logo
Drone footage reveals orcas making tools from kelp to groom each other

Drone footage reveals orcas making tools from kelp to groom each other

Independent3 days ago

Orcas, also known as killer whales, have been documented using an ingenious method to groom one another, a new study reveals, by detaching sections of seaweed to provide a communal back scratch.
Researchers observed the marine mammals biting off the end of a kelp stalk, positioning it between themselves and a companion, and then rolling the seaweed between their bodies for extended periods.
This unique behaviour, akin to a shared massage, highlights the complex social dynamics of these apex predators.
The intriguing findings were detailed in a study led by the Centre for Whale Research (CWR), in collaboration with the University of Exete.
The paper, published in the journal Current Biology, is entitled: 'Wild killer whales manufacture and use allogrooming tools.'
Scientists spotted the behaviour in drone footage of southern resident orcas in the Salish Sea, in the inland waters of the US state of Washington.
Whales of all ages were seen partaking in the tool-making, possibly to strengthen social bonds and promote skin health, researchers suggested.
CWR research director Dr Michael Weiss said researchers were 'amazed' when they first noticed the behaviour.
Several whale species are known to engage in 'kelping' – moving kelp with their heads, fins and bodies – likely for play, or possibly to remove parasites and maintain healthy skin.
The new discovery, dubbed 'allokelping', is different because the kelp is selected, trimmed and manipulated by two whales working together.
Dr Weiss added: 'Bull kelp stalk is firm but flexible, like a filled garden hose, with a slippery outer surface. I suspect these features make it an ideal grooming tool.
'What I find remarkable about this behaviour is just how widespread it is in the population.
'Males and females of all life stages and from all three southern resident pods were seen using kelp in this way. All evidence points to it being an important part of their social lives.'
The team observed allokelping on eight out of 12 days included in the study and based on their observations, suspect that this behaviour may be universal in this population.
Whales were most likely to pair up to allokelp with close maternal relatives, and those of similar age.
Rachel John, a masters student studying animal behaviour at the University of Exeter, said: 'This population of whales has been formally studied for 50 years – the best-studied orcas on the planet – and yet major new discoveries can still be made.
'We hadn't noticed 'allokelping' before because the videos being collected from our previous aircraft weren't of high enough quality, but the footage we're getting now shows this behaviour in great detail.'
Commenting on the possible reasons for allokelping, Professor Darren Croft, of the University of Exeter and CWR's executive director, said: 'We know touch is really important.
'In primates – including humans – touch moderates stress and helps to build relationships.
'We know killer whales often make contact with other members of their group – touching with their bodies and fins – but using kelp like this might enhance this experience.
'It might also be important for skin health. Whales and dolphins have a variety of strategies to help them slough dead skin, and this may be yet another adaptation for this purpose.
'Brown algaes like bull kelp also have antibacterial and anti-inflammatory properties that may provide further benefits to the whales.'
Professor Croft said researchers were working to confirm the initial findings and 'investigate the social and skin health benefits of this behaviour'.
Other orcas are known to rub their bodies on smooth stone beaches, possibly to remove dead skin and parasites, but the southern resident whales have not been seen doing this.
Funders of the study included the UK Natural Environment Research Council and the Orca Fund, a grant making fund created by Wild Fish Conservancy and administered by the Rose Foundation for Communities and the Environment.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

RFK Jr's new vaccine committee issues bombshell decision on flu shots after previous panel was fired en masse
RFK Jr's new vaccine committee issues bombshell decision on flu shots after previous panel was fired en masse

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

RFK Jr's new vaccine committee issues bombshell decision on flu shots after previous panel was fired en masse

