Ant unit to seek stablecoin permits in Hong Kong, Singapore: sources
[HONG KONG] Jack Ma-backed Ant Group's international unit is planning to apply for stablecoin licences in Singapore and Hong Kong, according to people familiar with the matter.
Singapore-based Ant International will apply for the stablecoin issuer's licence in Hong Kong as soon as the city's Stablecoins Ordinance goes into effect in August, the people said, asking not to be identified because the matter is private. As well as Singapore, the company is also planning to seek a permit in Luxembourg, they added.
The move is designed to bolster the fintech firm's blockchain operation underpinning its cross-border payment and treasury management services, the people said. Ant processed more than US$1 trillion of global transactions last year, a third of which were handled by its blockchain-based Whale platform, they said.
Ant representatives did not respond to an emailed request for comment. A spokesperson for the Hong Kong Monetary Authority declined to comment. Regulators in Singapore and Luxembourg were not immediately able to comment.
Since its record initial public offering was halted in 2020, Ant has been developing new initiatives to drive growth as its lucrative online lending business got handicapped by regulators in China.
Overseas, the Ant International arm established an independent board, setting the stage for a spinoff and potential IPO. The unit generated nearly US$3 billion in revenue for 2024 and has produced two consecutive years of adjusted profit, Bloomberg reported in May.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
Ant International could fetch an IPO valuation ranging from US$8 billion to US$24 billion if it were to list in Hong Kong, according to Bloomberg Intelligence.
Increasingly, the unit's treasury business has shown growth potential due to the sheer amount of transactions it handles for the e-commerce platforms of its affiliate Alibaba Group Holding, as well as external clients.
The treasury business, which is underpinned by the Whale platform, uses blockchain technology, including encryption and artificial intelligence, to improve the efficiency and transparency of fund transfers.
The Whale platform currently supports multiple tokenized assets from banks and institutions around the world. It uses privacy computing technologies such as homomorphic encryption and enables multiparty verification.
The company has signed collaboration agreements with more than 10 banks globally including HSBC Holdings, BNP Paribas, JPMorgan Chase and Standard Chartered. This week, it also formed a strategic partnership with Deutsche Bank to work on payment solutions and treasury management.
Stablecoins are digital assets designed to hold a steady value, usually pegged to another currency. They are crucial to the functioning of crypto markets, with about US$243 billion of them in circulation in May.
Regulators around the world are trying to put rules around the sector, fearing the risk of stablecoin crashes and the potential for massive money laundering. US lawmakers are working on legislation to regulate stablecoin companies.
As crypto adoption has grown, many companies have slowly made their way into the space, including financial and technology heavyweights. A high-profile attempt by Facebook and Instagram owner Meta Platforms to launch a stablecoin in 2019 later unravelled after a backlash. The rollout in 2023 of a stablecoin from PayPal Holdings marked the first effort from a big financial company.
There are also tokens that can act like stablecoins for use as collateral during trading, like tokenized money market funds. Asset managers including BlackRock and Franklin Templeton have created these kinds of products in recent years. BLOOMBERG
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
an hour ago
- Business Times
Millions of acres of public land sales slated for US tax Bill
[WASHINGTON] The sale of millions of acres of federal land would provide billions of dollars to help pay for President Donald Trump's massive package of tax cuts and spending in the Senate's version of the Bill released on Wednesday (Jun 11) night. As much as around 1.2 million hectares of land owned by the Bureau of Land Management and the US Forest Service would be mandated for sale in the legislation. The measure, requiring each agency to sell a small percentage of the hundreds of millions of acres of land they manage in eligible states that include Alaska as well as western states, could raise as much as US$10 billion over 10 years, according to a fact sheet. The plan is part of a broader effort to generate as much as US$29 billion through a combination of expanded oil, gas, coal and geothermal lease sales, and new timber sales made public in the legislation unveiled by the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee. Similar energy requirements, included new energy lease sales in the coastal plain of Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, were included in the House version of the bill, which passed by a one-vote margin last month. The sale of public lands to help pay for the legislation has been a political lightning rod. A plan to sell about 500,000 acres of federal land in Utah and Nevada was stripped by the House version of the Bill amid opposition from Republicans such as Montana Representative Ryan Zinke. The concept of public land sales has also enraged environmental and conservation groups, who say the proposal threatens wildlife as well as access to lands for outdoor recreation, hunters and fisherman. 'It's a travesty that Senate Republicans are putting more than 3 million acres of our beloved public lands on the chopping block to sell at fire-sale prices to build mega mansions for the ultra-rich,' said Patrick Donnelly, a director at the Center for Biological Diversity. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Tuesday, 12 pm Property Insights Get an exclusive analysis of real estate and property news in Singapore and beyond. Sign Up Sign Up Republicans have said the sales are needed to provide cheap land to help address a housing crisis, and to help western states, where the government owns large swaths of federal land, to restore the areas to economic production and associated tax revenue. 