell. "Time to drop the really big bomb: Donald Trump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!," Musk wrote in an X post, which he later deleted. Musk even appeared to support Trump's impeachment. At the White House, Trump replied, "Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will any more. Very disappointed in Elon." He also revealed Musk was "aware" of the bill. Musk shot back, "False. This bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress would even read it!" Then came more jabs. "Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate. Such ingratitude," he said. "The Big Ugly Bill will INCREASE the deficit to $2.5 trillion," he added. He even proposed a new party, "Is it time to create a new political party in America that actually represents the 80% in the middle?" Musk also dug up Trump's old 2012-2013 tweets slamming government overspending, calling him out and asking, "Where is this guy today??" June 6 Trump fired back on Truth Social. He wrote, "Elon was 'wearing thin,' I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!" He added, "The easiest way to save money in our Budget is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts". He also said, "I don't mind Elon turning against me, but he should have done so months ago." Elon Musk said, "If this bill passes, we will decommission our Dragon capsules and halt cooperation with NASA's deep space initiatives." He later took back his words. Musk also posted, "Tariffs will cause a recession in the second half of this year." Asked about Musk in an ABC interview, Donald Trump said, "You mean the man who has lost his mind?" He also warned of "serious consequences" if Musk supports Democrats in 2026, and said he had no plans to reconcile. Later that day, Musk appeared to soften. Replying to billionaire Bill Ackman's peace offer, he said, " You're not wrong." June 10 Trump told reporters, "I just wish [Musk] well." Musk responded to the video with a red heart emoji on X. June 11

Mexican flag fuels debate amid LA protests over immigration raids
Mexican flag fuels debate amid LA protests over immigration raids

Business Standard

time38 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

Mexican flag fuels debate amid LA protests over immigration raids

Los Angeles has been roiled in protests since Friday, when ICE officers conducted raids at several workplaces in the city's garment district ANI US Mexico's green, white and red flag has emerged as a defining symbol of the ongoing immigration protests in Los Angeles, CNN reported. Demonstrators have been waving the Mexican flag alongside those of other Latin American countries and the United States to express solidarity with immigrants and to protest against recent federal raids. Los Angeles has been roiled in protests since Friday, when ICE officers conducted raids at several workplaces in the city's garment district. While initially peaceful, the protests have led to dozens of arrests and some violent clashes. President Donald Trump deployed thousands of National Guard troops and Marines, sparking outrage from Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom, who described the mobilization as an "illegal takeover" and a "blatant abuse of power." The Mexican flag has been a longstanding symbol in immigration protests, especially in LA, which is seen as the capital of the Mexican diaspora in the US. According to Census data, over 3.4 million people of Mexican heritage or birth live in Los Angeles County--more than any other US county. Republican leaders have criticized the prominence of the flag. "Insurrectionists carrying foreign flags are attacking immigration enforcement officers," Vice President JD Vance wrote on X. Senator Markwayne Mullin told CNN's Dana Bash, "They were literally out there protesting, carrying a foreign flag. That is absolutely insane. They're not just peaceful protesters. These are illegals." The Department of Homeland Security has circulated images showing protesters clashing with police while waving the Mexican flag. Stephen Miller, Trump's deputy chief of staff for policy, described the demonstrators on social media as "foreign nationals, waving foreign flags, rioting and obstructing federal law enforcement attempting to expel illegal foreign invaders." Despite criticism, protesters and academics defended the symbolic use of the flag. Raul Hinojosa-Ojeda, a UCLA professor, said such demonization of symbols is a "well-documented move on the part of the Trump administration, knowing that every single demonstration of this type brings out the Mexican flag." Former Congressman Adam Kinzinger told CNN the optics were poor: "The visuals of the Mexican flag at protests are terrible, honestly... I just think that it would be much stronger if they were carrying American flags only." The flag's presence in protests has deep roots. Jorge Castaneda, former Mexican foreign minister, said, "This is something that goes back to the 1990s, when many people protested against Proposition 187," adding that most demonstrators today are likely American citizens. He noted it would be "quite reckless and foolish" for undocumented individuals to protest publicly due to deportation risks. Republican strategist Mike Madrid argued in the Sacramento Bee that waving the Mexican flag "transforms what should be a debate about American constitutional rights and due process into a conversation about foreign loyalty and cultural assimilation." However, others see the flag as a symbol of unity and identity. "The flags mean their families. The flags mean their communities. It's not about having an international invasion," Hinojosa-Ojeda said. Antonio Rodriguez, an organizer with the Brown Berets, said, "I don't necessarily think just because somebody has pride in their culture that they're un-American... Waving a Mexican flag, for us, is showing pride in our culture and our family. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store