
Voice of lay Catholics is likely to be heard in Leo XIV's church
'Every voice had equal value,' said Susan Pascoe, the business consultant, who is chair of Catholic Emergency Relief Australia. She sat at a table with the future pope for the meetings, which often stretched to 11 hours or more a day during four weeks in Rome.
Advertisement
Pope Francis dropped by to listen in, leading another meeting attendee, Wyatt Olivas, a college student from Wyoming, to refer to the pontiff as his 'bestie in Christ.'
When Leo stepped out onto the balcony of St. Peter's Basilica on Thursday and gave his first address as pontiff, he indicated that he would continue this practice of listening closely to many voices.
He called for a 'synodal church,' referencing the process of dialogue between church leaders and lay people that was one of Francis' signature legacies.
Francis, in seeking to democratize the church, opened summits of bishops to lay people, including women, who in 2023 were permitted to vote for the first time about what issues the church should address.
Advertisement
Francis did not want church policies to be decided only by bishops in closed rooms. He wanted to open the doors to all Catholics.
That the new pope decided to mention the concept at all in his first address was significant, said the Rev. James Martin, a Jesuit writer and well-known proponent of outreach to LGBTQ+ Catholics. Inviting lay people to sit as equals with bishops was one of Francis' contentious moves.
'So a cardinal archbishop from an ancient diocese had to listen to a 20-year-old college student from Philadelphia, and that is quite threatening to some people,' Martin said. 'It's really important that Pope Leo has embraced that.'
Olivas, a 21-year-old Sunday school teacher and junior at the University of Wyoming in Laramie, was first invited to a meeting in Rome in 2023, when he was 19.
At first, he said, he wondered if any of the church leaders, particularly the high-ranking cardinals, would take him seriously. But as the meetings began, with strict rules of engagement requiring everyone to listen while others spoke, the appearance of hierarchy broke down.
'These cardinals who typically sit on their thrones,' Olivas said, 'for them to sit equally with a 19-year-old and listen to me' made him feel like 'we're all in this together.'
At the meetings during Francis' papacy, some divisive topics came up, including the ordination of women as Catholic deacons, the requirement of celibacy for priests and the church's attitude toward same-sex couples. Francis requested that various study groups examine some of the more difficult issues and compile reports, in effect postponing decisions about whether to change church teachings or church law.
Advertisement
Progressives who had high hopes that these listening sessions might lead to tangible shifts in church policy worry that the new pope will continue along a path of 'a lot of talk and very little action,' said Miriam Duignan, executive director of the Wijngaards Institute for Catholic Research.
Some conservatives say progressives hijacked the meetings as a way to push their liberal agenda. 'Synodality for some people is an ideology,' said Gerhard Ludwig Müller, a conservative cardinal from Germany.
Supporters of the process say that simply bringing lay people into discussions with church leaders enhances a transparency that the church has previously lacked.
'If you look at a country like Australia, which had a five-year inquiry into sexual abuse, the notion of a culture of clericalism was part of the analysis of what needed to be addressed,' Pascoe said. For too long, she said, the church was organized around a structure where 'all authority was vested in one individual of the priest or bishop.'
By forcing church leaders to talk seriously with lay people, she said, the consultations inaugurated by Francis tried to introduce a 'responsible approach to living and being in the church.'
For Leo, who worked as a missionary and parish priest in Peru, listening to and living among lay people has long been a key tenet of his leadership style.
In Peru, he served as bishop of a rural diocese and was 'living with them, not in a palace but in a simple house,' said the Rev. Gilles Routhier, a professor of theology at Laval University in Quebec and an adviser to the Vatican meetings convened by Francis.
Archbishop Andrew Nkea Fuanya of Bamenda, Cameroon, who also sat at the same table as the future Pope Leo during the meetings in 2024, said the man who is now pontiff took the sessions very seriously even though he occasionally had to dash out to deal with his day job running the Vatican office that selects and manages bishops globally.
Advertisement
'You could see he appreciated the contribution of everyone, and he also came across as a very good listener,' Nkea Fuanya said.