'This proposal allows a fraction of 1 per cent of federal land to be used to build houses,' the Senate energy committee said in the fact sheet. 'In doing so, it will create thousands of jobs, allow millions of Americans to realise the American dream, and reduce the deficit and fund our public lands.' The Senate bill aligns with a Trump administration plan to identify areas of 'underutilised' land suitable for development. Interior Secretary Doug Burgum told the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee Wednesday the agency had identified some 250,000 acres near cities where development could lower the cost of housing. But New Mexico Senator Martin Heinrich, the panel's top Democrat, said the idea was deeply unpopular in the West with 'animosity that runs the entire political spectrum.' 'These are places that belong to all of us,' Heinrich said in an interview Thursday. 'Once this stuff gets sold off to developers, we'll never get it back. It will be behind a no trespassing sign.' BLOOMBERG
CNA
2 hours ago
- CNA
All town councils receive top ratings for second year running
SINGAPORE: All 17 town councils have scored "green" - the highest rating - across four indicators in the latest estate management report released by the Ministry of National Development (MND) on Friday (Jun 13), the second time in as many years. The report covered the financial year from April 2024 to March 2025. Singapore's General Election took place on May 3. Green is the top rating, followed by amber and red, and the town councils are assessed by their estate cleanliness, estate maintenance, lift performance, as well as service and conservancy charges (S&CC) arrears management. MND said on Friday it will not publish the estate management report for the financial year from April 2025 to March 2026. This is because the town councils were formed on May 30 following GE2025 and as such, they will "require a transition period to stabilise their operations after the handover of towns," the ministry added. "During this period, MND will continue to monitor the performance of the town councils and share our feedback with the town councils to better support their transition." The ministry said that it will resume publication of the reports from FY2026 (April 2026 to March 2027). 'This is consistent with the approach taken after GE2020,' added MND. REPORT OBSERVATIONS In terms of estate cleanliness, the ministry noted that all town councils before GE2025 scored "green" as they had less than four counts of cleanliness observations per block on average. The "green" rating applied across the board in relation to estate maintenance as these town councils had an average of under four counts of maintenance observations per block. As for lift performance, they all had less than two lift faults per 10 lifts, and less than one hour of downtime per lift each month. The frequency of faults and duration of downtime are measured by the Tele-Monitoring System. Lastly, they all had less than 40 per cent of the monthly collectible S&CC for the town overdue and fewer than four in 100 households that owed arrears for three months or more. The Town Council Management Report (TCMR) was first introduced in 2009. Assessments for estate cleanliness are made based on observations, such as the presence of stain and litter, bulky refuse, cobwebs, graffiti, moss, and faeces or bird droppings. As for estate maintenance, obstructions in common areas, storage of combustible items, unauthorised fixtures, damaged plaster/large cracks/spalling concrete and the presence of wild plants/weeds are taken into account. MND also said it will publish the corporate governance report for the period from April 2024 to March 2025 period in December, after it has received and reviewed the town councils' audited financial statements and their auditor's reports.
Business Times
2 hours ago
- Business Times
Homeowners battle insurers over US$2.9 trillion climate risk
[PARIS] When Bernard Weisse first noticed a tiny crack in the outer wall of his house on the outskirts of Paris, he dismissed it as little more than a nuisance. But in the four years since, a spiderweb of fissures has spread from floor to ceiling and snaked into virtually every corner of his home. 'We can hear loud cracking noises especially when it's warm outside,' said the retired salesman and father of three. 'Sometimes, I think we should get all our stuff together and leave.' Like a growing number of people around the world, Weisse is grappling with subsidence – a term for the sinking land that's causing damage to homes and other structures built on it. The slow-moving climate disaster has already caused tens of billions in damage and has the potential to affect 1.2 billion people in areas accounting for more than US$8 trillion of economic output. While groundwater extraction, mining and earthquakes also cause the ground to shift, global warming vastly increases the risks. What happens is that soil swells with winter rain and then shrinks as it dries in the heat, cracking foundations in the process. Because of its soil and its status as the world's fastest-warming continent, Europe is particularly exposed. The European Central Bank estimates the region's potential damage from sinking land at more than 2.5 trillion euros (S$3.69 trillion) across all euro-area financial institutions. Although most of that is classified as 'low risk,' this summer is forecast to be one of the hottest and driest on the continent, creating perfect conditions for subsidence damage. For Weisse, the cost for repairs could climb to as much as 200,000 euros to keep his two-story home from crumbling. That would be part of the estimated 43 billion euros in damage that households face by 2050 in France alone, according to insurance trade group France Assureurs. With that much money at stake, it's set off a battle over who will ultimately have to pay. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Tuesday, 12 pm Property Insights Get an exclusive analysis of real estate and property news in Singapore and beyond. Sign Up Sign Up Weisse's town of Presles-en-Brie has teamed up with 14 nearby villages and sued the state to have their subsidence issues recognised as a natural catastrophe like flash floods and wildfires. That would trigger payments from insurers and the government, powerful opponents for the municipalities. 