Court records reveal prosecutors allege Kohberger bought knife, sheath before Idaho homicides
This is a breaking news story. Check back to idahostatesman.com for updates. To sign up for breaking news alerts, click here.
Bryan Kohberger, the man charged with murder in the fatal stabbings of four University of Idaho students, bought the same brand of knife that police suspect was used in the violent crime in November 2022, according to a new court filing.
In March 2022, Kohberger ordered a Ka-Bar knife with sheath and a sharpener from Amazon, the prosecution alleged in the legal brief, which was filed Monday but not made public until Wednesday. Detectives found a Ka-Bar brand leather knife sheath that included the U.S. Marine Corps stamped insignia at the crime scene in Moscow next to one of the victims and later discovered DNA on its button snap, according to a probable cause affidavit.
Assisting with the high-profile case, the FBI used an advanced forensic technique called investigative genetic genealogy, or IGG, with the knife sheath DNA to initially land on Kohberger as the suspect in late December 2022, prosecutors previously said. After Kohberger's arrest 12 days later in Pennsylvania, police and prosecutors allege the DNA was matched directly to Kohberger through a swab of his cheek.
The four U of I student victims were Kaylee Goncalves, 21, of Rathdrum; Madison Mogen, 21, of Coeur d'Alene; Xana Kernodle, 20, of Post Falls; and Ethan Chapin, 20, of Mount Vernon, Washington. The three women lived in the Moscow home with two other young women who went physically unharmed; Chapin was Kernodle's boyfriend and stayed over for the night.
Each victim died from stab wounds and sharp-force injuries caused by an edged weapon, believed to be a large, fixed-blade knife, Latah County Coroner Cathy Mabbutt previously said. Just days into the sprawling homicide investigation, the Idaho Statesman was first to report that police were canvassing area hardware stores asking about any recent sales of fixed-blade knives.
Kohberger, 30, is charged with four counts of first-degree murder, and prosecutors intend to seek the death penalty if a jury finds him guilty. He is a former graduate student at Washington State University in Pullman, Washington. In summer 2022, Kohberger moved from Pennsylvania, where he grew up, to Washington to attend WSU's doctorate program of criminal justice and criminology, according to court records.
After a court hearing in November 2024 in Boise, Steve Goncavles, father of victim Kaylee Goncalves, told the Statesman in an interview that he was informed of evidence that Kohberger bought a Ka-Bar knife before he relocated to the West for graduate school.
'I think he had thought about this crime immensely, planned it, and I think the facts will bear that out,' Steve Goncalves said. 'I've been told the murder weapon was purchased in Pennsylvania. (If) you come out with that, then you're coming with a plan.'
It remains unknown if police have found the weapon they believe was used to kill the four students. Kohberger's defense has said repeatedly in court that their client has no connection to the victims and is innocent of the crimes for which he stands accused.
The defense said in a court filing last month aimed at excluding the prosecution's use of information obtained from Amazon at trial that the search warrants were overly broad, and resulting data 'incomplete' and from a 'household account shared by Mr. Kohberger and other family members.'
'Cherry-picking specific clicks or purchases out of an Amazon click-history removes all of the context,' read the filings signed by defense attorney Elisa Massoth.
In fact, investigators 'narrowly tailored' their search warrant for Kohberger's Amazon account and disclosed all of the data to the defense, the prosecution argued in response Monday. The account's historic data showed 'purchase of a Ka-Bar knife with sheath before the murders and his click activity indicat(ed) a search for a knife with sheath after the murders,' the filing read.
Prosecutors plan to use means other than Amazon click activity to connect the knife purchase — 'and subsequent search inquiries for a replacement knife and/or sheath' — to Kohberger, including his financial activities, they added.
Investigators in the case limited their spring 2023 search warrant to Amazon account activity, including payment methods, cart items, wish lists, purchases and reviews of knives and accessories viewed by Kohberger from March 20 to March 30, 2022 and also from Nov. 1 to Dec. 6, 2022, prosecutors wrote. Amazon responded with the requested data in June 2023, and two weeks later prosecutors provided the same information to the defense, they wrote.