In a conversation recorded last year at a church in Illinois, when he was still a cardinal, the man who is now Pope Leo explained how Francis was 'looking for a way to help people understand that the church is not Father up here on Sunday with a lot of spectators.'
He added, 'It does not take away at all the authority, if you will, or the ministry of those who are called to specific services in the church, such as a bishop or a priest. But it does call the best gifts out of each and every one to bring them together.'
It is not yet clear whether Leo will encourage the consultative groups to continue talking about the most sensitive issues facing the church. But those who have participated in the process say it would be hard for him to completely squash those discussions.
Martin said that those who had specific pet issues needed to understand that the process was more about 'changing the methods by which we would be able to move ahead with some of these issues.'
He added that some of the most commonly raised topics by certain Catholics did not necessarily resonate with the faithful the world over.
Advertisement
'We also heard from people who were much more concerned about migrants and refugees, about poverty, about living in countries where Catholics are minorities' than about ordaining women or supporting the desires of divorced and remarried Catholics to receive Communion, Martin said.
'Those are a certain constellation of concerns,' he added. The new pope, he said, 'really has to take a much more universal view of the church.'
This article originally appeared in
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Pope Leo XIV calls for peace in first Pentecost message
The new Pope Leo XIV called for peace around the world in his first Pentecost address on Sunday. Speaking to tens of thousands of people in St Peter's Square, the first US-born head of the Catholic Church emphasized that peace must come from the heart. "Only a peaceful heart can spread peace in the family, society, and international relations," said Leo. He stressed the need to engage in dialogue, even in times of war. With a view to the numerous armed conflicts around the world, the 69-year-old added: "May the spirit of the risen Christ open paths of reconciliation wherever there is war. May he enlighten those who govern and give them the courage to take steps towards de-escalation and dialogue." The former cardinal was elected as the successor to the late pope Francis exactly one month ago. As pontiff, Leo - born Robert Francis Prevost - is the head of 1.4 billion Catholics worldwide. At the Pentecost Mass in St Peter's Square, he also called for "walls of indifference and hatred" to be torn down. "Where there is love, there is no room for prejudice, for 'security' zones separating us from our neighbours, for the exclusionary mindset that, tragically, we now see emerging also in political nationalisms," Leo said. According to the Vatican, 80,000 people gathered in St Peter's Square for the address. The Catholic Church is celebrating a Jubilee in 2025 as it does every 25 years. As a result, there are even more pilgrims and tourists in Rome than usual.

Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Poles march for LGBTQ+ equality after presidential vote raises fears
By Thomas Holdstock GDANSK, Poland (Reuters) -Thousands of Poles took part in a Pride march in the northern port city of Gdansk on Saturday, showing their support for the LGBTQ+ community amid fears for its future after nationalist candidate Karol Nawrocki won a presidential election. Participants waved rainbow flags and the blue, pink, and white banners representing the transgender community. Many carried placards bearing messages such as "Love is love" and "12 years together - when civil partnership?". A parallel Pride event was also held in the western city of Wroclaw. Nawrocki, supported by the conservative Law and Justice (PiS) party, has raised alarm among LGBTQ+ advocates. During its time in power from 2015 to 2023, PiS made opposition to what it termed "LGBTQ+ ideology" a central part of its platform, framing it as a threat to traditional values in the predominantly Catholic country. "I was devastated to be honest," 23-year-old student Agata said when asked about Nawrocki's victory. "I am scared. I don't know what our future looks like." Although LGBTQ+ issues were less prominent in Nawrocki's campaign than in that of his PiS-backed predecessor Andrzej Duda in 2020, his platform included commitments to resist "ideology in schools" and to oppose adoption by same-sex couples. He has stated that marriage should remain between a man and a woman and, while rejecting civil partnerships, expressed a willingness to discuss legal recognition for a "close person", regardless of sexual orientation. In contrast, a pro-European coalition that came to power in 2023 introduced a draft bill to legalise civil partnerships. However, with the presidency holding veto power, the bill's future remains uncertain. Agata said that she hoped a law on civil partnerships could come into effect, but that it was unlikely during Nawrocki's presidency. "I want more equality in our society, in our country," she said.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Biden Weaponized Law Enforcement Against Catholics