'It's David against Goliath,' said Dominique Rodriguez, who's been mayor of the pastoral community of 2,300 people for more than three decades. So far, the big guys are winning. In Presles-en-Brie, at least 40 homeowners have sought subsidence compensation since 2020, and while two houses were granted recognition under a public-private insurance programme called CatNat, others were rejected. Europe is the epicentre because of its clay-rich soil and relatively high population density. Also, buildings from the 1970s and 80s – when a postwar housing construction boom was still underway – are particularly susceptible. While Presles-en-Brie is an early victim, the issues are global. Jakarta has sunk more than 2.5 metres in a decade, and Teheran drops as much as 22 centimetres a year. In the US, Houston is most affected, with 40 per cent of the city subsiding more than half a centimetre a year. More than 425,000 Dutch houses will be exposed over the next decade, with subsidence already lowering house prices by as much as 5 per cent, according to a recent study by the Tinbergen Institute. Repair costs can exceed 100,000 euros per home and are rarely covered by insurance. 'The situation is urgent,' said Karsten Klein, director of advocacy at Vereniging Eigen Huis, a Dutch homeowners association. 'Waiting until homes become uninhabitable is not an option.' In London, shifting ground levels over the next five years are set to affect two-fifths of the housing stock, or more than a million homes, according to the British Geological Survey. Across the UK, there have been a half dozen 'surge years' for subsidence over the last two decades. With the country experiencing one of its driest springs in a century, 2025 could end up as another 'high risk' year, according to Geobear, a company that undertakes repairs. Insurance claims for the hazard jumped 78 per cent between 2019 and 2023 and the average payout rose 40 per cent over that period, according to data provided by the Association of British Insurers. While the UK is one of the few countries in the world where insurers cover subsidence damage, it's tricky to manage because the impacts can be affected by local conditions like trees soaking up water. A few years ago, central London suffered the most from subsidence, but now it affects eastern neighbourhoods more, according to satellite data from Geobear says its data supports the shift of the subsidence burden to eastern London, where the surface is less built up and so more exposed. If movements are related to clay shrinkage, then it makes sense that places like Barking are hit harder, said Otso Lahtinen, Geobear's chief executive officer. In France, half of all single-family homes could be affected by subsidence by the end of the decade, according to Paul Esmein, head of the French insurance lobby. Since 2016, the country's insurers have paid about 1 billion euros a year for subsidence claims. That amount tripled in 2022, when European temperatures hit their second-highest level. To cope with rising losses from natural disasters and provide protection for homeowners, France launched a public-private insurance programme in 1989 called CatNat – a system that puts the state and the industry on the same side as costs surge. Homeowners are compensated for damage after their municipality has been awarded a CatNat certification. Otherwise, insurers are free to reject claims. Despite the challenges faced by communities like Presles-en-Brie, France's system is close to a best-case scenario for homeowners, which have little to no recourse to have subsidence damage covered in most other countries. 'Since its creation, the French system for recognising natural disasters has constantly adapted to the damage suffered by the population,' the French interior ministry said in response to Bloomberg questions, adding that the criteria for subsidence recognition was relaxed last year. In the case of Presles-en-Brie, the interior ministry said natural disaster conditions was recognised for part of 2020 as soil moisture was determined to be abnormal. It didn't comment on the ongoing dispute. Allianz France says that over the last decade subsidence constituted 60 per cent of all CatNat damages in the country, almost double the rate of the previous 15 years. 'The trend is getting more complicated with climate change,' said Pierre Vaysse, chief underwriting officer for property and casualty at the French insurer. 'The forecast is that claims will at least increase by 50 per cent and probably double by 2050.' France's CatNat system lost 49 million euros in 2024, its eighth straight annual deficit. Known as the Central Reinsurance Fund, the programme is paid for by a national surcharge on insurance policies, which was raised by eight percentage points in January to account for climate change. For homeowners, the strained system means higher premiums but with no certainty of coverage, and there's a risk that insurers abandon vulnerable areas as has happened in parts of the US prone to hurricanes and wildfires. Potential repairs include foundation reinforcements known as micropiles and injecting compounds into the soil to stabilise the clay. In some cases, the costs can approach the value of the home. With selling hardly a viable option, owners have little choice but to fork out the money themselves. 'There is a real threat that the damage will end up dislocating our entire house,' said Weisse, the owner of the damaged house in Presles-en-Brie. Burdened by the impact of climate change, the insurance system is 'on its last legs,' said Regis Thauvin, who handles subsidence issues for the town council and is also affected. 'We can't just tell people to wait a year and a half for a decision to be made before doing the necessary work.' The legal fight with the state has been going on since late last year and the towns, which represent about 72,000 people in total, are still waiting for a court date. As of early June, the government hadn't sent experts to review local damage. The municipalities are prepared to take their case to the European Court of Human Rights if they lose, according to Rodriguez, the mayor of Presles-en-Brie. 'We have little hope that our legal appeal will eventually succeed,' he said. 'But the residents welcome our action and the fact that we're at least trying to make ourselves heard.' BLOOMBERG
