
My hometown of LA has right to be angry as Trump sends in the Marines
My hometown of LA has right to be angry as Trump sends in the Marines | Opinion Even if you think the crackdown on illegal immigration is necessary, it is not conservative to crash through neighborhoods to round up people who have become part of the community.
Show Caption
Hide Caption
LA protesters ignite Waymo taxis, see the remains
Protesters vandalized and set Waymo autonomous taxis on fire amid anti-ICE protests in Los Angeles.
My hometown of Los Angeles has witnessed an outpouring of intense, and to varying degrees violent, protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers who are engaged in detaining illegal/undocumented immigrants.
The protests have precipitated a mobilization of the National Guard, and even the dispatching of a small contingent of Marines, as protesters collide with ICE and other law enforcement officers.
The federal involvement signals an escalation in what has become the most striking episode of civil unrest in California since the summer of 2020.
The alarmism surrounding Los Angeles is understandable. The fury over the immigration issue also is understandable. I am born and raised in LA. I'm generally conservative on the immigration question. But it is important for us to take a nuanced look at the outrage we are seeing in Los Angeles.
Consequences of illegal immigration have hurt my community
Undocumented/illegal immigration (take your pick) has had a damaging impact on certain communities in Los Angeles for many years. That impact has been most concentrated in Black communities, which have largely dissolved due to the overwhelming influx of immigrants, particularly from Latin America.
Political marginalization, wage competition and the strains placed on public benefits and the public school system have outraged many members of Black Los Angeles.
That was one of the primary issues in my congressional campaign against Democratic Rep. Maxine Waters in 2014, when Black activists in the district allied with the GOP largely because of concerns about immigration.
Two years later, I went door-to-door in Los Angeles to recruit participants for a University of Southern California study on eye health in the Black community. At one point, I found myself speaking to an older Black woman who had a newspaper propped up on her sofa. Headlines declared the victory of newly elected President Donald Trump.
'Do you have a problem with my newspaper?' she asked, noting my glance toward it as we spoke in her living room. 'Well, if you do, then you can just get the hell on. I voted for this man and you know why? Because he is going to get rid of these damn illegals who are ruining our community.'
Opinion: Waymo cars get torched by LA protesters, burning Google – an immigration ally
Black Angelenos have been affected by violence, often in areas where law-abiding citizens already have to fear greater than normal rates of crime. The strain on public services also represents a financial burden on taxpayers. Other pressures placed on an already crowded city by increased numbers of immigrants stoke frustration.
All these problems are real. People are right to call attention to them.
But that's not all there is to the story.
Illegal immigration is more nuanced than many believe
The nuances occupy a couple of categories. There are benefits to undocumented immigration that accrue to the upper middle class and certain businesses. That much is clear, even if it's not a privilege that Americans living outside of Los Angeles' suburban middle class care to preserve for them.
But cheaper services, domestic work, construction and automotive labor are things many people often benefit from by way of undocumented immigrants. It's become a way of life for much of Los Angeles' upper economic classes.
When I say "way of life," I am referring to something deeper then the mere economic. I am talking about the culture of communities, the norms and relationships we grow accustomed to. This is the second category of nuanced reality people need to understand when observing Los Angeles in this moment. It's the nuances of community.
Illegal immigrants and their families, including their children who've inherited birthright citizenship, are part of our community. They are the abuela with the tamale stand by the park, the mechanic you joke around with at the auto shop or the gardener who feels like an uncle.
The kids I went to school with in Culver City, who were made citizens by virtue of a constitutional interpretation that I believe violates the 14th Amendment, were my friends. They were no less a part of my community for having undocumented parents.
People who have lived their lives generally at peace with their undocumented neighbors and their families have stronger bonds with these immigrants than with the faceless ICE agents who burst into our neighborhoods to remove people we know.
Opinion: What do Republicans value? My fellow conservatives need to fight the right way.
Now, I have a great deal of sympathy for ICE agents as well. They are the spear tip of an effort to respond to the neglect of territorial sovereignty perpetrated by the U.S. government for generations.
It is one of the great betrayals of American interests, in favor of politicians and corporations, that unchecked illegal immigration should have reached such a scale over such a period of time. I don't blame federal agents for doing their job or for believing in it.
This doesn't change the fact that, in Los Angeles, ICE agents are the ones who look like aliens.
Trump's deportation policy stands in the shadow of American history
All of this highlights an irony in the Trump administration's approach to rectifying the immigration issue. As conservative as the principles of national sovereignty and rule of law are, conservatism also stands for the continuity of community, the respecting of norms, customs and relationships that give a place its character.