Even the initial story about the FBI targeting Catholics for suspicion and surveillance was bad enough. In December 2023, the House Judiciary Committee published a detailed report about how the FBI specifically identified traditional Catholics as potential domestic terror threats. The House report revealed the shocking finding that the Richmond, Virginia, office of the FBI suspected traditional Catholics "as violent extremists and proposed opportunities for the FBI to infiltrate Catholic churches as a form of 'threat mitigation." In sworn testimony before the U.S. Senate, former FBI Director Christopher Wray was challenged by Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri: "Now we know that, in fact, FBI agents did approach a priest and a choir director to ask them to inform on parishioners." Despite this serious allegation, Wray denied a wider FBI initiative and blamed a localized mistake in Richmond. Well … new information reveals that, at best, FBI Director Wray was playing fast and loose with the truth. At worst, the then-sitting chief law enforcement investigator of America committed perjury when he dishonestly stated that the memo was "a single product by a single field office." Oh, all while completely maligning the largest denomination of Christian believers in the United States. But, alas, the sad story of the FBI targeting Catholics does not end in 2023. New information uncovered by Sen. Charles Grassleys committee reveals that the so-called "Richmond memo" was more like a nationwide all-points-bulletin from FBI brass, informing legions of agents to suspect and investigate faithful parishioners across the land. As CatholicVote describes, "the FBIs anti-Catholic Richmond memo was distributed to more than 1,000 employees in FBI field offices across the country." Sen. Grassleys press release states that a whistleblower "produced at least 13 additional documents and five attachments that used anti-Catholic terminology and relied on information from the radical far-left Southern Poverty Law Center" to target Catholics. Amazingly, such harsh anti-Catholic actions formed a key policy agenda for Joe Biden, a politician who constantly trumpeted his Catholic bona fides and bragged about the rosary he carries in his pocket. Of course, those pronouncements did not stop him from targeting the Little Sisters of the Poor for brutal Department of Justice intimidation when he was vice president. Nor did Joes faith restrain him as president, when he awarded Americas highest civilian honor, the Presidential Medal of Freedom, to the late Cecile Richardson, one of the most prolific abortion providers in U.S. history. Unfortunately, Bidens anti-Catholic actions follow a tragic trend of recent decades for Democrats, once the proud home to generations of Catholic voters across America. In fact, Bidens eventual vice president, Kamala Harris, engaged in brazen anti-Catholic bigotry as a U.S. senator in 2018. Harris tried to derail the judicial nomination of Brian Buescher simply because the district court nominee dared to belong to the Catholic fraternal charity organization, the Knights of Columbus. I wrote about that prejudice - an unconstitutional religious litmus test - in a December 26, 2018, opinion piece for RealClearPolitics. No wonder that during the 2024 presidential race, then-Sen. JD Vance called the Biden-Harris White House "the most anti-Catholic administration in living memory." Which brings us back to the present day and these newfound facts about the breadth and scope of the anti-Catholicism of Bidens FBI. This targeting fits within a larger context of the completely unacceptable politicized weaponization of federal law enforcement by people like Biden, Harris, Wray, and former Attorney General Merrick Garland. Sen. Grassley makes it clear that he believes Wray lied under oath. If that allegation is correct, then the Trump-Vance DOJ must charge Wray. In addition, this issue carries great political peril for Democrats and big continued rewards for Republicans. Historically, Catholics decide national elections. For over half a century, the Catholic vote has determined the winner in every election but one (choosing Al Gore over George W. Bush in 2000). In 2024 Trump rolled up an incredible +11% margin among Catholics nationwide, a giant improvement over his tie among Catholics in 2020. In fact, Trump would not have won the popular vote - surprising every "expert" - without his dominant performance among Catholics. So, lets get to the truth, punish the evildoers, and reap the political spoils as well. Steve Cortes is president of the League of American Workers, a populist right pro-laborer advocacy group, and senior political advisor to Catholic Vote. He is a former senior advisor to President Trump and JD Vance, and a former commentator for Fox News and CNN.