
Outrage over locked playpark and plan to destroy 41 trees near Glasgow
It is understood the estate, which was officially named Weavers Lea by the developer, was supposed to be completed by Avant Homes and adopted by East Renfrewshire Council a year ago.
The Littleton Park estate (Image: Sourced) Homeowners, however, say they have now been told this will not happen until the construction of 39 properties by Briar Homes is completed adjacent to the site, on the former site of Lyoncross Farm, leaving families stuck in 'an unsafe, incomplete environment'.
Briar homes was due to start construction work in mid-June, but have submitted a change with council planners to enhance access/parking bays/paths, and to remove even more trees than originally planned.
A resident, who asked not to be named, said: 'The play park was supposed to be open last year yet the kids still can't use it because it's fenced off.
'They have nowhere else to play as we are surrounded by construction and fencing. It's really unfair on them.
'The council and developers continue to avoid answering questions about the adoption delay of the estate's roads and infrastructure.
'Residents are calling for an immediate pause on further development until a new, independent environmental and arboriculture assessment is completed, and until the promised masterplan infrastructure including safe pedestrian routes and green spaces is delivered.'
Aurs Road construction traffic (Image: Sourced) The construction traffic from the Briar Homes site will also pass directly through residential streets in Littleton Park and go right past the children's play area.
'Briar Homes has not secured the necessary permissions or legal rights to use these private estate roads for heavy vehicles,' added the resident.
'On leaving our estate, Aurs Road is a single-lane bottleneck controlled by temporary traffic lights – there's no room for further construction traffic.
'Residents fear for the safety of the children and the families, yet their request to delay construction until the delayed Aurs Road project is finished has been rejected by the council.'
The trees are part of the local skyline (Image: Sourced) Briar Homes are now proposing to remove 41 trees which residents say are 'mature and ecologically viable' in Dams to Darnley Country Park.
This it is claimed includes endangered species of Ash and Elm and is being done based on 'outdated tree surveys from 2021'.
The trees can be seen in the distance from Barrhead train station (Image: Sourced) It is understood by residents that a huge sycamore on the new Briar Homes site will be lost to make way for a "single parking bay".
READ NEXT: We saved this historic building from a state of disrepair
This has been described as a 'nature crime' by another resident who is also worried that the loss of trees will destroy bat and bird habitats.
The trees at Lyoncross Mound (Image: Sourced) Concerns have also been raised about the listed 18th-century Lyoncross Farmhouse, an important architectural feature of the area, which is said to 'remain neglected without any conservation plan, while the proposed housing obscures its visibility and context'.
Lyoncross Farmhouse (Image: Sourced)
'Residents have been left out of key decisions - no neighbour notifications, no updated consultations, and no clear communication on why these projects are being pushed through despite public and environmental objections,' added the first resident.
READ NEXT: Inside the superb modern home for sale worth over £300k
A spokesperson from Briar Homes, said: 'Following the purchase of the land in May 2025, and in keeping with demand, our mission is to deliver high-quality, sustainable homes in Barrhead.
'We support the wider regeneration of Barrhead including contributions towards affordable housing and an extensive landscaping and tree provision strategy.
'We have been consulting and collaborating with East Renfrewshire Council on all aspects of development.
'We continue to engage with local residents and our construction approach aims to prioritise the health and safety of both workers and the community while minimising disruption to residents.'
An Avant Homes spokesperson said: 'Our development in Barrhead was fully completed last June and the roads on the development are all final surfaced.
'Following a joint inspection visit with officers of ERC's roads department in May 2025, a list of minor remedial works has been agreed and our contractor is scheduling these to be done. We anticipate these works will be completed by the beginning of September.
'The play park is fully installed and is, at present, purposely fenced off to allow the grass and planting to become established before it is opened to the public. The local council is aware of the approach we are taking.
'A full inspection and health and safety approval from our play park designer is also required before it can be opened and we are arranging for this to take place in line with the fencing removal. We anticipate that the play park will open by the end of June.'