These norms and relationships sometimes evolve in initially unlawful or tragic circumstances. American frontiersmen invaded Native American territory, even against the edicts of the U.S. government, at almost every turn in the early expansion of our nation.
We can say that happened long ago, so it doesn't matter now. But would it be right to uproot families now because of the unlawful invasion of Native American territory generations ago? Many of those who are most incensed about the porousness of our border and the accommodations we make to the undocumented are also the most proud of our American founding and the frontier spirit of our heritage.
There are differences of opinion with respect to the scope of deportations, even among those who advocate for a crackdown on illegal immigration. Some favor deporting only flagrant criminals; others want those who crossed the border recently to be returned to their home countries.
Then there are some who favor deporting as many illegal immigrants as possible, regardless of their behavior and their contributions since arriving. For those who argue for mass deportation, how can we look at illegal immigrants as criminals without regarding in the same way our own ancestors who invaded Native Americans' territory and violently displaced the inhabitants?
If the view is that our American ancestors, while worse than imperfect, laid by God's grace the foundation for communities that grew into a great nation, then isn't there a case to be made for charity and accommodation in dealing with most of our undocumented neighbors now?
Of course, certain people make having empathy for the undocumented very hard. That includes not only those who wave Mexican flags in the face of legal authority while insisting on their "right" to remain in the nation illegally. It also includes their allies who take zero inventory of the damage done to communities and to the rule of law by policies that allow for mass illegal immigration.
Still, when my best friend's first son was born, I remember his mother, an elderly woman who immigrated to the United States decades ago, approaching me at the celebration of her grandson's birth with a gift basket that held a Mexican flag and an American flag.
She said to me: "Mi nieto es un Mexicano y un Americano tambien." ("My grandson is a Mexican and an American too.")
Her point was that her family was proud of their heritage, but they were also proud to be a part of a nation and a community that she and I shared across the gulf of language and legal status.
LA has a right to be angry. But we need a better answer.
Personally, I might aggressively shut the border, and build a wall if it actually helped, because I believe that we blew past a reasonable volume of immigration a long time ago. It's a good thing that Trump has essentially frightened the world into no longer trying to cross our border illegally. That had to end.
Democratic politicians like California Gov. Gavin Newsom have invited the pendulum swing on immigration by pushing it so far the other way. Now, Trump, never one to be concerned with proportionality, threatens to escalate tensions further in the name of rule of law.
Yet, even if you think the crackdown on illegal immigration is necessary, it is not conservative to crash through neighborhoods to round up people who have become part of the community.
America must understand that Los Angeles is not Omaha, not Savannah and not Des Moines. Los Angeles has a right to be angry. Los Angeles has a right to be LA.
There should be a better way. Sadly, it seems like nobody is looking for one.
John Wood Jr. is a columnist for USA TODAY Opinion. He is national ambassador for Braver Angels, a former nominee for Congress, former vice chairman of the Republican Party of Los Angeles County, musical artist, and a noted writer and speaker on subjects including racial and political reconciliation. Follow him on X: @JohnRWoodJr

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Politico
17 minutes ago
- Politico
Trump revokes California's nation-leading electric vehicle mandate
President Donald Trump moved Thursday to eliminate California's nation-leading vehicle emissions standards, upending strict rules that had become a template for states across the nation to realize their greenhouse gas ambitions. Trump signed three Congressional Review Act resolutions rolling back a trio of California's rules at a White House signing ceremony, delivering on his Day 1 executive order to quickly roll back electric vehicle mandates around the country. 'We officially rescue the US auto industry from destruction by terminating California's electric vehicle mandate, once and for all,' Trump said at a Oval Office signing alongside House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.), Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy, Energy Secretary Chris Wright and EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin. The president, in a wide-ranging speech before the signing, used the moment to hit on a range of issues, including inflation, his disdain for windmills and his recent fallout with Tesla CEO Elon Musk. 'Now we know why Elon doesn't like me so much,' Trump quipped, before saying that Musk never asked him to save EV rules and that their break was over other 'smaller things.' While the Trump administration has also gone on the offensive against federal vehicle standards, California's regulations aimed at phasing out gas-powered passenger vehicles and heavy-duty diesel trucks — which are followed by a dozen other states — have drawn the stiffest opposition from the auto and fossil fuel industries. 'Worse than unachievable, these EV mandates were going to be harmful,' said John Bozzella, president and CEO of the Alliance for Automotive Innovation. 