NBC's 'Dateline' previously reported Kohberger purchased a Ka-Bar knife, but cited only unnamed law enforcement sources.
Kohberger's capital murder trial is set for this summer in Boise, starting with jury selection in late July. Opening statements are expected to begin by mid-August.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Critics want U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi disbarred, but at what cost?
The Florida Bar on Friday dismissed a complaint brought by a coalition of about 70 liberal-leaning and moderate law professors, attorneys and former Florida Supreme Court justices against U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi. The complaint accuses Bondi, Florida's former attorney general, of violating her ethical duties in her current job. As the Miami Herald reported, the complaint claims Bondi 'has sought to compel Department of Justice lawyers to violate their ethical obligations under the guise of 'zealous advocacy.'' While Bondi may have violated ethical rules — that's unclear — disbarring a U.S. attorney general is extreme and could be a slippery slope. The move would no doubt be seen, perhaps rightfully so, as political retribution, and that would only add more fuel to the raging dumpster fire of our partisan politics these days. The complaint outlined three instances in which the coalition said Bondi's conduct violated Florida Bar rules and longstanding norms of the Justice Department. In one instance, they said, she fired a seasoned immigration lawyer who the Trump administration said sabotaged the case in the mistaken deportation of a Maryland man to El Salvador. Another instance cited: A longtime federal prosecutor in the District of Columbia resigned rather than carry out enforcement orders that she said were unsupported by evidence. A third example: Several senior federal prosecutors in New York and Washington resigned after they refused to follow a Justice Department order to drop corruption charges against New York Mayor Eric Adams. The Bar rejected the complaint Friday, as it had done with two previous complaints about Bondi by the same group, and cited a jurisdictional issue. It said it 'does not investigate or prosecute sitting officers appointed under the U.S. Constitution while they are in office.' The group includes two retired Florida Supreme Court justices, Barbara J. Pariente and Peggy A. Quince. Make no mistake: Bondi is deeply political. And she has shown her commitment to carry out President Donald Trump's agenda at all costs. Bondi has made it clear that the president's priorities and the DOJ's mission are, in her view, one and the same. This is a break in the fire wall that has long existed between the presidency and the Justice Department. But politicizing the law — or the Bar — isn't the answer, no matter which side is doing it. Ethical standards must be enforced. That's a cornerstone of the legal profession. But it's hypocritical to condemn Bondi's politicization of the DOJ while attempting a similar act via the Bar. We recognize that Trump's Justice Department is by design, political. And Bondi's actions have been extremely partisan — including when she placed the DOJ attorney on leave in the case of the Maryland man who had been wrongly deported a man to El Salvador. 'At my direction, every Department of Justice attorney is required to zealously advocate on behalf of the United States,' Bondi said in a statement. 'Any attorney who fails to abide by this direction will face consequences.' The Florida Bar exists to ensure the integrity of the legal system is protected – not act as a political referee. It's understandable that some feel justified challenging Bondi's standing as a lawyer. Bondi's conduct does warrant scrutiny, and she holds an enormous amount of power as the U.S. attorney general. But the uncertainty of the times shouldn't be a reason to use the law to punish ideological opponents, even if we think the other side does it, here to send the letter.

Miami Herald
2 days ago
- Miami Herald
Critics want U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi disbarred, but at what cost?