Regarding the Briar Homes development, the Avant Homes spokesperson added: 'Briar Homes is an entirely separate housebuilder to Avant Homes which is developing land adjacent to our site in Barrhead.
'As part of the planning consent granted to Briar Homes by the local authority, construction traffic for their development will pass through a limited part of our site.
'Once the construction traffic is no longer required by Briar Homes, the local authority will be in a position to adopt the roads on our development.'
East Renfrewshire Council has been contacted for comment.
All reactions:
77

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Glasgow Times
08-08-2025
- Glasgow Times
Charges for East Renfrewshire school transport to be scrapped
East Renfrewshire Council is considering removing fees for 'privilege transport' from the start of the 2025/26 school year in order to comply with the regulations. Last year, the council collected almost £17,500 through the charges, which are paid for seats remaining once all eligible children have been allocated a space. The number of 'privilege' places has dropped in recent years, from 52 in 2022/23 to 39 in 2024/25. Council officials are proposing the charges are removed and the way places are allocated is changed. Cabinet members will consider their recommendations next week (August 14). School transport is provided for pupils who live two or more miles from their allocated primary and three or more miles from their allocated secondary. When there are leftover seats, they are offered to non-eligible families through the council's privilege transport scheme. Currently, when there are more applications for privilege places than spaces available, a ballot is held to allocate seats. Efforts to make school transport more efficient, such as reducing the size of vehicles, has caused the drop in privilege places in recent years, a council report states. However, a 43% uplift in the charge from the 2023/24 school year meant revenue increased. The education department received £14,199 in 2022/23, £18,417 in 2023/24 and £17,453 in 2024/25. Currently, privilege places cost £3.20 per day. The Public Services Vehicles Accessibility Regulations (PSVAR) was introduced in 2000 to require a 'baseline level of accessibility on buses and coaches designed to carry over 22 passengers on local and scheduled routes', the council report adds. 'Initially, the regulations applied only to new vehicles, with older vehicles given longer periods to comply in order that they did not need to be replaced before the end of their useful working life. The regulations have subsequently been implemented on a phased basis over recent years.' There are exemptions for 'exclusive home-to-school transport services' but they do not apply when at least one passenger pays a fare. Those with privilege places 'effectively pay for a fare'. That means that all providers would need to comply with the PSVAR across all their vehicles. However, the council report stated: 'Through ongoing discussions with our transport partner, SPT, we are aware that not all school transport providers are currently able to comply with all aspects of the PSVAR.' Officials add many vehicles are fully compliant but this is 'not consistent across all services or operators, given the diverse range of vehicles operated on a daily basis'. 'It is therefore not possible to continue with the current approach to privilege transport with a charge being levied where we are unable to guarantee that a service will be fully accessible on all days on which it operates,' the report states. The education department could charge only on services which are PSVAR-complaint, but officials say this would 'result in an inconsistency', where some parents would be charged while others receive the same service for free. It would also cause 'an additional administrative burden'. It is proposed to stop charging for privilege transport from the start of the 2025/26 school sessions, but the scheme will continue. Places will no longer be allocated via a ballot. Instead, a new distance-based ranking for all applications is planned. The report adds it would see 'all applications received by the advertised closing date ranked in order of distance within the catchment area'. 'This ranking would subsequently be used to allocate up to the appropriate number of places, ensuring sufficient reserved places were maintained for those who may require transport provision if moving into the school later in the session.'