RFK Jr.'s newly-appointed vaccine advisory panel voted to recommend Americans take flu shots without a chemical that conspiracy theorists believe causes autism. The dramatic reversal in federal vaccine guidance follows Kennedy's sweeping removal of all 17 members of the previous Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) earlier this month. Their replacements, handpicked by Kennedy and including several vaccine skeptics, cast their first major vote by a margin of 5–1 to discourage use of thimerosal-containing flu shots - a formulation used in less than 5% of doses in the U.S. Scientists have determine that the mercury-based preservative thimerosal poses no health risk and is already absent from the vast majority of vaccines. The panel's decision ignores decades of scientific consensus and comes despite the Food and Drug Administration stating clearly that thimerosal is safe and that its removal from most vaccines was a precautionary move, not one based on evidence of harm. A CDC report affirming that conclusion was removed from the committee's website ahead of Thursday's vote after Kennedy's office reportedly blocked its release. Anti-vaccine groups have for decades linked thimerosal to autism and other neurodevelopmental disorders, and Kennedy wrote a book in 2014 in which he advocated for 'the immediate removal of mercury' from vaccines. Study after study has found no evidence that thimerosal causes autism or other harm. Yet since 2001, all vaccines routinely used for US children age 6 years or younger have come in thimerosal-free formulas - including single-dose flu shots that account for the vast majority of influenza vaccinations. Anti-vaccine groups have for decades linked thimerosal to autism and other neurodevelopmental disorders, and Kennedy wrote a book in 2014 in which he advocated for 'the immediate removal of mercury' from vaccines 'There is still no demonstrable evidence of harm,' one panelist, Dr. Joseph Hibbeln, a psychiatrist formerly with the National Institutes of Health, said in acknowledging the committee wasn't following its usual practice of acting on evidence. But he added that 'whether the actual molecule is a risk or not, we have to respect the fear of mercury' that might dissuade some people from getting vaccinated. In recent days, Kennedy has posted on X about its alleged dangers. The FDA on its website says 'there was no evidence that thimerosal in vaccines was dangerous,' and that the decision to remove it previously was a precautionary measure to decrease overall exposure to mercury among young infants. Multi-dose forms of CSL's Afluria and Flucelvax as well as Sanofi's Fluzone use thimerosal as a preservative, according to the FDA's website. Sanofi said it will have sufficient supply of its flu vaccine to support customer preference for this season. CSL said it supplies a very low number of multi-dose vials of flu vaccine in response to demand. Medical groups decried the panel´s lack of transparency in blocking a CDC analysis of thimerosal that concluded there was no link between the preservative and neurodevelopmental disorders, including autism. The data had been posted on the committee's website Tuesday, but was later removed - because, according to ACIP member Dr. Robert Malone, the report hadn't been authorized by Kennedy´s office. Panel members said they had read it. The panel, called the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, voted 5-1 in three separate votes to recommend thimerosal-free shots. The now 7-person panel was installed by Kennedy earlier this month after he abruptly fired all 17 members of the the influential Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) and handpicked replacements that include several vaccine skeptics. The ACIP panel advises the CDC determine who should be vaccinated against a long list of diseases, and when. Those recommendations have a big impact on whether insurance covers vaccinations and where they're available. It typically meets three times a year and intends to conduct its next meeting in the third quarter, CDC said. 'The risk from influenza is so much greater than the nonexistent - as far as we know - risk from thimerosal. So I would hate for a person not to receive the influenza vaccine because the only available preparation contains thimerosal,' Dr. Cody Meissner, the only panel member who voted against the recommendation, said in explaining his vote. Lyn Redwood, formerly of the Kennedy-founded anti-vaccine group Children's Health Defense, gave the presentation on thimerosal, arguing that it was a neurotoxin. Redwood's presentation posted on the CDC's website earlier this week initially included a reference to a study that does not exist. The report she gave to the committee was significantly shorter, removing a slide that made a reference to that study and another saying she did not have any conflicts of interest. 'With the vote on thimerosal this afternoon, the new committee has turned the ACIP process into a farce,' said former CDC vaccine adviser Dr. Fiona Havers, who resigned last week over Kennedy's changes to vaccine policy. She said it is unprecedented to have an outside speaker present and then move immediately to a vote. Evidence is usually compiled formally by CDC and reviewed by a work group. She noted that CDC experts did not present their data publicly to refute Redwood. xCBS and The New York Times have reported that the agency hired Redwood to work in its vaccine safety office. An HHS spokesman declined to comment on whether Redwood had been hired by the CDC. While Thursday's debate involved only a small fraction of flu vaccines, some public health experts contend the discussion unnecessarily raised doubt about vaccine safety. Already, fewer than half of Americans get their yearly flu vaccinations, and mistrust in vaccines overall is growing. 'Selective use of data and omission of established science undermines public trust and fuels misinformation,' said Dr. Sean O´Leary of the American Academy of Pediatrics. He said of the new panelists, 'Nothing about their recent actions have been science-based or transparent.' The flu votes marked the final step of a two-day meeting that alarmed pediatricians and other doctors' groups, who pointed to new panelists' lack of expertise in how to properly track vaccine safety - and a shift in focus to some longtime messages of antivaccine groups. 'What should have been a rigorous, evidence-based discussion on the national vaccine schedule instead appeared to be a predetermined exercise orchestrated to undermine the well-established safety and efficacy of vaccines and fundamental basics of science,' said Dr. Jason Goldman of the American College of Physicians. Of special concern was the announcement by panel chairman Martin Kulldorff to reevaluate the 'cumulative effect' of the children's vaccine schedule - the list of immunizations given at different times throughout childhood. That reflects the scientifically debunked notion that children today get too many vaccinations, somehow overwhelming their immune system. Doctors say improved vaccine technology means kids today are exposed to fewer antigens - substances that the immune system reacts to - than their grandparents despite getting more doses. US Rep. Kim Schrier, a pediatrician and Democrat from Washington state, told reporters on Thursday that children are exposed to more antigens 'in one day of day care' than in all their vaccinations. Earlier on Thursday, the committee voted 5-2 to recommend use of Merck's recently approved RSV antibody drug Enflonsia for infants 8 months or younger whose mothers did not receive a preventive shot during pregnancy. ACIP panel member Retsef Levi raised safety concerns about the antibody drug, which were addressed by experts at the FDA and CDC. He said he would be concerned about giving the product to one of his healthy children and was one of the two votes against the recommendation. The panel's recommendations need to be adopted by either the CDC director or the Health and Human Services Secretary before becoming final. There is currently no CDC director. President Donald Trump's nominee for the post, Susan Monarez, spoke to a Senate committee on Wednesday as part of the confirmation process. Also at the ACIP meeting: The panel backed a new option to protect infants against RSV, a virus especially dangerous to babies. It voted 5-2 that a newly approved antibody shot from Merck could be used alongside two existing options. Kulldorff said the panel may look into whether hepatitis B vaccination of newborns is appropriate if the mother doesn't carry the liver-destroying virus. Pediatricians counter that babies can catch the virus in other ways, such as from other caregivers who don't know they're infected. Kennedy already sidestepped the advisory group and announced the COVID-19 vaccine will no longer be recommended for healthy children or pregnant women. But CDC scientists told the panel that vaccination is 'the best protection' during pregnancy and that most children hospitalized for COVID-19 over the past year were unvaccinated. Some advisers questioned if the CDC´s extensive tracking of vaccine safety is trustworthy.