The Florida Bar on Friday dismissed a complaint brought by a coalition of about 70 liberal-leaning and moderate law professors, attorneys and former Florida Supreme Court justices against U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi. The complaint accuses Bondi, Florida's former attorney general, of violating her ethical duties in her current job. As the Miami Herald reported, the complaint claims Bondi 'has sought to compel Department of Justice lawyers to violate their ethical obligations under the guise of 'zealous advocacy.'' While Bondi may have violated ethical rules — that's unclear — disbarring a U.S. attorney general is extreme and could be a slippery slope. The move would no doubt be seen, perhaps rightfully so, as political retribution, and that would only add more fuel to the raging dumpster fire of our partisan politics these days. The complaint outlined three instances in which the coalition said Bondi's conduct violated Florida Bar rules and longstanding norms of the Justice Department. In one instance, they said, she fired a seasoned immigration lawyer who the Trump administration said sabotaged the case in the mistaken deportation of a Maryland man to El Salvador. Another instance cited: A longtime federal prosecutor in the District of Columbia resigned rather than carry out enforcement orders that she said were unsupported by evidence. A third example: Several senior federal prosecutors in New York and Washington resigned after they refused to follow a Justice Department order to drop corruption charges against New York Mayor Eric Adams. The Bar rejected the complaint Friday, as it had done with two previous complaints about Bondi by the same group, and cited a jurisdictional issue. It said it 'does not investigate or prosecute sitting officers appointed under the U.S. Constitution while they are in office.' The group includes two retired Florida Supreme Court justices, Barbara J. Pariente and Peggy A. Quince. Make no mistake: Bondi is deeply political. And she has shown her commitment to carry out President Donald Trump's agenda at all costs. Bondi has made it clear that the president's priorities and the DOJ's mission are, in her view, one and the same. This is a break in the fire wall that has long existed between the presidency and the Justice Department. But politicizing the law — or the Bar — isn't the answer, no matter which side is doing it. Ethical standards must be enforced. That's a cornerstone of the legal profession. But it's hypocritical to condemn Bondi's politicization of the DOJ while attempting a similar act via the Bar. We recognize that Trump's Justice Department is by design, political. And Bondi's actions have been extremely partisan — including when she placed the DOJ attorney on leave in the case of the Maryland man who had been wrongly deported a man to El Salvador. 'At my direction, every Department of Justice attorney is required to zealously advocate on behalf of the United States,' Bondi said in a statement. 'Any attorney who fails to abide by this direction will face consequences.' The Florida Bar exists to ensure the integrity of the legal system is protected – not act as a political referee. It's understandable that some feel justified challenging Bondi's standing as a lawyer. Bondi's conduct does warrant scrutiny, and she holds an enormous amount of power as the U.S. attorney general. But the uncertainty of the times shouldn't be a reason to use the law to punish ideological opponents, even if we think the other side does it, too. Click here to send the letter.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Key figures from Bryan Kohberger's Pennsylvania youth summoned to Idaho for student murders trial
FIRST ON FOX: Key figures from Idaho student murders suspect Bryan Kohberger's Pennsylvania past have been summoned as witnesses in his upcoming trial, according to court documents. They include Jesse Harris, whose name is on the boxing gym where Kohberger used to train, Ann Parham, an advisor at the school Kohberger attended, and Marie Bolger, a former professor who taught Kohberger at DeSales University. Kohberger wrote that he boxed daily at Harris' gym in a 2015 job application previously obtained by Fox News Digital. Bryan Kohberger Defense Suggests 'Alternate Perpetrators' In Idaho Murders, Joining Infamous Legal Strategy In a 2023 interview with the Daily Mail, Bolger said Kohberger was one of her brightest students and one of only two she had recommended for Ph.D. programs in a decade. However, she explained, she'd never met him in person and only taught him over email and Zoom during the height of the coronavirus pandemic. She helped him work on his graduate thesis, which centered on "how and why criminals commit their crime," she said. Read On The Fox News App Bryan Kohberger Defense Claims 'Alternate Perpetrators' In Idaho Student Murders Follow The Fox True Crime Team On X Two other witnesses are Ralph Vecchio and Maggie Sanders. Their connections to the case were not immediately clear. The documents were made public in a Pennsylvania court days after Kohberger's defense filed an amended witness list in Boise. Kohberger is accused of fatally stabbing four University of Idaho students in a 4 a.m. home invasion attack -- Madison Mogen, 21, Kaylee Goncalves, 21, Xana Kernodle, 20, and Ethan Chapin, also 20. Sign Up To Get The True Crime Newsletter Prosecutors allege he left his DNA on a knife sheath detectives found with Mogen's body. They also plan to introduce some of his DeSales homework as evidence he was well-versed in concepts related to crime scene handling and the transfer of evidence. He was pursuing a Ph.D. in criminology at Washington State University at the time of the murders and previously obtained a master's degree from DeSales. The trail begins in August. Kohberger could face death by firing squad if article source: Key figures from Bryan Kohberger's Pennsylvania youth summoned to Idaho for student murders trial