Glasgow Times
02-08-2025
- Glasgow Times
MSP hits out at plans for new solar wind farm in Eaglesham
An application for the project at Bonnyton Golf Club has been lodged with East Renfrewshire Council. Contractors Advance Grid Solutions has proposed the installation of 41,000 Solar Photovoltaics, aiming for an anticipated export capacity of up to 28 megawatts (MW). Jackson Carlaw, MSP for Eastwood, has voiced strong opposition to the planned development, arguing that it would significantly erode greenbelt land in Eaglesham. The bid follows East Renfrewshire Council's decision in April to grant planning permission for a 40MW battery energy storage facility located just over two miles from the golf club on the east side of Glasgow Road. Carlaw said: 'There is a serious risk that large swathes of greenbelt land in Eaglesham could now be lost to development. 'The solar farm proposal suggests that the unacceptable decision of Labour and Independent councillors to grant planning permission for the battery plant may lead to a stream of applications for energy infrastructure projects on our local greenfield sites. 'There is no evidence in the planning support statement that the applicant has fulfilled a key requirement of Scotland's National Planning Framework 4 to identify and explore if the development can be on land that is not part of the greenbelt.' Carlaw said that while planning powers are devolved to Scotland, the position of the previous UK Conservative Government was that brownfield areas should be prioritised for solar development. He added: 'It is vital that the case continues to be made for protecting Eaglesham's green belt and I urge local residents to object to the solar farm planning application.' A statement accompanying the planning application for the solar wind farm states: 'The 28 MW array will supply ~29 GWh/yr of zero-carbon electricity, advancing national and Local Development Plan 2 goals. 'LVIA (Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment) confirms no significant landscape or visual effects from the well-screened site; LEMP (Landscape and Ecological Management Plan) secures native planting and a measurable biodiversity net-gain with no impact on designated habitats. 'Cultural-heritage, glint-and-glare and aviation assessments record no significant residual effects.' An East Renfrewshire Council spokesperson said: 'The application will be considered in due course.' Advance Grid Solutions has been approached for comment. Comments supporting or objecting to the proposal can be made by typing in the reference number – 2025/0405/TP – on the planning applications search page of East Renfrewshire Council's website.


Glasgow Times
22-07-2025
- Glasgow Times
Campaigners to challenge Eaglesham battery plant ruling
Mum-of-three Morag Hannan is worried about the possible fire risk from lithium-ion batteries as the 40-megawatt storage plant is set to be installed opposite her home on Glasgow Road. Alongside her husband Craig, they have raised a petition for judicial review against East Renfrewshire Council. The couple have launched a crowdfunding campaign to cover the costs of the action, with almost £3,400 donated so far. Ms Hannan said she has 'many concerns about the safety risk as well as toxic fumes' from the site. She believes her family, and an elderly neighbour, would be forced to evacuate towards a fire, as there is no way out to the back of their properties. But they could become trapped if fire engines need to use a hydrant outside their driveway, the mum said. READ MORE: All the latest changes to Glasgow city centre streets explained GPC 1137 Ltd, a subsidiary of Apatura, had an initial bid refused by East Renfrewshire's planning committee last year, when councillors voiced concerns over fire risk, but a second application was later approved. After that decision, a reporter appointed by the Scottish Government rejected an appeal over the first plan. He found the proposal would lead to 'adverse visual effects in a greenbelt location'. Apatura wants to store surplus energy from the national grid in the batteries, which would then be returned when required. It has said the development will 'support the decarbonisation of the energy industry in the UK'. Judicial reviews focus on the process or legality of a decision, rather than the planning merits of the application. It is understood the review will centre on Cllr Paul Edlin, who the campaigners say was unable to vote at the second planning meeting following a complaint that he had 'prejudiced himself' with comments made about the project at a community council meeting. They believe this wasn't the case and Cllr Edlin faced 'undue pressure' not to attend the meeting, denying him an opportunity to 'partake in local democracy'. READ MORE: This is the plan for this iconic Glasgow city centre building Almost 3,700 people have signed a petition which calls for the decision to be overturned. Council officials are currently investigating the required legal steps and the cost of revoking permission, following a motion from Conservative councillors. They previously had a motion which pushed for revocation ruled incompetent. Ms Hannan said: 'The only remedy available to us is to take legal action ourselves and we are going to continue this fight until the decision is overturned.' East Renfrewshire Council is expected to defend its position. A spokesman said the authority is unable to comment due to the ongoing legal proceedings. Campaigners believe the case could be heard in September. The developers have previously said the application was 'accompanied by a suite of technical documents which demonstrate the proposal will not lead to significant adverse harm'. Ahead of the meeting where planning permission was granted, council officials reported the second application differed from the original as more information has been submitted on fire safety and a water tank is now proposed to be created underground.