Meta removes scientist's Facebook page after discussion about tornadoes and climate change, he claims
Meta removes scientist's Facebook page after discussion about tornadoes and climate change, he claims

The Independent

time9 hours ago

  • The Independent

Meta removes scientist's Facebook page after discussion about tornadoes and climate change, he claims

A scientist claimed a Missouri weather Facebook page he ran was removed by Meta after there was a discussion about tornadoes and climate change. Professor Anthony Lupo, an atmospheric scientist at the University of Missouri, was debating with a Facebook user on the Midwest Missouri Weather page he ran on the platform for more than five years. The pair were discussing the state's busy tornado season and the possible impacts of the weather phenomenon La Nina or climate change, he told The College Fix. Shortly after the exchange, Lupo's personal account was locked and when he regained access on June 8, he discovered 'the weather page was gone.' He described the discussion as mildly 'combative' but not overtly hostile in an interview with the college outlet. The other user argued that the busy tornado season was linked to climate change, not La Nina, as the professor posted. The scholar said that Meta did not give him a reason for removing the page. He added that he only had circumstantial evidence and reasoned that the page could have been taken down for other reasons. The Independent has contacted Meta for comment. Lupo said his page shared weather forecasts and summaries of the climate in Missouri. 'Occasionally, when I've done that, I got messages about violating community standards,' Lupo told The Fix. He said these instances were 'just summarizing numbers.' 'I would get this warning that your post may violate community standards and that would appear on the page itself for a short time,' he added. Experts warned that climate misinformation could spread far rapidly since Meta decided to bring in X-style community notes and remove its third-party fact-checking. It comes as Meta's CEO Mark Zuckerberg has implemented policy shifts that are more closely aligned with President Donald Trump since he was elected. 'The trend is towards living in a world where there basically are no facts. This is just sort of another step down the road,' Andrew Dessler, a climate scientist, previously told Politico. In April 2024, Meta blocked links on all of its platforms to a piece criticizing the company's alleged suppression of climate change content. Meta said it occurred due to a 'security error.'

Texas firm aims to build world's largest data energy complex with nuclear, gas, solar
Texas firm aims to build world's largest data energy complex with nuclear, gas, solar

Reuters

time9 hours ago

  • Reuters

Texas firm aims to build world's largest data energy complex with nuclear, gas, solar

WASHINGTON, June 26 (Reuters) - Fermi America, a Texas company co-founded by former U.S. Energy Secretary Rick Perry, aims to build the largest energy and data complex of its kind powered by nuclear, natural gas and solar, it said on Thursday. Fermi plans to partner on the "Hypergrid" project with Texas Tech University and said it will be launched on July 4. Perry, who also served as Texas governor, said that China is building 22 nuclear reactors while the U.S. is building none. "We're behind - and it's all hands on deck. We need to be doing everything in our power to win this race, because this is the race that really matters." Interest in building new nuclear plants has spiked after President Donald Trump issued executive orders last month that aim to fast track applications for new reactors and overhaul the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Nuclear critics and some proponents have criticized the overhaul as potentially detrimental to the industry and putting politics ahead of safety and public health. Trump this month also fired Democratic NRC commissioner Chris Hanson. Fermi said the Amarillo campus has the potential to deliver up to 11 gigawatts (GW) of new nuclear, gas and solar power, about enough for more than 8.2 million homes, with 1 GW expected online by late 2026. It did not say how much the project would cost or how it is being financed. Fermi said the project will be the largest U.S. nuclear power complex, but did not say when it would be completed. U.S. nuclear power has been plagued by delays and cost overruns, with the last reactor coming online last year in Georgia. The last two reactors completed in Vogtle, Georgia, cost a total of more than $30 billion, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration The NRC said it is reviewing applications from Fermi which should be public soon. The Washington Post said the project has applied for four 1-GW nuclear reactors. Fermi did not immediately confirm that. The nearly 5,800-acre (2,347-hectare) campus will also have capacity for large artificial intelligence data centers. The site, near the Department of Energy's Pantex nuclear weapons plant, "underscores Fermi's strategic position to build clean, safe, new nuclear power for America's next-generation AI," Fermi said. The site is also situated near some of the largest U.S. gas pipelines and atop a large natural gas field.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store