'Harmful to auto affordability, to consumer choice, to industry competitiveness and to economic activity.' The move takes place against the backdrop of worsening relations between Trump and Gov, Gavin Newsom, with the president ordering the military to quell unrest in Los Angeles over immigration raids. It also comes as Tesla CEO and former White House adviser Elon Musk clashed with Trump last week over electric vehicle policies. Trump's signature revokes the Golden State's unique permission to exceed federal vehicle pollution standards, which it's used for decades to set nation-leading rules. A dozen other Democrat-led states have opted to follow California's rules, representing one-third of the U.S. auto market. California's regulations aim to require automakers to sell increasing percentages of zero-emission vehicles, culminating in a 2035 target of all new-car sales being electric or otherwise carbon-free. Trump had targeted California's rules in his first term and on the campaign trail for his second term. EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin asked Congress to revoke them using the Congressional Review Act, which allows Congress to overturn rules passed in the waning days of the previous administration. The request triggered a debate among Republicans about whether to stretch congressional norms by using the CRA to roll back California's rules, which Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough and the nonpartisan Government Accountability Office have said aren't subject to the law. In addition to the rules for passenger vehicles, Thursday's signings roll back California's authority to enforce zero-emission sales targets for commercial trucks and higher standards for heavy-duty diesel engines. The fight over whether Congress acted lawfully will now head to the courts. California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Attorney General Rob Bonta said last month they would sue immediately after Trump signs the resolutions. The outcome of that court case will have widespread implications, as Democratic leaders seek to wean drivers and industry off fossil fuels and hit lofty greenhouse gas emissions reduction goals. But the question is especially acute for California, which has struggled for decades to reduce the nation's worst smog in the Los Angeles area and Central Valley and comply with federal air quality standards under the Clean Air Act. Failure to reach those standards could result in sanctions and withholding of federal highway funds, which both Republican and Democratic administrations have floated in the past. Trump's EPA threatened sanctions against the state in 2019, just days after the agency revoked an earlier version of its electric vehicle rules. 'It is hard to imagine that they will not threaten sanctions,' said Ann Carlson, who was head of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration under former President Joe Biden. 'The president clearly has it out for California, and Los Angeles is obviously in his sights.' EPA said in a statement when asked about the possibility of sanctions that it will enforce the Clean Air Act. 'EPA will continue to implement the Clean Air Act as provided in law and will continue to hope that California can get into attainment after decades of nonattainment,' the agency said. EPA could develop its own plan for California to meet federal standards, though air quality experts say that's unlikely because the agency would have to take unpopular steps like restricting driving. California Air Resources Board spokesperson Lindsay Buckley said in a statement that without the waivers, the state will need to find an alternative to reach compliance. CARB chair Liane Randolph told state lawmakers during a hearing last month that she's 'confident California will prevail in litigation,' but that could take years, during which the rules are not enforceable. Randolph suggested that the state could consider approaches like district emissions rules for 'indirect sources' like warehouses that attract commercial trucks, incentives to encourage EV purchases and putting more funding towards public transit.


Buzz Feed
17 minutes ago
- Buzz Feed
19 US Military Members Share Thoughts On Donald Trump
Recently, we asked active and reserve US military members and veterans to share their honest thoughts on Donald Trump and the Trump administration, and they got incredibly candid. Amid Veterans Affairs layoffs, jeopardizing America's relationship with long-standing allies like Canada, and even using the military as a backdrop for Trump's political rallies, here's how veterans and US military members are responding: "Nine-year veteran here. I think Trump is using executive orders to bypass checks and balances among the three branches. Trump's actions make it look like he thinks he is above the law, which is similar to every other dictator in history. It's sad that the judicial and legislative branches don't have more backbone to defend the Constitution against this clown." —Anonymous "I served for over 23 years before retiring. I'm now realizing I may have to pick up arms again because there are too many idiots in the country and in the US military." "I've been Active Duty for 13 years. The way the military has evolved over the years — with all the DEI stuff — has been hard to deal with. I'm glad to see it gone, as I believe that service should be merit-based for promotion. I also like the fact that we project strength now." "I retired from the USAF. I served during the Cold War, when we kept Russia at arm's length because we knew they couldn't be trusted. Two of my sons served; my daughter-in-law is serving in the Air Force, and my son-in-law is in the Army. I have discouraged two grandsons and three strangers from joining the military, and THAT hurts my heart. I never thought I'd do that. A dangerous man is in charge. God help us." —magicalsquid60 "He's the worst president in my lifetime. Him calling veterans 'suckers and losers' says it all!" "I'm a veteran and physician. I just hope that active military members remember that their oath is to the Constitution, not a wannabe dictator. I'm glad I'm at the end of my life, but I feel bad for my son and the younger generations who will suffer for Trump's megalomania. He and his puppets break the Constitution with impunity. And, as a physician, I'm appalled at RFK Jr. being the Secretary of Health." "I believe this country — effectively a plutocracy — is rapidly becoming an oligarchy. Politics aside, I'm mostly dependent on Social Security retirement, VA disability, and subsidized housing, so I'm quite apprehensive about the current administration's attack on all three of those programs. Every day, it seems like we're reverting back to the '50s." "I'm currently serving in the Army Reserve and spent 10 years on active duty. The majority of people I work with are glad Trump won, and so am I. As soldiers, we pray for peace while preparing for war. Finally, someone is in charge who will keep us out of war. Strong men make peace while weak ones start wars." —Anonymous "I have 30 years of active and reserve duty, primarily during the Cold War. We didn't have Trump and the MAGAs when I served, but I imagine that many in service now may agree with their policies. However, many civilians may not realize that military members have it drilled into them that the US military should not get involved in politics on a professional level. I cannot imagine any service member from my generation taking an active part in action against the American public based on orders coming down the Chain of Command. I don't think that aspect of military service has changed. For those afraid that Trump has no guardrails left in his second term, I believe the military can keep him in check if he ever looks to them to support actions against the Constitution, regardless of his justifications. I want to believe that service members won't shrink from standing up to a dictator." "I'm an 80-year-old veteran, and I'm completely appalled by what Trump is committing. I am disgusted, and I feel like our democracy is on the verge of complete collapse." "Never in my life would I have thought I'd ever say the following: Trump, his entire administration, and the entire MAGA cult make me ashamed to be an American! I predict that Trump will declare himself to be the 'Leader of America' for life before the end of his current term. From an Air Force retiree, I fear another civil war is coming." "I voted for President Trump twice and have served a total of 26 years: 16 active and 10 reserve. At 69 years old, I have no regrets serving all that time or voting for him. I'd do it again, actually." —Anonymous "I'm a veteran. I voted for Trump the first time, but I didn't vote for him the last. He's doing exactly what I thought he would do: be a bully. He talks to our allies the way he should be talking to Putin and his thugs. To me, Trump is disgusting and an embarrassment to our great country. Everything he says is a lie. I don't blame our allies for fighting back; Trump is poison to good people, and I'll be glad when he disappears from office." "I'm a 23-year retiree, and I'm embarrassed that I ever served. I feel like I wasted my life in the military. Politicians only care about politicians. I've been shit on by both sides of the aisle, but Republicans have clearly painted veterans to be 'entitled' individuals. We get treated like shit under President Trump." "I'm a Cold War vet, and there is absolutely nothing that the current administration can do to convince me that they are not compromised by Russian agents. Today's military leaders need to make sure that their troops know the difference between an illegal order and a lawful one! I see no reason to trust our current political leaders." —edgynugget757 "As a retiree and veteran, I think Trump is doing a great job, and I hope he keeps it up. For those who say they took an oath to defend the Constitution from foreign and domestic enemies, where were you during the last presidency? Now that was a real clown show. The world was laughing at the United States because of the stumbling, bumbling moron. I don't know any service member who supported Joe Biden or his pathetic Vice President." "I served in the US Army for 33 years under President Reagan, all the way through President Obama. The former Soviet Union has been our enemy since the end of WWII, yet Trump gives them aid and comfort. He pardoned those who partook in an insurrection, and he totally disregards his oath to support the Constitution. I believe he will go down as one of the worst presidents the United States has ever had. I am thankful that I do not currently serve, because I would find it very difficult to obey his orders. I am sad to say that I am extremely disappointed in the American voters for electing a convicted felon, and a person so unworthy to lead this country and represent us on a world stage." "After giving the Air Force four years of my life for my country, I am now ashamed to be an American! Having turned on our most important allies and treating our fellow Americans like numbers by terminating their jobs without can anyone respect a moron like the one we have in charge now? I fear for the future of my grandchildren and can only hope we can last until he is replaced! The sooner, the better!" Lastly: "It appears Trump is consolidating power by forcing qualified people out of their positions and placing MAGA puppets in their stead. As a veteran, I've not seen anything like this in my life. I weep for my country. Trump pardoned January 6 rioters, including those convicted of violent assaults, which undermines the accountability of justice and emboldens extremists to an alarming degree. Our oath was to the Constitution — how do we defend against an unlawful order from this country's leader when he pardons those who have attacked the Capitol? Follow the money. Trump is laying waste to our country while playing golf. I can only pray that our resilience as Americans will get us through the next four years. Stand up!" —purplephone528 If you're an active duty or reserve US military member or a veteran, what are your thoughts on Trump's presidency so far? Let us know in the comments, or you can anonymously voice your thoughts using the form below.
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
GOP Megabill Boosts Wealthy Households While Hurting Poor, CBO Says
Middle-income Americans also would see gains from President Trump's agenda of tax reductions and spending cuts.